Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Caucasians will be a minority in America by 2050

0 views
Skip to first unread message

J

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:16:30 PM12/21/09
to
This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
from South and Central America and Asia.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091216/ap_on_go_ot/us_white_minority


WASHINGTON - The estimated time when whites will no longer make up the
majority of Americans has been pushed back eight years - to 2050 - because
the recession and stricter immigration policies have slowed the flow of
foreigners into the U.S.

Census Bureau figures released Wednesday update last year's prediction that
white children would become a minority in 2023 and the overall white
population would follow in 2042. The earlier estimate did not take into
account a drop in the number of people moving into the U.S. because of the
economic crisis and the immigration policies imposed after the Sept. 11,
2001, terror attacks.

The 2050 estimate is one of four projections released that is based on rates
for births and deaths and a scenario in which immigration continues its more
recent, slower pace of adding nearly 1 million new foreigners each year.
Demographers said that scenario offers the best look for now at the future
demographic makeup based on current conditions, rather than other models
which assume higher rates of immigration.

The United States has 308 million people today; two-thirds are non-Hispanic
whites.


--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com

A very Merry Christmas to all!


Jimbo

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:21:28 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal.

What are you carping about? Most of the immigrants are catholics.
The rest of us are having fewer kids to prevent the molestation.

Zacharias Mulletstein

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:19:29 PM12/21/09
to
J wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> ardent liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough
> immigration enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on
> *all* immigration from South and Central America and Asia.

I agree! Keep America clean and aligned with the One lamb virgin pure
northern European, Jesus Christ.


Jimbo

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:24:40 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:19 pm, "Zacharias Mulletstein" <zmulletst...@isright.com>
wrote:

> J wrote:
> > This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> > ardent liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough
> > immigration enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on
> > *all* immigration from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> I agree!  

Yes, but you're a proven nutcase.

Dakota

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:38:27 PM12/21/09
to

Is Jesus from northern Europe now?

Syd M.

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:44:18 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal.

Since when were you ever a 'liberal,' Junkie?

PDW

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 5:16:15 PM12/21/09
to
"Dakota" <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote in message
news:1pzxtw74z0lpx$.1m0xq4qpv2ud1.dlg@40tude.net...

Well - his *story* is.

Frank Galikanokus

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 6:04:43 PM12/21/09
to

Caucasians were a minority in America until about two hundred yeas ago.

No big deal, except to ignorant white trash.

JAM

Frank Galikanokus

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 6:06:05 PM12/21/09
to

Yes, I've heard that the mythical jesus was a white european.

JAM

Andrew Usher

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 6:45:15 PM12/21/09
to
J wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
> from South and Central America and Asia.

It probably _should_ but the leftists are just too deluded.

Andrew Usher

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:02:18 PM12/21/09
to

So if the country is 49% white, 25% Hispanic, 15% black and 11% Asian
the whites are a minority? What does that make the other races?

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:04:28 PM12/21/09
to

"Andrew Usher" <k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6b649729-a26b-4b4a...@o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

If you had made a case for that based upon evidence... but no, you just
puppet what Lush Dumbo says. And how much more "deluded" can you be than to
believe in the Bush family, who has almost single-handedly brought this
country to it's knees to further their New World Order agenda? There are a
myriad of examples out their of this, the S&N theft, Gulf War I & II, their
"coziness" with the Sauds, who are the true enemies of this country.

I could point them all out but you're too "deluded" to see them for what
they are.

Pathetic.


Mike Painter

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:10:37 PM12/21/09
to
J wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> ardent liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough
> immigration enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on
> *all* immigration from South and Central America and Asia.
>
No, it scares people like you.
This town is over 70% Mexican and they practice the family values that the
whites only talk about in church. Since EMS in this area is still mainly
white, the EMTs and Paramedics recieve special training in handling these
situation since they are so *VERY* rare in other communities.
I never lock my doors and on two occasions my neighbor has come into my
house when he was worried about me. Once I was taking a nap.
The other time I was out of town. When he did not find the food I left for
my dog he bought some at the store and fed him.


Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:12:41 PM12/21/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:15 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
<k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

What does the color of skin matter to anyone who is not a bigot?

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:15:43 PM12/21/09
to

"Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:3n30j5dbp008lpj0h...@4ax.com...

Not one damn thing. What riles me the most is the way the right always
blames the left for it's own mistakes. Illegal immigration SKYROCKETED
during the Bush years and yet they blame the left for it. Bush's agenda is
to drag this country to it's knees in order to accept the NWO. Clinton is
equally as guilty. And Obama.


Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:18:49 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:12 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:15 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
> <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

>
> >J wrote:
> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> >> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> >> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
> >> from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> >It probably _should_ but the leftists are just too deluded.
>
> >Andrew Usher
>
> What does the color of skin matter to anyone who is not a bigot?

It makes a difference now because Democrats control all of the federal
government and they treat minorities different than whites. This is
not incongruent with your statement above.

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:24:10 PM12/21/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ad0d9a55-524e-41e1...@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 21, 4:12 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:15 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
> <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >J wrote:
> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> >> ardent
> >> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> >> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all*
> >> immigration
> >> from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> >It probably _should_ but the leftists are just too deluded.
>
> >Andrew Usher
>
> What does the color of skin matter to anyone who is not a bigot?

It makes a difference now because Democrats control all of the federal
government

lol! You couldn't tell by looking at the supposed "left-wing" media.


--
Republicans = Sore Loserman's 2009.


Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:33:06 PM12/21/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:18:49 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

Really? I thought the objection of the right was that Democrats didn't
treat minorities differently the way the reactionaries thought they had
the right to.

I am glad that LBJ drove the Dixiecrats out of the party when he turned
against state-sponsored racism, but it is truly sad that the Republicans
threw away over a century of integrity on the issue and welcomed the
racists with open arms.

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:35:16 PM12/21/09
to

"Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:aq40j5dntmm91f0ip...@4ax.com...

Couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you.


Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:38:57 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:15 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:

> "Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
>
> news:3n30j5dbp008lpj0h...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:15 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
> > <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

>
> >>J wrote:
> >>> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> >>> ardent
> >>> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> >>> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all*
> >>> immigration
> >>> from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> >>It probably _should_ but the leftists are just too deluded.
>
> >>Andrew Usher
>
> > What does the color of skin matter to anyone who is not a bigot?
>
> Not one damn thing. What riles me the most is the way the right always
> blames the left for it's own mistakes. Illegal immigration SKYROCKETED
> during the Bush years and yet they blame the left for it. Bush's agenda is
> to drag this country to it's knees in order to accept the NWO. Clinton is
> equally as guilty. And Obama.

Illegal immigration will sky-rocket when there are a lot of jobs and
no incentive to enforce the laws. Illegal immigrants don't care who's
president.

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:43:31 PM12/21/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bd9531d0-c88b-465f...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

Which of course explains why Bush de-funded the Border Patrol and then set
up HS to further the clusterfuck at the border for long enough to allow for
some 15 million illegals to enter. During HIS administration. The latter
point I've included because in no way shape or form did you address the
FAILURE of Bush to protect our borders. If 9-11 had happened under Clinton,
you morons would have had him strung-up. But for Bush, you have a million
and one excuses for his carefully crafted incompetence.


Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:53:49 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:33 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:18:49 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
> <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

>
>
>
>
>
> >On Dec 21, 4:12 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:15 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
> >> <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >> >J wrote:
> >> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> >> >> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> >> >> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
> >> >> from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> >> >It probably _should_ but the leftists are just too deluded.
>
> >> >Andrew Usher
>
> >> What does the color of skin matter to anyone who is not a bigot?
>
> >It makes a difference now because Democrats control all of the federal
> >government and they treat minorities different than whites.
>
> Really? I thought the objection of the right was that Democrats didn't
> treat minorities differently the way the reactionaries thought they had
> the right to.

That is a very ignorant assumption. Conservatives are against
affirmative action and racial quotas - especially those that aren't
productive like giving university spots to unqualified blacks who drop
out at the expense (mostly) of more qualified Asians.

> I am glad that LBJ drove the Dixiecrats out of the party

That is also ignorant. Of the 17 Dixiecrats who served in the Senate
only Strom Thurmond became a Republican. All the rest remained
Democrats.

> when he turned
> against state-sponsored racism, but it is truly sad that the Republicans
> threw away over a century of integrity on the issue and welcomed the
> racists with open arms.

Robert "N-Bomb" Byrd is the obvious racist in federal government yet
he's remained in the ever loving arms of the Democrats.

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 7:56:28 PM12/21/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8fea1054-e5e1-4b6a...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

Oh you fucking creep.
This is typical. You really care about the "qualified Asians" getting a fair
shake? Hell no you don't. What you care about is USING this Asian premise to
make your asinine point.

Fucking race-baiter.


Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:16:18 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:56 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:8fea1054-e5e1-4b6a...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

If you weren't a racist, you'd be able to debate this point and and
not just get frustrated and call names. Don't you really, really wish
it were the wealthy whites who were denied entrance instead of the
poorer Asians who are over-represented and doing quite well at our
schools? You lose, too bad, so sad.

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:21:07 PM12/21/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:09fde3ea-3981-4956...@h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

lol! "I know you are but what am I?" is hardly an intelligent rebuttal,
Allie.


Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:24:23 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:43 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:bd9531d0-c88b-465f...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

Are you trying to say you are against illegal immigration to this
country?

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:26:20 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 5:21 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:09fde3ea-3981-4956...@h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

Obviously Democrats are racists. Do you judge people by the content of
their character -or- by the color of their skin and think racial
quotas and affirmative action are good things?

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:27:31 PM12/21/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8d7bb4d8-c16b-44e2...@u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

Of course I am. And many others that you consider "traitors" and "leftist"
are against illegal immigration.

And you STILL haven't address Bush letting all of these illegals into the
country in the first place.


Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:28:17 PM12/21/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49921976-d104-47f3...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...

When you ASSUME, you make an ass out of both you and me.

Think about it, Al.


Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:45:10 PM12/21/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:38:57 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

If we do nothing about anthropogenic climate change, the immigration
will increase.

Father Haskell

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 9:41:07 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 4:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
> from South and Central America and Asia.

I've a better solution. Everyone should fuck everyone
else, until there are no races left.

Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 9:44:32 PM12/21/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:41:07 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

That is happening, slowly.

Smiler

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 9:52:57 PM12/21/09
to

Except for one....the human race.

--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer


The Chief Instigator

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 10:07:20 PM12/21/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:16:30 -0500, J <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
> from South and Central America and Asia.

Stoned again, Junkie? It shows.

--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Grand Rapids 3 (December 20)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, December 26 vs. San Antonio, 7:35

tdny

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 10:15:02 PM12/21/09
to

Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 1:47:03 AM12/22/09
to
Morontheist and racist scum "J":

> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal.

Felt like it's time to show your White Pride(TM) again, didncha,
herrenmensch?

--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...

My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:34:30 AM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 5:28 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:49921976-d104-47f3...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...

If anything, I assued that.

> Think about it, Al.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:35:50 AM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 5:45 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:38:57 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
> <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

If we adopt the Kyoto protocol we'll (those who are lucky enough to
have jobs) be picking our own fucking lettuce.

Alan Ford

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:47:04 AM12/22/09
to
Free Lunch wrote:

>> On Dec 21, 4:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
>>> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
>>> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
>>> from South and Central America and Asia.
>> I've a better solution. Everyone should fuck everyone
>> else, until there are no races left.
>
> That is happening, slowly.

That's right, you don't want to fuck too fast.


--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?

Otto Graham's Cleats

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 3:23:03 AM12/22/09
to

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8be0ee3-6c0c-45b9...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

You say that like it's a bad thing.


Barack Hussein Bohica

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 4:59:52 AM12/22/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:45:10 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:

Fortunately, as hurricane Katrina proved, the leftwads will sit and
bleat stupidly as the waters rise around them.

Viva global warming!

Barack Hussein Bohica

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 5:02:43 AM12/22/09
to

Still, the Democrats have a couple centuries (and counting) of racism
they will need to atone for one day soon.

Barack Hussein Bohica

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 5:04:35 AM12/22/09
to

None so shrill as a baracking moonbat cornered by the truth.

Barack Hussein Bohica

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 5:06:52 AM12/22/09
to

Didja make that up all by yourself? No wonder newsreaders stump
you...

Barack Hussein Bohica

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 5:09:44 AM12/22/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:41:07 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

By that reasoning, the moonbats should already be a ~very~ uniform
shade of tan...

MarkA

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 9:03:51 AM12/22/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:16:30 -0500, J wrote:

> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration
> from South and Central America and Asia.
>

Why should that scare anyone? Oh, yeah, I forgot - you're a white
supremacist bigot who thinks that Caucasians are the pinnacle of evolution.

--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock

Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 10:40:57 AM12/22/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:35:50 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

Putting off problems that we have known about for decades tends to give
us a number of unpalatable options. I expect that you will vote for "I
don't care what happens to people when I'm dead".

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:06:44 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 12:23 am, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:a8be0ee3-6c0c-45b9...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

Most of us have aspired to, and achieved more than "lettuce picker".
Good luck with that - there's going to be a lot of competition.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:13:21 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 1:59 am, Barack Hussein Bohica

<CharlieFoxt...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:45:10 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:38:57 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
> ><caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

If Al Gore wasn't a liar I will soon be living on tropical beach-front
property. I hope it comes true, but I'm sure he's just trying to sell
carbon credits to pay for his 20X average home electric bill and
private jet.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:19:53 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 7:40 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:35:50 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al

Wrong, 3 decades ago there was impending ice age and a population
bomb.

> tends to give
> us a number of unpalatable options. I expect that you will vote for "I
> don't care what happens to people when I'm dead".

"Assume you are a scientist and have been given a major financial
grant to prove that the mythical unicorn really did exist. You know
that as long as you can demonstrate some progress in showing the
unicorn might have existed, your financial grant will be renewed each
year, provided some other scientist does not come out with substantial
evidence that the unicorn could not have existed. Under such
conditions, you would have a very strong incentive to disregard much
of the evidence that the unicorn could not have existed and each year
provide only the data that could demonstrate that the unicorn might
have existed. You also would have a very strong incentive to attack
any scientist who raised serious questions or provided evidence that
the unicorn could not have existed. You even might go so far as to
refer to them with the disparaging term 'unicorn deniers' and attempt
to use your influence with other scientists who also are receiving
grants dependent on the existence of the unicorn to try to prevent the
unicorn deniers from publishing their findings in well-regarded
scientific journals. The recently released e-mails (by whistleblowers
or hackers, depending on your prejudice) between some of the best-
known scientists behind global warming showed that they succumbed to
the all-too-human tendency to protect their turfs and pocketbooks,
despite the evidence." - Richard W. Rahn

Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:25:23 PM12/22/09
to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:19:53 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

Please point to a journal article that said this.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:43:48 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 9:25 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:19:53 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al

You've got to be fucking kidding...
http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,944914,00.html
http://denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/173/3992/138

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_bomb

Go back to your rock you ignorant dumb fuck.

Jimbo

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 1:00:26 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 6:06 pm, Frank Galikanokus <FrankGalikano...@nospam.net>
wrote:

> Zacharias Mulletstein wrote:
>
> > J wrote:
> > > This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> > > ardent liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough
> > > immigration enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on
> > > *all* immigration from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> > I agree!  Keep America clean and aligned with the One lamb virgin pure
> > northern European, Jesus Christ.
>
> Yes, I've heard that the mythical jesus was a white european.
>
> JAM

Well, certainly every portrait/painting I've ever seen was of a white
anglo-saxon type. Well, except for "Black Jesus". :D

Jimbo

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 1:03:33 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 7:43 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:bd9531d0-c88b-465f...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> On Dec 21, 4:15 pm, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
>
> >news:3n30j5dbp008lpj0h...@4ax.com...
>
> > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:15 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
> > > <k_over_hb...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> > >>J wrote:
> > >>> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> > >>> ardent
> > >>> liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
> > >>> enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all*
> > >>> immigration
> > >>> from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> > >>It probably _should_ but the leftists are just too deluded.
>
> > >>Andrew Usher
>
> > > What does the color of skin matter to anyone who is not a bigot?
>
> > Not one damn thing. What riles me the most is the way the right always
> > blames the left for it's own mistakes. Illegal immigration SKYROCKETED
> > during the Bush years and yet they blame the left for it. Bush's agenda is
> > to drag this country to it's knees in order to accept the NWO. Clinton is
> > equally as guilty. And Obama.
>
> Illegal immigration will sky-rocket when there are a lot of jobs and
> no incentive to enforce the laws. Illegal immigrants don't care who's
> president.
>
> Which of course explains why Bush de-funded the Border Patrol and then set
> up HS to further the clusterfuck at the border for long enough to allow for
> some 15 million illegals to enter. During HIS administration. The latter
> point I've included because in no way shape or form did you address the
> FAILURE of Bush to protect our borders.

There were so many failures during the Bush administration, it's hard
to zero in on just one. :D


If 9-11 had happened under Clinton,
> you morons would have had him strung-up. But for Bush, you have a million
> and one excuses for his carefully crafted incompetence.- Hide quoted text -
>

But...! Clinton got a bj in the oval office!!!

Jimbo

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 1:09:02 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 3:23 am, "Otto Graham's Cleats" <AutomaticO...@brown.org>
wrote:
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:a8be0ee3-6c0c-45b9...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> You say that like it's a bad thing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Nothing wrong with picking lettuce. Some of us oldster's first jobs
was picking lettuce, or corn, or whatever. That's part of the
problem, our kids don't want to do these jobs anymore, half of them
think that they should start as CEO's, and the other half just want to
play their Playstations. The bald fact is, we need a certain amount
of these "illegals" every year to do that work.

tdny

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 1:30:01 PM12/22/09
to

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:17:41 PM12/22/09
to

In Salzburg I saw an ancient nativity where there was snow and a
chalet. We take for granted that we live in world where we can easily
see photographs of Israel and Jews and illustrated Bibles. I'll bet
there are lot of people who think Thomas Sowell is white because
they've only read him.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:22:04 PM12/22/09
to

For a living? I doubt that.

> That's part of the
> problem, our kids don't want to do these jobs anymore, half of them
> think that they should start as CEO's, and the other half just want to
> play their Playstations.

If they are not going to school they should be living on their own.
Which brings up the question... How does raising the minimum wage help
the country when these kids are part-time living at home anyway and
spending their money on the XBox?

> The bald fact is, we need a certain amount
> of these "illegals" every year to do that work.

Why do they have to be illegal?

SkyEyes

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:46:18 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 2:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal.

Oh, horsepucky. It doesn't scare me one bit, and I'm about as "white"
as you can get. Also a liberal.

Now FOAD , IBen. You're not wanted here.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net

SkyEyes

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 2:48:11 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 2:38 pm, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:19:29 -0600, Zacharias Mulletstein wrote:
> > J wrote:
> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> >> ardent liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough

> >> immigration enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on
> >> *all* immigration from South and Central America and Asia.
>
> > I agree!  Keep America clean and aligned with the One lamb virgin pure
> > northern European, Jesus Christ.
>
> Is Jesus from northern Europe now?

If he actually existed, no, he wasn't. But the white supremacists
like to pretend that he was, buncha fatuous idiots that they are.

Jimbo

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 3:22:41 PM12/22/09
to

Should be, but a large number of them are not.

[snip remaining irrelevancy]

Frank Galikanokus

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 4:35:37 PM12/22/09
to

Illegal immigration will end when we intact laws that penalize employers
for hiring illegals.

JAM

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 6:06:43 PM12/22/09
to

"Frank Galikanokus" <FrankGal...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:4B313BA9...@nospam.net...

> Illegal immigration will end when we intact laws that penalize employers
> for hiring illegals.

You already have such laws.
What you lack is the will to enforce them.

btw - The word is "enact", not "intact" - you stupid bigot.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 6:09:14 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 1:35 pm, Frank Galikanokus <FrankGalikano...@nospam.net>
wrote:

I'm pretty sure we have those but we aren't enforcing them.

Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 6:54:51 PM12/22/09
to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:09:14 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

We nominally have them, but the way they are written makes it easy for
an employer to plead ignorance as long as they get something that looks
like it fits the rules. Employers are not required to verify that the
social security number provided is correct or that the driving license
or birth certificate are valid.

Will we change the law to require everyone to get a passport and present
that to prospective employers? Don't hold your breath. People talk big
about how awful it is that employers hire folks who aren't supposed to
be working in this country, but they don't want to do anything about it
that inconveniences employers or citizens.

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 7:09:34 PM12/22/09
to
"Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:7sm2j5118n8updb60...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:09:14 -0800 (PST), Yer Pal Al
> <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

>>> Illegal immigration will end when we intact laws that penalize employers


>>> for hiring illegals.
>>
>>I'm pretty sure we have those but we aren't enforcing them.
>
> We nominally have them, but

That's the way discussions with anti-immigrants always seem to go.
You start with an outrageous statement, and then when it's proved untrue,
you make their "what I meant to say" disclaimer.
Then, when that's proved untrue as well, you just throw up another untrue
statement.

They cycle could be broken at anytime with one, single, honest statement.
It's too bad for you that there are no HONEST statements to support your
bigotry.

Jimbo

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 8:09:06 AM12/23/09
to
On Dec 22, 4:35 pm, Frank Galikanokus <FrankGalikano...@nospam.net>
wrote:
> JAM- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Those laws are actually in place. The trick is to get them enforced.

Jimbo

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 8:11:52 AM12/23/09
to
On Dec 22, 6:06 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
> "Frank Galikanokus" <FrankGalikano...@nospam.net> wrote in message

>
> news:4B313BA9...@nospam.net...
>
> > Illegal immigration will end when we intact laws that penalize employers
> > for hiring illegals.
>
> You already have such laws.
> What you lack is the will to enforce them.
>

This is the point of problem. For all of their bluster, our
lawmakers, democrats and republicans, love those illegal immigrants.
For the democrats, they keep the prices of many food items low, which
pleases their consituency. For Republicans, the immigrants are a
source of cheap labor, thereby maximizing profits, which keeps their
constituency happy. What it all boils down to is despite the bluster,
they are not going to do very much about illegal immigrants.

Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 8:23:12 AM12/23/09
to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:09:34 -0600, "Sanders Kaufman"
<bu...@kaufman.net> wrote in alt.atheism:

Why did you cut the rest of my answer?

How does your answer respond to what I said?

Frank Mayhar

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 12:27:35 PM12/23/09
to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:18 -0800, SkyEyes wrote:

> On Dec 21, 2:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
>> ardent liberal.
>
> Oh, horsepucky. It doesn't scare me one bit, and I'm about as "white"
> as you can get. Also a liberal.
>
> Now FOAD , IBen. You're not wanted here.

What Iben doesn't seem to grasp (along with pretty much all the _rest_ of
reality) is that in many parts of the US, caucasians are _already_ a
minority. This includes pretty much all of the Southwest and large parts
of West Texas. I suspect that it's true in LA as well, overall, although
some places have more than others.

I've certainly done my part to help things along: My son is half
Chinese. My older brother's son is half Native American and half black
(he was adopted since my brother's late wife couldn't have kids) and
_his_ kids are half Hispanic. My other brother never had kids but his
girlfriend _also_ couldn't have kids and so adopted a couple of beautiful
Vietnamese girls.

White skin is _way_ overrated.
--
Frank Mayhar fr...@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
http://www.zazzle.com/fmayhar*

Frank Galikanokus

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 12:57:49 PM12/23/09
to

Really, tell me about these laws.

btw, what am I supposed to do when my spell checker doesn't know when I
spell the wrong word correctly?

Bigot? You got it wrong bub. I'm only against illegal immigration.

JAM

SkyEyes

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 1:56:40 PM12/23/09
to
On Dec 23, 10:27 am, Frank Mayhar <fr...@exit.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:18 -0800, SkyEyes wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 2:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
> >> ardent liberal.
>
> > Oh, horsepucky.  It doesn't scare me one bit, and I'm about as "white"
> > as you can get.  Also a liberal.
>
> > Now FOAD , IBen.  You're not wanted here.
>
> What Iben doesn't seem to grasp (along with pretty much all the _rest_ of
> reality) is that in many parts of the US, caucasians are _already_ a
> minority.  This includes pretty much all of the Southwest and large parts
> of West Texas.  I suspect that it's true in LA as well, overall, although
> some places have more than others.

Word. We Anglos have been a minority in southern Arizona since
forever.

> I've certainly done my part to help things along:  My son is half
> Chinese.  My older brother's son is half Native American and half black
> (he was adopted since my brother's late wife couldn't have kids) and
> _his_ kids are half Hispanic.  My other brother never had kids but his
> girlfriend _also_ couldn't have kids and so adopted a couple of beautiful
> Vietnamese girls.

Oh, cool, you come from a rainbow family, too! My family was pure
Scandahoovian when we moved to Tucson; now we have Native American
(Navajo, Yaqui, and Apache) members and Hispanic members.

That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
lutefisk. Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.

> White skin is _way_ overrated.

Indeed, as are blue eyes, especially in the Sonoran Desert. Tip: buy
stock in BluBlocker sunglasses. I go through about a pair a month.

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 4:57:42 PM12/23/09
to
"Jimbo" <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f709d69a-c55f-4648...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...

> On Dec 22, 6:06 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:

>> You already have such laws.
>> What you lack is the will to enforce them.
>
> This is the point of problem. For all of their bluster, our
> lawmakers, democrats and republicans, love those illegal immigrants.

You say that like it's a BAD thing.
They also appreciate our jaywalkers and pot-smokers and bible-thumpers and
anyone else who SUPPORTS them.
That's the way a Democracy is supposed to work.

The problem that the anti-immigrant crowd has is that they don't stand FOR
anything.
Sometimes y'all try to spin your anti-immigrant position as pro-something -
but it just rings hollow with mainstream Americans.

> What it all boils down to is despite the bluster,
> they are not going to do very much about illegal immigrants.

It's not just the politicians who so easily trick you.
Because bigots are both stupid and desperate for validation, you guys are
PERFECT marks for every con that comes along.

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:06:23 PM12/23/09
to

"Frank Galikanokus" <FrankGal...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:4B325A1D...@nospam.net...
> Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>> You already have such laws.
>> What you lack is the will to enforce them.
>>
>> btw - The word is "enact", not "intact" - you stupid bigot.
>> Really, tell me about these laws.

OK - I charge $45/hr. for tutoring services and you can pay me via Paypal..


> btw, what am I supposed to do when my spell checker doesn't know when I
> spell the wrong word correctly?

My best suggestion is that you acquaint yourself with the English language.
A little education might help you with that whole Bigot thing you've got
going on, too.

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:11:35 PM12/23/09
to

"SkyEyes" <skye...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:067d4bc3-fbab-4775...@g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

> Oh, cool, you come from a rainbow family, too!

Actually, the rainbow is the political icon for homosexuals.

Frank Mayhar

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:44:04 PM12/23/09
to
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:40 -0800, SkyEyes wrote:

> On Dec 23, 10:27 am, Frank Mayhar <fr...@exit.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:18 -0800, SkyEyes wrote:
>> > On Dec 21, 2:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
>> >> ardent liberal.
>>
>> > Oh, horsepucky.  It doesn't scare me one bit, and I'm about as
>> > "white" as you can get.  Also a liberal.
>>
>> > Now FOAD , IBen.  You're not wanted here.
>>
>> What Iben doesn't seem to grasp (along with pretty much all the _rest_
>> of reality) is that in many parts of the US, caucasians are _already_ a
>> minority.  This includes pretty much all of the Southwest and large
>> parts of West Texas.  I suspect that it's true in LA as well, overall,
>> although some places have more than others.
>
> Word. We Anglos have been a minority in southern Arizona since forever.

Were they ever a majority there? Seems like they were probably always
outnumbered by the darker-toned folks.

>> I've certainly done my part to help things along:  My son is half
>> Chinese.  My older brother's son is half Native American and half black
>> (he was adopted since my brother's late wife couldn't have kids) and
>> _his_ kids are half Hispanic.  My other brother never had kids but his
>> girlfriend _also_ couldn't have kids and so adopted a couple of
>> beautiful Vietnamese girls.
>
> Oh, cool, you come from a rainbow family, too! My family was pure
> Scandahoovian when we moved to Tucson; now we have Native American
> (Navajo, Yaqui, and Apache) members and Hispanic members.

Yeah, I didn't mention my older brother's wife's adopted daughter who
happens to be black. Bob tends to get the last word when people
(speciously) claim his views are "racist." "Here's a picture of my
family. Now, what were you saying?"

This is not bad for three guys whose father's family was poor East Texas
white trash.

> That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
> lutefisk. Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.

Mmmmturkeymmmmm.

>> White skin is _way_ overrated.
> Indeed, as are blue eyes, especially in the Sonoran Desert. Tip: buy
> stock in BluBlocker sunglasses. I go through about a pair a month.

Heh. Fortunately, hazel eyes run in my family. My son's, though, are
dark, dark brown, almost black, like his mother. He has her darker skin,
too, for which I am very grateful. I would not wish my skin on anyone.
I burn if I _think_ about going out in the sun. (Okay, that's an
exaggeration. I have actually go out for longer than 20 minutes.)

dilecticon

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:55:37 PM12/23/09
to
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jimbo" <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:f709d69a-c55f-4648...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 22, 6:06 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
>
>>> You already have such laws.
>>> What you lack is the will to enforce them.
>>
>> This is the point of problem. For all of their bluster, our
>> lawmakers, democrats and republicans, love those illegal immigrants.
>
> You say that like it's a BAD thing.

What part of "illegal" baffles you, eraserhead?

dilecticon

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:56:36 PM12/23/09
to
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
> "Frank Galikanokus" <FrankGal...@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:4B325A1D...@nospam.net...
>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>>> You already have such laws.
>>> What you lack is the will to enforce them.
>>>
>>> btw - The word is "enact", not "intact" - you stupid bigot.
>>> Really, tell me about these laws.
>
> OK - I charge $45/hr. for tutoring services

You couldn't tutor a newborn to puke, you fucking lying moron.

dilecticon

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:57:35 PM12/23/09
to
All the rainbows are homos?

Who knew?

http://www.welcomehome.org/

Free Lunch

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:59:43 PM12/23/09
to
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:55:37 -0700, dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote in
alt.atheism:

Legislatures often pass laws hoping that they will not be obeyed. While
they lose a lot of money throwing people in jails and prisons, fines are
a big-time money-making operation for governments.

dilecticon

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 6:28:56 PM12/23/09
to
Free Lunch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:55:37 -0700, dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote in
> alt.atheism:
>
>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>> "Jimbo" <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f709d69a-c55f-4648...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Dec 22, 6:06 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
>>>>> You already have such laws.
>>>>> What you lack is the will to enforce them.
>>>> This is the point of problem. For all of their bluster, our
>>>> lawmakers, democrats and republicans, love those illegal immigrants.
>>> You say that like it's a BAD thing.
>> What part of "illegal" baffles you, eraserhead?
>
> Legislatures often pass laws hoping that they will not be obeyed.

Prove it.

> While
> they lose a lot of money throwing people in jails and prisons, fines are
> a big-time money-making operation for governments.

A useless red herring.

Get lost.

AZ Nomad

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 7:31:36 PM12/23/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:16:30 -0500, J <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
>liberal. This problem could be resolved easily by tough immigration
>enforcement within our borders, and a 25 year freeze on *all* immigration

oh shit no! What'll become of your family when they're poor brown
trash?

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 6:08:06 PM12/23/09
to

"Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:d585j5ps76dp7clae...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:55:37 -0700, dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote in

>>What part of "illegal" baffles you, eraserhead?


>
> Legislatures often pass laws hoping that they will not be obeyed. While
> they lose a lot of money throwing people in jails and prisons, fines are
> a big-time money-making operation for governments.

[Removed inappropriate cross-postings to: alt.atheism, soc.men]

The immigration issue isn't so much about MAKING money as much as it is
about SAVING money.
Even if we wanted to fight the bigots' fights for them, we simply cannot
afford to do it.
Nobody can.
.

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 8:35:42 PM12/23/09
to
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:40 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 10:27?am, Frank Mayhar <fr...@exit.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:18 -0800, SkyEyes wrote:
>> > On Dec 21, 2:16?pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
>> >> ardent liberal.
>>
>> > Oh, horsepucky. ?It doesn't scare me one bit, and I'm about as "white"
>> > as you can get. ?Also a liberal.
>>
>> > Now FOAD , IBen. ?You're not wanted here.

>>
>> What Iben doesn't seem to grasp (along with pretty much all the _rest_ of
>> reality) is that in many parts of the US, caucasians are _already_ a
>> minority. ?This includes pretty much all of the Southwest and large parts
>> of West Texas. ?I suspect that it's true in LA as well, overall, although

>> some places have more than others.
>
> Word. We Anglos have been a minority in southern Arizona since
> forever.
>
>> I've certainly done my part to help things along: ?My son is half
>> Chinese. ?My older brother's son is half Native American and half black

>> (he was adopted since my brother's late wife couldn't have kids) and
>> _his_ kids are half Hispanic. ?My other brother never had kids but his

>> girlfriend _also_ couldn't have kids and so adopted a couple of beautiful
>> Vietnamese girls.
>
> Oh, cool, you come from a rainbow family, too! My family was pure
> Scandahoovian when we moved to Tucson; now we have Native American
> (Navajo, Yaqui, and Apache) members and Hispanic members.

You're a Scandahoovian? My in-laws are, too, even if they've got a bit
Welsh mixed in as well...and I'm a Scots Irish in-law to her family up in
the Dakotas, Maine, and Washington and Oregon. Small world, innit?

> That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
> lutefisk. Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.

I've avoided lutefisk for 54 years and change, and I'll stick with food that
hasn't been dead for a month at room temperature. ;-)

--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Grand Rapids 3 (December 20)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, December 26 vs. San Antonio, 7:35

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 8:59:42 PM12/23/09
to

"The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrnhj5hbd....@eris.io.com...

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:40 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
> wrote:

>> That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
>> lutefisk. Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.
>
> I've avoided lutefisk for 54 years and change, and I'll stick with food
> that
> hasn't been dead for a month at room temperature. ;-)

It's like yogurt - only with fish instead of cream.
Yummm.

Yer Pal Al

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 9:42:17 PM12/23/09
to
On Dec 23, 5:59 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
> "The Chief Instigator" <patr...@io.com> wrote in messagenews:slrnhj5hbd....@eris.io.com...
>
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:40 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net>

> > wrote:
> >> That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
> >> lutefisk.  Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.
>
> > I've avoided lutefisk for 54 years and change, and I'll stick with food
> > that
> > hasn't been dead for a month at room temperature.  ;-)
>
> It's like yogurt - only with fish instead of cream.
> Yummm.

There is something very, very wrong with Scandanavians. It's not like
it is impossible for them to get fresh fish:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iebNdCSqWmc

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 9:44:29 PM12/24/09
to

I'd rather have a Dunkin Donut (whenever there's more than one in the metro,
sometime next year - in a city of two million). The only survivor is a
15-mile drive towards the Ship Channel.

Clave

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 10:09:53 PM12/24/09
to
"Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:x6AYm.54953$cd7....@newsfe04.iad...

It's like biting into frozen vaseline.

Jim


SkyEyes

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 12:16:23 AM12/25/09
to
On Dec 23, 3:11 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
> "SkyEyes" <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in message

>
> news:067d4bc3-fbab-4775...@g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Oh, cool, you come from a rainbow family, too!
>
> Actually, the rainbow is the political icon for homosexuals.

Yeah, I know. I'm co-opting it.

SkyEyes

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 12:19:46 AM12/25/09
to
On Dec 23, 6:35 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@io.com> wrote:

Ja; Svenske fruwe.

> > That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
> > lutefisk.  Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.
>
> I've avoided lutefisk for 54 years and change, and I'll stick with food that
> hasn't been dead for a month at room temperature.  ;-)

You are wise. Now that the grandparents and aunties have passed on,
nobody clamors for the stuff anymore. However, when I was around 12-
ish, I not only had to eat it, they made me learn to fix it.
<Shudder>

dilecticon

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 12:45:14 AM12/25/09
to
And thank you for sharing your dietary oddities...

BDK

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 2:18:30 AM12/25/09
to
In article <hh1ae3$cdn$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com says...

LOL. I used to work with a woman from Norway, and she brought a few
pieces of it to work. It was one of the creepiest things I've ever
eaten. The smell. Wow!

Tastes worse than Vegamite, and that's disgusting.
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 6:35:36 AM12/25/09
to

"BDK" <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.259e314c...@news.buckeye-express.com...

> LOL. I used to work with a woman from Norway, and she brought a few
> pieces of it to work. It was one of the creepiest things I've ever
> eaten. The smell. Wow!
>
> Tastes worse than Vegamite, and that's disgusting.

I heard about it several years ago and I've actually been very interested
in trying it ever since.
One of the things I liked about being in the Navy was trying weird, new
kinds of food - and this one seems VERY weird.
... and I always liked vegemite - in small doses.
.
.

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 10:59:41 AM12/25/09
to
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:19:46 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 6:35?pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@io.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:40 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote:
>> > On Dec 23, 10:27?am, Frank Mayhar <fr...@exit.com> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:18 -0800, SkyEyes wrote:
>> >> > On Dec 21, 2:16?pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> >> >> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most
>> >> >> ardent liberal.
>>
>> >> > Oh, horsepucky. ?It doesn't scare me one bit, and I'm about as "white"
>> >> > as you can get. ?Also a liberal.
>>
>> >> > Now FOAD , IBen. ?You're not wanted here.
>>
>> >> What Iben doesn't seem to grasp (along with pretty much all the _rest_ of
>> >> reality) is that in many parts of the US, caucasians are _already_ a
>> >> minority. ?This includes pretty much all of the Southwest and large parts
>> >> of West Texas. ?I suspect that it's true in LA as well, overall, although
>> >> some places have more than others.
>>
>> > Word. ?We Anglos have been a minority in southern Arizona since

>> > forever.
>>
>> >> I've certainly done my part to help things along: ?My son is half
>> >> Chinese. ?My older brother's son is half Native American and half black
>> >> (he was adopted since my brother's late wife couldn't have kids) and
>> >> _his_ kids are half Hispanic. ?My other brother never had kids but his
>> >> girlfriend _also_ couldn't have kids and so adopted a couple of beautiful
>> >> Vietnamese girls.
>>
>> > Oh, cool, you come from a rainbow family, too! ?My family was pure

>> > Scandahoovian when we moved to Tucson; now we have Native American
>> > (Navajo, Yaqui, and Apache) members and Hispanic members.
>>
>> You're a Scandahoovian? ?My in-laws are, too, even if they've got a bit

>> Welsh mixed in as well...and I'm a Scots Irish in-law to her family up in
>> the Dakotas, Maine, and Washington and Oregon. ?Small world, innit?

>
> Ja; Svenske fruwe.
>
>> > That means we have tamales for Chrisnukkahsolstice, instead of <gag>
>> > lutefisk. ?Altogether an improvement, if you ask me.

>>
>> I've avoided lutefisk for 54 years and change, and I'll stick with food that
>> hasn't been dead for a month at room temperature. ?;-)

>
> You are wise. Now that the grandparents and aunties have passed on,
> nobody clamors for the stuff anymore. However, when I was around 12-
> ish, I not only had to eat it, they made me learn to fix it.
><Shudder>

*That* is a definite Uff Da! ;-)

Budikka666

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 3:34:16 PM12/29/09
to
On Dec 21, 3:16 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:

Whites are already in the minority on planet Earth. Deal with it you
shamefully racist piece of trash.

Budikka

duke

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 5:02:10 PM12/29/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:34:16 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:

>On Dec 21, 3:16�pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>
>Whites are already in the minority on planet Earth. Deal with it you
>shamefully racist piece of trash.

What's the matter, you big dud, tired of getting your ass kicked by me?

The Dukester, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

Lars Eighner

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 5:45:31 PM12/29/09
to
In our last episode, <3cle4h....@news.alt.net>, the lovely and talented
J broadcast on tx.politics:

> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
> liberal.

Of course it doesn't scare anyone who has accomplished anything himself. It
only scares those whose only grasp on merit is the claim that their skin is
the same color as someone who did accomplish something once.

--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> Warbama's Afghaninam day: 27
669.5 hours since Warbama declared Viet Nam II.
Warbama: An LBJ for the Twenty-First century. No hope. No change.

Enkidu

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 6:02:43 PM12/29/09
to
Lars Eighner wrote:

> In our last episode, <3cle4h....@news.alt.net>, the lovely and talented
> J broadcast on tx.politics:
>
>> This is the kind of news that scares the shit out of even the most ardent
>> liberal.
>
> Of course it doesn't scare anyone who has accomplished anything himself. It
> only scares those whose only grasp on merit is the claim that their skin is
> the same color as someone who did accomplish something once.

Considering that my wife is hispanic (and of course my daughters too), I
don't really see this as a problem either.
--
Enkidu

Virgil

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 7:20:28 PM12/29/09
to
In article <svukj5le75jme9oqd...@4ax.com>,
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:34:16 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 21, 3:16�pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> >
> >Whites are already in the minority on planet Earth. Deal with it you
> >shamefully racist piece of trash.
>
> What's the matter, you big dud, tired of getting your ass kicked by me?

One hardly tires of what has not yet come to pass.

0 new messages