SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, BOSTON, MA: CASES FILE BY THE BLACKS & OTHER NON-WHITES ARE IN DANGER

[humanrights....@gmail.com]

BLACK GOVERNOR DEVAL PATRICK, MA: JOINS MAKER OF INJUSTICE IN THE MASS JUDICIAL SYSTEM - Suffolk County Superior Court Judges Dismiss Non-white cases because of color and race

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/12/05/governor_picks_fewer_minorities_for_bench/?page=full - The Boston Globe

Boston, MA May 25, 2013

We have started and completed several cases, from the lowest courts to the Supreme Court of the United States.

In addition to the incident of swift denial of the cases filed by blacks and other non-whites across the United States, the incident in the Suffolk County Superior Court is the worst. Any piece of trash of brief or motion filed by the white attorneys against black and other non-white litigants are granted without reading the submissions of the blacks and other non-whites purposed to empower whites.

In over 231 countries where we have our representatives, US court system particularly Mass court system is the most corrupt, racist, suffers judges and administrators inequities, cases prevail based on the color and race of the applicant and blacks and other non-whites are gravely and horribly under-served.

Whites take all positions and non-whites are in danger on track to get justice. Media and police are used to cover the injustice arising from inequity and injustice.

Mass court system is ruined by a black Governor Deval Patrick and past white governors. The present governor has terribly jumped injustice in the judicial system because of inequity in selection of judges and appointment of the administrators of the judiciary all of which manifest in education and training of attorneys/lawyers K-tertiary level.

Few Black judges and lawyers/attorneys summed less than 1% representations but have less gouts to voice out justice and hand down justice for the blacks and other non-whites because of fear of death and persecution by whites who are in control. For example black Judges in the matter of Haneefah Smith and Corrine Wilkins v. MASS REALTY ADVISOR Docket No. SUCV12-4235 G (Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston) and Ofume v. RST Investment Group, Inc, Troy Lewis and DHCD (Southeastern Housing Court, Brockton, MA) were bold to hand down impartial and fair justice and they careless whether you are blacks, whites and others. To gather fact and experience we attended their proceedings several times to draw up our conclusion.


In the case, Haneefah Smith and Corrine Wilkins v. MASS REALTY ADVISOR Docket No. SUCV12-4235 G (Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston) the whites in control removed the Black Judge after only one hearing which was on case review proceeding and the case review heard by this Black Judge tuned this case into right directions capable of getting balanced justice for all parties. It is good when you lose a case you see the reason why you lost such case.


Majority of the white Judges in Mass (Hempden, Plymouth, Essex, Suffolk, etc) are heartless and less learned towards justices because distortion of the esprit of justice is the handwork of unlearned actors of justice such as judges, magistrate and clerks.

The briefs of the blacks and other non-whites are viewed with animosity distance look, racist predetermination based on their black color and race and swiftly deny their cases which have merit if taken by transparent judge.

Less than 1% representation in computation of black judges and administrators tries to add up the judicial power of the white judges and administrators to harm the path of non-whites in their efforts to get justice.

Majority of the smart and other non-whites kids that desire to study law is forced out of school or wrongly counseled/guided by over 95% of the white teachers, counselors and administrators across the United States to shutdown their interest to study law. Same incident is observed in all other professions in the United States.

White governors in Mass are worst governors and this black governor operates like past white governors to add more and more injuries.

The most terrible conditions in the entire Mass trial courts are the relationships between white judges and white clerks, magistrates, assistant clerks and other white administrators. White clerks, magistrates, assistant clerks and other white administrators pick the case file of blacks and other non-whites and rush to see the racist judges who would deny the cases of the black or other non-white applicants without reading the cases. All the time, they orally petition the brief to confuse and influence the judges and build up an adverse opinion on the judges immediately.

In the United States, in major part of vertical and horizontal interactions, what white tells another white carries no doubts and based on this racist trust, the judges deny these good cases and on appeal the court of appeals (district, state, and federal court of appeals) in majority follow the track of what another white judges have said in the cases of non-whites below.

For example, our representative, Dr. Phillip C. Ofume presented a merit Motion for Short Order of Notice to single Judge, The Honourable Justice Bonnie H. MacLeod-Mancuso, in the Matter, Ofume v. DHCD, Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group, Inc. Docket No. SUCV2012-04496-E (Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston, MA) but because this Judge was not on seat, the case was given to another Judge selected by the racist assistant clerk. See Motion below.

In the presence of Dr. Ofume, the white female assistant clerk used telephone and personal contact with a presiding Judge to petition Dr. Ofume and our brief without even reading our case.

According to information, Dr. Ofume's review of the time frame between the time the assistant clerk took the brief and the time she came back with the cover page of our brief bearing the ugly handwritten denial statement of the Judge, show that the Judge did not read our brief and several exhibits attached with it.

No normal and transparent Judge will deny this temporary injunctive relief because the relief sought will harm any parties in this case. Because the Judge did not read any part of our brief, the Judge constructed his/her opinion that our case has personal and subject matter jurisdictions in the Boston Housing Court where both personal and subject matter jurisdictions does not exist and never existed.

The case under which a temporary relief is sought is Ofume v. DHCD, Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group, Inc. Docket No. SUCV2012-04496-E (Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston, MA) and our Petition for Judicial Review is pending in the Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston, MA and our case has no origin and other stake in the Boston Housing Court. Therefore both subject matter and personal jurisdictions remain with the Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston, MA.

It is judiciarily insane for this Judge to order that we should seek the relief sought in the Boston Housing Court which is 100% a neutral court vis-a-vis our original case (Ofume v. DHCD, Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group, Inc. Docket No. SUCV2012-04496-E - Suffolk County Superior Court, Boston, MA) and motion for temporary injunctive relief.

Articled & Posted by:

DR. PHILLIP C. OFUME & ASSOCIATES,
LIMPT, INC. & IMUN, INC. PROJECT (EDU & WORKFORCE PROJECT, HUMAN RIGHTS, INSURANCE CORP., LAW REFORM & LITIGATION PROJECT - INTL. CHAPTER); INTL. COALITION FOR PRO SE/UNSIGNED LAWYERS & GLOBAL CLASS ACTION PROJECT; INTL. ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY, FOSTER/ADOPTIVE/ ORPHANAGE & CIVIL LIBERTIES OF THE NUCLEAR AND EXTENDED FAMILIES
c/o Dr. Phillip C. Ofume (USA)
41 Gallivan Boulevard
Dorcherster, MA 02124
Tel. 617-606-1753 & 857-258-3987

Mailing Address:
P. O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903
Tel. 617-606-1753 & 857-258-3987
E-mail: limpt...@gmail.com or
globalaids_hiv...@yahoo.co.uk or
humanrights....@gmail.com

_______________________________________________________________________________



COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Suffolk, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
OF THE TRIAL COURT

CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. SUCV2012-04496-E

_________________________________________________________________________

Phillip Ofume (on behalf Ofume family),
Applicant/Petitioner (Pro se and Forma Pauperis)

v.

Mass Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) and Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group, Inc.
Respondents
__________________________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S VERIFIED MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR EMERENCY EQUITABLE RELIEF (M.C.P.R. 1)AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO SINGLE JUDGE, THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE , BONNIE H. MACLEOD
________________________________________________________________________


Because of EXHIBIT A attached now comes the Applicant’s Memorandum of law, fact and physical evidence and respectfully moves this Honourable Court seeking Emergency Equitable Relief (M.C.P.R. 1)and also in alternative request permanent or temporary Injunctive Relief in nature of temporary restatement of the Emergency Assistance (EA ) or family with Children Shelter granted Applicant and his family by the DHCD in June 2012 to stop EXHIBIT A which is the 12th politically motivated eviction time to time designed to render Applicant and his family homeless since 2009.


A. PROOF THAT APPLICANT AND HIS FAMILY PAID ABOVE NORMAL RENT AND INHERITED VANDALIZED/BROKEN APARTMENT (506 WARREN AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR, BROCKTON, MA)

1. Under endless political persecution in the United States, the 11 apartments which Applicant and his family have lived in Massachusetts and Virginia, the housing matter, Ofume v. Hector et als Suffolk County Superior Court Civil Action Dockect No.SUCV 2013-1640-B is another proof that Applicant and his family have been evicted 11 times but have not been evicted for non-payment of rent and vandalization of apartment. In this matter (Ofume v. DHCD, Troy Lewis and RST) the reports of the City of Brockton Board of Health (Inspectional Service Department)also showed that in addition to 506 Warren Avenue Apt. #2 Brockton, MA since October 12, 2005 Applicant and his family have been forcibly given broken, vandalized and inhabitable apartment or home as punitive political action. See Applicant’s housing cases Ofume v. Geor


2. In August 2011 Applicant and his family found a good apartment located at # 96 Walnut Street Brockton, MA and they inspected it and it was good.

3. Respondents, RST Investment Group, INC. and Mr. Troy Lewis increased the rent and added other charges and Applicant and his family paid and Mr. lewis issued payment receipt to them and August 16, 2011 was scheduled for move in. 96 Walnut Street, Brockton MA rent payment receipts EXHIBITS I & J.

4. Days through August 16, 2011 at 9.00 pm Applicant and his family maintained constant telephone conversation with Mr. Lewis and he continually told them that the apartment (96 Walnut Street, Brockton MA) they paid for was still available and August 16, 2011 at 9.00 p.m. when Applicant and his family arrived there Mr. Lewis harassed and bullied them and told them that another apartment (506 Warren Avenue Brockton, MA) was available and he took them at about 10 p.m. to this smelling, complete broken apartment, no heat and no serviceable heating system and sockets, no hot water, mold invaded the entire apartment, there are multiple broken windows and doors, blocked toilet, drone of mice, cockroaches, etc.


5. Applicant and his family instantly requested for refund of the large amount of money they paid to Mr. Lewis, he refused to refund any part of the money. Applicant’s family were frequently sick because of the condition in the apartment. The better apartment(96 Walnut Street, Brockton MA)was $1,300.00/month and on August 16, 2011 politically, Mr. Lewis increased rent of the broken apartment to $1,350.00.

6. Mass Department of Health and Human Services (Inspectional Service department) and Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Public Safety and Fire Department were called into Applicant and his family’s complaint against Mr. Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group and several reports and criminal citations including declaring the entire apartment and building inhabitable and failed CMR Fitness; were issued against Mr. Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group.


7. In the Presiding Honourable Justice Wilber P. Edwards of Southeastern Housing Court held Applicant’s Counter-Claim and dismissed Mr. Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group eviction complaint without Prejudice and allowed Applicant’s Counterclaim to proceed. Applicant filed major lawsuit with the Plymouth County Superior Court (Brockton Session) against Mr. Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group.

8. On the final determination and decision of Judge Edwards, this Judge found serious violation and that the Board of Health and other reports clearly showed that 506 Warren Avenue, 2nd Floor Brockton, MA was vandalized prior to renting it to the Applicant and his family. Because of these poor conditions, Judge Edwards cut the rent from $1,350.00 down to $600.00 and deductible past over-payment in favor of the Applicant


B. FURTHER PROOF THAT APPLICANT’S PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW WILL PREVAIL AND THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE GRANTED.


9. Paragraphs 1 to 8 above show that apartment located at 506 Warren Avenue, 2nd Floor Brockton, MA was totally vandalized and written off as inhabitable apartment when Mr. Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group forced Applicant and his family to take apartment.


10. Mr. Troy Lewis and RST Investment Group further went into the Southeastern Housing Court to influence Court’s Housing Specialists and ClerkS to write fictitious and fraudulent report for them dated January 3, 2012 (EXHIBIT H) to enable them elude cited Housing Code violation.


11. On January 4, 2012 Mass Department of Health and Human Services (Inspectional Service department) and Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Public Safety and Fire Department came to the apartment and Mass Department of Health and Human Services (Inspectional Service department) conducted further and general inspections on Applicant’s apartment and wrote another report, see EXHIBITS F & G


12. Answer and Defense of the Defendant(DHCD)dated December 26, 2012 (EXHIBIT P) which Counsel for DHCD filed directly with this Court without respecting The Superior Court Rule 9A was opposed by the Applicant, Dr. Phillip Ofume and he requested this Court to dismiss defendant’s Answer and Defence pursuant to Mass Sup.Ct. R. 9A, Mass. R. Civ. R. P. 12(b)(6) (5).


13. Answer and Defense of the Defendant(DHCD)dated December 26, 2012 (EXHIBIT P)stated none of the two moneyed and falsified claims (housing denied because of a. non-payment of rent and b. vandalization of property based on falsified Paper (EXHIBIT B) which is unverified, unsworn, unsigned and without signature, etc. The Hearing Officer, ignored EXHIBITS C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, and relied on baseless paper (EXHIBIT B)




C. PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF


13. The proof that Applicant and his family have not been evicted for non-payment of rent and vandalization of apartment of paragraphs 1 (one) through thirteen (13) above are incorporated by reference and factual affirmation supported by physical exhibits stated in paragraphs 1 to 13 above.

14. In Nigeria May 2012 through present, the role of the Applicant, Dr. Phillip C. Ofume in supporting national merger of several political parties including but unlimited to Dr. Ofume’s national and international coalition which have merged with ALL PROGRESSIVE CONGRESS (APC) fear that APC will win the presidency of Nigeria 2015 to end U.S. , UK, etc. imposed government in Nigeria(see https://www.facebook.com/drphillip.ofume? ref=tn_tnmn; https://www.facebook.com/allprogressivecongressapc) has become the reason for EXHIBIT A and August 2009 through present including Ofume v. Hector et als Suffolk County Superior Court Civil Action Docket No.SUCV 2013-1640-B




15. Without granting Applicant’s Application, his children and entire family will suffer irreparable harm which no law and restitution would cure to far damaging level that because of EXHIBIT A his children will lose their education and parents and parents will lose their children.

16. Applicant’s children have changed schools over 10 times since 2009 and each change affects them. In Boston Public Schools majority of his children has stabilized and doing great and these children are horrified when Sheriff served EXHIBIT A.

17. Because of paragraph 14 above, the government of the United States, Nigeria, UK, and oil/gas companies have expended their terrorist aggression to render Applicant and his family 12th homeless, seize and divide his children, separate Dr. & Mrs. Ofume via imposed separated shelter system, lobbied and won the Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to stop contribution of rental assistance to the Applicant and his family pending grant of work permit by the USCIS and employment. Ex-Governor Mitt Romney did the same thing October 2005 to August 2006. See


18. This Court has review power to grant Applicant’s application because Respondents will not suffer any harm and the public will be alarmed if this Court should allow EXHIBIT A to render Applicant and his family 12th homelessness and endanger the lives of the children and parents in this part of democracy.

19. From The Supreme Court of the United States to the smallest in America, interests of the children, parents and public are very important in constructing the opinion of this Court and other courts.


20. Without urgent action taken by this honorable court, the subject child will suffer more and more abusive danger educationally, socially, economically, psychologically, etc and finally drop out of school.


WHEREFORE, because of EXHBIT A, the Applicant asks that this Honorable Court grant his temporary application for Emergency Family with Children Housing Assistance or Emergency Assistance (EA) pending review in this case.




C. VERIFICATION OF PETITION

I, Phillip C. Ofume hereby respectfully verify and submit the above-mentioned documents and that they are correct to the best of my knowledge and signed and authorize submission under the pains and penalties of perjury this 16th day of May 2013.

________________________________________

DR. PHILLIP C. OFUME & ASSOCIATES,
LIMPT, INC. & IMUN, INC. PROJECT (EDU & WORKFORCE PROJECT, HUMAN RIGHTS, INSURANCE CORP., LAW REFORM & LITIGATION PROJECT - INTL. CHAPTER); INTL. COALITION FOR PRO SE/UNSIGNED LAWYERS & GLOBAL CLASS ACTION PROJECT; INTL. ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY, FOSTER/ADOPTIVE/ ORPHANAGE & CIVIL LIBERTIES OF THE NUCLEAR AND EXTENDED FAMILIES
c/o Dr. Phillip C. Ofume (USA)
41 Gallivan Boulevard
Dorcherster, MA 02124
Tel. 617-606-1753 & 857-258-3987

Mailing Address:
P. O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903
Tel. 617-606-1753 & 857-258-3987
E-mail: limpt...@gmail.com or
globalaids_hiv...@yahoo.co.uk or
humanrights....@gmail.com


Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development c/o The Honorable Secretary of Justice and Attorney-General of the commonwealth of Massachusetts Attention, Attorney of Record Gwen A. Werner
Department of Justice (Litigation) One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108 -1518
Phone: (617) 727-2200
Attorney Kathleen J. Moore
P. O. Box 558
Milton, MA 02186

Ms. Barbara Boe Morgan
Mass Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD)
100 Cambridge Street,
Boston, MA

Honorable Bonnie H. MacLeod Superior Court
U.S. Post Office & Courthouse
15th Floor
90 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109