when is a husband not a husband?
the messenjah
ggamble
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
when is a husband not a husband?
When his wife is named Janet Santana and she's a blow up sex doll?
Bertie the Bunyip
When he's tossed out of the house for being a pervert?
Like you were?
Bertie
Chance Hopkins
"the messenjah" <theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote in message
news:1111642234....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
>
A friend of mine said recently:
"In my 50 years of life, I have NEVER heard anyone say they wanted to be
kept alive artificially as a vegetable."
Can anyone here truthfully say they would like to be kept alive as a
vegetable, on life support?
ggamble
chuckles is still alive.
I think.
Peter J Ross
It seems that Google may have switched his life support machine back
on after an appeal.
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]
Society
"Chance Hopkins" <chance_...@hotmail.com> barked in message
news:HTs0e.84$CR5....@monger.newsread.com...
>
> "the messenjah" reported...
>> http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
Excerpt:
Michael Schiavo, who was Terri Schiavo's
husband when she suffered a heart attack
and severe brain damage 15 years ago,
today lives with another woman with whom
he has had two children. Except that he has
never sought a divorce from Terri - and
therefore by law has final say over her life -
he is by no normal definition her "husband."
Kathleen Parker, "To help live or let die"
©2005 Tribune Media Services, March 23, 2005
> A friend of mine said recently:
>
> "In my 50 years of life, I have NEVER heard
> anyone say they wanted to be kept alive
> artificially as a vegetable."
Cute, Chance Hopkins, but irrelevant.
Bet'cha you've never heard anyone say
they'd like a broken arm, either, but that
doesn't tell me that if you break your
arm you'd like to be put down like the
dog you aspire to be.
Also, Terri Schiavo is not a "vegetable"
nor is she being kept alive "artificially"
any more than you are when you're
fed with a bottle.
> Can anyone here truthfully say they would
> like to be kept alive as a vegetable,
> on life support?
Your red herring was disposed of earlier
in this post, Chance Hopkins. Sheesh.
By the way, Terri Schiavo has been in a
minimally conscious state for 15 years and
only NOW her man pulls this "she wouldn't
want to live like this" claim outta his *ss.
His behavior belies his claim. He's acting
just like the woman now on Court TV who
offed her man and NOW claims that he was
abusing her -- he's not able to tell HIS SIDE
of the story, very convenient for her. Hmmm.
--
Who we are and who we become depends,
in part, on whom we love.
Fari Amini, Richard Lannon, and Thomas Lewis
_A General Theory Of Love_
New York: Random House (2000)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0375503897/menwebA
>
>
the messenjah
That's not what this story is about. But thanks for your comments.
Mark Sobolewski
"Society" <Soc...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
Hello Society,
It's always a pleasure to disagree with you.
A broken arm isn't the same a loss of
conciousness.
> Also, Terri Schiavo is not a "vegetable"
> nor is she being kept alive "artificially"
> any more than you are when you're
> fed with a bottle.
I hate to make a cute quip at a time like this
(the whole situation is very tragic) but
feminists regard a fetus as not even human
because the woman's womb feeds it.
> > Can anyone here truthfully say they would
> > like to be kept alive as a vegetable,
> > on life support?
>
> Your red herring was disposed of earlier
> in this post, Chance Hopkins. Sheesh.
Her state isn't much beyond that.
> By the way, Terri Schiavo has been in a
> minimally conscious state for 15 years and
> only NOW her man pulls this "she wouldn't
> want to live like this" claim outta his *ss.
> His behavior belies his claim. He's acting
> just like the woman now on Court TV who
> offed her man and NOW claims that he was
> abusing her -- he's not able to tell HIS SIDE
> of the story, very convenient for her. Hmmm.
I think he's been in a court fight for years over
this and only now has it wound it's way through
the legal system.
regards,
Mark Sobolewski
Daedalus
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz>, wrote:
I think he was commenting on you and how you were proof that living as
a vegetable is a horrible existence.
Jade
Daedalus
<gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org>, wrote:
>On Thursday 24 March 2005, ggamble wrote in rec.arts.poems:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:12:55 GMT, "Chance Hopkins"
>> <chance_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"the messenjah" <theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote in message
>>>news:1111642234....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>> http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
>>>
>>>A friend of mine said recently:
>>>
>>>"In my 50 years of life, I have NEVER heard anyone say they wanted to be
>>>kept alive artificially as a vegetable."
>>>
>>>Can anyone here truthfully say they would like to be kept alive as a
>>>vegetable, on life support?
>>
>> chuckles is still alive.
>> I think.
>
>It seems that Google may have switched his life support machine back
>on after an appeal.
>
>PJR :-)
I bet he begged and whined for days about starving from attention
deficit.
Jade
the messenjah
The story is not about me. You people still can't offer any intelligent
comments. Not surprising...
>
> Jade
Aratzio
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz> transparently proposed:
What were these:
:But here are some FACTS not opinion:
:
:1. Terri Schiavo case is a private family matter.
:2. Politicians and the right to life are using it as a stalking horse
:to garner votes and publicity.
:3. There are NO new ethical or legal boundaries being drawn here.
:4. Congress is (specifically Frist) impotent in this case (something
:you are more than familiar with).
:5. The courts have ruled and Terri's wishes were recognized.
:6. Bill Frist will be running for president in 2008.
:7. Where were the RTL and Congress in the previous cases?
Point 1 you agreed and then refuted yourself.
Point 2 you disagreed and were slapped for being stupid.
Point 3 you avoided due to ignorance of the issues.
Point 4 you whined about YOU and avoided the point due to ignorance.
Point 5 you ignored due to ignorance of the issues.
Point 6 you said was untrue and got spanked by facts.
Point 7 you avoided due to ignorance of the issues.
Here try this on for size:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/15/lifesupport.baby.ap/
Where were you, Congress and the religious hypocrites while that was
going on?
No international debate here:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/jul/04071404.html
Still waiting on some media blitz here:
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=6992
Oh wait it was a man, not a photogenic woman...
Now backpedal your way out of this one or just toss a one liner and
run, again.
So when you can actually discuss the facts of the case and not the
rhetoric of the case do please try.
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
Daedalus
wrote:
Oh he's not interested in those. Those are intelligent comments.
Now if you want to talk Kevin Cannon and TSB bearings he's ALL about
that!
They spanked him off usenet, you know.
Jade
Chance Hopkins
Ok, how about this. Kathleen Parker seems to want to call the husband an
adulterer because he hasn't been jerking off for 15 years, and therefore he
has no place in making a decision. The court transcripts show that more than
the husband had heard Terri say she didn't want to live as a vegetable. He
is just a witness, like the others.
>>
>> Jade
>
Society
"Mark Sobolewski" <mark_so...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mark_sobolewski-EB...@news.central.cox.net...
>
> Society wrote:
>>
>> Chance Hopkins barked...
>> >
>> > "the messenjah" reported...
>> >> http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
>>
>> Excerpt:
>>
>> Michael Schiavo, who was Terri Schiavo's
>> husband when she suffered a heart attack
>> and severe brain damage 15 years ago,
>> today lives with another woman with whom
>> he has had two children. Except that he has
>> never sought a divorce from Terri - and
>> therefore by law has final say over her life -
>> he is by no normal definition her "husband."
>>
>> Kathleen Parker, "To help live or let die"
>> ©2005 Tribune Media Services, March 23, 2005
>>
>>
>> > A friend of mine said recently:
>> >
>> > "In my 50 years of life, I have NEVER heard
>> > anyone say they wanted to be kept alive
>> > artificially as a vegetable."
>>
>> Cute, Chance Hopkins, but irrelevant.
>> Bet'cha you've never heard anyone say
>> they'd like a broken arm, either, but that
>> doesn't tell me that if you break your
>> arm you'd like to be put down like the
>> dog you aspire to be.
>
>
> A broken arm isn't the same a loss of
> conciousness.
Well, we don't disagree on that, Mark.
It wasn't the "loss of consciousness" that was
the key element of Chance Hopkins' attempted
wisecrack but that in 50 years Chance has
"NEVER heard anyone say" blah blah blah.
There aren't a lot of 50-year olds who we'll
hear saying how much they look forward to
being 70 years old, but I'm confident that
most people upon considering all the angles
will conclude that it DOES beat the alternative!
>> Also, Terri Schiavo is not a "vegetable"
>> nor is she being kept alive "artificially"
>> any more than you are when you're
>> fed with a bottle.
>
> I hate to make a cute quip at a time like this
> (the whole situation is very tragic) but
> feminists regard a fetus as not even human
> because the woman's womb feeds it.
Well, Mark, there's no limit to a feminist's
stupidity -- nor is there a limit to her control
freak fetish, either. (Sigh.)
Next, I suppose the feminist camp will
move to declare a 'post-partum fetus' "not
even human" if the woman breast feeds, eh?
Sheesh.
>> > Can anyone here truthfully say they would
>> > like to be kept alive as a vegetable,
>> > on life support?
>>
>> Your red herring was disposed of earlier
>> in this post, Chance Hopkins. Sheesh.
>
> Her state isn't much beyond that.
Well, there's some credible dispute about that.
See this document -- especially the list of criteria
for distinguishing between a permanent vegetative
state (PVS) and a minimally conscious state (MCS)
that begins on page 3:
http://www.nationalreview.com/pdf/Affidavit.pdf
This is a tough case and if the man still seen in law
as married to Terri Schiavo weren't, um, compromised,
by his ongoing disregard of his marriage obligations
I might well not give much weight to the sincere
belief of her blood relatives that she is still conscious
in her crippled brain and body.
I've been giving this case much thought for some
time. I contemplate the possibility that Terri
Schiavo's parents are correct, that she's damaged
but not at all dead in her cerebral cortex and
I try to imagine what sort of consciousness is
possible to someone with such diminished
capacities. I shudder when I think on it. But
I do wonder if such an existence entails that
the person in that state is suffering. And I conclude
"Not necessarily." The diminished but not snuffed
out consciousness may be such that it is not aware
of what has been lost and that consciousness may
be continuing on with no need at all to mourn
what has been lost. The historical case of Phineas
Gage, the man whose frontal lobe was damaged
in a railroad construction accident illustrates to
some degree the point I wish to make. Mr. Gage
didn't have the same personality after his injury
but he still had personhood.
To put it crudely, how many IQ points would a
human being have to lose before life is unlivable?
(Yeah, Parg may be a case in nature that illustrates
just such a situation. And with her cerebral cortex
reduced to the capacity of a sterile worker bee's
mental states, upon examination I conclude that
Parg's life is not worth living. ;-)
>> By the way, Terri Schiavo has been in a
>> minimally conscious state for 15 years and
>> only NOW her man pulls this "she wouldn't
>> want to live like this" claim outta his *ss.
>> His behavior belies his claim. He's acting
>> just like the woman now on Court TV who
>> offed her man and NOW claims that he was
>> abusing her -- he's not able to tell HIS SIDE
>> of the story, very convenient for her. Hmmm.
>
> I think he's been in a court fight for years over
> this and only now has it wound its way through
> the legal system.
For only the last few years, not the entire15.
--
Unlike others, my religion
isn’t a soundbite religion.
So a single verse
isn’t the whole definition...
"John" in a comment to the post
"I know Miracles happen..." in the blog
_Musings of an Expagan_
http://www.expagan.info/blog/?p=4
Gene
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
when the writer is a biased female??
Mark Sobolewski
"Society" <Soc...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
What makes this case so tragic and difficult is the gray
line and ambiguity of the situation. If the husband
was truly compromised, wouldn't he have taken the
million offered to him and taken a walk?
My wife, FYI, agrees with you. She says that if the parents
want to care for her, then what's the problem? Let
her go and make everyone happy.
Actually, I have a sick joke/question for you:
Let's say your mind was so deteriorated that you
became a male feminist sympathizor and marxist
and felt sad that women weren't getting better
treatment even as they were treating you like crap.
Would you want to be put out of your misery?
Here's another sick joke for the occasion:
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/02/Apr/jones.html
> I've been giving this case much thought for some
> time. I contemplate the possibility that Terri
> Schiavo's parents are correct, that she's damaged
> but not at all dead in her cerebral cortex and
> I try to imagine what sort of consciousness is
> possible to someone with such diminished
> capacities. I shudder when I think on it. But
> I do wonder if such an existence entails that
> the person in that state is suffering. And I conclude
> "Not necessarily." The diminished but not snuffed
> out consciousness may be such that it is not aware
> of what has been lost and that consciousness may
> be continuing on with no need at all to mourn
> what has been lost. The historical case of Phineas
> Gage, the man whose frontal lobe was damaged
> in a railroad construction accident illustrates to
> some degree the point I wish to make. Mr. Gage
> didn't have the same personality after his injury
> but he still had personhood.
I saw an interview with the husband and he's quite
intelligent in discussing the issue. Did you
see him question whether the state should determine
whose decision it is about quality of life?
Is not suffering sufficient to keep someone alive forever
even at the objection of their guardian?
My father was clear: He wanted the plug pulled.
Not only that, but he wanted it pulled for his
family's sake as well as his own. He wanted to move
on. If there was some federal judge empowered to make
the choice otherwise, he might have lingered for months
and caused a lot of pain for everyone.
> To put it crudely, how many IQ points would a
> human being have to lose before life is unlivable?
> (Yeah, Parg may be a case in nature that illustrates
> just such a situation. And with her cerebral cortex
> reduced to the capacity of a sterile worker bee's
> mental states, upon examination I conclude that
> Parg's life is not worth living. ;-)
Ok, I'll be selfish and talk about the pink elephant:
What about livable for others? Is simply lingering
in a minimal dreamlike state, at best, justification
for blowing millions of dollars that could help
other people live better lives?
> >> By the way, Terri Schiavo has been in a
> >> minimally conscious state for 15 years and
> >> only NOW her man pulls this "she wouldn't
> >> want to live like this" claim outta his *ss.
> >> His behavior belies his claim. He's acting
> >> just like the woman now on Court TV who
> >> offed her man and NOW claims that he was
> >> abusing her -- he's not able to tell HIS SIDE
> >> of the story, very convenient for her. Hmmm.
> >
> > I think he's been in a court fight for years over
> > this and only now has it wound its way through
> > the legal system.
>
> For only the last few years, not the entire15.
Which, in all fairness, means he wasn't so quick to
give up on her recovery. Which is worse?
Him trying to pull the plug the whole time
or giving up only after all other alternatives have
been exhausted?
Interestingly enough, this case made Russian TV.
So many of these issues are being discussed on a world
state. Oh, wait, GW says we don't have to give a shit
about a global test. :-)
regards,
Mark Sobolewski
Aratzio
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>I sure wish I could garner intelligent comments from people. But,
>that's par for the course in rec.arts.poems. This is a very poignant
>story, and this part of the issue is overlooked by people. Even by the
>courts.
Except everytime someone brought up salient points that demonstrated
your ignorance of the facts and the issues, you punted a one-liner and
ran for the hills. Then came back with that same whine about
"intelligent comments". So what you were looking for was people more
ignorant than yourself. I would suggest soc.men.
--
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems,
but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
Daedalus
wrote:
>On 23 Mar 2005 22:03:46 -0800, "the messenjah"
><theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> When he's tossed out of the house for being a pervert?
>>>
>>> Like you were?
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>>
>>I sure wish I could garner intelligent comments from people. But,
>>that's par for the course in rec.arts.poems. This is a very poignant
>>story, and this part of the issue is overlooked by people. Even by the
>>courts.
>
>Except everytime someone brought up salient points that demonstrated
>your ignorance of the facts and the issues, you punted a one-liner and
>ran for the hills. Then came back with that same whine about
>"intelligent comments". So what you were looking for was people more
>ignorant than yourself. I would suggest soc.men.
I would suggest Alaska!
Jade
David Tholen
What does your post have to do with culture, Daedalus?
Hyerdahl
No. I agree with you. Even if Terri's husband has monetary reasons
for wanting his wife to die, I'm not sure that is relevant to Terri's
wish.
I can't imagine she'd want to continue on in the state she's in. If it
is discovered, at some point in time, that her husband wanted to end
her life for suspect reasons, they could always file a wrongful death
suit. But let's face the music; even if his reasons ARE selfish, this
poor woman would not, IMO, want to go on. That being the case, just
how "wrongful" ARE his reasons?
the messenjah
She's a troll, just like Aratzio. I've already been clear on how I
stand on the issue. It's wrong to starve a woman to death. We treat
animals with more dignity.
Aratzio
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
So then shut the fuck up already. You whinging about something to
which you have no clue in no way validates your OPINIONS. Your idea od
*intelligent discussion* is for someone, anyone, to agree with you and
have a slurpfest. Problem is, no one is that stupid, so you are, as
usual, left standing alone crying like a 3 year old lost in a grocery
store.
Aratzio
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
>
>Aratzio wrote:
<sneck>
>>
>> So then shut the fuck up already. You whinging about something to
>> which you have no clue in no way validates your OPINIONS. Your idea
>od
>> *intelligent discussion* is for someone, anyone, to agree with you
>and
>> have a slurpfest. Problem is, no one is that stupid, so you are, as
>> usual, left standing alone crying like a 3 year old lost in a grocery
>> store.
>
>Get a grip on reality, you dipshit.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How's the negotiations for Kevin Cannon's dad to cut off insurgent.org
going?
Had any vegetarian chicken lately.
When you going to Michigan to visit Mike?
NC to vist John Henry?
NJ to visit Kevin?
Call any TSB bearing competitors to complain about Kevin?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Daedalus
>Get a grip on reality, you dipshit.
Lack of intelligent response noted. You lose again pansy ass.
Jade
mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
a jar
geddit?
arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together
the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed
Aratzio
Doorn't ged it, I seemed to be screened.
af...@webtv.net
the messenjah
Aratzio wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2005 08:34:51 -0800, "the messenjah"
> <theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Aratzio wrote:
> <sneck>
>
> >>
> >> So then shut the fuck up already. You whinging about something to
> >> which you have no clue in no way validates your OPINIONS. Your
idea
> >od
> >> *intelligent discussion* is for someone, anyone, to agree with you
> >and
> >> have a slurpfest. Problem is, no one is that stupid, so you are,
as
> >> usual, left standing alone crying like a 3 year old lost in a
grocery
> >> store.
> >
> >Get a grip on reality, you dipshit.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> How's the negotiations for Kevin Cannon's dad to cut off
insurgent.org
> going?
I wouldn't know...
>
> Had any vegetarian chicken lately.
Huh?
>
> When you going to Michigan to visit Mike?
Nope.
> NC to vist John Henry?
Nope.
> NJ to visit Kevin?
Nope.
However, I'm going down to Palm Beach this Memorial Day to visit a
woman I went to college with.
>
> Call any TSB bearing competitors to complain about Kevin?
Wait and see...
Aratzio
Por Que?
Follow-up tricks are for kids.
af...@webtv.net
Daedalus
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz>, wrote:
I didn't know they buried the WACs with the other vets.
Jade
PS - you never went to college.
the messenjah
Huh?
>
> Jade
>
> PS - you never went to college.
Really?
Daedalus
<theguyo...@veryfast.biz>, wrote:
Think about it for a fortnight, dumbass.
>>
>> Jade
>>
>> PS - you never went to college.
>
>Really?
Yep, really. Post proof otherwise, bike messenjer. YOu'd have trouble
graduating from McDonald's U.
Jade
the messenjah
Really? Wow...
>
> Jade
af...@webtv.net
sock
>
> What does your post have to do with culture, Daedalus?
>
What do you know about culture, David?
the messenjah
And what does all this nonsense have to do with the link to the article
I posted?
af...@webtv.net
Bertie the Bunyip
sednews:1111768085.2...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
What have you got to do with culture, period, chuckles?
I mean aside form the one you got going between your toes?
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip
sednews:1111768491.7...@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> Get a grip on reality, you dipshit.
Is that waht you're calling your dick this week Chuckles?
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip
sednews:1111775170.0...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
God ilove this guy.
Bertie
>
>
Ross
in news:1111795226.9...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
You mean that article where the author (and I infer you agree with her)
claims moral superiority over a man in a very difficult ethical situation?
You, being an unpricipled hypocrite, do not have the character to make any
credible judgement upon the man in his situation: don't give me that
'family values' bullshit -- it is quite clear that you value your pedophilc
fantasies over much else.
--
Go not to Usenet for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.
af...@webtv.net
Ross
this in news:1111798040.3...@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
[Absolutely nothing]
Since when did a WebTVer think she/he/it can control posts on Usenet?
Dan Baldwin
>
> Ross scrawled this on the wall:
> > af...@webtv.net pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> > this in news:1111798040.3...@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> >
> > [Absolutely nothing]
> >
> > Since when did a WebTVer think she/he/it can control posts on Usenet?
>
>
> I noticed that it replied to itself a couple times in alt.test. I guess
> it wanted to see if that neato "follow-up" thing really works. Heh.
Actually, its trying to direct posts out of alt.culture.alaska.
In vain, oc course.
--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*
I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative.
Hail the un-alive
Art Deco
> Brett wrote:
> >
> > Ross scrawled this on the wall:
> > > af...@webtv.net pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> > > this in news:1111798040.3...@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> > >
> > > [Absolutely nothing]
> > >
> > > Since when did a WebTVer think she/he/it can control posts on Usenet?
> >
> > Hey, it's a WebTVer. They're even stupider than AOLosers.
> >
> > I noticed that it replied to itself a couple times in alt.test. I guess
> > it wanted to see if that neato "follow-up" thing really works. Heh.
>
> Actually, its trying to direct posts out of alt.culture.alaska.
>
> In vain, oc course.
Say hi to PSCREECHING PSYLVIA.
Hi, PSCREECHING PSYLVIA!
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
"a photon can travel faster than light when it is not excited"
"Ions are attracted to IRON"
"The dense ions in the ionosphere are simulating a
much higher gravitational pull to earth."
-- Alexa Cameron demonstrates her 200+ alien-implanted IQ
"I really don't care too much for humans"
"Just think of all the fun watching them from above while they
dance their kooker-step on their burning planet ..."
-- Chuckweasel Bohnehead's delusional non-human self-image
Art Deco
> On 25 Mar 2005 10:13:45 -0800, af...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Aratzio wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:24:21 -0800, mariposas morgan mair fheal
> >> greykitten tomys des anges <mair_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >when hes ajar
> >> >
> >> >a jar
> >> >geddit?
> >> >
> >> >arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together
> >> >
> >> >the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
> >> >but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed
> >>
> >> Doorn't ged it, I seemed to be screened.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> A positive attitude may not solve all your problems,
> >> but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the >effort.
>
> Por Que?
>
> Follow-up tricks are for kids.
It is PSCREECHING PSYLVIA.
Art Deco
> Yep, I love spring fishing. The fish are reallllly hungry.
>
>
Hi, PSYLVIA! Why do you like alt.test so much?
Susan
"Hyerdahl" <Hyer...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1111763146.7...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Chance Hopkins wrote:
> > "the messenjah" <theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote in message
> > news:1111642234....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
> > >
> >
> > A friend of mine said recently:
> >
> > "In my 50 years of life, I have NEVER heard anyone say they wanted to
> be
> > kept alive artificially as a vegetable."
> >
> > Can anyone here truthfully say they would like to be kept alive as a
> > vegetable, on life support?
>
> No. I agree with you. Even if Terri's husband has monetary reasons
> for wanting his wife to die, I'm not sure that is relevant to Terri's
> wish.
> I can't imagine she'd want to continue on in the state she's in
That's what we say about YOU lol
. If it
> is discovered, at some point in time, that her husband wanted to end
> her life for suspect reasons, they could always file a wrongful death
> suit. But let's face the music; even if his reasons ARE selfish, this
> poor woman would not, IMO, want to go on. That being the case, just
> how "wrongful" ARE his reasons?
>