soc.men Google Group

Re: Left/right dimension and feminism are independent

2010-01-05T04:25:48Z

On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:26:05 -0800 (PST), Masculist
Just the opposite is true. There are very few "girls here" that I
have ever gotten along with.
Smitty, on the other hand, kissed up to Jennifer Larson, OhSoJourner
and a host of other feminazis.
Smitty -- the revolutionary who wants me institutionalized for

Re: The "Tiger Woods" double standard

2010-01-05T04:08:56Z

Now that's a splendid argument!
Andrew Usher

Re: BBC: fascism spawned by suffragism

2010-01-05T04:04:03Z

On Jan 4, 9:46 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
There is, no doubt, but that does not prove a _causal_ relationship
(Post hoc). I would guess there is, though, based in the general
patterns of men's and women's political thought, which are both
irrational but differently so.

Re: Left/right dimension and feminism are independent

2010-01-05T04:00:58Z

On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:32:29 -0800 (PST), Stephen Morgan
Do I still hate women because I love them?
Well, look at it this way, SM.
Women are more dangerous to men who are intrigued by them than to men
who aren't intrigued by them.
So it makes perfect sense to hate that which is a danger to you,
doesn't it?

Re: The "Tiger Woods" double standard

2010-01-05T03:59:51Z

On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:43:22 -0800 (PST), Equal Time
What a crock of shit.

Re: BBC: fascism spawned by suffragism

2010-01-05T03:46:02Z

On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:35:58 -0800 (PST), Stephen Morgan
Somewhat along the same lines, an economist named John Lott wrote a
book a few years ago called "Freedomnomics".
Among the things that he does in the book is to show a statistical
correlation between female suffrage and the growth of government.

Re: On sperm donation ...

2010-01-05T03:06:50Z

On Dec 31 2009, 7:50 pm, "Society" <Soci...@feminism.is.invalid>
wrote:
No, as you know, I argue that society will pay the bill some way or
other. There is no way to eliminate it without morally objectionable
methods.
But that happens all the time. No one can be self-sufficient;
therefore any private decisions that do not maximise economic output

Objection to the political argument of Mark Sobolewski (aka PolishKnight) and relatives

2010-01-05T02:57:36Z

Mark has just posted another reply in the thread originally about
Marxism and feminism here [link]
. I started to reply to it but realised I had better start a new
thread because: he never responds to me anyway, and my argument was
more fundamental than that one post.

Re: Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 TWO TIME FELON and Garage Burglar used teen as accomplice

2010-01-05T01:24:29Z

Kent? LOL

Re: The "Tiger Woods" double standard

2010-01-05T01:17:13Z

In article <Rv70n.60171$PH1.41754@edtnps8 2>,
Hello Heidi (Happy New Year!)
I'm reminded of a line from The Doors:
Patricia: "Those vows were forever in the goddess' sight!
"Death does not part, only lack of love.""
Jim Morrison: "Come on, Patricia! I was stoned. It seemed like
a fun thing to do at the time."

Re: All Natural Plastics

2010-01-05T01:08:09Z

In article
<0d5fc4c4-3cbe-4c45-936c-97adb 80b3...@e37g2000yqn.googlegrou ps.com>,
Denise, women are experts at desiring the unnatural and even
paradoxical. My wife joked that I have a point about whether women
should have the vote or not after seeing other women ask their husband's
for a half hour which dress they should buy. :-)

Re: BBC: fascism spawned by suffragism

2010-01-05T00:52:24Z

On Jan 4, 2:35 pm, Stephen Morgan <grauniad2libe...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
<snip>
OK, why was this so? Why did fascism (in Britain) appeal to women
primarily? I really have no idea of the history here. What's the point
that you're trying to make? (I have some ideas, but ...)
Andrew Usher

Why does Kent Wills refuse to archive his posts?

2010-01-05T00:50:31Z

Yumhuyk > Is he afraid of someone using his USENET
Yumhuyk > postings against him? Like his parole officer?
Kent, Are you under the supervision of a Parole Officer AGAIN?
[link]
Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar
used teen as accomplice

Re: Another thread diverted into right-wing nonsense

2010-01-05T00:35:05Z

In article <MPG.25a95871b5ade588989...@ne ws.eternal-september.org>,
I wasn't talking about Mapplethorpe literally (since I referred to him
in the plural. I don't think he's been cloned. :-) I was using him as
an allegory for artists who go out of their way to offend religious
groups as a publicity stunt.

Re: 2010 broken down into manageable pieces.

2010-01-05T00:29:46Z

Even if you were right on this, what would it matter to today? You
seem stuck in the past about this.
Andrew Usher