> A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of attention" > burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the story > up.
> A big part of a campus was sealed off after Rowena Jones reported > being attacked, bound, raped and left on a muddy slope beside a pond.
> She gave police a 27-page statement detailing the "assault".
> In fact Jones had pulled down her own trousers and tied herself up > with sticky tape from the art department.
> The 21-year-old pleaded guilty at Exeter magistrates' court to > wasting police time.
> Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at > the city's university.
> Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape > and a baby-killing.
> David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were > working on the Jones case.
> "Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were > employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry."
> Rachel Bentley, defending, said Jones, who is studying for an MA, now > felt remorse.
> Jones's parents - both teachers from Newport in Shropshire - reached > the court soon after she was sentenced to two months in prison.
> A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was only > reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged *he* > was raped - while the inquiry went on.
> The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women.
I'm impressed that she was jailed. "Wasting police time" is wishy- washy, though; isn't there such an offense as 'public mischief'?
"Centre of attention" or quasi-political statement?
Andras ---- "Truth does not penetrate the preoccupied mind" - Ch. Darwin
> In article <19991030091939.13877.qm...@nym.alias.net>, > door...@nym.alias.net broadcasted a bitstream which decodes to... > > From the Mirror, 30 October 1999:
> > A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of attention" > > burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the story > > up.
> > A big part of a campus was sealed off after Rowena Jones reported > > being attacked, bound, raped and left on a muddy slope beside a pond.
> > She gave police a 27-page statement detailing the "assault".
> > In fact Jones had pulled down her own trousers and tied herself up > > with sticky tape from the art department.
> > The 21-year-old pleaded guilty at Exeter magistrates' court to > > wasting police time.
> > Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at > > the city's university.
> > Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape > > and a baby-killing.
> > David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were > > working on the Jones case.
> > "Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were > > employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry."
> > Rachel Bentley, defending, said Jones, who is studying for an MA, now > > felt remorse.
> > Jones's parents - both teachers from Newport in Shropshire - reached > > the court soon after she was sentenced to two months in prison.
> > A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was only > > reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged *he* > > was raped - while the inquiry went on.
> > The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women.
> I'm impressed that she was jailed. "Wasting police time" is wishy- > washy, though; isn't there such an offense as 'public mischief'?
> "Centre of attention" or quasi-political statement?
> Andras
I think it is high time that when anyone makes a false report of someone committing a felony that too should be considerd a felony. It needs much more then a slap on the hand and a no no. These things have ruined men's lives, bankrupted some and I am sure have driven some to suicide. It happens all to often in pending divorce cases too.
> ----With the cooperation of the police agency of a small metropolitan
community, 45 consecutive, disposed, false rape allegations covering a 9 year period were studied. These false rape allegations constitute 41% the total forcible rape cases
> "Truth does not penetrate the preoccupied mind" - Ch. Darwin > Regarding this study, 41% (n= 45) of the total disposed rape cases
(n= 109) were officially declared false during this 9-year period, that is, by the complainant's admission that no rape had occurred and the charge, therefore, was false. The incidence figure was variable from year to year and ranged from a low of 27% (3 out of Il cases) to a high of 70% (7 out of 10 cases). The 9-year period suggests no trends, and no explanation has been made for the year-to-year fluctuation.
One of the most haunting and serious implications of false rape allegations concerns the possibility of miscarried justice. We know that false convictions occur, but this study only tells us that these false accusers were weeded out during the very early stages of investigation. However encouraging this result may be, we cannot claim that false charging does not incur suffering for the accused. Merely to be a rape suspect, even for a day or two, translates into psychological and social trauma.
[Other studies on college campuses have come up with a figure of about 50% for false rape reports]
Quite unexpectedly then, we find that these university women, when filing a rape complaint, were as likely to file a false as a valid charge. Other reports from university police agencies support these findings (Jay, 1991). In both police agencies, the taking of the complaint and the follow-up investigation was the exclusive responsibility of a ranking female officer. Neither agency employed the polygraph and neither declared the complaint false without a recantation of the charge.
NOTE: 50% of reported rapes were FALSE! Yet very little if anything is done to these women who RUIN men by doing this. The very mimumum should be a year in jail for this. Much more if the man actually went to trail. Since it is very expensive to defend against this, I wonder how many men plea bargin for a year in jail as opposed to 10 even though they are innocent? (see Innocent MEN in Prison thread)
-- ALL WE ARE ASKING IS FOR FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT FOR ALL WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS THE FEMINST MOVEMENT WOULD NOT EXIST!
> On 30 Oct 1999 09:19:39 -0000 Ian Newman <door...@nym.alias.net> > wrote:
> >From the Mirror, 30 October 1999:
> > A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of attention" > > burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the story > > up.
> > A big part of a campus was sealed off after Rowena Jones reported > > being attacked, bound, raped and left on a muddy slope beside a pond.
> > She gave police a 27-page statement detailing the "assault".
> > In fact Jones had pulled down her own trousers and tied herself up > > with sticky tape from the art department.
> > The 21-year-old pleaded guilty at Exeter magistrates' court to > > wasting police time.
> > Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at > > the city's university.
> > Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape > > and a baby-killing.
> > David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were > > working on the Jones case.
> > "Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were > > employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry."
> > Rachel Bentley, defending, said Jones, who is studying for an MA, now > > felt remorse.
> > Jones's parents - both teachers from Newport in Shropshire - reached > > the court soon after she was sentenced to two months in prison.
> >A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was only > >reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged *he* > >was raped - while the inquiry went on.
> >The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women.
> I'll bet the National Organization of Women is pissed. Their > resolution is to fight any legislation which punishes women for filing > false police reports.
> The man that was accused should have a civil remedy too. Hit her in the pocket book.
-- Like the Brave said when asked, "Why is your Squaw walking?" "She got no horse" the Brave responded.
That's false as in by the FBI standard. What that translates into is that 50% of the time it was either proven impossible for it to have occured, (a very rare occurance), or that the woman later confessed to have been lying. Certainly, there are more false accusations then just ones when the woman admits it later and thus truth is MORE then 50% of the allegations are false.
>> I'm impressed that she was jailed. "Wasting police time" is wishy- >> washy, though; isn't there such an offense as 'public mischief'?
How about severe degradation of character? Why isn't she being charged with that?
| | | >> A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was only | >> reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged *he* | >> was raped - while the inquiry went on. | >> | >> The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women. | > | >I'm impressed that she was jailed. "Wasting police time" is wishy- | >washy, though; isn't there such an offense as 'public mischief'? | | I don't think so. Wasting police time is fairly serious but she would | have got longer if she'd been charged with wasting police money. | | >"Centre of attention" or quasi-political statement? | | I was wondering about that. It gives feminists a lot more street cred if | they've been raped and/or abused, preferably in this lifetime. Still, | she'll be a living martyr when she gets out in about three weeks. | | The Women Against Rape viragoes have already been phoning radio talk shows | to claim she has been persecuted. (She pleaded guilty but they're ignoring | that.)
Yes I also saw a feminist interviewed on the TV news last night - she said that because she hadn't actually accused SOMEONE the judgement against her was too harsh!!! At a time when Police resources are stretched to the limit as it is - this idiotic feminist apparently did not think there was much wrong causing the following:- . Quoting the original article:
Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at the city's university.
Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape and a baby-killing.
David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were working on the Jones case.
"Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry."
| > | > >From the Mirror, 30 October 1999: | > > | > > A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of attention" | > > burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the story | > > up. | > > | > > A big part of a campus was sealed off after Rowena Jones reported | > > being attacked, bound, raped and left on a muddy slope beside a pond. | > > | > > She gave police a 27-page statement detailing the "assault". | > > | > > In fact Jones had pulled down her own trousers and tied herself up | > > with sticky tape from the art department. | > > | > > The 21-year-old pleaded guilty at Exeter magistrates' court to | > > wasting police time. | > > | > > Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at | > > the city's university. | > > | > > Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape | > > and a baby-killing. | > > | > > David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were | > > working on the Jones case. | > > | > > "Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were | > > employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry." | > > | > > Rachel Bentley, defending, said Jones, who is studying for an MA, now | > > felt remorse. | > > | > > Jones's parents - both teachers from Newport in Shropshire - reached | > > the court soon after she was sentenced to two months in prison. | > > | > > | > >A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was only | > >reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged *he* | > >was raped - while the inquiry went on. | > > | > >The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women. | > > | > > | > | > I'll bet the National Organization of Women is pissed. Their | > resolution is to fight any legislation which punishes women for filing | > false police reports. | > | > | > The man that was accused should have a civil remedy too. Hit her in the pocket | book.
In this case she merely said that she was "raped by a stranger" no man was ever accused in THIS case, however her action WASTED a LOT of valuable time and resources when those involved could have been working on some very REAL cases.
Phil
| > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | | -- | Like the Brave said when asked, "Why is your Squaw walking?" | "She got no horse" the Brave responded.
In article <7vflq0$pu...@lure.pipex.net>, phillewisnos...@dial.pipex.com broadcasted a bitstream which decodes to... [...]
> Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at > the city's university.
They were looking for a violent sexual predator. There are such devices out there, and it is the duty of the coppers to try to bust him before more of the population (especially college girls) gets attacked. Sure they put effort into it; that's why she deserves to cool her jets for a while. Such a stunt is not cute; the fable of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" neatly sums up the moral of the story.
Andras ---- "Truth does not penetrate the preoccupied mind" - Ch. Darwin
> That's false as in by the FBI standard. What that translates into is that 50% > of the time it was either proven impossible for it to have occured, (a very > rare occurance), or that the woman later confessed to have been lying. > Certainly, there are more false accusations then just ones when the woman > admits it later and thus truth is MORE then 50% of the allegations are false.
> >> I'm impressed that she was jailed. "Wasting police time" is wishy- > >> washy, though; isn't there such an offense as 'public mischief'?
> How about severe degradation of character? Why isn't she being charged with > that?
> Hombre - Work did not set us free.
Good poin Hombre and I think if a woman falsely accuses a certain man (by name ect) she should be charged with rape herself since she psychologically raped him. The charge agaisnt her should be as serious as the charge agaist him! Maybe then and only then, the number of them would drop.
-- ALL WE ARE ASKING IS FOR FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT FOR ALL WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS THE FEMINST MOVEMENT WOULD NOT EXIST!
> >On 30 Oct 1999 09:19:39 -0000 Ian Newman <door...@nym.alias.net>=20 > >wrote:
> >>From the Mirror, 30 October 1999:
> >> A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of = > attention"=20 > >> burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the = > story=20 > >> up.=20
> A sentence of 20 years would be more appropriate. False rape > accusations are probably far too frequent to be dealt with in such a > slight manner.
> -----------------
Repost from another string with this title but it needs to be repeated:
I think it is high time that when anyone makes a false report of someone committing a felony that too should be considerd a felony. It needs much more then a slap on the hand and a no no. These things have ruined men's lives, bankrupted some and I am sure have driven some to suicide. It happens all to often in pending divorce cases too.
> ----With the cooperation of the police agency of a small metropolitan
community, 45 consecutive, disposed, false rape allegations covering a 9 year period were studied. These false rape allegations constitute 41% the total forcible rape cases
> "Truth does not penetrate the preoccupied mind" - Ch. Darwin > Regarding this study, 41% (n= 45) of the total disposed rape cases
(n= 109) were officially declared false during this 9-year period, that is, by the complainant's admission that no rape had occurred and the charge, therefore, was false. The incidence figure was variable from year to year and ranged from a low of 27% (3 out of Il cases) to a high of 70% (7 out of 10 cases). The 9-year period suggests no trends, and no explanation has been made for the year-to-year fluctuation.
One of the most haunting and serious implications of false rape allegations concerns the possibility of miscarried justice. We know that false convictions occur, but this study only tells us that these false accusers were weeded out during the very early stages of investigation. However encouraging this result may be, we cannot claim that false charging does not incur suffering for the accused. Merely to be a rape suspect, even for a day or two, translates into psychological and social trauma.
[Other studies on college campuses have come up with a figure of about 50% for false rape reports]
> "He who, who he"
-- ALL WE ARE ASKING IS FOR FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT FOR ALL WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS THE FEMINST MOVEMENT WOULD NOT EXIST!
> Ian Newman <door...@nym.alias.net> wrote in message > news:19991030155605.3347.qmail@nym.alias.net... > | ANDRAS wrote: > | > | > | >> A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was > only > | >> reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged > *he* > | >> was raped - while the inquiry went on. > | >> > | >> The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women. > | > > | >I'm impressed that she was jailed. "Wasting police time" is wishy- > | >washy, though; isn't there such an offense as 'public mischief'? > | > | I don't think so. Wasting police time is fairly serious but she would > | have got longer if she'd been charged with wasting police money. > | > | >"Centre of attention" or quasi-political statement? > | > | I was wondering about that. It gives feminists a lot more street cred if > | they've been raped and/or abused, preferably in this lifetime. Still, > | she'll be a living martyr when she gets out in about three weeks. > | > | The Women Against Rape viragoes have already been phoning radio talk shows > | to claim she has been persecuted. (She pleaded guilty but they're ignoring > | that.)
> Yes I also saw a feminist interviewed on the TV news last night - she said > that because she hadn't actually accused SOMEONE the judgement against her > was too harsh!!! At a time when Police resources are stretched to the limit > as it is - this idiotic feminist apparently did not think there was much > wrong causing the following:- > . > Quoting the original article:
> Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at > the city's university.
> Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape > and a baby-killing.
> David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were > working on the Jones case.
> "Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were > employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry."
> Phil
Repost from another string with this title but it needs to be repeated:
I think it is high time that when anyone makes a false report of someone committing a felony that too should be considerd a felony. It needs much more then a slap on the hand and a no no. These things have ruined men's lives, bankrupted some and I am sure have driven some to suicide. It happens all to often in pending divorce cases too.
> ----With the cooperation of the police agency of a small metropolitan
community, 45 consecutive, disposed, false rape allegations covering a 9 year period were studied. These false rape allegations constitute 41% the total forcible rape cases
> "Truth does not penetrate the preoccupied mind" - Ch. Darwin > Regarding this study, 41% (n= 45) of the total disposed rape cases
(n= 109) were officially declared false during this 9-year period, that is, by the complainant's admission that no rape had occurred and the charge, therefore, was false. The incidence figure was variable from year to year and ranged from a low of 27% (3 out of Il cases) to a high of 70% (7 out of 10 cases). The 9-year period suggests no trends, and no explanation has been made for the year-to-year fluctuation.
One of the most haunting and serious implications of false rape allegations concerns the possibility of miscarried justice. We know that false convictions occur, but this study only tells us that these false accusers were weeded out during the very early stages of investigation. However encouraging this result may be, we cannot claim that false charging does not incur suffering for the accused. Merely to be a rape suspect, even for a day or two, translates into psychological and social trauma.
[Other studies on college campuses have come up with a figure of about 50% for false rape reports]
-- ALL WE ARE ASKING IS FOR FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT FOR ALL WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS THE FEMINST MOVEMENT WOULD NOT EXIST!
On 30 Oct 1999 15:32:46 -0000, squir...@echelon.alias.net (Kane) wrote:
>I'll bet the National Organization of Women is pissed. Their >resolution is to fight any legislation which punishes women for filing >false police reports.
Strange, you'd think anyone interested in securing justice, especially through the often murky details of rape, would want to stamp down hard on obviously fabricated accounts.
MSH
The truth is rarely pure, and never simple. Oscar Wilde.
Kane wrote in message <527d1d9ec3a26b42d240678f34dd7...@anonymous.poster>... >On 30 Oct 1999 09:19:39 -0000 Ian Newman <door...@nym.alias.net> >wrote:
>>From the Mirror, 30 October 1999:
>> A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of attention" >> burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the story >> up.
>> A big part of a campus was sealed off after Rowena Jones reported >> being attacked, bound, raped and left on a muddy slope beside a pond.
>> She gave police a 27-page statement detailing the "assault".
>> In fact Jones had pulled down her own trousers and tied herself up >> with sticky tape from the art department.
>> The 21-year-old pleaded guilty at Exeter magistrates' court to >> wasting police time.
>> Nine hundred police hours were spent on investigating her "ordeal" at >> the city's university.
>> Staff were taken off other inquiries including murder, a real rape >> and a baby-killing.
>> David Bowen, prosecuting, said that at one stage 60 officers were >> working on the Jones case.
>> "Scientists, intelligence support and forensic experts were >> employed," he added. "This was a major inquiry."
>> Rachel Bentley, defending, said Jones, who is studying for an MA, now >> felt remorse.
>> Jones's parents - both teachers from Newport in Shropshire - reached >> the court soon after she was sentenced to two months in prison.
>>A couple of years ago there was a similar case and the "victim" was only >>reprimanded. A young man had spent time in custody - where he alleged *he* >>was raped - while the inquiry went on.
>>The courts are beginning to be less sypathetic towards women.
>I'll bet the National Organization of Women is pissed. Their >resolution is to fight any legislation which punishes women for filing >false police reports.
> >Jesus, women like that make it even more of a nightmare for real rape > >victims. Stupid bitch.
> >-- > >Sonia.
> No concern for men who might be falsely accused, just concern for females.
Over the years several feminists (like Avedon) have claimed that this is not the only thing that feminists see wrong with false rape accusations, but I have never seen a single feminist come up with anything different. A rare few after much debate have admitted that there may be another problem, but it is absolutely never something that either occurs to them or is even obvious to them when it is pointed out.
That an innocent man may spend ten years in prison is not a feminist problem and never will be.
> Typical feminist blinkered thinking.
No, it's typical sexist thinking, sexist to the core.
In article <SugaOAiuDIWtMIExVVJng3WbP...@4ax.com>, p...@india.com wrote:
> >On 30 Oct 1999 09:19:39 -0000 Ian Newman <door...@nym.alias.net>=20 > >wrote:
> >>From the Mirror, 30 October 1999:
> >> A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of > >> attention" burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the > >> story up. > A sentence of 20 years would be more appropriate. False rape > accusations are probably far too frequent to be dealt with in such a > slight manner.
This was almost 20 years ago, but a woman recanted a rape claim she made (to cover up a consensual sex act from her parents while she was a teenager). As a result of her original claim, a man was arrested, convicted and spent several years in jail (she claims she felt trapped into testifying against him as he so closely matched her description of her assailant).
A conversion to a more religious lifestyle prompted her to come clean and the man was freed.
She never spent any time in jail and I doubt she compensated the man in any meaningful way.
Jeff
=================================================================== NOTE: Remove underscores from my e-mail address to reply personally.
> In article <SugaOAiuDIWtMIExVVJng3WbP...@4ax.com>, p...@india.com wrote:
> > >On 30 Oct 1999 09:19:39 -0000 Ian Newman <door...@nym.alias.net>=20 > > >wrote:
> > >>From the Mirror, 30 October 1999:
> > >> A UNIVERSITY student who cried rape "to be the centre of > > >> attention" burst into tears yesterday when she was jailed for making the > > >> story up.
> > A sentence of 20 years would be more appropriate. False rape > > accusations are probably far too frequent to be dealt with in such a > > slight manner.
> This was almost 20 years ago, but a woman recanted a rape claim she made > (to cover up a consensual sex act from her parents while she was a > teenager). As a result of her original claim, a man was arrested, > convicted and spent several years in jail (she claims she felt trapped > into testifying against him as he so closely matched her description of > her assailant).
> A conversion to a more religious lifestyle prompted her to come clean and > the man was freed.
> She never spent any time in jail and I doubt she compensated the man in > any meaningful way.
> Jeff
> =================================================================== > NOTE: Remove underscores from my e-mail address to reply personally.
I am sure if I were the man who did the time I could think of a way to punish her. -- Like the Brave said when asked, "Why is your Squaw walking?" "She got no horse" the Brave responded.
In article <7vganv$hp...@newsource.ihug.co.nz>, "S" <nikhil@***ihug.co.nz> wrote:
> Jesus, women like that make it even more of a nightmare for real rape > victims. Stupid bitch.
> -- > Sonia.
Absolutely, hardly helpful is it? Vey rare event though, out of hundreds and hundreds of studies it has never been a particularly prominent feature.
Men do of course get accused of crimes that are not always entirely their fault. It is neither simple or clear cut.
Consenuality can be legitimately mistaken or confused. However most sex crime against females are not reported because the females can't see any point. It is an uphill jouney for them.
>> A sentence of 20 years would be more appropriate. False rape >> accusations are probably far too frequent to be dealt with in such a >> slight manner.
> This was almost 20 years ago, but a woman recanted a rape claim she made >(to cover up a consensual sex act from her parents while she was a >teenager). As a result of her original claim, a man was arrested, >convicted and spent several years in jail (she claims she felt trapped >into testifying against him as he so closely matched her description of >her assailant).
> A conversion to a more religious lifestyle prompted her to come clean and >the man was freed.
> She never spent any time in jail and I doubt she compensated the man in >any meaningful way.
>Jeff
If God were fair...she would pay in HELL. More realistically, she really should have spent time in the big house. It is even more frightening to think howe many people are sent to jail for rape without any actual "evidence". Kind of makes you wonder how many of these innocent guys are sitting in jail
On Sat, 06 Nov 1999 16:41:52 GMT, sic transit gloria mundi
<cadaz...@my-deja.com> wrote: >In article <7vganv$hp...@newsource.ihug.co.nz>, > "S" <nikhil@***ihug.co.nz> wrote: >> Jesus, women like that make it even more of a nightmare for real rape >> victims. Stupid bitch. >Absolutely, hardly helpful is it? Vey rare event though, out of >hundreds and hundreds of studies it has never been a particularly >prominent feature.
Actually, it is unknown how "rare" it is. Studies can't really help much here since the problem derives from problems inherent in our legal system.
>Men do of course get accused of crimes that are not always entirely >their fault. It is neither simple or clear cut.
>Consenuality can be legitimately mistaken or confused. However most sex >crime against females are not reported because the females can't see >any point. It is an uphill jouney for them.
Again....we can only speculate that "most" or even "any" sex crimes go unreported. IMHO I would say "some" go unreported..but I can't even prove that ANY go unreported (by definition).
In article <a18kONwZsxUcLfzrUN5WlvvyG...@4ax.com>, p...@india.com says...
> On Sat, 06 Nov 1999 16:41:52 GMT, sic transit gloria mundi > <cadaz...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >In article <7vganv$hp...@newsource.ihug.co.nz>, > > "S" <nikhil@***ihug.co.nz> wrote: > >> Jesus, women like that make it even more of a nightmare for real rape > >> victims. Stupid bitch.
> >Absolutely, hardly helpful is it? Vey rare event though, out of > >hundreds and hundreds of studies it has never been a particularly > >prominent feature.
FBI stats show that 1 out of 4 rape claims are false. That is 25%. Time to hang some lying bitches.
> Actually, it is unknown how "rare" it is. Studies can't really help > much here since the problem derives from problems inherent in our > legal system.
> >Men do of course get accused of crimes that are not always entirely > >their fault. It is neither simple or clear cut.
> >Consenuality can be legitimately mistaken or confused. However most sex > >crime against females are not reported because the females can't see > >any point. It is an uphill jouney for them.
> Again....we can only speculate that "most" or even "any" sex crimes go > unreported. IMHO I would say "some" go unreported..but I can't even > prove that ANY go unreported (by definition).
> -----------------
> "He who, who he"
-- Like the Brave said when asked, "Why is your Squaw walking?" "She got no horse" the Brave responded.
