Message from discussion
First Kalamazoo Report
Received: by 10.204.156.199 with SMTP id y7mr543952bkw.7.1337189799436;
Wed, 16 May 2012 10:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e27ni183bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Renia <re...@otenet.gr>
Newsgroups: soc.history.medieval
Subject: Re: First Kalamazoo Report
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:36:30 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <jp0oj2$suv$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <jopq8c$p1r$1@reader1.panix.com> <jor6qb$mvk$1@dont-email.me> <jora35$n5m$2@reader1.panix.com> <josukb$i5g$1@dont-email.me> <jp021v$ou2$1@dont-email.me> <jp0knh$6et$1@reader1.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 3FPw3D+0yL/RqjnQaoflJA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 16/05/2012 17:30, Paul J Gans wrote:
> As it is now each seems to be unaware of the other. And, like other
> scientists, archaeologists write in a jargon that makes their work
> difficult for the non-specialist to understand.
Since when have archaeologists been scientists? Some scientists (e.g.
dendrochronologists, geophysicists) contribute to archaeological
discovery and archaeologists use their knowledge, but archaeology itself
is a branch of history.