It’s still a bit early to make a broad and definitive statement but
there is every indication that the Payor’s Gambit is working.
Under a Motion to Refrain, the moving party is generally the
respondent father. This is somewhat unusual to the normal process of
filing for divorce or child support where the moving party is the
applicant mother.
If the father’s motion is just, it is one of the few opportunities for
the respondent to set the tone of a motion.
The applicant mother may make the mistake of doing what she has likely
done in the past, that is, making the first punch count. She makes the
mistake of thinking that her response is the first punch but it is
not. Her’s is a first response since the father has set the tone by
being the moving party.
As the mother’s previous gambits have shown mostly successful she is
likely to indulge in a litany of claims and accusations or innuendos
and inferences that are far from the refuting the father’s claim. She
is now extending the rope with which to hang herself. - the Payor’s
Gambit is working.
"Moderator" <meld...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c01ceaf-e17d-48a4...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Defeatist...
>
> "Moderator" <meldo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>Defeatist...
LOL's, you clowns can hang yourself over what, so you can kiss the ground
the global elite have over you, while you keep on begging for butter to lube
yourselves to get more ass fucking.....you clowns are too stupid to know any
better.
> >Defeatist...
>
> LOL's, you clowns can hang yourself over what, so you can kiss the ground
> the global elite have over you, while you keep on begging for butter to lube
> yourselves to get more ass fucking.....you clowns are too stupid to know any
> better.
>
You sound a bit confused too, like that other poster, Super 8.
Something in the water, maybe.
Ah. Then it most probably *is* something in the water...
> >Defeatist...
>
> LOL's, you clowns can hang yourself over what, so you can kiss the ground
> the global elite have over you, while you keep on begging for butter to
lube
> yourselves to get more ass fucking.....you clowns are too stupid to know
any
> better.
>
>You sound a bit confused too, like that other poster, Super 8.
>Something in the water, maybe.
Nope but you clowns aew very confudsed about winnig in court...too funny..
you should know your drinking it right now...
I'm not drinking any Canadian water right now. Really, It all for
government saftey, *do* try and get a grip.
Hey, lay off the water while there's still time...
don't you mean how your all crying over having to pay the child support, all
because you didn't have the balls to tell the judge to fuck off and sick it
up his ass...
Why, no, It all for government saftey. I mean I'm concerned that your
drinking habits are exacerbating your affliction.
Alright. Let's help him out folks. Would anyone like to shed light on
this humdrum obscure post?
Ok, I see you didn't do anything and just got all upset. Well that not a big
surprise bubby..
Why, it is not going to change anything.....he'll lose and yet another man
bites the dust..
Any change or movement or cult is simply a composite of individual
actions. So far the refraining order against the FRO holds and the
mother’s litany of claims have begun to be rejected. In this case a
very practical outcome is achieved namely holding back a government
organization that has considerable force at its disposal. One person
did this without force and within the rules of the court.
Your schoolgirl fantasies of a people’s organized militia are more at
home on a big screen than they are in anything most people would
consider a civilized society.
It all for government saftey, take your vaccines of toxic death wrote:
> "John Jones" <jonesc...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:hbf2ch$fbu$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> > Moderator wrote:
> > > Motion to Refrain - The Payor?s Gambit Works in Canada You Say?
> > >
> > > It?s still a bit early to make a broad and definitive statement but
> > > there is every indication that the Payor?s Gambit is working.
> > >
> > > Under a Motion to Refrain, the moving party is generally the
> > > respondent father. This is somewhat unusual to the normal process of
> > > filing for divorce or child support where the moving party is the
> > > applicant mother.
> > >
> > > If the father?s motion is just, it is one of the few opportunities for
> > > the respondent to set the tone of a motion.
> > >
> > > The applicant mother may make the mistake of doing what she has likely
> > > done in the past, that is, making the first punch count. She makes the
> > > mistake of thinking that her response is the first punch but it is
> > > not. Her?s is a first response since the father has set the tone by
> > > being the moving party.
> > >
> > > As the mother?s previous gambits have shown mostly successful she is
> > > likely to indulge in a litany of claims and accusations or innuendos
> > > and inferences that are far from the refuting the father?s claim. She
> > > is now extending the rope with which to hang herself. - the Payor?s
> > > Gambit is working.
> >
> > Alright. Let's help him out folks. Would anyone like to shed light on
> > this humdrum obscure post?
>
> Why, it is not going to change anything.....he'll lose and yet another man
> bites the dust..
>Any change or movement or cult is simply a composite of individual
>actions. So far the refraining order against the FRO holds and the
>mother's litany of claims have begun to be rejected.
It's too ingrained in today's socity to let you off the hook. The global
elite put all this stuff in place, to keep you as a slave. You will be a
slave, no matter what you do, unless you look to other mean's....as do all
men need too...
>Your schoolgirl fantasies of a people's organized militia are more at
>home on a big screen than they are in anything most people would
>consider a civilized society.
So you think people defending their god given right is just a fanasty. You
never learned anything from histroy have you sonny. But this fanasty of
willing something that will never take place, is just out right silly for
you to beleive in, or that you could win....You been a slave for too long
boy to think you will get justice in the governments courts, you will be
either jailed or killed as a example of defining the ruling elite...There is
only one course of action to save your silly souls...
Defeatist.
>Defeatist.
How can I be that, when I am a realist, AND KNOW realistic, you will lose
like all those other who came before you and you will be chewing on your
rubber shoes again, as you can't win against a government corrupt system
that wants it's slaves, like you and all those others who hope to tame
governments laws and legislations. Hell even political potato heads in
office will not help you out when they themselves know that those men's
rights can never be united, so how are you going to win then.....you neeed
to stop smoking that crack buddy, before you end up causing yourself to lose
yourself in self deception
No, sorry sonny, but being realist, or realistic on matter political issues
helps show people like you and those other slaves are on the wrong path to
self distrution
> Any change or movement or cult is simply a composite of individual
> actions. So far the refraining order
what refraining order?
> against the FRO
Who are the FRO?
> holds and the
> mother’s litany
Who's mother and do I need to know every fact there is in the world?
> of claims
What claims?
> have begun to be rejected. In this case a
> very practical outcome is achieved namely holding back a government
> organization
What government?
> that has considerable force at its disposal. One person
> did this without force and within the rules of the court.
Who are you talking about?
What are you talking about?
Go away.
All good questions.
>
> Go away.
Not so good. How are we going to get any answers if he goes away?
Because you anticipate defeat, as above. If there is anything in
Meldon's approach, you will miss it.
Not at all, it already been done in the court, you the poor person and your
freinds don't know any better. Sad really...