Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fulfillment Elusive for Girls with Junk Degrees

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Society

unread,
Nov 5, 2007, 3:12:56 AM11/5/07
to

Here's another documented example of the young
and dumb with junk degrees and ambitions
of being a "professional world-saver." Surprise,
surprise, all of the people profiled in this
article are (drum roll) girls!

See:
"Fulfillment Elusive for Young Altruists in the
Crowded Field of Public Interest"
by Ian Shapira, _Washington Post_ staff writer
Friday, November 2, 2007; Page A01
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/01/AR2007110102675.html>

Guess what, a lot of people would like a job
jetting around the world and bossing around heads
of state. IME, international relations is a girl-heavy
college major like psychology, history, english,
communication arts (the fancy name for I wanna
be on TV), and all those fill-in-the-idiocy "studies"
fraudulences.

IMO, all government assistance to colleges and
universities for anyone to take any class that isn't
science, technology, engineering, or math (known
increasingly by the acronym STEM) should be
cut off. People who want degrees in dilletante
subjects for debutantes should pay for 'em themselves.

--
Men will respect women -- as equals,
as peers -- when women act like equals
and peers. That means no attitudes
of entitlement and expectations of
special treatment. Some great women
already understand how to be peers
and have a capitalistic attitude:
no benefits without paying the price.
Others, unfortunately, are socialistic
in demeanor: what free benefits do I get
for just showing up?

Marc H. Rudov as the "NoNonsense Advisor"
replying to "Vanquished in Vancouver"
<http://themansnononsenseguidetowomen.com/page6.html>

PolishKnight

unread,
Nov 10, 2007, 10:29:07 PM11/10/07
to
In article <13itk46...@corp.supernews.com>,
"Society" <Soc...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:


She could try getting married. She's only 29!

regards,
PolishKnight

Andre Lieven

unread,
Nov 11, 2007, 10:59:35 AM11/11/07
to
On Nov 5, 3:12 am, "Society" <Soci...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
> Here's another documented example of the young
> and dumb with junk degrees and ambitions
> of being a "professional world-saver." Surprise,
> surprise, all of the people profiled in this
> article are (drum roll) girls!
>
> See:
> "Fulfillment Elusive for Young Altruists in the
> Crowded Field of Public Interest"
> by Ian Shapira, _Washington Post_ staff writer
> Friday, November 2, 2007; Page A01
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/01/AR200...>

Did you notice that " They say the high competition for comparatively
low-paying jobs... "

Gee ! I guess that *they're " discriminating " against *themselves*.
No wonder Dr. Warren Farrell was able to write " Why MEN Earn
More ".

I seem to recall, that when Public Service was seen as a Good
Thing, that the *men* who went into it, still managed to marry,
have families, and never whined that they didn't make CEO bags
of cash. They just... did their work, and were happy with what
*they chose*. ( Lester Pearson, a past Cdn PM, is a good case
in point: He also did three years service in the military during WW
1. As I type this, its about time for the moment of silence at the
Canadian War Memorial... )

> Guess what, a lot of people would like a job
> jetting around the world and bossing around heads
> of state. IME, international relations is a girl-heavy
> college major like psychology, history, english,
> communication arts (the fancy name for I wanna
> be on TV), and all those fill-in-the-idiocy "studies"
> fraudulences.

Don't forget " life coaches "...

> IMO, all government assistance to colleges and
> universities for anyone to take any class that isn't
> science, technology, engineering, or math (known
> increasingly by the acronym STEM) should be
> cut off. People who want degrees in dilletante
> subjects for debutantes should pay for 'em themselves.

Well, I dare say that: " At GWU's Elliott School of International
Affairs, where tuition exceeds $40,000 a year ", about covers it.

> Men will respect women -- as equals,
> as peers -- when women act like equals
> and peers. That means no attitudes
> of entitlement and expectations of
> special treatment. Some great women
> already understand how to be peers
> and have a capitalistic attitude:
> no benefits without paying the price.
> Others, unfortunately, are socialistic
> in demeanor: what free benefits do I get
> for just showing up?
>
> Marc H. Rudov as the "NoNonsense Advisor"
> replying to "Vanquished in Vancouver"
> <http://themansnononsenseguidetowomen.com/page6.html>

Bingo.

Andre

0 new messages