Climate Models and Their Evaluation - Executive Summary
crunch
Please comment fully.
David Christainsen - Meteorologist
Newton, Mass. USA
Dawlish
Why Crunchy? Same again. Don't you ever learn?
No-one in their right mind should comment on the article without you
firstly giving your views, to say upon which shelf you feel the
article should sit in your religious, pseudo-scientific mind. Stop
this silly cross-posting of articles that you get from other denialist
sites without commenting on them first (or just post them to your
quaker group). It's just annoying.
crunch
My name is David Christainsen; can't you read?
I am already on record that like Prof. Lindzen of MIT,
I strongly distrust the climate models for climate
prediction; it's a black box and only God knows what's
going on in there!
So, Mr. UK Meteorologist - what's your opinion?
Dawlish
>
> - Show quoted text -
You and Lindzen make a fine pair Crunchy. Both of you deny that
climate modelling is useful, which is odd, as most climate scientists
accept that the climate models are both useful and are highly likely
to be proved accurate within their error bars. You believe
differently. Good luck with that belief.
crunch
>
> - Show quoted text -
Prof Lindzen once wrote a report for the IPCC; you
never did. Want to try again?
(<<Kelly>>)
Graham P Davis
Learn some netiquette and stop cross-posting. If that is beyond you, please
select a follow-up group.
[FU to sci.environment - automatically chosen by my newsreader]
--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy
"I wear the cheese. It does not wear me."
crunch
Learn some netiquette yourself; my crossposting
is perfectly proper.
Further, since you are a Friend, I ask whether
you have ever heard of Lewis Fry Richardson,
Quaker pacifist and meteorologist?
Peace,
David Christainsen
Newton, Mass. USA