Da Vinci Code Painting is a Forgery - Da Vinci Code Deception lo
Paulus Ben Jacob
The Christ. These enemies of the Christian faith use Leonardo Da
Vinci's painting The Last Supper as proof that Jesus was not God, that
he married Mary Magdalene, and had a child with her. The Code liars
point to the painting and tell you: look, that's not a man sitting on
Christ's right, that's a woman. It's not John the beloved disciple,
it's Mary Magdalene. And you look and have to agree that the figure
on Christ's right is a woman, not a man, and you become helpless and
defenseless.
Yes, that's a woman, but it's not a woman painted by Leonardo Da
Vinci. It's a forgery -- a repainting of The Last Supper. The
painting on the wall of the dining hall of Santa Maria delle Grazie in
Milan, Italy is no longer the work of Leonardo Da Vinci, but the work
of Pinin Brambilla Barsilon, an art restorer who took 20 years to
completely repaint this masterpiece while pretending to restore it.
She changed the face of Jesus, removing His beard, and changed the
figure of John to a woman. "It is ruined," said Carlo Bertelli who,
as director of the Istituto Centrale del Restauro, commissioned its
20-year restoration, completed in 1999.
Attached is a one-page pdf document showing the original painting and
the current changes and also a close up of the original John and his
current feminine transformation. Please read it and then forward this
email and the attachment to as many people as you can. Print it and
make copies and give it to your co-workers, friends and neighbors --
especially to those who already swallowed the Code lies. Please don't
see the Da Vinci Code movie, and convince others not to see it. It is
really an insult to anyone's intelligence because it is a smelly heap
of lies that your enemies expect you to take and like just because it
is dished out by Hollywood. Do not support the Da Vinci Code
conspirators -- not just because they're enemies of your faith, but
also because they're shameless liars.
For a more extensive expose of the Da Vinci Code conspiracy and the
people behind it, send an email to jaco...@sbcglobal.net and enter
'code conspiracy' in the subject area.
B.G. Kent
movie...and by putting it out there it has gotten people to talk about
what they believe in ....possibilities...what they think they know..what
they know and what they hope for.
Please provide proof for your words that the Da Vinci Painting is a
forgery.
thanks. I await your proof.
Bren
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Paulus Ben Jacob wrote:
> The Da Vinci Code book and movie are a direct attack on Our Lord Jesus
> The Christ. These enemies of the Christian faith use Leonardo Da
> Vinci's painting The Last Supper as proof that Jesus was not God, that
> he married Mary Magdalene, and had a child with her. The Code liars
> point to the painting and tell you: look, that's not a man sitting on
> Christ's right, that's a woman. It's not John the beloved disciple,
> it's Mary Magdalene. And you look and have to agree that the figure
> on Christ's right is a woman, not a man, and you become helpless and
> defenseless.
>
> Yes, that's a woman, but it's not a woman painted by Leonardo Da
> Vinci. It's a forgery -- a repainting of The Last Supper. The
> painting on the wall of the dining hall of Santa Maria delle Grazie in
> Milan, Italy is no longer the work of Leonardo Da Vinci, but the work
> of Poohface Bramsipoopa Barsilon, an art restorer who took 20 years to
Paulus Ben Jacob
about 20 seconds.
On Mon, 15 May 2006 23:53:34 GMT, "B.G. Kent" <rav...@victoria.tc.ca>
wrote:
Steve Hayes
>Please provide proof for your words that the Da Vinci Painting is a
>forgery.
>
>thanks. I await your proof.
As you are so fond of saying, it's an opinion, and you can't prove an opinion.
You are entitled to your opinion, and they are entitled to theirs.
--
The unworthy deacon,
Stephen Methodius Hayes
Contact: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm
Orthodox mission pages: http://www.orthodoxy.faithweb.com/
B.G. Kent
If he did..then I was wrong...if not...then he needs to prove it.
Blessings
Bren
On Wed,
grantco
> The Da Vinci Code book and movie are a direct attack on Our Lord Jesus
> The Christ. These enemies of the Christian faith use Leonardo Da
> Vinci's painting The Last Supper as proof that Jesus was not God, that
> he married Mary Magdalene, and had a child with her.
How would Jesus having a wife and a child prove that he wasn't God?
Surely God would be capable of doing whatever he wants and STILL be
God, wouldn't he?
>
> Yes, that's a woman, but it's not a woman painted by Leonardo Da
> Vinci.
You'd probaly be better off and just agreeing with the rest of the
orthodox and just say that John was a young effeminate man :-)
It's a forgery -- a repainting of The Last Supper. The
> painting on the wall of the dining hall of Santa Maria delle Grazie in
> Milan, Italy is no longer the work of Leonardo Da Vinci, but the work
> of Pinin Brambilla Barsilon, an art restorer who took 20 years to
> completely repaint this masterpiece while pretending to restore it.
> She changed the face of Jesus, removing His beard, and changed the
> figure of John to a woman. "It is ruined," said Carlo Bertelli who,
> as director of the Istituto Centrale del Restauro, commissioned its
> 20-year restoration, completed in 1999.
Chances are MUCH better that the restorer REMOVED the additions to the
work which were NOT originally painted by Leonardo. The Last Supper
started disintegrating from almost the moment Leonardo finished it.
LOTS of people after Leonardo have touched it up and probably DID add
their own "additions" to it.
>
> Attached is a one-page pdf document showing the original painting and
> the current changes and also a close up of the original John and his
> current feminine transformation.
Where; the attachment? Maybe you should post an address instead...
Steve Hayes
>Paulus Ben Jacob wrote:
>> The Da Vinci Code book and movie are a direct attack on Our Lord Jesus
>> The Christ. These enemies of the Christian faith use Leonardo Da
>> Vinci's painting The Last Supper as proof that Jesus was not God, that
>> he married Mary Magdalene, and had a child with her.
>
>How would Jesus having a wife and a child prove that he wasn't God?
>Surely God would be capable of doing whatever he wants and STILL be
>God, wouldn't he?
No, it wouldn't make any difference to whether Jesus is God or not.
But if Jesus WAS God, and some people assert a claim to biological descent
from him, then it makes them, at least in their own eyes, a cut above other
people.
I was at a seminar on the church and bioethics the other day, and someone
mentioned the idea of cloning a saint. I can't think that any educated
Christian would take such a thing seriously, but it's the kind of think that
could capture the imagination of unbelieving journalists.
A few years ago there was a film called "The boys from Brazil", about cloning
Afolf Hitler -- just the opposite of cloning a saint.
People whose minds have been shaped by seeing films like "Jurassic Park" might
take such things very seriously.
The Christian belief is that God has only one begotten son -- the rest of us
are adopted.
But if some can claim a higher status than the rest of us, then they'll love
the idea that Jesus had biological descendants. If he wasn't God, it wouldn't
be half so much fun.