MAYOR EDWARD CLANCY OF THE CITY OF LYNN AND GOVERNOR DEVAL PATRICK OF MASSACHUSETTS JOINED IN LAWSUIT: OFUME FAMILY
searchgroup
MASSACHUSETTS JOINED IN LAWSUIT: OFUME FAMILY
June 18, 2009
Prior to joining the Mayor of Lynn and Governor of Massachusetts,
Deval Patrick several letters/petitions were sent to the mayor and the
governors (Deval Patrick and Mitt Romney) without action taken in all
the circumstances. Nationally and internationally, one major question
continued to surface, whether the mayor (Edward Clancy) and the
governors (Mitt Romney and Deval Patrick) have family and children. In
the apartment there are over 150 unfixed housing violations.
In the family's apartment (33 Arlington Street, Lynn MA), in addition
to disconnected heat and partial hot water and over 150 housing
violations, cooking gas and complete hot water were disconnected. As
if these disconnections were not able to kill the family, the Mayor of
the City of Lynn has ordered disconnection of COLD WATER on June 22,
2009 to starve the family to death. Publishers's further question is
whether this type of government has rights to go to Asia, Africa,
South America, etc to teach or advice on issues relating to human
rights, rule of law, etc.
On March 17, 2009 at Classical High School, Lynn second child in the
family was attacked and he sustained injuries including dislocated
ankle, broken jaw, etc. Lawyers/Attorneys in Massachusetts refused to
take this case and other cases because of what they called overhead
powers. Same refusal went round and round across all cases of severe
violation directed against the family. Media and other news system are
sanctioned from taken the family's case.
The landlords of this apartment get full monthly rent from the state's
agency - DEPARTMENTOF TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE (DTA). Income allowed to
the family (7 children and two parents) is ONLY 14-child food stamps
and $240/mo paid to one US born child.
Office of the agency's commissioner said that's the order is issued by
the governors and Bush. 2005 - 2008 asylum case remained stocked.
Under the new government, the family requested that the case be moved
to another state because Canadian/Nigerian govts and Nigeria's foreign
oil/gas companies have captured and spoiled federal and state courts.
After Bush's secret order for the deportation of the family's eldest
son Kleber Ofume , the new government quickly entered stay of further
deportation of members of this family. The currupt Board of
Immigration Appeal (BIA) under Bush swept several applications for
stay under the rug. Now the BIA has started in BUSH way by refusing to
release record of the case to US Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Under Bush, federal actors continue to seat on the family's asylum
case with 100% sanction on relief including Job Authorization and
other Refugees/Asylees humanitarian assistance. All these assistances
or relief will be granted if Dr. Ofume should abandon his bid for the
President of Nigeria 2007 and 2011. Heartlessly, the length of the
sanction is over six years in Canada and about 4 years in US.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
LAWRENCE DIVISION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS
NORTHEAST HOUSING COURT (LYNN SESSION)
______________________________________________________________
CASE NO. 08H77SP003967
______________________________________________________________
OFUME FAMILY (Phillip Ofume, et
al)
Applicant/Appellant
(Tenant)
v.
1ST MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE
(DTA)
2ND NANCY & SALVATORE VIGORITO ET ALS
3RD METROPOLITAN BOSTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP (MBHP)
4TH NATIONAL GRID, NORTHBOROUGH, MA
5TH LYNN, WATER & SEWER COMMISSION
6TH GOVERNOR DEVAL PATRICK, GOVERNOR OF THE
COMMONWEALTH MASSACHUSETTS
7. MAYOR EDWARD CLANCY, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
LYNN
Respondents (Property owners & Utility
companies)
________________________________________________________________
VERIFIED INTERLOCUTORY EMERGENCY MOTIONS/MEMORANDUM FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER ON THE RESPONDENTS ABOVE TO CONNECT GAS, HEAT, HOT
WATER, EXTERMINATE COCKROACHES, MICE, REPTILES, FIXING SEVERAL
UNSERVICEABLE DOORS, WINDOWS, TOILET, BEDS, MATTRESSES/BEDS, ETC AND
FURTHER ORDER ON 5TH RESPONDENT NOT TO DISCONNECT COLD WATER AND
PARTICULAR ORDER ON 1ST AND 3RD TO PROVIDE HOUSING VOUCHER PENDING
APPEALS PURSUANT TO M.R.C.P. 65(a)
Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
Appeals Court No. 2009-J-0020
_____________________________________________________________________
1
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
Notwithstanding the fact that this court lacks
jurisdiction over Administrative proceedings already pending before
the Lawrence Division of The Massachusetts Superior Court and
considering that this Court claimed jurisdiction pending appeals,
Applicant moves per this Motion requesting urgent temporary
restraining Order on 1st, 2nd. 3rd, 4th , 5th, 6th and 7th
respondents for the relief afore-listed and further state that the
Applicant is entitled to this relief or order because of the following
reason:
1. The punitive and cruel conditions below imposed on Applicant (7
children and 2 parents) are severe acute breach of US Constitution,
United Nations International laws, US Bill of Rights, Massachusetts
Human Rights Act, etc
2. On this court’s file there is an order of Judge McHugh of the
Mass Court of Appeals (01/30/2009) returning this Motion to The
Presiding Judge David D. Kerman and thereon attached and will be
marked EXIBIT “A”. Accordingly same Motion was further returned to
The Presiding Judge David D. Kerman and severally in Lynn Sessions
this Motion was presented to Judge David D. Kerman and ignored. During
session for March 31, 2009 without hearing Judge Kerman entered Order
“Denied” and left seven children and two parents to slowly die under
the above mentioned conditions of lack of heat, hot water, gas and
cooking stove under bitter cold and zero-income. On June 11, 2009 5th
respondent emerged with another harassment and hate notice relating to
termination of COLD WATER on June 22, 2009 (attached and marked
EXHIBIT “B”) which will be total shutdown of utilities without
relocation voucher or alternative shelter which considers proximity to
children school and learning programs in Lynn, MA. June 22, 2009
notice of 5th respondent is improperly and wrongfully served into the
mailbox of the Applicant (Black) without same copies to the White
tenant (Apt. #2). Applicant falls
2
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
within Massachusetts and Federal poverty level and rent, utilities,
etc are supposed to be covered pending job authorization and
employment Past notices of the utility companies were served on the
respondents and properly docketed courts below and above.
3. The family fragmentation conditions of the respondents created
extensive physical and psychological tortures for the applicant
(children and adult), because of multiple treacherous sanctions on
shelter relocation voucher within their school jurisdiction; abject
poverty; disconnection of utilities and further threat of the
invasion of their apartment by uncountable man groomed and adopted
COCKROACHES, MICE, REPTILES, etc ; SEVERAL UNSERVICEABLE DOORS,
WINDOWS, TOILET, BEDS, MATTRESSES/BEDS, ETC; zero-come to the
limited extent that under-14 child food stamp; etc.
4. Applicant has conducted investigation and research into the
nonchalance of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents and found that
6th and 7th respondents are responsible for the action of other
respondent. In May and June 2009 Applicant had tele-investigative
meetings with unidentified staff of 1st and 3rd respondents and they
advised that they are following the orders of 6th and 7th respondents.
Applicant’s recent letters to 6th and 7th respondents are attached
and marked EXHIBITS “C” & “D”.
5. Reason of paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, Applicant/Appellant,
Phillip Ofume and family in the above mentioned Motion, request this
Court pursuant to M.R.C.P. 65 (a) for Order commanding 1st, 2nd, 3rd,
4th , 5th 6th and 7th respondent to do the following pending appeals,
a. 1st respondent to continue to pay rents into the court’s
trust account because of the nonchalance of 1st, 2nd and 3rd
respondents to fix over 150 housing violation citations issued by The
Massachusetts Inspectional Services of the Department of Health and
3
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
Human Services dated June 26, 2007 and June 2008 and the approved
representatives of the Ap[pellees (MBHP and DTA);
b. 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents pay utilities bills to 4th and
5th respondents;
c. 1st , 2nd and 3rd respondents to maintain the apartment to
the level allowed by the within legislation including extermination ;
d. order commanding 4th and 5th respondent to connect gas ,
heat, hot water, etc;
e. 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondent to fix over 150 housing violation
citation issued on the respondents mentioned above;
etc.
6. The Applicant/Appellant, Ofume family is entitled to
further complete relief or order in writing because of the reason
following:
a. This Motion is highly politicized and hijacked by the political
opponents of the Applicant/Appellant. Applicant is a potential
presidential candidate for Nigeria’s Presidential Election 2011. Very
shocking under claimed constitutional judicial system, in part this
Motion was presented three times (02/10/2009, 03/10/2009, and
03/24/2009) before the presiding Judge Kerman (below) and unheard and
the fourth time also unheard but the Judge rose for short break after
hearing other cases and delivered oral order limited to
“Denied” (attached) through the presiding Clerk of Court.
b. The Motion is about temporary restraining and injunctive relief
to stop termination of
4
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
coldwater and connect and reconnect heat, hot water, gas and stove,
etc and fix over 150 housing violation citations issued by The
Massachusetts Inspectional Services of the Department of Health and
Human Services dated June 26, 2007 and June 2008 and the approved
representatives of the Appellees (MBHP and DTA) in an apartment where
seven children and two parents live under over 98% zero-income to the
limited extent that one US born child is paid child assistance of
$240.00 and other children are paid NOTHING and under 14-child given
starvation food stamps and all adult members are given NOTHING
including job authorization.
c. In the present torture and detention/prison without walls (33
Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902) between February 3,
2006 and August 2007 no heat, hot water and with unserviceable gas
stove which was used to cook and provide heat to the apartment even
when new baby arrived in the family. In part (heat and partial hot
water) reconnected on November 20, 2007 and disconnected on March 17,
2008 after the apartment was poisoned. Horribly, on March 17, 2009
gas and partial hot water were disconnected to unleash murder without
stitches. Any American must try to feel the pains suffered by
children, men and women to be able to become leader of democracies. In
this apartment, Ofume family (seven children and two parents) is
tortured physically and psychologically as result of the action of the
judicial system. February 3, 2006 - present,
under this massive disconnection the landlords and utility companies
(DTA, MBHP, Vigoritos, National Grid, etc) are paid in full every
month with tax money.
d. On December 30, 2008 counsel for the respondent (DTA) issued
threat on its intention to disconnect the utilities in Applicant’s
apartment including cessation of rent payment. The Presiding Judge
David D. Kerman said “you (DTA) must continue to pay rent and
utilities pending appeals” but this Court refused to put this oral
order in writing. Appellant has requested for Judge Kerman’s advise
in writing without action taken to issue written advise to the extent
of denying this motion which sought ONLY temporary
5
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
restraining order on respondents pending appeals.
e. Applicant/Appellant/Defendant presented to this Court an
additional, “Verified Emergency Interlocutory Application (Ex-Parte)
of Phillip Ofume and Family for temporary Restraining Order on the
Respondents Pending Trial and appeal Pursuant to Mass. Rules of civil
Procedure 65(a) and Mass Rules of Appellate Procedure 6 to Single
Judge of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Appeals Courts.” (attached
as Exhibit A and sent to this Court and Court of appeals) . Upon
receipt, the Clerk of the Mass Appeals Court issued a clear directions
or instructions (attached as Exhibit Band sent to this Court and Court
of appeals) as clear as stated in Appeals Court’s directions to the
Judge of the Court below and specifically stating that the Judge of
this Court will address all Appellant/Defendant’s pending matters
including this Application on December 30, 2008.
f. Additionally, Appellant filed with this Court THREE
(3) VERIFIED MOTIONS FOR STAY OF EXECUTION AND WAIVER OF BOND OR CASH
AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ON APPELLEES PENDING APPEAL PURSUANT TO
MASS. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 65(a), RE-SUBMITTED TO SINGLE JUDGE OF
THE MASSACHUSETTS COURT OF APPEALS (attached and marked Exhibit C and
sent to this Court and Court of appeals)
g. After the motion days November 25, 2008 and December
30, 2008 the Court below maintained the longstanding policy and
practice of DO NOT WRITE, DO NOT TELEPHONE, DO NOT SPEAK, DO NOT FAX,
DO NOT E-MAIL, etc. and created a battlefield of escalated
lawlessness, harassment and related cruelty including blockade,
barricade and nailed wall to wall, the major emergency escape doors in
case of fire/arson incident which the respondents are trying to use
to get quick repossession/eviction/transfer plans.
h. Finally, one question presented, whether Applicant’s relief will
disadvantage the
Respondents and public. All research and investigation conducted by
the Applicant/ Appellant show that Appellant’s Motion/Application and
relief will not harm
6
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
Respondents and their agents or have adverse effect on public
interest.
i. February 3, 2006 - present, part of Appellant’s research and
investigation shows that under over 150 terrible and unfixed housing
violation citations issued by the Massachusetts Inspectional Services
of the Department of Health and Human Services and the approved
representatives of the Defendants (MBHP and DTA) the landlords and
their agents continued to receive full payment for rents and utilities
which are not there in the apartment.
j. Utility company continued to enjoy payments to the extent of
collecting $700.00/month for heating whereas there is no heat in
Appellant’s apartment; several hundreds of dollars for partial hot
water which is capable of bathing one person of 9-member family and
now no hot water; snow is not removed; no coking stove; fridge and
several other utensils are microscopically serviceable; etc.
7. LEGAL QUESTION AND ARGUMENT
A. Issue
Whether in democratic nation of America, children and parents are
allowed to leave under the conditions mentioned above.
On relocation to another shelter, whether the move is in the best
interests of the child.
Whether there is a reasonable likelihood the proposed move will
enhance the quality of life for the child and the custodial parent,
including the short and long term effects of the move on the custodial
parent's ability to support the child;
Whether there is a support system of family or friends, either at the
new or old location; and Educational opportunities for the children at
the new and old locations.
Finally, whether the relocation request is made in good faith. The
Arizona Court of
7
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
Appeals has pushed the burden of proof to the relocating parents to
determine whether or not the move is in the child’s best interests,
with close reference to well defined factors.
B. Background of Argument
In the constitution and bill of rights of the United States what is
the justice pressure of “VERIFIED INTERLOCUTORY EMERGENCY MOTIONS/
MEMORANDUM FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ON THE RESPONDENTS ABOVE
TO CONNECT GAS, HEAT, HOT WATER, EXTERMINATE COCKROACHES, MICE,
REPTILES, FIXING SEVERAL UNSERVICEABLE DOORS, WINDOWS, TOILET, BEDS,
MATTRESSES/BEDS, ETC AND FURTHER ORDER ON 5TH RESPONDENT NOT TO
DISCONNECT COLD WATER AND PARTICULAR ORDER ON 1ST AND 3RD TO PROVIDE
HOUSING VOUCHER PENDING APPEALS “. This what the worst deficient
justice system would grant at ease because even the worst dictator on
earth would grant this motion because no living beings would survive
under the conditions imposed on the Applicant since October 12, 2005.
Without considering the conditions of children in school and poverty
level of parents and children 1st and 3rd respondents under the
command of 6th and 7th respondents, sanctioned Mass relocation voucher
to Applicant in person to enable them do personal search and relocate
into several vacant 4 or 5 bedroom apartments in Lynn within good
proximity to children’s school and convenient for parents’ poverty
level pending job authorization and employment.
Appellant’s five children are in elementary school, high school and
tertiary institution (college) within Lynn School jurisdiction and
they resumed school year 2008/2009 on September 3/5, 2008. Some of the
Appellant’s children attend interactive school program (formal and
informal school program) which can not be easily designed in another
school jurisdiction. Under paid mission, without any emergency (fire
and other emergencies) Appellees sought forcible transfer of these
children that are in schools to old depredated hotel which onlookers
called dangerous place (named Townline Inn, 725 Broadway, Malden, MA)
where they (seven children and five in
8
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
school and two under home K) will not be allowed to enter into the
hotel or Travelers’ Inn with their luggage and books shelves, computer
and other learning materials, etc.
Reference to paragraphs 4 and 6 above or conditions of children and
parents, Appellant or Ofume family used its personal resources and
contracted labor to bring 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1 Lynn MA
01902 to over or about 65% safe living conditions. Also the imposed
poor conditions of the Appellant which mitigated reason to stay within
Lynn School District are that heads of Appellant’s family with scores
of academic and professional qualifications is forced by President
George W. Bush et al to suffer and live under zero-income to the
limited extent that the family’s under 14-child are given food ration
or stamps since April 2006. Directly and indirectly, please see,
Fitzgerald v. Camdenton R-III School District, 439 F. 3d 773, 206 L.
Ed. Rep. 837, C.A. 8 (Mo) March 01, 2006 (No. 04-3102); Camdenton R-
III School District v. Mr. and Mrs. F (School district tries to force
special education evaluation on homeschooled student); Tropea v.
Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727, 642 N.Y.S.2d 575, 578 (1996).
Considering the conditions of the Appellant and the effort made by the
Appellant to make 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1 Lynn MA 01902 safe
(65%) to enable the children get good health and succeed in their
education, there is no emergency which has triggered emergency
transfer to hotel where Appellant‘s children will loss their education
and fall into the street. Some of the receipts of the work done will
be presented during the hearing and Appellant will move for the
evidence to be entered into evidence in support of this appeal.
Effective June 28, 2007 about or over 65% of safety citations or
violations which were inherited by the Appellant on February 3, 2006
have been corrected by the Appellant and not restituted. Notices and
reminders to the Appellees to fix the remaining defects were
unheeded.
Considering the present conditions of the apartment which the
Appellant (Parent) has struggle under zero-income to make livable and
designed educational program for the children under Lynn Public System
which can not be transferred to another school jurisdiction.
9
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
February 3, 2006 - present the Appellant found several apartments in
Lynn, MA but the Appellees (DTA, MBHP, and HAP) have been disrupting
the efforts sometimes they secretly petition Appellant and warn
landlords to deny Appellant the apartment. Under this terrible
condition, Appellant decided to mobilize some people to work along
investigative cross axis to find apartment in Lynn. Notwithstanding
the scare put in the mind of some landlords and their agencies not to
come out boldly to denounce the Appellees, Appellant is able to
uncover one terrible incident. Appellant’s agents (people) found 5
bedrooms apartment undergoing major reconstruction and about two weeks
to completion and satisfactorily located at 44 Endicott Street, Lynn
with a good proximity to all the schools and other essential services
(library, bus stop, super market, etc) where Appellants children
attend better than the present apartment. Appellant’s agents
negotiated the lease and collected all information concerning the
monthly rent and utilities. Based on this background, Appellant’s
agents collected the forms and mailed them to the Appellant. Appellant
issued detailed preliminary notice on Appellees and HAP and advised
the Appellees and HAP that everything has been negotiated and that the
first tenant that has occupied the completed apartment has
Massachusetts Rental Vouchers. In the process of filling out the forms
under shelter or homeless condition, which is like third party tenancy
agreement, the grantor must identify the Appellant. HAP requested the
Appellant to disclose full name and address of the landlord and that
without disclosing these particulars HAP will not fill part of the
form. The Forms bears the complete name of the leasing agency which is
“GREATER BOSTON REAL ESTATE BOARD .” HAP returned the blank forms to
Appellant. HAP started secret search for the landlord or his agent.
HAP found them and went to the extent to look for everything and
destroyed the reputation of the Appellant and fought hard to make sure
the Appellant lost the chance to get the apartment.
C. Constitutional and Statutory Standpoint
Efforts of highly educated parents to make their children to be in
school even under worst odds have been downsized by dictatorship.
Under the state or systemic terrible conditions, the Appellant has
suffered to make sure that his/her children are in school
10
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
even when the government imposed hostile and cruel sanction to prevent
them of the right to education of themselves and their children, they
designed home school curricula and interacted them with the curricula
of the Lynn Public System or under formal and informal school programs
in Lynn Public System. It took them time, material resources and
within Lynn learning resources and professional know-how to setup a
program of learning in Lynn School System.
To forcibly remove these children from school within less than two
weeks when they resumed 2008/2009 academic year is mark of cruelties.
See notice to quit dated September 11, 2008 and date to quit is dated
September 10, 2008. To expand the harassment, on September 12, 2008
some of the landlords (Nancy Vigorito) issued additional Notice to
Quit and served. DTA and MBHP or Appellees were surprised when these
children were able to resume the school year 2008/2009 under zero-
income and sanction on money to foot school supplies, shoes, bus
fare, clothes, etc. What is NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND when child and
parents suffer 100% sanction on right to job authorization, school
supplies, shoes, bus fare, clothes, etc.?
Indirectly, the Montana Supreme Court in re Marriage of Cole, supra,
729 P.2d at 1280-81 (1986) that the best interests of a child must be
considered and put above all other things including firm order that
courts must take bold step to ensure the child's best interests, and
on the other side the custodial parent's fundamental right. Also in
most cases, lower Court through Supreme Court of the United States,
the rights of the parents and child were considered. See Marriage of
Cole, supra; Zwerneman v. Kenny, 236 N.J. Super. 1, 563 A.2d 1139
(App. Div. 1989); Sheley, ___ Wash. App. 2d ___, 895 P.2d 850
(1995), 128 Wash. 2d 1007, 910 P.2d 481 (1996); Ziegler v. Ziegler,
107 Idaho 527, 691 P.2d 773 (Ct. App. 1985); Everett v. Everett, 660
So. 2d 599 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995) (following Ziegler).
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in Auge v. Auge, 334 N.W.2d 393
(Minn. 1983),
11
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
that the transfers or relocation must be in the child's best interests
and would not endanger the child's health and well-being (education,
socialization, etc). The preemptive transfer of the Appellant’s
children and parents failed to make a prima facie showing against the
move, therefore Appellant requests the Director of Hearing to grant
Appellant’s appeal. Paragraphs 9 to 17 above strike unshaken accord
that the child's best interests must be determined with reference to
specific factors.
Several states such as Arizona, Illinois, Nebraska, New Mexico, New
York, and Missouri follow the best-interests approach to the condition
of the child. Indirectly and directly, Massachusetts applies “
Guardian Ad Litems (G.A.L).” Regardless of the position of the
Appellees, G.A.L which is appointed by the Judge must look at the
needs of the child now and for the future; Appellant and Appellees
must subordinate their
interests to those of the child. Majority of the evaluation requires
that the “G.A.L. should take a developmental view, one that regards
the needs of the children now and as the
grow and age.” (Boston Divorce Attorneys The Best Interest of the
Child)
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing including humanitarian consideration, Applicant
request this Court to grant this motion which comes with specific
relief aforementioned.
Respectfully verified and signed under the pain and penalty of
perjury,
____________________
Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D. – Representative/Advocate for the Applicant/
Appellant, Ofume Family
33 Arlington Street, Suite 1
Lynn, Massachusetts 01902
Tel. 339-440-5148
Fax 339-440-5148
12
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
E-mail: confi...@hotmail.com, global
aids_hivcur...@yahoo.co.uk
Websites “ Dr. Phillip Ofume”
TO:
Clerk of the Courts
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
John Adams Courthouse
One Pemberton Square
Boston, MA 02108
Ms. Susan Trippi & Record Manager
Clerk-Magistrate of the Court
Northeast Housing Court
Fenton Judicial Center
2 Appleton Street
Lawrence, MA 01840
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Dr. Phillip C. Ofume, Representative/Advocate for the Plaintiff or
co-Plaintiff hereby certify that I have served the foregoing
document, upon all parties, by mailing a copy, first class, postage
prepaid to:
The Honourable Secretary of Justice and Attorney-General of
Massachusetts
Government Bureau/Trial Division Attn.: Lisa J. Fauth
One Ashburton Place, Room 1813
Boston, MA 02108
Michael Ciccolo - Assistant General Counsel
Department of Transitional Assistance
600 Washington Street
Boston, MA 02111
Mr. Edward B. McGrath
BURNS & FARREY
150 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
The Clerk of Court Attn.: Ms. Susan Trippi
Northeast Housing Court
13
Ofume v. Vigorito, DTA, et al Lower Court No. 08H77SP003967
Fenton Judicial Center
2 Appleton Street
Lawrence, MA 01840
Sal & Nancy Vigorito
14 Nixon Lane
Stoneham, MA 02180
Lynn, Water and Sewer Commission
400 Parkland Avenue
Lynn, MA 01905
781 596-2400 Tel.
781-595-1420 Fax
National Grid Electric
Northborough, MA
Tel. 1800-344-7233
Mayor Edward Clancy
Mayor of the City of Lynn
City Hall
Lynn, MA.
_____________________
Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D. – Representative/Advocate for the Ofume
Family
DATED: June 16, 2009
14
RELEASED BY:
Phillip Ofume, Ph.D.
Chair, National & International Policy Research Council; Head, Law
Reform and Litigation and Security Policy Council; Candidate in Exile
- Nigeria's Presidential Election 2011; National Chair, Canadian
Sociology and Anthropology Association -Anti-Racism Committee (p)
.
Godson Etiebet, Ph.D.
Researcher, (Policy/Good Government) National and International
Policy Research Council Coordinator, Europe Section, Switzerland
Cynthia H. Taylor, Ph.D./Alh. (Dr.) Farruk Mohammad
Strategic Development Researchers - International Policy Research
Council, Middle East Project
Tan Ochollu, D.Lit.
Principal Researcher, (Strategic Development) National and
International Policy Research Council Director of Asia Project
Reid MacDonald, Ph.D.
Coordinator, North America Section
Kris Kifindi Bunkheti, Ph.D. - Sept 2007 - present continued to be
detained/imprisoned by the PM of Canada Stephen Harper
Researcher (Language/Culture), National and International Policy
Research Council York University (Department of History) Toronto,
Ontario Canada (p)
Jerome Tesfai, D. Min/Div
Principal Researcher, Policy and Practice in Government and Foreign
Interveners - Africa Project
Francois Bourgeois/Pierre Bushel
International Human Rights Watch and Democracy - St. Etienne, France
Send Comment to: Ihrwa4re...@hotmail.com for Europe Section
AFRICAN CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ASSOCIATION (ACHRA);
NETLINK INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (NLICS);
INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR NIGERIAN PEOPLE'S LIBERATION AND
DEMOCRACY(ICN-PLD); OIL AND CHEMICAL WATCH INTERNATIONAL (OCWI);
AFRICAN CANADIAN IMMIGRANT SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION (ACISA);
INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRIK (NIPAD).
Contact:
P. O. Box 25153 Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada B3M 4H4 Phone: (902)
832-3559 Fax: (902) 832-3558 E-mail:
federr...@hotmail.com,sis_mc...@hotmail.com for North/South
Americas ; Africa ; Middle East ; Asia ; Australia ; etc.
In the United States of America:
Dr. Phillip C. Ofume
c/o 33 Arlington Street, Suite 1
Lynn, Massachusetts USA 01902
Mobile: (617) 888 - 4205 (No Voice Message)
Tel. (617) 263- 8604 (Voice Message allowed)
Tel (781) 842-1225 (24-hr service)
Websites: "Dr. Phillip Ofume";
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dr.+Phillip+Ofume+Political+Mani...
etc E-mail: globalaids_hivcureinteract...@yahoo.co.uk ,
Disclaimer: We have experienced series of high handed cyber attacks
such as deleting of words and sentences from our write-ups;
distorting and confusing the meaning of our letters/report/
advertisement/ articles; returning and destroying our e-mail and
snail mail; changing and distorting write-ups on-line; importing
strange ideas into our write-ups; etc. In the light of this, we
hereby advise you to disregard the activities of these cyber-vultures
and contact
us for signed hard copies directly from the Publishers.