Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Statehood for Puerto Rico
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
hielan' laddie  
View profile  
 More options Nov 14 2012, 10:29 am
Newsgroups: soc.history.what-if, alt.history.future
From: hielan' laddie <bobbiebu...@bobbybruce.co.uk.not>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:28:06 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 14 2012 10:28 am
Subject: Re: Statehood for Puerto Rico
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:52:51 -0500, Allen W. McDonnell wrote
(in article <k7uth7$lb...@dont-email.me>):

>> I just surfed through some of the earlier threads
>> on Puerto Rico in shwi, and I wanted a point that
>> I found in some past threads clarified.  What happens
>> to the U.S. House of Representatives?  Do they get
>> six more added or do they take six away from
>> somewhere else?  If six are deleted from elsewhere
>> how does this happen and when?  Who decides how
>> to redraw the boundaries?

> In 1911 Congress capped the number at 435 voting members of the House of
> Representatives, to increase the number either temporarily until the next
> census or permanently they would need to simply pass a new law with the new
> number and specify if the change is temporary or permanent.  See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apportionment_Act_of_1911

> The subsequent act of 1941 made redistricting and reapportionment automatic
> after each census instead of requiring a new law each decade.  Presumably
> when Congress admits Puerto Rico they will have to give them representation
> commensurate with their population, else they will be in violation of the
> equal representation standard for the House.  Personally I think they should
> just add the seats to the house chamber, it has been frozen at 435 for a
> hundred years now and the population of the country has quadrupled in that
> time so each of us only has one quarter as much influence on our
> representatives as our ancestors had.

One quarter of zero is still zero.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.