Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Feminism and National Defense
23 views
Skip to first unread message
Marcus Aurelius
Jun 5, 2013, 10:37:34 PM6/5/13
to
The XIX (19th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1920) which gave
women the right to vote did not contemplate women being required, as a
requisite of this right, to perform mandatory military service
inclusive of combat duty.
However, in effect, this amendment has given women an electoral
majority in the U.S.A. over men that has been increasing.
"Male voting rates have declined sharply since the mid-1960s i.e. the
beginning of the Matriarchal social and political construct
(feminism).
Between the 1964 and 2000 Presidential elections, the male voting rate
declined from 72 to 53 percent.
Because the USA has a winner take all, bought, and gerrymandered form
of electoral representation, the female absolute and electoral
majority has a disproportionately adverse affect on male political
representation, male rights, and male equality.
The female vote makes up approximately 54-56% of the total in the
U.S.A..
This results in a political framework that produces a socio-political-
economic-legal that is essentially matrifocal,gynocentric, and
Matriarchal."
The aforementioned makes American men and the men of other democratic
nations virtual slaves to the aforementioned feminist electoral
majority's foreign policy,military, and defense related objectives and
means.
In 1971 in the United States, draft resisters initiated a class-action
suit alleging that male only conscription violate men's rights to
equal protection under the US Constitution.
When the case reached the United States Supreme Court in 1981, they
were supported by a men's rights group and multiple women's groups
including the National Organization for Women. However, the Supreme
Court upheld the Military Selective Service Act stating that "the
argument for registering women was based on considerations of equity,
but Congress was entitled, in the exercise of it's Constitutional
powers, to focus on the question of military need, rather than
equity." (Wikipedia-Mens Rights)
This, in itself, is EXTREMELY unjust, oppressive, and discriminatory
towards men.
The personal, economic, cultural, and political attack, led by
feminists and their male feminist supporters, on returning Vietnam
Veterans was motivated, according to psychologists, by the impression
by women that Vietnam Veterans represented "the strong male image".
Should women and minorities have preference in employment, education,
and other wise over returning war veterans, inclusive of combat
veterans?
Our nation and our government determined, by law and custom that they
should.
This is what returning Vietnam Veterans faced.
Should Vietnam Veterans, in fact, be actively discriminated against in
employment, education, and otherwise?
Yes, this is what our nation and our government determined, by law,
and custom that they should.
The image of the aggressive feminist associating with long haired
effeminate base men for the purpose of denigrating returning Vietnam
Veterans and all men of character remains a shameful part of our
current and past history and culture.
The very organized,aggressive, demeaning,unprincipled, discriminatory
and sexist attacks on returning Vietnam Veterans in the late 1960's
and early 1970's by feminists set the pattern for the aggressive,
unprincipled,organized, and discriminatory attacks by feminists on men
subsequent to the same. In other words, the most efficacious means for
feminists to obtain their misandric goals is to DESTROY those that
oppose them or that they perceive as having the character and/or
motivation to do the same.
In this author's opinion, the fact that women were not required to
serve in the military nor the combat arms, although they had the same
right to vote as these men who sacrificed so much, encouraged an
arrogant, predatory, demeaning, exploitative, and discriminatory
attitude towards Vietnam Veterans.
Further, the fact that women and others, although they do not have to
serve in the military, are the electoral majority results in the fact
that this same majority unjustly determines when this nation goes to
war, how the war is to be fought, and how the returning veteran is to
be treated.
This results in the initiation of unwise and unnecessary wars, unwise
military strategies, the oppressive exploitation of those in the
military, and the initiation of wars motivated by the selfish and
unjust motives of this feminist electoral majority.
Should an electoral majority, which, by law, is determined to be too
weak or base to serve in the military, inclusive of the combat arms
and/or is unwilling and/or unable to serve in such a capacity, have
the right to determine when and how a nation is to engage in military
operations, inclusive of war, and how the returning veteran is to be
treated?
Of course not. Our present system gives the electoral majority that
does not serve, women and others, the means and motive to exploit and
denigrate men who serve in the military. Again, this was exemplified
in the War in Vietnam and the hostile, insulting, and discriminatory
treatment that Vietnam Veterans received by the same individuals and
groups, women and others, which were exempt from and/or avoided said
service and who, at the same time, demanded and received preferential
treatment in employment, education, and law over returning Vietnam
veterans, even combat veterans.
In today's United State's military, women receive preferential
treatment over men with lower standards and fewer service requirements
than men by law..
Women demanded from their political representatives that they should
receive this preferential treatment.
Their unprincipled political representatives yielded to these unjust
discriminatory demands despite the extremely deleterious affect the
same had on the capabilities of the armed forces of the United States.
Further, feminists and others in the military have launched a virtual
war on men in the military through wide spread hysterical false
accusations of sexual assaults, rapes, and other illegal acts against
women. These lies and slanders are supported by the establishment
media and unethical politicians.
The result has been and continues to be a virtual feminist political
purge from the U.S. Military of some of our most loyal, courageous,
and efficacious military leaders.
The intent of these feminist diatribes is to further discriminatory
favoritism of women in the military while promulgating systematic
discrimination against men in the military.
Feminists and their supporters have utilized the same strategy in
other occupations virtually driving most men out of certain
occupations. The remaining few men tend to be male feminists,
effeminate, and/or gay.
Men should refuse to serve in the military in the USA and other
nations unless there is a reasonable correlation between military
service, especially mandatory military service (the military draft)
and electoral representation (the right to vote) and until those other
republican principles (equal rights and equal responsibilities for all
citizens-no more affirmative action) are restored.
There has been a repeated pattern, since the War in Vietnam, of
exploiting the veteran, then denigrating the veteran, and then
granting preferential treatment to those who are unable and/or
unwilling to serve in the U.S. military, especially the combat arms.
This unjust and predatory pattern is likely to continue unless
electoral representation, the right to vote, is reasonably associated
with military duty, especially mandatory military duty, the military
draft.
This same electoral majority, unwilling and/or unable to serve in the
U.S. Military, granted itself preference by law and custom in
employment, education, the law, the receipt of social services and by
other means, both overt and covert, EVEN OVER RETURNING COMBAT
VETERANS.
The aforementioned results in an abusive, offensive, denigrating,
oppressive, and discriminatory attitude by American women not only
towards American military veterans but towards all men, especially men
who demonstrate the traditional male virtues.
This aggressive and unprincipled attack on returning Vietnam Veterans,
as the "strong male image" was merely the initial assault on those
American men, by feminists, both male and female, who demonstrated
any of the traditional male virtues.
It continues in all spheres of American life.
American women have found it to be politically, economically,
socially, and culturally advantageous for them to form alliances with
base and weak men for the purpose of dominating and exploiting men who
have the traditional male virtues.
As per the experience of the returning Vietnam Veteran, the same
alliance continues to this date with the result that the traditional
male culture in the U.S.A. has been destroyed.
No wonder that men from foreign countries routinely laugh at the
effeminate nature of American men who have been degraded out of fear,
obedience, and the shame of being men from our women who have made to
feel guilty for just being men.
Metrosexual, base, and effeminate men have become de rigeur welcome,
nourished, made safe, and have become "politically correct' in
American Society and in the eyes of the law.
Manly behavior is NOT.
Every single foreign war the U.S.A. has entered into in the past 50
years has progressively been less and less effective.
The U.S.A. no longer seems able to win a difficult war with
decisiveness and efficiency.
The military justice system, in the name of "political correctness",
has run amok, where even the most base, lying, evil, insecure,
mercenary, violent, and selfish women, some of whom have been
officially proven to be so, can easily destroy good soldiers of proven
great courage, great character, great patriotism, honor, and respect.
The men of our armed forces are no match psychologically, emotionally,
or spiritual for most men of foreign nations.
women the right to vote did not contemplate women being required, as a
requisite of this right, to perform mandatory military service
inclusive of combat duty.
However, in effect, this amendment has given women an electoral
majority in the U.S.A. over men that has been increasing.
"Male voting rates have declined sharply since the mid-1960s i.e. the
beginning of the Matriarchal social and political construct
(feminism).
Between the 1964 and 2000 Presidential elections, the male voting rate
declined from 72 to 53 percent.
Because the USA has a winner take all, bought, and gerrymandered form
of electoral representation, the female absolute and electoral
majority has a disproportionately adverse affect on male political
representation, male rights, and male equality.
The female vote makes up approximately 54-56% of the total in the
U.S.A..
This results in a political framework that produces a socio-political-
economic-legal that is essentially matrifocal,gynocentric, and
Matriarchal."
The aforementioned makes American men and the men of other democratic
nations virtual slaves to the aforementioned feminist electoral
majority's foreign policy,military, and defense related objectives and
means.
In 1971 in the United States, draft resisters initiated a class-action
suit alleging that male only conscription violate men's rights to
equal protection under the US Constitution.
When the case reached the United States Supreme Court in 1981, they
were supported by a men's rights group and multiple women's groups
including the National Organization for Women. However, the Supreme
Court upheld the Military Selective Service Act stating that "the
argument for registering women was based on considerations of equity,
but Congress was entitled, in the exercise of it's Constitutional
powers, to focus on the question of military need, rather than
equity." (Wikipedia-Mens Rights)
This, in itself, is EXTREMELY unjust, oppressive, and discriminatory
towards men.
The personal, economic, cultural, and political attack, led by
feminists and their male feminist supporters, on returning Vietnam
Veterans was motivated, according to psychologists, by the impression
by women that Vietnam Veterans represented "the strong male image".
Should women and minorities have preference in employment, education,
and other wise over returning war veterans, inclusive of combat
veterans?
Our nation and our government determined, by law and custom that they
should.
This is what returning Vietnam Veterans faced.
Should Vietnam Veterans, in fact, be actively discriminated against in
employment, education, and otherwise?
Yes, this is what our nation and our government determined, by law,
and custom that they should.
The image of the aggressive feminist associating with long haired
effeminate base men for the purpose of denigrating returning Vietnam
Veterans and all men of character remains a shameful part of our
current and past history and culture.
The very organized,aggressive, demeaning,unprincipled, discriminatory
and sexist attacks on returning Vietnam Veterans in the late 1960's
and early 1970's by feminists set the pattern for the aggressive,
unprincipled,organized, and discriminatory attacks by feminists on men
subsequent to the same. In other words, the most efficacious means for
feminists to obtain their misandric goals is to DESTROY those that
oppose them or that they perceive as having the character and/or
motivation to do the same.
In this author's opinion, the fact that women were not required to
serve in the military nor the combat arms, although they had the same
right to vote as these men who sacrificed so much, encouraged an
arrogant, predatory, demeaning, exploitative, and discriminatory
attitude towards Vietnam Veterans.
Further, the fact that women and others, although they do not have to
serve in the military, are the electoral majority results in the fact
that this same majority unjustly determines when this nation goes to
war, how the war is to be fought, and how the returning veteran is to
be treated.
This results in the initiation of unwise and unnecessary wars, unwise
military strategies, the oppressive exploitation of those in the
military, and the initiation of wars motivated by the selfish and
unjust motives of this feminist electoral majority.
Should an electoral majority, which, by law, is determined to be too
weak or base to serve in the military, inclusive of the combat arms
and/or is unwilling and/or unable to serve in such a capacity, have
the right to determine when and how a nation is to engage in military
operations, inclusive of war, and how the returning veteran is to be
treated?
Of course not. Our present system gives the electoral majority that
does not serve, women and others, the means and motive to exploit and
denigrate men who serve in the military. Again, this was exemplified
in the War in Vietnam and the hostile, insulting, and discriminatory
treatment that Vietnam Veterans received by the same individuals and
groups, women and others, which were exempt from and/or avoided said
service and who, at the same time, demanded and received preferential
treatment in employment, education, and law over returning Vietnam
veterans, even combat veterans.
In today's United State's military, women receive preferential
treatment over men with lower standards and fewer service requirements
than men by law..
Women demanded from their political representatives that they should
receive this preferential treatment.
Their unprincipled political representatives yielded to these unjust
discriminatory demands despite the extremely deleterious affect the
same had on the capabilities of the armed forces of the United States.
Further, feminists and others in the military have launched a virtual
war on men in the military through wide spread hysterical false
accusations of sexual assaults, rapes, and other illegal acts against
women. These lies and slanders are supported by the establishment
media and unethical politicians.
The result has been and continues to be a virtual feminist political
purge from the U.S. Military of some of our most loyal, courageous,
and efficacious military leaders.
The intent of these feminist diatribes is to further discriminatory
favoritism of women in the military while promulgating systematic
discrimination against men in the military.
Feminists and their supporters have utilized the same strategy in
other occupations virtually driving most men out of certain
occupations. The remaining few men tend to be male feminists,
effeminate, and/or gay.
Men should refuse to serve in the military in the USA and other
nations unless there is a reasonable correlation between military
service, especially mandatory military service (the military draft)
and electoral representation (the right to vote) and until those other
republican principles (equal rights and equal responsibilities for all
citizens-no more affirmative action) are restored.
There has been a repeated pattern, since the War in Vietnam, of
exploiting the veteran, then denigrating the veteran, and then
granting preferential treatment to those who are unable and/or
unwilling to serve in the U.S. military, especially the combat arms.
This unjust and predatory pattern is likely to continue unless
electoral representation, the right to vote, is reasonably associated
with military duty, especially mandatory military duty, the military
draft.
This same electoral majority, unwilling and/or unable to serve in the
U.S. Military, granted itself preference by law and custom in
employment, education, the law, the receipt of social services and by
other means, both overt and covert, EVEN OVER RETURNING COMBAT
VETERANS.
The aforementioned results in an abusive, offensive, denigrating,
oppressive, and discriminatory attitude by American women not only
towards American military veterans but towards all men, especially men
who demonstrate the traditional male virtues.
This aggressive and unprincipled attack on returning Vietnam Veterans,
as the "strong male image" was merely the initial assault on those
American men, by feminists, both male and female, who demonstrated
any of the traditional male virtues.
It continues in all spheres of American life.
American women have found it to be politically, economically,
socially, and culturally advantageous for them to form alliances with
base and weak men for the purpose of dominating and exploiting men who
have the traditional male virtues.
As per the experience of the returning Vietnam Veteran, the same
alliance continues to this date with the result that the traditional
male culture in the U.S.A. has been destroyed.
No wonder that men from foreign countries routinely laugh at the
effeminate nature of American men who have been degraded out of fear,
obedience, and the shame of being men from our women who have made to
feel guilty for just being men.
Metrosexual, base, and effeminate men have become de rigeur welcome,
nourished, made safe, and have become "politically correct' in
American Society and in the eyes of the law.
Manly behavior is NOT.
Every single foreign war the U.S.A. has entered into in the past 50
years has progressively been less and less effective.
The U.S.A. no longer seems able to win a difficult war with
decisiveness and efficiency.
The military justice system, in the name of "political correctness",
has run amok, where even the most base, lying, evil, insecure,
mercenary, violent, and selfish women, some of whom have been
officially proven to be so, can easily destroy good soldiers of proven
great courage, great character, great patriotism, honor, and respect.
The men of our armed forces are no match psychologically, emotionally,
or spiritual for most men of foreign nations.
&
Jun 5, 2013, 11:27:39 PM6/5/13
to
On 06/05/2013 10:37 PM and 02/12/2013 07:22 pm , Marcus Aurelius wrote:
> The XIX (19th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1920) which gave
> women the right to vote did not contemplate women being required, as a
> requisite of this right, to perform mandatory military service
> inclusive of combat duty.
why do you keep spamming our group with same plagiarized posts go away
> The XIX (19th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1920) which gave
> women the right to vote did not contemplate women being required, as a
> requisite of this right, to perform mandatory military service
> inclusive of combat duty.
and dont come back troll bastard
Marcus Aurelius
Jun 7, 2013, 12:19:35 AM6/7/13
to
QIM The Mighty Masculist
Jun 7, 2013, 3:25:34 PM6/7/13
to
Tom
𝓣𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓖𝓻��𝓪𝓽
Jun 7, 2013, 9:45:56 PM6/7/13
to
On 06/05/2013 11:27 PM, & wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 10:37 PM and 02/12/2013 07:22 pm , Marcus Aurelius (AKA Paul Elam) wrote:
>> The XIX (19th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1920) which gave
>> women the right to vote did not contemplate women being required, as a
>> requisite of this right, to perform mandatory military service
>> inclusive of combat duty.
>
> why do you keep spamming our group with same plagiarized posts go away
> and dont come back troll bastard
>
Paul (Marcus) wants to redefine the topics, &.
>> The XIX (19th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1920) which gave
>> women the right to vote did not contemplate women being required, as a
>> requisite of this right, to perform mandatory military service
>> inclusive of combat duty.
>
> why do you keep spamming our group with same plagiarized posts go away
> and dont come back troll bastard
>
Keep up the good work, Dude.
- - -
Loved by few. Hated by many. Envied by all:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
https://profiles.google.com/TurinTurambar.1/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
retardsman
Jun 9, 2013, 12:22:22 PM6/9/13
to
nice summation of the reality of the matriarchy's "treatment" of male vets over the past 40 years
basically, a total (and ongoing!) beatdown of the very men the matriarchy used, and uses, to defend her evil and iniquity, domestic and foreign
first the Gynogulag cynically used these men in her profitable wars, after which point the United Sisterhood of Amerika punished them lifelong for the crime of their masculinity, awarding their jobs and futures to women (often, their own wives and daughters) and telling them they deserved their second-class citizenship because they were Oppressors and historical Abusers or pore, downtrodden Woman
given such hateful and despicable treatment, the title "Feminism and National Defense" take on global import, because having subjected the best of "her" men to the gleeful tyranny of feminism over the past half-century, America's capabilities for "National Defense" are now zero (0) given that God now loathes your Bitch Nation, and the best men in America have NO (0) reason to "defend" a country that betrays and despises them, and makes no secret of either sentiment in its media, schools, families, workplaces, and fem-government
good luck with that Defense there, Ms. Amerika, now that you and your Emasculated Enablers have destroyed masculinity, you are gonna need LOTS of luck
keep looking up, your future is coming in fast
basically, a total (and ongoing!) beatdown of the very men the matriarchy used, and uses, to defend her evil and iniquity, domestic and foreign
first the Gynogulag cynically used these men in her profitable wars, after which point the United Sisterhood of Amerika punished them lifelong for the crime of their masculinity, awarding their jobs and futures to women (often, their own wives and daughters) and telling them they deserved their second-class citizenship because they were Oppressors and historical Abusers or pore, downtrodden Woman
given such hateful and despicable treatment, the title "Feminism and National Defense" take on global import, because having subjected the best of "her" men to the gleeful tyranny of feminism over the past half-century, America's capabilities for "National Defense" are now zero (0) given that God now loathes your Bitch Nation, and the best men in America have NO (0) reason to "defend" a country that betrays and despises them, and makes no secret of either sentiment in its media, schools, families, workplaces, and fem-government
good luck with that Defense there, Ms. Amerika, now that you and your Emasculated Enablers have destroyed masculinity, you are gonna need LOTS of luck
keep looking up, your future is coming in fast
&
Jun 9, 2013, 12:59:34 PM6/9/13
to
On 06/09/2013 12:22 PM, retardsman wrote:
> first the Gynogulag cynically used these men in her profitable wars,
> after which point the United Sisterhood of Amerika punished them
> lifelong for the crime of their masculinity, awarding their jobs and
> futures to women (often, their own wives and daughters) and telling
> them they deserved their second-class citizenship because they were
> Oppressors and historical Abusers or pore, downtrodden Woman
>
whats a gynogulag is that where they put mass shooters like you
> first the Gynogulag cynically used these men in her profitable wars,
> after which point the United Sisterhood of Amerika punished them
> lifelong for the crime of their masculinity, awarding their jobs and
> futures to women (often, their own wives and daughters) and telling
> them they deserved their second-class citizenship because they were
> Oppressors and historical Abusers or pore, downtrodden Woman
>
QIM The Mighty Masculist
Jun 9, 2013, 2:44:20 PM6/9/13
to
anything political or spiritual yet you are hiding here at soc.men.
We need you out front and public. You have only one life to give to
your country <smile>
Tom
&
Jun 9, 2013, 3:01:43 PM6/9/13
to
On 06/09/2013 02:44 PM, QIM The Mighty Masculist wrote:
>> keep looking up, your future is coming in fast
>
> Darn good to see you ray. You're the best writer and commentator on
> anything political or spiritual yet you are hiding here at soc.men.
> We need you out front and public. You have only one life to give to
> your country <smile>
>
why do you support your mass shooter friend you should try to talk him
>> keep looking up, your future is coming in fast
>
> Darn good to see you ray. You're the best writer and commentator on
> anything political or spiritual yet you are hiding here at soc.men.
> We need you out front and public. You have only one life to give to
> your country <smile>
>
out of it
Indy
Jun 9, 2013, 3:12:44 PM6/9/13
to
&
Jun 9, 2013, 3:21:17 PM6/9/13
to
retardman then youre yellow i guess we know where you stand too
retardsman
Jun 10, 2013, 1:54:28 PM6/10/13
to
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 11:44:20 AM UTC-7, QIM The Mighty Masculist wrote:
> On Jun 9, 9:22 am, retardsman <remarks...@yahoo.com> wrote: > nice summation of the reality of the matriarchy's "treatment" of male vets over the past 40 years > > basically, a total (and ongoing!) beatdown of the very men the matriarchy used, and uses, to defend her evil and iniquity, domestic and foreign > > first the Gynogulag cynically used these men in her profitable wars, after which point the United Sisterhood of Amerika punished them lifelong for the crime of their masculinity, awarding their jobs and futures to women (often, their own wives and daughters) and telling them they deserved their second-class citizenship because they were Oppressors and historical Abusers or pore, downtrodden Woman > > given such hateful and despicable treatment, the title "Feminism and National Defense" take on global import, because having subjected the best of "her" men to the gleeful tyranny of feminism over the past half-century, America's capabilities for "National Defense" are now zero (0) given that God now loathes your Bitch Nation, and the best men in America have NO (0) reason to "defend" a country that betrays and despises them, and makes no secret of either sentiment in its media, schools, families, workplaces, and fem-government > > good luck with that Defense there, Ms. Amerika, now that you and your Emasculated Enablers have destroyed masculinity, you are gonna need LOTS of luck > > keep looking up, your future is coming in fast
Darn good to see you ray. You're the best writer and commentator on anything political or spiritual yet you are hiding here at soc.men.
hey thomas how you doing? i saw you in the thread
> On Jun 9, 9:22 am, retardsman <remarks...@yahoo.com> wrote: > nice summation of the reality of the matriarchy's "treatment" of male vets over the past 40 years > > basically, a total (and ongoing!) beatdown of the very men the matriarchy used, and uses, to defend her evil and iniquity, domestic and foreign > > first the Gynogulag cynically used these men in her profitable wars, after which point the United Sisterhood of Amerika punished them lifelong for the crime of their masculinity, awarding their jobs and futures to women (often, their own wives and daughters) and telling them they deserved their second-class citizenship because they were Oppressors and historical Abusers or pore, downtrodden Woman > > given such hateful and despicable treatment, the title "Feminism and National Defense" take on global import, because having subjected the best of "her" men to the gleeful tyranny of feminism over the past half-century, America's capabilities for "National Defense" are now zero (0) given that God now loathes your Bitch Nation, and the best men in America have NO (0) reason to "defend" a country that betrays and despises them, and makes no secret of either sentiment in its media, schools, families, workplaces, and fem-government > > good luck with that Defense there, Ms. Amerika, now that you and your Emasculated Enablers have destroyed masculinity, you are gonna need LOTS of luck > > keep looking up, your future is coming in fast
Darn good to see you ray. You're the best writer and commentator on anything political or spiritual yet you are hiding here at soc.men.
yeah this is the only place they dont delete my comments :O)
and no wonder... there's one actual poster for every fifty fruits/spooks on this list
this list has become exactly reflective of western culture, one actual man for every fifty punks/skanks
gubbermint aint got nothin to worry about tom, my own people muzzle me -- and Auntie Samael doesnt even pay them!!
;O)
We need you out front and public. You have only one life to give to your country <smile> Tom
i die every day in this place but it aint enough, and never will be, she's like Ungoliant, she'd consume the entire universe and still be unsatisfied, claiming she'd been Abused
cheers
Lady Veteran
Jun 16, 2013, 11:13:55 AM6/16/13
to
treat another human being like a human being. Feminists didn't do that
to you-you did it to yourself.
Now quit crying about your lost balls.
LV
--
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
If you are an idiot, I am your worst nightmare.
If you are a racist, fat-basher, bible thumper
or reTHUGlican,you would do well to avoid me at
all costs.
---------------------------------------------
&
Jun 16, 2013, 11:54:30 AM6/16/13
to
something bad happen to you look like just an accident they are
emasculated whiners they hide in background all the time expecting
someone else to make things fair for them with no effort from them they
expect life to be fair free and just to them they cry when women play
dirty take advantage and society helps . drones are disposable they were
drones
> Now quit crying about your lost balls.
>
> LV
>
John Doe
Nov 18, 2013, 4:34:23 PM11/18/13
to
Marcus Aurelius <alexander26a hotmail.com> wrote:
> The U.S.A. no longer seems able to win a difficult war with
> decisiveness and efficiency.
Apparently you don't consider the Gulf War to have been difficult.
> The U.S.A. no longer seems able to win a difficult war with
> decisiveness and efficiency.
I would agree, it was more like a police action. But at least it
was decisive, efficient, and something to be proud of. Perhaps the
last.
&
Nov 18, 2013, 4:54:52 PM11/18/13
to
scammer voice for men group
0 new messages