I don't usually look at Werner's posts anymore,
because of their lack of anything but libertarian
doctrine and bitching, but I've had a fit of it over the
last week or so.
I really have been wondering about the motive
for Wermer's libertarianism. I feel there must be a
motive because I don't feel the philosophy is good
enough for anyone to subsume without a motive.
Since he'd just complained that I hadn't answered
a set of questions of his, I thought it was a good
time to point out that he rarely answers questions
about himself yet doesn't hesitate to challenge
others based on his assumptions about them.