British Hooligans Lay Anti-Bush Plans
D. Spencer Hines
""UK Protesters Aim to Humiliate Bush Like Saddam" reads the Reuters
headline:
"Anti-war protesters plan to topple and dance on a mock statue of
President Bush in the center of London as part of demonstrations to
"blight" his visit to Britain next month.
Their re-working in Trafalgar Square of the famous humiliation of a
Saddam Hussein statue in Baghdad six months' ago will be among running
protests including marches and a mock trial of Bush planned around his
November 19-21 state visit.
"People are excited about the prospect of opposing George Bush because
they feel this visit adds insult to the injury already caused by the
Iraq war," said Lindsey German, of Stop the War Coalition, one of
various groups planning the events."
Now, if there's one thing we know from reading Reuters' coverage of the
Palestinian Arabs' "uprising for independence," it's that it's not a
good idea to humiliate people. The Israelis keep humiliating the poor
Palestinians, who naturally react by wantonly murdering innocent
Israelis. Isn't Lindsey German the slightest bit worried that she's
going to cause President Bush to kill lots of people by humiliating him
like this?"
James Taranto
The Wall Street Journal
----------------------
Indeed....
Counterproductive To The Max....
Hilarious!
These Brit hooligans just get dumber and dumber as time goes by.
"Loverly...."
Deus Vult.
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
foobar
> These Brit hooligans just get dumber and dumber as time goes by.
Err fistly its REALLY dumb for Bush to come to the UK right now,
everyone is pissed witht he Iraq war, and blames Bush (you can't really
blame Blair hes gone mad, I feel sorry for him really).
Expect to see just about anything when hes does come. Including the Met
trying to deal with large crowds who are going to be very fucked off.
The other thing, "These Brit hooligans" who turned up on the original
march numbered 1-2million. "These Brits" would be more accurate.
Michael W Cook
D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 5:15 am:
SNIP
> James Taranto
> The Wall Street Journal
> ----------------------
>
> Indeed....
Indeed, Hines.
More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
MWC
Christopher
wrote:
Err the so called 'hooligans' according the todays Mirror are a crowd
of assorted crustys organisations. I for one hope they do try it on,
it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
Christopher
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Kites rise highest against
the wind - not with it."
Winston Churchill
Christopher
More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
party the louder they rant.
Drew Nicholson
news:3f9297f1...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>
> Err the so called 'hooligans' according the todays Mirror are a crowd
> of assorted crustys organisations. I for one hope they do try it on,
> it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
> they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
>
Wow. The Pentagon should put you in charge of media relations. You fit
right in what that general who said that the fighting in Iraq and
Afghanistan was a fight against Satan.
Bryn Fraser
<mcai...@hotmail.com> writes
>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:53:36 +0100, foobar <gdf...@ewfsdfa.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>> These Brit hooligans just get dumber and dumber as time goes by.
>>
>>Err fistly its REALLY dumb for Bush to come to the UK right now,
>>everyone is pissed witht he Iraq war, and blames Bush (you can't really
>>blame Blair hes gone mad, I feel sorry for him really).
>>Expect to see just about anything when hes does come. Including the Met
>>trying to deal with large crowds who are going to be very fucked off.
>>
>>The other thing, "These Brit hooligans" who turned up on the original
>>march numbered 1-2million. "These Brits" would be more accurate.
>
>Err the so called 'hooligans' according the todays Mirror are a crowd
>of assorted crustys organisations. I for one hope they do try it on,
>it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
>they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
>
Hey steady on! The salmon have only just started returning....
--
Bryn Fraser
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman!" Bill Clinton
The Good Old Days, Days of Innocence...
Ken [NY)
<D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu> wrote:
>"Anti-war protesters plan to topple and dance on a mock statue of
>President Bush in the center of London as part of demonstrations to
>"blight" his visit to Britain next month.
I guess this means that David Blaine will not be available
then to throw stones at at the Thames?
Boys will be boys and men will be men.
Ken (NY)
Chairman,
Department Of Redundancy Department,
Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (VRWC)
____________________________________
email:
http://www.geocities.com/bluesguy68/email.htm
One day during the 1984 reelection campaign,
a television correspondent, Andrea Mitchell
to be exact, shouted a question across the
Rose Garden to President Reagan: "What about
Mondale's charges?" Without missing a beat,
the President paused as he was returning to
the Oval Office and replied, "Tell him he
should pay them."
Q: What the hardest thing about rollerblading?
A: Telling your parents you’re gay.
Paul J Gans
>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:53:36 +0100, foobar <gdf...@ewfsdfa.com>
>wrote:
>>
>>> These Brit hooligans just get dumber and dumber as time goes by.
>>
>>Err fistly its REALLY dumb for Bush to come to the UK right now,
>>everyone is pissed witht he Iraq war, and blames Bush (you can't really
>>blame Blair hes gone mad, I feel sorry for him really).
>>Expect to see just about anything when hes does come. Including the Met
>>trying to deal with large crowds who are going to be very fucked off.
>>
>>The other thing, "These Brit hooligans" who turned up on the original
>>march numbered 1-2million. "These Brits" would be more accurate.
>Err the so called 'hooligans' according the todays Mirror are a crowd
>of assorted crustys organisations. I for one hope they do try it on,
>it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
>they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
Have you folks no regard for the environment? Thames dumping
is so medieval.
---- Paul J. Gans
Bryn Fraser
Cook <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> writes
In message <BBB8258E.11766%crusader_p...@hotmail.com>, Michael W
Cook <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> writes
The place chock-full of Arab terrorists, very risky...
Actually I am surprised the USA have not started pounding the UK because
of the Islamic threat it poses.
Next year maybe... when Iran and Syria have been liberated...
Have you seen GWBs latest approval ratings?
40%.....
Hilarious
O mė miserum!
William Black
> I for one hope they do try it on,
> it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
> they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
As far as I'm aware the Met don't actually have access to automatic weapons,
their H&C MP-5s are specially made so they can't actually fire on full auto.
I also imagine that dumping bodies in the Thames breaks more regulations
than you would really want to.
Now get back under your rock Troll...
--
William Black
------------------
On time, on budget, or works;
Pick any two from three
D. Spencer Hines
Cook is a charter member of the Pig-Ignorant, Angry Left ---- in concert
with his buddies on USENET.
Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even though
many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
be Great any more.
DSH
Deus Vult
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
willmacd
Christopher wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:53:36 +0100, foobar <gdf...@ewfsdfa.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>These Brit hooligans just get dumber and dumber as time goes by.
>>
>>Err fistly its REALLY dumb for Bush to come to the UK right now,
>>everyone is pissed witht he Iraq war, and blames Bush (you can't really
>>blame Blair hes gone mad, I feel sorry for him really).
>>Expect to see just about anything when hes does come. Including the Met
>>trying to deal with large crowds who are going to be very fucked off.
>>
>>The other thing, "These Brit hooligans" who turned up on the original
>>march numbered 1-2million. "These Brits" would be more accurate.
>
>
> Err the so called 'hooligans' according the todays Mirror are a crowd
> of assorted crustys organisations. I for one hope they do try it on,
> it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
> they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
Please, it's taken a long time to clean up the Thames, lets not pollute
it with the rotting carcasses of "I am better than thou" scumbags.
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:27:34 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> in article aaokb.459$iV3....@eagle.america.net, D. Spencer Hines at
>> D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 5:15 am:
>>
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>>> James Taranto
>>> The Wall Street Journal
>>> ----------------------
>>>
>>> Indeed....
>>
>> Indeed, Hines.
>>
>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
>>
>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
>
> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
> party the louder they rant.
Rabid Leftie ?
I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
That was Middle England there, dear boy, and 59% of the British Population
believe Blair lied to Parliament and the public over WMD.
Christopher's obviously pissed the Tory (Maggie) Party has gone to the dogs
and are no longer taken seriously in politics.
Still, they'll be needing a new leader soon, perhaps he should stand......
Hilarious
MWC
Vaughan Sanders
"Bryn Fraser" <br...@finhall.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:drUHPuBiJqk$Ew...@finhall.demon.co.uk...
> In message <3f9297f1...@news.dsl.pipex.com>, Christopher
> <mcai...@hotmail.com> writes
> >On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:53:36 +0100, foobar <gdf...@ewfsdfa.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> These Brit hooligans just get dumber and dumber as time goes by.
> >>
> >>Err fistly its REALLY dumb for Bush to come to the UK right now,
> >>everyone is pissed witht he Iraq war, and blames Bush (you can't
really
> >>blame Blair hes gone mad, I feel sorry for him really).
> >>Expect to see just about anything when hes does come. Including the
Met
> >>trying to deal with large crowds who are going to be very fucked
off.
> >>
> >>The other thing, "These Brit hooligans" who turned up on the
original
> >>march numbered 1-2million. "These Brits" would be more accurate.
> >
> >Err the so called 'hooligans' according the todays Mirror are a crowd
> >of assorted crustys organisations. I for one hope they do try it on,
> >it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
> >they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
> >
>
> Hey steady on! The salmon have only just started returning....
>
> --
> Bryn Fraser
>
Personally I would be putting the Stars and Strips on the roof to
replace the Cross of St George ( if I had one).
But I would draw the line at polluting the Thames -:))
Red Ken is holding an *alternative* reception at City Hall for the
Anti's.
Lets do London a favour and blow him up, methinks :-))
Jamie
Vaughan Sanders
snip
>
> The place chock-full of Arab terrorists, very risky...
>
> Actually I am surprised the USA have not started pounding the UK
because
> of the Islamic threat it poses.
Well I'm sure GWB being an Essex boy, won't be short of recruits from
this part of the country, when he decides to start a war of liberation.
Jamie
Michael W Cook
br...@finhall.demon.co.uk wrote on 19/10/03 5:35 pm:
> Have you seen GWBs latest approval ratings?
>
> 40%.....
>
> Hilarious
He's also just pissed off Howard, the Oz PM, by calling him;
"The US's sheriff in SE Asia"
A massive security operation has been taking place during Bush's latest tour
to keep anti-war and anti-US protestors away from him.
Except they couldn't do a thing about the 3000 who lined his route from the
airport burning US flags and shouting anti-Bush slogans.
I can't wait till he gets here.
Maybe we should set up a bonfire for him on Tower Hill.
That's what we used do for troublesome colonials wasn't it ?
MWC
Michael W Cook
D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 6:39 pm:
> Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even though
> many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
> be Great any more.
>
> DSH
Hilarious, especially coming from someone who was never on a winning side
when he served.
The 'Great' in Britain is still very much there, Hines.
Except it got a little tarnished by following a Red Neck Cowboy into a war
the majority of the population didn't agree with.
MWC
Bryn Fraser
Cook <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> writes
I'll print passes for that one...
I hear Blair's ticker went on the blink today...
Nothing but good news all day...
Yuk Tang
> He's also just pissed off Howard, the Oz PM, by calling him;
>
> "The US's sheriff in SE Asia"
Didn't he call him John 'Major' as well? I can understand difficulties
with 'Aznar', but Howard is an English name.
--
Cheers, ymt.
Email to: jim dot laker one at btopenworld dot com
Neville Lindsay
"Michael W Cook" <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BBB8B86D.117CD%crusader_p...@hotmail.com...
> in article EaPRz4DN1rk$Ew...@finhall.demon.co.uk, Bryn Fraser at
> br...@finhall.demon.co.uk wrote on 19/10/03 5:35 pm:
>
> > Have you seen GWBs latest approval ratings?
> >
> > 40%.....
> >
> > Hilarious
>
> He's also just pissed off Howard, the Oz PM, by calling him;
>
> "The US's sheriff in SE Asia"
>
> A massive security operation has been taking place during Bush's latest
tour
> to keep anti-war and anti-US protestors away from him.
>
> Except they couldn't do a thing about the 3000 who lined his route from
the
> airport burning US flags and shouting anti-Bush slogans.
Now that is a really powerful protest from 20 million people. These few
clowns are representative?
3,000 represents 0.0015 percent of Australia's population. Now I guess our
idiot level population at 1 percent, so that magnificent 3,000 of yours
means that the organisers could turn out only 15 percent of our idiots. That
says it all - a protest of idiots, organised by idiots, reported by ....
NL
John
"Drew Nicholson" <anicho...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:5Zwkb.179279$%h1.169968@sccrnsc02...
What does that have to do with the make-up of the so-called "Stop The War"
group. Most of the leadership of these groups are extreme left (or
anarchist), and would dance in the streets if Saddam came back to power
(just to spite Bush/Blair). In fact many of them hate anything to do with
the current order, especially capitalism, IMF, WTO or global trade in
general. They hate the US far more than they do Islamo fascism. And there is
very little "peaceful" about the more radical among them (a few air-headed
kids just out to have a 'good time' notwithstanding).
John
Michael W Cook
at nev...@bigpond.net.au wrote on 20/10/03 6:18 am:
Wake up Neville, or should I perhaps call you Orville ?
The protestors weren't in Australia, Bush hasn't even got there yet.
In light of this information, plus the fact your mail address is from
Australia - that must surely make you the Village Idiot of Oz.
Congratulations.
Neville Lindsay
If you want to be a silly airhead.
> The protestors weren't in Australia, Bush hasn't even got there yet.
>
> In light of this information, plus the fact your mail address is from
> Australia - that must surely make you the Village Idiot of Oz.
>
> Congratulations.
Well, I am away fishing, no mobile phone, no television. No doubt I will
catch up with the world. Tell me what the idiot proportion was wherever the
yahoos put on their idiotic turn. Are the percentages different - a mere
3,000 of .... what? Now if it was Kribati, that would indeed be a powerful
percentage, but what is it of the actual event and country? Bugger all.
Now go and read your post and tell me how clear it is - looks like a Village
Idiot babbling to me.
Congratulations.
NL
Soren Larsen
"Neville Lindsay" <nev...@bigpond.net.au> skrev i en meddelelse
news:mYQkb.158864$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Oh My! How do you stand the isolation?
> No doubt I will
> catch up with the world.
I doubt it.
Soren Larsen
Neville Lindsay
"Soren Larsen" <soh...@tiscali.dk> wrote in message
news:bn0mck$rbsng$1...@ID-131301.news.uni-berlin.de...
Very erudite - what one would expect of a 10 year old.
NL
Soren Larsen
OK I'll be as clear as a neon sign.
If you cant catch up with access to the net, when can you catch up?
Soren Larsen
Neville Lindsay
It's what I choose to look for when fishing, and your neon is running on 6v
in your desire for juvenile spite. Try looking at the issue, and the lack of
response and evasion of the point I was making - or is that too stressful
for a 6v mind?
NL
Yuk Tang
> Neville Lindsay at nev...@bigpond.net.au wrote on 20/10/03 6:18
> am:
>> "Michael W Cook" <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> message news:BBB8B86D.117CD%crusader_p...@hotmail.com...
>>>
>>> route from
>>> the
>>> airport burning US flags and shouting anti-Bush slogans.
>>
>> Now that is a really powerful protest from 20 million people.
>> These few clowns are representative?
>> 3,000 represents 0.0015 percent of Australia's population. Now I
>> guess our idiot level population at 1 percent, so that
>> magnificent 3,000 of yours means that the organisers could turn
>> out only 15 percent of our idiots. That says it all - a protest
>> of idiots, organised by idiots, reported by ....
>
>
> The protestors weren't in Australia, Bush hasn't even got there
> yet.
>
> In light of this information, plus the fact your mail address is
> from Australia - that must surely make you the Village Idiot of
> Oz.
>
> Congratulations.
Question: what percentage of Iraq's population were involved in that
(in)famous occasion when they stomped on Saddam's statue? Numbers
involved: 100, 20 million.
Question: what percentage of the UK's population were involved in that
anti-war rally? Numbers involved: 1-2 million, 60 million.
Christopher
wrote:
Yes, the less crustys around the less air pollution there is.
> Thames dumping
>is so medieval.
Christopher
Christopher
<black_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3f9297f1...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>
>> I for one hope they do try it on,
>> it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
>> they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
>
>As far as I'm aware the Met don't actually have access to automatic weapons,
>their H&C MP-5s are specially made so they can't actually fire on full auto.
>
>I also imagine that dumping bodies in the Thames breaks more regulations
>than you would really want to.
>
>Now get back under your rock Troll...
Ah. looks like we have a crusty supporter here.
Christopher
I think you'll find what we object to was being lied to rather then
the actual war.
Christopher
<crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>in article 3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:27:34 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
>> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> in article aaokb.459$iV3....@eagle.america.net, D. Spencer Hines at
>>> D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 5:15 am:
>>>
>>>
>>> SNIP
>>>
>>>> James Taranto
>>>> The Wall Street Journal
>>>> ----------------------
>>>>
>>>> Indeed....
>>>
>>> Indeed, Hines.
>>>
>>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
>>>
>>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
>>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
>>
>> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
>> party the louder they rant.
>
>Rabid Leftie ?
If the cap fits.
>I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
True, more like useful idiots, who red kenny, and the usual leftie
suspects from parliment addresed.
>That was Middle England there, dear boy, and 59% of the British Population
>believe Blair lied to Parliament and the public over WMD.
We didn't like being lied to thats all, a clear case for the war was
not made.
>Christopher's obviously pissed the Tory (Maggie) Party has gone to the dogs
>and are no longer taken seriously in politics.
Christopher isn't a tory.
>Still, they'll be needing a new leader soon, perhaps he should stand......
As above.
>Hilarious
William Black
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:05:20 +0000 (UTC), "William Black"
> <black_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f9297f1...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
> >
> >> I for one hope they do try it on,
> >> it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
> >> they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
> >
> >As far as I'm aware the Met don't actually have access to automatic
weapons,
> >their H&C MP-5s are specially made so they can't actually fire on full
auto.
> >
> >I also imagine that dumping bodies in the Thames breaks more regulations
> >than you would really want to.
> >
> >Now get back under your rock Troll...
>
> Ah. looks like we have a crusty supporter here.
Actually no.
I'm a supporter of both Blair and the war.
However thugs who want to shoot people going about their lawful business get
no mercy.
foobar
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:05:19 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>in article t_zkb.560$iV3....@eagle.america.net, D. Spencer Hines at
>>D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 6:39 pm:
>>
>>
>>>Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even though
>>>many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
>>>be Great any more.
>>>
>>>DSH
>>
>>Hilarious, especially coming from someone who was never on a winning side
>>when he served.
>>
>>The 'Great' in Britain is still very much there, Hines.
>>Except it got a little tarnished by following a Red Neck Cowboy into a war
>>the majority of the population didn't agree with.
>
>
> I think you'll find what we object to was being lied to rather then
> the actual war.
>
marched because we were lied to?
Michael W Cook
Lindsay at nev...@bigpond.net.au wrote on 20/10/03 1:56 pm:
You answered it, so what does that make you ?
Air Head ?
Dick Head ?
Or just a plain idiot ?
Go back to your fishing, their brain power is about on par with yours.......
Michael W Cook
Lindsay at nev...@bigpond.net.au wrote on 20/10/03 2:06 pm:
>>>> Wake up Neville, or should I perhaps call you Orville ?
>>>
>>> If you want to be a silly airhead.
>>>
>>>> The protestors weren't in Australia, Bush hasn't even got there yet.
>>>>
>>>> In light of this information, plus the fact your mail address is
>> from
>>>> Australia - that must surely make you the Village Idiot of Oz.
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations.
>>>
>>> Well, I am away fishing, no mobile phone, no television.
>>
>> Oh My! How do you stand the isolation?
>>
>>
>>> No doubt I will
>>> catch up with the world.
>>
>> I doubt it.
>>
>> Soren Larsen
>
> Very erudite - what one would expect of a 10 year old.
>
> NL
No television, no radio, no mobile phone etc etc.
Neville's playing Outback Jack and Crocodile Dundee on his own.
Hilarious.
Yet he has internet access, giving him the ability to tune into just about
every major radio station and media outlet in the world at the push of a
button.
"No doubt I'll catch up with the world"
Too late, Neville, you got left you behind years ago.
MWC
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 20/10/03 4:59 pm:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:05:19 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> in article t_zkb.560$iV3....@eagle.america.net, D. Spencer Hines at
>> D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 6:39 pm:
>>
>>> Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even though
>>> many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
>>> be Great any more.
>>>
>>> DSH
>>
>> Hilarious, especially coming from someone who was never on a winning side
>> when he served.
>>
>> The 'Great' in Britain is still very much there, Hines.
>> Except it got a little tarnished by following a Red Neck Cowboy into a war
>> the majority of the population didn't agree with.
>
> I think you'll find what we object to was being lied to rather then
> the actual war.
Some predicted the outcome over a year ago.
The lies just cemented it.
MWC
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 20/10/03 5:03 pm:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> in article 3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
>>
>>>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
>>>>
>>>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
>>>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
>>>
>>> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
>>> party the louder they rant.
>>
>> Rabid Leftie ?
>
> If the cap fits.
Quite amusing, one thread I'm a Neo-Nazi, now I'm a Rabid Leftie.
Somehow me thinks the two are not compatible..........
>> I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
>
> True, more like useful idiots, who red kenny, and the usual leftie
> suspects from parliment addresed.
The speakers were of no consequence, for the majority of people who attended
it was a matter of principle to make their voice/opinion seen/heard.
My 60+ year old mother did the march and came home without going to the park
for the speakers etc - I certainly wouldn't call her a leftie.
For sure, your so-called 'Rabid Left' like the Socialist Worker Trots were
out in force along with all the other leftie loons, but they were the
minority.
>> That was Middle England there, dear boy, and 59% of the British Population
>> believe Blair lied to Parliament and the public over WMD.
>
> We didn't like being lied to thats all, a clear case for the war was
> not made.
Which is what all the people were protesting about, they didn't believe the
negotiation cycle should be stopped and the evidence presented making a case
for war was bollocks.
You've just admitted it yourself.
Except you like to label them all a bunch of Leftie Loons.
Which is not true.
Red Ken and all his cronies couldn't fill Walthamstow Dog Track, let alone
Hyde Park for a rally, you are grossly distorting the event.
>> Christopher's obviously pissed the Tory (Maggie) Party has gone to the dogs
>> and are no longer taken seriously in politics.
>
> Christopher isn't a tory.
Good for you.
Stop acting like one of Maggie's boys then people won't get confused.
MWC
Brad Meyer
<crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>The 'Great' in Britain is still very much there, Hines.
The "Great" in Britain expired in the Suez in '56 following a
lingering illness after two major attacks. Remains on view in England.
Neville Lindsay
"Michael W Cook" <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BBB9E3FE.1184A%crusader_p...@hotmail.com...
> in article f01ff3fb.03102...@posting.google.com, kit spanos at
> spa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote on 20/10/03 5:02 pm:
>
> > "D. Spencer Hines" <D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu> wrote in message
> > news:<t_zkb.560$iV3....@eagle.america.net>...
> >> You've certainly got that right.
> >>
> >> Cook is a charter member of the Pig-Ignorant, Angry Left ---- in
concert
> >> with his buddies on USENET.
> >>
> >> Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even
though
> >> many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
> >> be Great any more.
> >
> >
> > Know much about Britain, Spencer?
>
> He likes to boast he's related to British Royalty - Princess Di, all the
> Medieval Kings, AND he calls Winston Churchill his cousin.
>
> In reality he's the failed son of a US Admiral, who has pissed up the wall
> every opportunity that has been handed to him on a plate.
>
> Ignore Hines, like Neville 'Outback Jack' he's another Group Village
Idiot.
>
> MWC
Ah, the Man (?) Without Argument who has to use ad hominem instead. It is
very comfortable to be abused by you and your ilk, as it shows just how
bankrupt you are, and that you are incapable of rational argument and
clueless to boot. Nary a useful point to make, no interesting discussion, no
knowledgeable input, no constructive contribution, just sniping, whinging,
whining, snivelling and abuse. You are starting to make Hinesy look good by
comparison. Quite an achievement.
NL
Neville Lindsay
As usual, you clowns do anything not to address the issue, and resort to
school yard level abuse. I suppose that is all you are capable of. I have
yet to see you make an adult statement and address an issue with a sane
response. But children are unruly these days.
NL
Christopher
<black_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3f94058c...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:05:20 +0000 (UTC), "William Black"
>> <black_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:3f9297f1...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>> >
>> >> I for one hope they do try it on,
>> >> it'll give the police an excuse to machine gun the scum down before
>> >> they flush their stinking carcasses into the thames.
>> >
>> >As far as I'm aware the Met don't actually have access to automatic
>weapons,
>> >their H&C MP-5s are specially made so they can't actually fire on full
>auto.
>> >
>> >I also imagine that dumping bodies in the Thames breaks more regulations
>> >than you would really want to.
>> >
>> >Now get back under your rock Troll...
>>
>> Ah. looks like we have a crusty supporter here.
>
>Actually no.
>
>I'm a supporter of both Blair and the war.
That's even worse.
>However thugs who want to shoot people going about their lawful business get
>no mercy.
Crustys couldn't engage in 'lawful business' if their life depened on
it, most of them are unemployable layabout's who live on benefits and
the only work that do is make the female crusty slapplers pregnant so
they can claim more money for the little bastards they'll produce.
Christopher
wrote:
>Christopher wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:05:19 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
>> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>in article t_zkb.560$iV3....@eagle.america.net, D. Spencer Hines at
>>>D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 6:39 pm:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even though
>>>>many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
>>>>be Great any more.
>>>>
>>>>DSH
>>>
>>>Hilarious, especially coming from someone who was never on a winning side
>>>when he served.
>>>
>>>The 'Great' in Britain is still very much there, Hines.
>>>Except it got a little tarnished by following a Red Neck Cowboy into a war
>>>the majority of the population didn't agree with.
>>
>>
>> I think you'll find what we object to was being lied to rather then
>> the actual war.
>>
>1-2 million people say we object to the war. How many people have
>marched because we were lied to?
1.99 million.
Christopher
<crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>in article 3f940630...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 20/10/03 4:59 pm:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:05:19 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
>> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> in article t_zkb.560$iV3....@eagle.america.net, D. Spencer Hines at
>>> D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu wrote on 19/10/03 6:39 pm:
>>>
>>>> Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even though
>>>> many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
>>>> be Great any more.
>>>>
>>>> DSH
>>>
>>> Hilarious, especially coming from someone who was never on a winning side
>>> when he served.
>>>
>>> The 'Great' in Britain is still very much there, Hines.
>>> Except it got a little tarnished by following a Red Neck Cowboy into a war
>>> the majority of the population didn't agree with.
>>
>> I think you'll find what we object to was being lied to rather then
>> the actual war.
>
>Some predicted the outcome over a year ago.
Like who?
>The lies just cemented it.
>
>MWC
>
Christopher
Christopher
<crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>in article 3f940685...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 20/10/03 5:03 pm:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
>> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> in article 3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
>>>
>>>>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
>>>>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
>>>>
>>>> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
>>>> party the louder they rant.
>>>
>>> Rabid Leftie ?
>>
>> If the cap fits.
>
>Quite amusing, one thread I'm a Neo-Nazi, now I'm a Rabid Leftie.
>
>Somehow me thinks the two are not compatible..........
You're a schizophric.
>>> I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
>>
>> True, more like useful idiots, who red kenny, and the usual leftie
>> suspects from parliment addresed.
>
>The speakers were of no consequence, for the majority of people who attended
>it was a matter of principle to make their voice/opinion seen/heard.
>
>My 60+ year old mother did the march and came home without going to the park
>for the speakers etc - I certainly wouldn't call her a leftie.
A useful idiot then.
>For sure, your so-called 'Rabid Left' like the Socialist Worker Trots were
>out in force along with all the other leftie loons, but they were the
>minority.
Who also make the most noise.
>>> That was Middle England there, dear boy, and 59% of the British Population
>>> believe Blair lied to Parliament and the public over WMD.
>>
>> We didn't like being lied to thats all, a clear case for the war was
>> not made.
>
>Which is what all the people were protesting about, they didn't believe the
>negotiation cycle should be stopped and the evidence presented making a case
>for war was bollocks.
>
>You've just admitted it yourself.
>
>Except you like to label them all a bunch of Leftie Loons.
>
>Which is not true.
I called them useful idiot's, not 'leftie loons'.
>Red Ken and all his cronies couldn't fill Walthamstow Dog Track, let alone
>Hyde Park for a rally, you are grossly distorting the event.
They knew kenny and his elk were going to speak, and yet the park had
a decent crowd.
>>> Christopher's obviously pissed the Tory (Maggie) Party has gone to the dogs
>>> and are no longer taken seriously in politics.
>>
>> Christopher isn't a tory.
>
>Good for you.
Christopher isn't a labour or lib-dem either.
>Stop acting like one of Maggie's boys then people won't get confused.
Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
see you outside.
Paul J Gans
>That's even worse.
How do I get to be a "crusty". Sounds like great work.
Is there an application office? How many females do I
get to make pregnant? Is there beer?
Inquiring minds want to know.
---- Paul J. Gans
D. Spencer Hines
Tell us more about these _Crustys_ _Layabouts_ and _Slapplers_.
Is some of this your marvelous Cockney Rhyming Slang [CRS] again?
Can one write _Crusties_ as well ---- or must it be _Crustys_?
An excellent Churchill quote too ---- it encapsulates my seven years on
USENET quite nicely.
Cheers,
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Britannicus Traductus Sum
"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f95115b...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
| Crustys couldn't engage in 'lawful business' if their life depened
[sic] on
| it, most of them are unemployable layabout's [sic] who live on
benefits and
| the only work that [sic] do is make the female crusty slapplers
Martin Reboul
Christopher wrote...
> Michael W Cook wrote:
>
> > D. Spencer Hines am:
> >
> >
> >SNIP
> >
> >> James Taranto
> >> The Wall Street Journal
> >> ----------------------
> >>
> >> Indeed....
> >
> >Indeed, Hines.
> >
> >
> >This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
> >population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
>
> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
> party the louder they rant.
Oh dear, not another one? Christopher eh...unusual name for an NN, they
usually choose something more Wagnerian. Oh well, we shall see....
Cheers
Martin
Martin Reboul
D. Spencer Hines wrote ...
> You've certainly got that right.
>
> Cook is a charter member of the Pig-Ignorant, Angry Left ---- in concert
> with his buddies on USENET.
>
> many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
> be Great any more.
Careful Christopher! This sad old queen is a notorious bugger and is clearly
trying to 'recruit' you for some loathesome purpose (probably involving you
kneeling before him - shudder!). Only fair to warn you....
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 21/10/03 12:14 pm:
> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
> see you outside.
Wanker.
Martin Reboul
Neville Lindsay wrote...
>
> Michael W Cook wrote...
Well Neville, I'm afraid you really must be fair here.
You have shown yourself to be an absolute wanker, arsehole and idiot so
many times on these newsgroups, what else do you expect? You are (I fear)
almost on a par with Seppo the Clown.
I hope you still feel comfortable...
Cheers
Martin
Martin Reboul
Christopher wrote...
> Michael W Cook wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> >> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> in article 3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
> >>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
> >>>
> >>>>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
> >>>>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
> >>>>
> >>>> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
> >>>> party the louder they rant.
> >>>
> >>> Rabid Leftie ?
> >>
> >> If the cap fits.
> >
> >Quite amusing, one thread I'm a Neo-Nazi, now I'm a Rabid Leftie.
> >
> >Somehow me thinks the two are not compatible..........
>
> You're a schizophric.
:¬) And you are illiterate!
> >>> I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
> >>
> >> True, more like useful idiots, who red kenny, and the usual leftie
> >> suspects from parliment addresed.
> >
> >The speakers were of no consequence, for the majority of people who
attended
> >it was a matter of principle to make their voice/opinion seen/heard.
> >
> >My 60+ year old mother did the march and came home without going to the
park
> >for the speakers etc - I certainly wouldn't call her a leftie.
>
> A useful idiot then.
You do like to live dangerously don't you 'Chris'!
> >For sure, your so-called 'Rabid Left' like the Socialist Worker Trots
were
> >out in force along with all the other leftie loons, but they were the
> >minority.
>
> Who also make the most noise.
No, you whining, bleating nazi tossers make far more - not that I like
listening to either.
> >>> That was Middle England there, dear boy, and 59% of the British
Population
> >>> believe Blair lied to Parliament and the public over WMD.
> >>
> >> We didn't like being lied to thats all, a clear case for the war was
> >> not made.
> >
> >Which is what all the people were protesting about, they didn't believe
the
> >negotiation cycle should be stopped and the evidence presented making a
case
> >for war was bollocks.
> >
> >You've just admitted it yourself.
> >
> >Except you like to label them all a bunch of Leftie Loons.
> >
> >Which is not true.
>
> I called them useful idiot's, not 'leftie loons'.
>
> >Red Ken and all his cronies couldn't fill Walthamstow Dog Track, let
alone
> >Hyde Park for a rally, you are grossly distorting the event.
>
> They knew kenny and his elk were going to speak, and yet the park had
> a decent crowd.
>
> >>> Christopher's obviously pissed the Tory (Maggie) Party has gone to the
dogs
> >>> and are no longer taken seriously in politics.
> >>
> >> Christopher isn't a tory.
Hah! A bit left wing for him...
> >Good for you.
>
> Christopher isn't a labour or lib-dem either.
Quite...
> >Stop acting like one of Maggie's boys then people won't get confused.
>
> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
> see you outside.
And then quotes Churchill! Sad fellow... I'll see you outside, only to laugh
at mind.
D'ye reckon this one is English for a change?
Cheers
Martin
LizR
>Crustys couldn't engage in 'lawful business' if their life depened on
>it, most of them are unemployable layabout's
Jesus effing wept! If you're going to wipe the floor with Crusties, please could you
try and arrange for an adult to punctuate your posts!?
>who live on benefits and
>the only work that do is make the female crusty slapplers
Slapplers? Maybe your minder should check your spellings too?
>pregnant so
>they can claim more money for the little bastards they'll produce.
oh ar, and with a bit of luck the SS will pay them enough to move into your road in
Surbiton. That'd be funny!
Liz
Christopher
wrote:
No, just don't wash for a 6 months, don't have you're hair cut for
over a year, and wear tatty smelly old clothes, and of course live on
the dole.
>How many females do I
>get to make pregnant?
That depends on you.
>Is there beer?
Carlsberg Special Brew is what I've heard they drink.
>Inquiring minds want to know.
Christopher
Christopher
<D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu> wrote:
>That's a most interesting paragraph. Vide infra.
>
>Tell us more about these _Crustys_ _Layabouts_ and _Slapplers_.
Have a look at any rent a mob where the anarchy groups are, and you'll
see them.
Christopher
>On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:01:15 GMT, mcai...@hotmail.com (Christopher) wrote:
>>Crustys couldn't engage in 'lawful business' if their life depened on
>>it, most of them are unemployable layabout's
>
>Jesus effing wept! If you're going to wipe the floor with Crusties, please could you
>try and arrange for an adult to punctuate your posts!?
Piss off bitch.
>>who live on benefits and
>>the only work that do is make the female crusty slapplers
>
>Slapplers? Maybe your minder should check your spellings too?
Alright its Slappers. Happy now.
>>pregnant so
>>they can claim more money for the little bastards they'll produce.
>
>oh ar, and with a bit of luck the SS will pay them enough to move into your road in
>Surbiton. That'd be funny!
Better still move them to Australia, out of sight...
Christopher
Plonker.
Christopher
<mar...@reboul1471.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>Christopher wrote...
>> Michael W Cook wrote:
>>
>> > Christopher wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
>> >> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> in article 3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>> >>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
>> >>>
>> >>>>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the British
>> >>>>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against something
>> >>>> party the louder they rant.
>> >>>
>> >>> Rabid Leftie ?
>> >>
>> >> If the cap fits.
>> >
>> >Quite amusing, one thread I'm a Neo-Nazi, now I'm a Rabid Leftie.
>> >
>> >Somehow me thinks the two are not compatible..........
>>
>> You're a schizophric.
>
>:¬) And you are illiterate!
How?
>> >>> I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
>> >>
>> >> True, more like useful idiots, who red kenny, and the usual leftie
>> >> suspects from parliment addresed.
>> >
>> >The speakers were of no consequence, for the majority of people who
>attended
>> >it was a matter of principle to make their voice/opinion seen/heard.
>> >
>> >My 60+ year old mother did the march and came home without going to the
>park
>> >for the speakers etc - I certainly wouldn't call her a leftie.
>>
>> A useful idiot then.
>
>You do like to live dangerously don't you 'Chris'!
Whats to fear from a line of text.
>> >For sure, your so-called 'Rabid Left' like the Socialist Worker Trots
>were
>> >out in force along with all the other leftie loons, but they were the
>> >minority.
>>
>> Who also make the most noise.
>
>No, you whining, bleating nazi tossers make far more - not that I like
>listening to either.
I'm not a nazi, which are socialists by another name.
>> >>> That was Middle England there, dear boy, and 59% of the British
>Population
>> >>> believe Blair lied to Parliament and the public over WMD.
>> >>
>> >> We didn't like being lied to thats all, a clear case for the war was
>> >> not made.
>> >
>> >Which is what all the people were protesting about, they didn't believe
>the
>> >negotiation cycle should be stopped and the evidence presented making a
>case
>> >for war was bollocks.
>> >
>> >You've just admitted it yourself.
>> >
>> >Except you like to label them all a bunch of Leftie Loons.
>> >
>> >Which is not true.
>>
>> I called them useful idiot's, not 'leftie loons'.
>>
>> >Red Ken and all his cronies couldn't fill Walthamstow Dog Track, let
>alone
>> >Hyde Park for a rally, you are grossly distorting the event.
>>
>> They knew kenny and his elk were going to speak, and yet the park had
>> a decent crowd.
>>
>> >>> Christopher's obviously pissed the Tory (Maggie) Party has gone to the
>dogs
>> >>> and are no longer taken seriously in politics.
>> >>
>> >> Christopher isn't a tory.
>
>Hah! A bit left wing for him...
Nope.
>> >Good for you.
>>
>> Christopher isn't a labour or lib-dem either.
>
>Quite...
Quite?
>> >Stop acting like one of Maggie's boys then people won't get confused.
>>
>> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
>> see you outside.
>
>And then quotes Churchill! Sad fellow... I'll see you outside, only to laugh
>at mind.
>D'ye reckon this one is English for a change?
Of course I'm English, are you a Scot, a Paddy, a Sheep shagger?
Christopher
Christopher didn't post that above this reply.
Drew Nicholson
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:12:19 +0100, "Martin Reboul"
> <mar...@reboul1471.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> >D. Spencer Hines wrote ...
> >> You've certainly got that right.
> >>
> >> Cook is a charter member of the Pig-Ignorant, Angry Left ---- in
concert
> >> with his buddies on USENET.
> >>
> >> Bush is doing The Right Thing in going to Great Britain ---- even
though
> >> many scruffy little ragamuffin Brits of Cook's ilk no longer want it to
> >> be Great any more.
> >
> >Careful Christopher! This sad old queen is a notorious bugger and is
clearly
> >trying to 'recruit' you for some loathesome purpose (probably involving
you
> >kneeling before him - shudder!). Only fair to warn you....
> >
> Christopher didn't post that above this reply.
>
Does Christopher refer to himself in the third person often?
Martin is trying to warn you that if Hines agrees with you, and butters you
up, you're doing something wrong. We've seen it before, in Nellie, MF-er,
and a few others around here. Quite sad, really.
Drew
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 22/10/03 11:24 am:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:23:38 GMT, LizR <news...@excite.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:01:15 GMT, mcai...@hotmail.com (Christopher) wrote:
>>> Crustys couldn't engage in 'lawful business' if their life depened on
>>> it, most of them are unemployable layabout's
>>
>> Jesus effing wept! If you're going to wipe the floor with Crusties, please
>> could you
>> try and arrange for an adult to punctuate your posts!?
>
> Piss off bitch.
>
>>> who live on benefits and
>>> the only work that do is make the female crusty slapplers
>>
>> Slapplers? Maybe your minder should check your spellings too?
>
> Alright its Slappers. Happy now.
>
>>> pregnant so
>>> they can claim more money for the little bastards they'll produce.
>>
>> oh ar, and with a bit of luck the SS will pay them enough to move into your
>> road in
>> Surbiton. That'd be funny!
>
> Better still move them to Australia, out of sight...
He was right, he's NOT a Tory or one of Maggie's Boys.
He's BNP.
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 22/10/03 11:25 am:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:12:01 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> in article 3f9512bb...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 21/10/03 12:14 pm:
>>
>>> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
>>> see you outside.
>>
>> Wanker.
>>
> Plonker.
Wow......
"Plonker"
That's got me quaking.
Christopher obviously fancies himself as a bit of a hard man.
He'd probably had half a shandy when he issued his threat to meet me
outside. Either that or his mates were with him and he thought he'd act
tough and try and show off in front of them.
Hilarious.
Christopher
Nope, he's UKIP.
Christopher
Hmmmm, is Wotan on that list.
Christopher
<crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>in article 3f965afc...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 22/10/03 11:25 am:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:12:01 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
>> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> in article 3f9512bb...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
>>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 21/10/03 12:14 pm:
>>>
>>>> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
>>>> see you outside.
>>>
>>> Wanker.
>>>
>> Plonker.
>
>Wow......
>
>"Plonker"
>
>That's got me quaking.
So it should.
>Christopher obviously fancies himself as a bit of a hard man.
>He'd probably had half a shandy
I don't drink. I'm teetotal.
>when he issued his threat to meet me
>outside. Either that or his mates were with him and he thought he'd act
>tough and try and show off in front of them.
Nope.
foobar
> | Christopher
> | +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> | "Kites rise highest against
> | the wind - not with it."
> | Winston Churchill
Heres a better Churchill quote:
All quotes in the excerpt are properly footnoted in the original
book, with full references to British archives and papers. Excerpt from
pages 179-181 of Simons, Geoff. *IRAQ: FROM SUMER TO SUDAN*. London: St.
Martins Press, 1994:
Winston Churchill, as colonial secretary, was sensitive to the cost
of policing the Empire; and was in consequence keen to exploit the
potential of modern technology. This strategy had particular relevance
to operations in Iraq. On 19 February, 1920, before the start of the
Arab uprising, Churchill (then Secretary for War and Air) wrote to Sir
Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare. Would it be possible for
Trenchard to take control of Iraq? This would entail *the provision of
some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some
kind but not death...for use in preliminary operations against turbulent
tribes.*
Christopher
wrote:
I usually change my sig at the end of the month.
Martin Reboul
Christopher wrote...
> Martin Reboul wrote:
>
> >
> >Christopher wrote...
> >> Michael W Cook wrote:
> >>
> >> > Christopher wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC), Michael W Cook
> >> >> <crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> in article 3f92988b...@news.dsl.pipex.com, Christopher at
> >> >>> mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 19/10/03 2:59 pm:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>> More bullshit from The Wall Street BushCo Loon.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> This is not a small anti-war group, but the majority of the
British
> >> >>>>> population feel the same - Bush is NOT welcome in the UK.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> More bs, from a rabid leftie, the smaller the anti against
something
> >> >>>> party the louder they rant.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Rabid Leftie ?
> >> >>
> >> >> If the cap fits.
> >> >
> >> >Quite amusing, one thread I'm a Neo-Nazi, now I'm a Rabid Leftie.
> >> >
> >> >Somehow me thinks the two are not compatible..........
> >>
> >> You're a schizophric.
> >
> >:¬) And you are illiterate!
>
> How?
Possibly schizophrenic too...
>
> >> >>> I wouldn't call the million plus in Hyde Park rabid anything.
> >> >>
> >> >> True, more like useful idiots, who red kenny, and the usual leftie
> >> >> suspects from parliment addresed.
> >> >
> >> >The speakers were of no consequence, for the majority of people who
attended
> >> >it was a matter of principle to make their voice/opinion seen/heard.
> >> >
> >> >My 60+ year old mother did the march and came home without going to
the park
> >> >for the speakers etc - I certainly wouldn't call her a leftie.
> >>
> >> A useful idiot then.
> >
> >You do like to live dangerously don't you 'Chris'!
>
> Whats to fear from a line of text.
I expect you'll find out.
> >> >For sure, your so-called 'Rabid Left' like the Socialist Worker Trots
were
> >> >out in force along with all the other leftie loons, but they were the
> >> >minority.
> >>
> >> Who also make the most noise.
> >
> >No, you whining, bleating nazi tossers make far more - not that I like
> >listening to either.
>
> I'm not a nazi, which are socialists by another name.
National Socialists. A name... and just about as 'socialist' as Tony Blair.
Well, you certainly sound like one Christopher.
Must be a liberal then.
> >> >Good for you.
> >>
> >> Christopher isn't a labour or lib-dem either.
> >
> >Quite...
>
> Quite?
Quite.
> >> >Stop acting like one of Maggie's boys then people won't get confused.
> >>
> >> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
> >> see you outside.
> >
> >And then quotes Churchill! Sad fellow... I'll see you outside, only to
laugh
> >at mind.
> >D'ye reckon this one is English for a change?
>
> Of course I'm English, are you a Scot, a Paddy, a Sheep shagger?
Tut tut! Seppo would probably call you a rascist for that...
I am also English - however, I expect that's all we have in common.
Fortunately for me.
Like all Englishmen, I have traces of all those in my blood and many others.
We are a bunch of mongrels - that's where our adaptability and strength
comes from.
Cheers
Martin
Martin Reboul
British Nazi Plonker, or Bleating Nancy Ponce?
>
> Nope, he's UKIP.
Aha... "UK Incompetant Pratt" I presume.
Or "UK Insolent Pogue" perhaps?
I object to the letters UK being used in such a fashion whichever it might
be, especially by one who calls the Welsh and Irish "sheep shaggers and
paddies" - a bit rich! Hardly united....
Cheers
Martin
William Black
Bob Sims, well known Nazi and racist, and also known as Wotan, doesn't
play here, we're a bit too rough...
--
William Black
------------------
On time, on budget, or works;
Pick any two from three
William Black
"D. Spencer Hines" <D._Spenc...@usa.yale.edu> wrote in message
news:Lnflb.685$iV3....@eagle.america.net...
> That's a most interesting paragraph. Vide infra.
>
> Tell us more about these _Crustys_ _Layabouts_ and _Slapplers_.
>
> Is some of this your marvelous Cockney Rhyming Slang [CRS] again?
>
> Can one write _Crusties_ as well ---- or must it be _Crustys_?
'Crusty' is usually applied to travellers not of Romany stock. The term
seems to be originally military and was applied to someone who does not
shower every day
'Layabout' is invariably used by the right wing press to denote people
without paid employment. It is not a term in common usage.
'Slapper' derives from 'Patty Slapper', a low level worker in the fish
packing industry. It usually means a woman of working class origins who is
believed to be of loose morals.
William Black
>
> Nope, he's UKIP.
Is that the bunch who levitate?
William Black
> I'm not a nazi, which are socialists by another name.
The pinging noise you can all hear is your inbuilt right-wing loony detector
going off.
Michael W Cook
mcai...@hotmail.com wrote on 22/10/03 2:59 pm:
>> He was right, he's NOT a Tory or one of Maggie's Boys.
>>
>> He's BNP.
>>
>
> Nope, he's UKIP.
UK Independence Party.
Hilarious.
More like a Chimps Tea Party.
The UKIP are no-hope group of disaffected right-wing Tories who are going
nowhere fast. People take more notice of the Monster Raving Loony Party.
Bryn Fraser
<black_...@hotmail.com> writes
Piggy-backing here...
Have just heard that reporter Mark Daly (The Secret Policeman BBC1 last
night) has been arrested...
Can anybody confirm...?
>
>
--
Bryn Fraser
Martin Reboul
Bryn Fraser wrote...
> William Black writes
> >
> >"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f965b41...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
> >
> >> I'm not a nazi, which are socialists by another name.
> >
> >The pinging noise you can all hear is your inbuilt right-wing loony
detector
> >going off.
> >
> >--
> >William Black
> >------------------
> >On time, on budget, or works;
> >Pick any two from three
>
> Piggy-backing here...
>
> Have just heard that reporter Mark Daly (The Secret Policeman BBC1 last
> night) has been arrested...
>
> Can anybody confirm...?
Apparently so - I somehow have a funny feeling he'll not be charged however!
If he is, I shall start the 'public outcry'! Living very near to a famous
police training establishment, I hav enot only seen their 'new recruits' in
action, but have actually fought with them on more than one occasion - as
piss-poor a bunch of prejudiced, stupid, cowardly, ignorant scum as I have
ever seen, I'm afraid to say. Not only racially either - they even hated
long hair at one time (as they had to have theirs cut I suspect!) and still
hate anyone with a better car. Usually the sort of rats who were bullied at
school, with grudges and chips on their shoulders, bitter, twisted and
thirsting for revenge.
These were the ones I saw in my various local pubs anyway, something that
has stopped lately I'm glad to say. Cowardly, cringing rats when in groups
of two or three, but rather like a bunch of England fans abroad when in a
larger mob. They have now been banned from visiting local pubs for well over
a decade, following a famous (and glorious) local battle which they lost
very heavily indeed (never taught to handle pool cues properly!).
Those that could still walk were marched out bleeding to vans by their
NCO's, to the great and cruel delight of the local bikers, hippies, Pakis,
wogs and girls, who had had enough, and whose combined forces finally
removed them from this manor for good. Horrible to think some may be senior
officers by now. An absolute shower!
Actually, they have seemed a lot better recently, and I even 'pulled' a
trainee policewoman once a while back... though that may show her judgement
probaly isn't really to be trusted, or so some might say. It's a tough and
difficult job - we only want the best doing it!
Cheers
Martin
Bryn Fraser
<mar...@reboul1471.freeserve.co.uk> writes
Too bloody right, the best are extraordinary... Some of the troops are
crap...
Unfortunately extreme political views are alive and well and organised
within our police forces.
I hope that Mark Daly's employers are as concerned about his safety as I
am... Any knowledge of the charges?
Remember Blair Peach...?
>
>
>
>
--
Bryn Fraser
Michael W Cook
black_...@hotmail.com wrote on 22/10/03 6:25 pm:
>
> "Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3f968d20...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>
>>
>> Nope, he's UKIP.
>
> Is that the bunch who levitate?
Very similar, I believe you're talking about the ones who jump about with
their legs crossed in a Yoga position (Yogic Flyers?).
The UKIP are the ones who nobody has heard of since Goldsmith died shortly
after the '97 election. If I remember rightly, that was when David Mellor
lost his seat and the UKIP still lost their deposit.
Seeing as Christopher can write, of a sorts, I expect if he's got the front
to call himself a UKIP supporter, they'll have him standing somewhere at the
next election.
Here's a predicted result:
Labour - 16475
Lib Dem - 9392
Conservative - 2673
Ind Labour - 1765
BNP - 654
Monster Raving Loony - 567
NO Euro - 256
Save our Hospital - 199
UKIP - 176
Another Lost deposit...................
Hilarious.
You could stand as Mickey Mouse and still get more votes than the UKIP.
MWC
Alex
> If he is, I shall start the 'public outcry'! Living very near to a famous
> police training establishment, I hav enot only seen their 'new recruits' in
> action, but have actually fought with them on more than one occasion - as
> piss-poor a bunch of prejudiced, stupid, cowardly, ignorant scum as I have
> ever seen, I'm afraid to say. Not only racially either - they even hated
> long hair at one time (as they had to have theirs cut I suspect!) and still
> hate anyone with a better car. Usually the sort of rats who were bullied at
> school, with grudges and chips on their shoulders, bitter, twisted and
> thirsting for revenge.
BASTARDS!!! I was just pulled over by the police on my way home. No
real reason, just a "routine vehicle documents inspection". Did I have
all of my vehicle documents upon me? (Is it normal to carry one's MOT
certificate in one's wallet?!) Wankers. Just because they were bored
and mine was the only car on the road at 1am, they tailed me for five
minutes and then pulled me over to play the most pathetic practical joke
since Cardinal Wolsey got his knob out at Hampton Court and pretended to
be a door! Now I have to trapse to the other side of town with all of
my car documents to present them at a police station, or I'll have
suddenly committed an offnce. Is this how they bugger about with their
statistics, by making up new "crimes"? Just as well I'm not a member of
any ethinic minority, or they might have beaten me up for the
inconvenience my ownership of a car evidently caused them!
They weren't nearly so fastidious on any of the 8 occassions that my car
has been broken into in the last 8 years. They didn't even bother to
look at the car on 7 of the 8 times. Nor were they especially
apologetic when they "accidentally" broke into my house (wrongly), then
just left it unguarded and unlocked, and quite clearly open, until I
arrived home (to have a heart attack) several hours later.
Why don't they go and get proper jobs, ey?
Cheers, Annoyed of Salford
Alex
Doesn't say that much about the UKIP, though. You can stand as a man in
a monkey suit and still get elected mayor of Darlington.
And it's well known that any strategically-shaved chimp wearing a blue
rosette could still win a safe Tory seat.
Cheers, Alex
Drew Nicholson
>
> >Christopher obviously fancies himself as a bit of a hard man.
> >He'd probably had half a shandy
>
> I don't drink. I'm teetotal.
>
Now, that explains a lot.
At least you're referring to yourself in first person, now...
Drew
Martin Reboul
Alex wrote...
Hmmm... this sounds rather familiar! One time I was stopped (many years ago)
I had the usual questions...
"Is this your car sir?"
"Yes" (NEVER say no, even if it is someone else's you've borrowed!)
"Do you have insurance?"
"Yes"
"Is this vehicle MOT'd?"
"It is.. here, I have the documents... and the V10, and my driving
licence..." (stands back looking suspicious, examining documents in minute
detail by torchlight. All is correct, looks rather disappointed and
eventually hands them back with a pout of annoyance)
"Do you normally carry these documents around with you sir?"
"Yes"
"Why is that... it seems 'unusual'?"
"Well, because you lot keep asking to see them and I'm tired of visiting the
police station and having to wait, that's why"
"There's no need to get shirty 'sir', I only asked... have you been
drinking?"
And so it went on in the time wasting,.time honoured tradition, while
several women were raped, several people stabbed by muggers and several
fights broke out on the other side of town no doubt.
One of the most illuminating and amusing incidents occurred the last time
that I was stopped, in a rather dodgy part of west London a while ago. It
was a hot day, and two heavily overweight and rather irritable coppers
pulled me up at some traffic lights. I was driving a rather dodgy Mini
Cooper with no MOT, no tax and no grill, and I had some 'contraband' aboard,
which I was rather keen for them to 'overlook'....
"Is this your car sir?"
"Yes"
"Why is there no grill?"
"It keeps cooler that way." (Officer #1bends over, sweating profusely and
looking as if he might explode with the effort as he peers into engine and
points vaguely at fan belt - a good 12" within. Adopts solemn tone.)
"That could be dangerous - what if someone was to get caught up in those fan
blades? This vehicle is unfit to be on the road!"
"Mmmm.... I see your point officer, but if anyone had got stuffed that far
into the engine compartment, I reckon being clipped by a fan blade wouldn't
really bother them?"
"Okay, that's enough of that... I'm telling you this car shouldn't...." At
this moment there is an urgent call on his radio 'violent assault in
progress - urgent assistance required!' and officer #2, who has been peering
into the car with alarming diligence, perks up when the road name is
mentioned... as do I.
"That's this road sarge!?" he pipes up. We are actually at the corner of the
very road mentioned! Officer #1 suddenly loses all his bullish arrogance and
goes a bit pale and thoughtful, looking up at the road name and biting his
lip as he shakes his big, fat head.
"Er... nah, it's right up the other end... leave it..." I see my chance to
escape.
"Quick lads - jump in, I'll take you there!" (How public spirited!)
"No... er... you'd best be on your way sir.... we'll overlook it this
time... come on, you're causing an obstruction..." wink, nervous smile...
off I go.
Exactly as it happened... a disgraceful display of cowardice and dereliction
of duty IMO, but I thought it best to forget about it as did they, the idle
bastards.
Even so, I am told our policemen are wonderful, and I have met a few who
actually were - about 50% I reckon. Age seems to improve them?
Cheers
Martin
Drew Nicholson
news:bn7hql$lub$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Exactly as it happened... a disgraceful display of cowardice and
dereliction
> of duty IMO, but I thought it best to forget about it as did they, the
idle
> bastards.
>
Same sorts of harrassment happen here. I'm driving down the road, doing
nothing illegal, and a cop pulls me over. Says he ran the tags, and my
wife, who's the registered owner, came up with a suspended license (due to a
mix-up at the DMV six months ago that is taking ages to work out).
All was well, but... why did they run the tags? Somewhat bothersome to me,
that is.
Ad C
crusader_p...@hotmail.com says...
> >
> > Nope, he's UKIP.
>
> UK Independence Party.
>
> Hilarious.
>
> More like a Chimps Tea Party.
>
> The UKIP are no-hope group of disaffected right-wing Tories who are going
> nowhere fast. People take more notice of the Monster Raving Loony Party.
>
>
Christopher
Or United Kingdom Independance Party, as we English will have to save
scotty lands arse [again] when we withdraw from the eu swamp.
>Or "UK Insolent Pogue" perhaps?
>
>I object to the letters UK being used in such a fashion whichever it might
>be, especially by one who calls the Welsh and Irish "sheep shaggers and
>paddies" - a bit rich! Hardly united....
Whatever.
Christopher
<black_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3f968d20...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>
>>
>> Nope, he's UKIP.
>
>Is that the bunch who levitate?
Nope, thats's the natural law party and it's I belive called yogi
flying, anyway they no longer put forward candidates for seats at
general elections.
Christopher
<crusader_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>in article bn6eic$jg9$7...@sparta.btinternet.com, William Black at
>black_...@hotmail.com wrote on 22/10/03 6:25 pm:
>
>>
>> "Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:3f968d20...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>>
>>>
>>> Nope, he's UKIP.
>>
>> Is that the bunch who levitate?
>
>Very similar, I believe you're talking about the ones who jump about with
>their legs crossed in a Yoga position (Yogic Flyers?).
>
> The UKIP are the ones who nobody has heard of since Goldsmith died shortly
>after the '97 election. If I remember rightly, that was when David Mellor
>lost his seat and the UKIP still lost their deposit.
Nope that was the referendum party.
>Seeing as Christopher can write, of a sorts, I expect if he's got the front
>to call himself a UKIP supporter, they'll have him standing somewhere at the
>next election.
>
>Here's a predicted result:
>
>Labour - 16475
>Lib Dem - 9392
>Conservative - 2673
>Ind Labour - 1765
>BNP - 654
>Monster Raving Loony - 567
>NO Euro - 256
>Save our Hospital - 199
>UKIP - 176
>
>Another Lost deposit...................
>
>Hilarious.
>
>You could stand as Mickey Mouse and still get more votes than the UKIP.
>
>MWC
>
Christopher
Christopher
Until Britain finds itself at the cross road, and the choice is either
becoming a mere province by going completely into a federal european
superstate with the euro as our currency and no sovereignty, and
pulling out of the eu, and scrapping all eu regulations and dictats,
and becoming an independent nation state again with all our sovereign
powers restored in Parliment.
Christopher
<anicho...@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3f968e52...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>>
>> >Christopher obviously fancies himself as a bit of a hard man.
>> >He'd probably had half a shandy
>>
>> I don't drink. I'm teetotal.
>>
>
>Now, that explains a lot.
How?
>At least you're referring to yourself in first person, now...
>
>
>Drew
>
>
Christopher
Christopher
LOL
>> >> >Good for you.
>> >>
>> >> Christopher isn't a labour or lib-dem either.
>> >
>> >Quite...
>>
>> Quite?
>
>Quite.
Quite??
>> >> >Stop acting like one of Maggie's boys then people won't get confused.
>> >>
>> >> Since when? I am no fan of Maggie, if you are insinuating I am I'll
>> >> see you outside.
>> >
>> >And then quotes Churchill! Sad fellow... I'll see you outside, only to
>laugh
>> >at mind.
>> >D'ye reckon this one is English for a change?
>>
>> Of course I'm English, are you a Scot, a Paddy, a Sheep shagger?
>
>Tut tut! Seppo would probably call you a rascist for that...
And the socts, irish, and welsh are not racist?
>I am also English - however, I expect that's all we have in common.
>Fortunately for me.
>Like all Englishmen, I have traces of all those in my blood and many others.
>We are a bunch of mongrels - that's where our adaptability and strength
>comes from.
> Cheers
> Martin
>
>
Christopher
Christopher
<black_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3f965b41...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
>
>> I'm not a nazi, which are socialists by another name.
>
>The pinging noise you can all hear is your inbuilt right-wing loony detector
>going off.
So you are right-wing?
John Cartmell
<rabi...@nospam.btinternet.com> wrote:
> Just as well I'm not a member of any ethinic minority, or they might
> have beaten me up for the inconvenience my ownership of a car evidently
> caused them!
Alternatively you could have forced an inquiry as to why you were being
dealt with more severely than a non-ethnic minority?
And your crime?...
...clearly you live in Salford! Nuff said. ;-(
--
John Cartmell jo...@cartmell.demon.co.uk FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
Acorn Publisher magazine & FD Games www.acornpublisher.com
Michael W Cook
rabi...@nospam.btinternet.com wrote on 23/10/03 2:28 am:
A mate of mine has been assaulted twice in the last couple of years, on the
first occasion they had the person's address who committed the assault, they
did nothing. On the second occasion they were given a reg no of the car the
person was driving, plus a witnesses telephone No, again they did nothing.
I myself was the victim of a fraud and lost over £2000, again they didn't do
a thing but sent me a crime ref no, that's all I ever heard.
It seems there's nothing to be gained in chasing real criminals these days,
it's too much like hard work, they'd rather tow away cars and dish out
parking tickets.
Michael W Cook
gra...@y.a.h.o.o.co.uk wrote on 23/10/03 10:45 am:
I didn't say they get more votes, I said people take more notice of the
MRL's.
Drew Nicholson
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:54:29 GMT, "Drew Nicholson"
> <anicho...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >"Christopher" <mcai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f968e52...@news.dsl.pipex.com...
> >>
> >> >Christopher obviously fancies himself as a bit of a hard man.
> >> >He'd probably had half a shandy
> >>
> >> I don't drink. I'm teetotal.
> >>
> >
> >Now, that explains a lot.
>
> How?
>
Because I'm a perceptive person.
Drew Nicholson
>
> Until Britain finds itself at the cross road, and the choice is either
> becoming a mere province by going completely into a federal european
> superstate with the euro as our currency and no sovereignty, and
> pulling out of the eu, and scrapping all eu regulations and dictats,
> and becoming an independent nation state again with all our sovereign
> powers restored in Parliment.
>
And somehow, when this happens, you won't have to deal with the EU anyway?
They'll be your closest trading partner -- a trading partner you just told
to sod off.
Doesn't sound good...