Fred "Kiddie-Porn" Cherry
Fred Cherry
[ Author was Fred Cherry ]
[ Posted on Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:33:55 GMT ]
In Message-ID: <shrapnel-130...@207-229-150-91.d.enteract.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame.fucking.faggots
Subject: Fred "Kiddie-Porn" Cherry
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:52:13 -0500
shra...@LICEenteract.com (Allen James, NAMBLA supporter), wrote:
> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
> SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
>
> ----------------------------------------X
> Fred Cherry, :
> PLAINTIFF, : 96_Civ.______
> -v- :
> : COMPLAINT
> JANET RENO, in her official capacity as :
> ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, :
> :
> DEFENDANT. :
> ----------------------------------------X
> PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
>
> 1. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief
> challenging provisions of the "Communications Decency Act of 1996"
> (the challenged provisions are referred to hereinafter as "the
> Act"). One provision imposes criminal penalties for "indecent" but
> constitutionally protected telecommunications to individuals under
> the age of 18; another criminalizes the use of any "interactive
> computer service" to "send" or "display in a manner available" to
> a person under 18 any communication that "depicts or describes, in
> terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community
> standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs." The
> plaintiff, a user of computer communication systems, asserts that
> the Act is unconstitutional on its face and as applied because it
> criminalizes expression that is protected by the First Amendment;
>
> ________________________________________
>
> In other words, O Fans Of Fred Cherry, he SUED the Government because
> they made child pornography on the Internet ILLEGAL.
>
> Jeez, what a lowlife you are, Fred.
What a liar you are, Allen! Sure, you quoted the first paragraph of my
complaint. But you neglected to tell the rest of the story. First of all,
what you quoted, except for the last sentence, is what I copied exactly
from the Complaint in the case of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. v.
Reno, Civ. No. 96-963 In the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania.
The reason I filed that suit, as you well know, is that the notorious Rod
Swift, a neonazi, and another NAMBLA supporter, was using indecent
language to lie about me. Since this neonazi NAMBLA supporter was an
Australian citizen, posting from Australia, he was not subject to the
Communications Decency Act of 1996. All I was trying to do was to defend my
right to quote this neonazi faggot NAMBLA supporter.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Elector of Homophobia
Fred Cherry
In Message-ID: <shrapnel-160...@207-229-173-2.d.enteract.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame.fucking.faggots
Subject: Re: Fred "Kiddie-Porn" Cherry
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 22:32:09 -0500
shra...@LICEenteract.com (Allen James,the NAMBLA supporter), wrote:
> In article <FAAM4...@world.std.com>, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> wrote:
Why did you omit what I actually wrote? Are you ashamed of the truth? Here
is what I actually wrote:
-----------------------------------snip-------------------------------
What a liar you are, Allen! Sure, you quoted the first paragraph of my
complaint. But you neglected to tell the rest of the story. First of all,
what you quoted, except for the last sentence, is what I copied exactly
from the Complaint in the case of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. v.
Reno, Civ. No. 96-963 In the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania.
The reason I filed that suit, as you well know, is that the notorious Rod
Swift, a neonazi, and another NAMBLA supporter, was using indecent
language to lie about me. Since this neonazi NAMBLA supporter was an
Australian citizen, posting from Australia, he was not subject to the
Communications Decency Act of 1996. All I was trying to do was to defend my
right to quote this neonazi faggot NAMBLA supporter.
----------------------------snip--------------------------------------
Now, if you want to talk about "kiddie-porn", don't forget the fact that
Seright-Payne, a homosexual gentleman, posted information concerning NAMBLA
about three years ago. Seright-Payne posted a message telling about the
fact that a NAMBLA group was meeting in a public library in the City of San
Francisco. The library tried to ban this group, but the American Civil
Liberties Union defended the right of NAMBLA to meet in that library. So,
the library hired a guard to keep the NAMBLA members out of the boy's
toilet. After that, the NAMBLA group was no longer interested in meeting at
that library. And this is the SAME American Civil Liberties Union which
refused to defend my right to criticize advocates of homosexual
child-molesting.
> Actually, you dishonest, lying old nutcase, I was KIND to you in that
> post. I did not post any of your insane, rambling 'testimony'.....
Why did you neglect to post the testimony of Clay Shirky? Clay Shirky,
testifying in favor of Internet censorship, had testified that I had
"polluted" the alt.christnet newsgroup. Now, you have to understand the
fact that Clay Shirky posts from a ISP that allowed Roy Radow to post
articles glorifying and exalting homosexual child-molesting, while
terminating all homophobes. Here is the proof:
-----------------------------snip------------------------------------
From: gen...@panix.com (Gita Enders)
Newsgroups: panix.chat
Subject: Re: I hope that we are careful out there...
Date: 25 Feb 1995 15:01:13 -0500
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC
Lines: 34
Messag- ID: <3io2a9$o...@panix.com>
References: <3i3rdv$e...@panix.com> <3i3rkj$f...@panix3.panix.com>
<3i3vh4$c...@panix2.panix.com> <3i40h7$4...@panix3.panix.com>
<3i6p2j$9...@panix2.panix.com> <3ia1gs$p...@panix3.panix.com>
<3ie2p8$g...@panix2.panix.com> <3ikqmn$g...@panix3.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Alexis Rosen writes:
Good ol' Roy Radow of Nambla? Never thought I'd miss him when he left.
You never can tell...
Fred Cherry (jo...@panix.com) quotes mail received from staff:
: If you continue your current tendency of posting what you think
: is just barely inside our tolerance for poor netiquette that
: behavior alone will push you over the edge.
I don't know where I got this idea, but I thought Panix stood for free
speech. Of course, part of Panix's right to free speech is the right not
to carry Fred, so its a muddled issue.
Where is Roy Radow when you need him?
-------------------------------------
bash$ pfinger roy
Login Name: roy Full Name: Roy Radow
Directory: /net/u/5/r/roy Shell: /usr/local/bin/ksh
Last login Wed Jan 18 14:51:29 on panix2.panix.com ttyre from 192.100.81.130.
No mail information available.
-------------------------------------
Well, that should cheer Alexis up...
People who wish to avoid being offended should run moderated newsgroups
or private mailing lists.
Gita "if you can't stand the flame, get out of the newsgroup" Enders
--------------------------------------snip----------------------------
> You're still ducking the question- why is it, that every time those
> good-for-nothing scumbags from NAMBLA post their vile bullshit on
> alt.politics.homosexuality, YOU are the ONLY person who does not vocally
> and swiftly argue against their vileness?
>
> You're always conspicuously ABSENT.......
Another faggot lie. The NAMBLA spokemen don't work that way. What they do
is to post all over Usenet. For example, in February of last year Falcor14
started a thread in the newsgroup soc.culture.cuba. When I responded to
Falcor14, about a dozen faggots like you came down on me like a ton of
bricks. They didn't object to Falcor14's post, they only objected to my
refutation of Falcor14.
Anyway, let's see you post a copy of any alleged post by you in which YOU
object to homosexual child-molesting. I haven't seen any such post by you.