Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Most Important Medieval Battles
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ken...@cix.compulink.co.uk  
View profile  
 More options May 10 2012, 12:35 pm
Newsgroups: soc.history.medieval
From: ken...@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:35:25 -0500
Local: Thurs, May 10 2012 12:35 pm
Subject: Re: Most Important Medieval Battles
In article <joeo79$34...@dont-email.me>, cemanue...@gmail.com (Curt

Emanuel) wrote:
> however consensus has
> been moving in the direction of believing that economics (plunder)
> was the primary one.

 I would have thought that had been fairly obvious from the start.
Monasteries like Lindisfarne were isolated defenceless and rich. About
all they lacked to be an ideal target was women. Where religion might
come in is that pagans would not feel any more guilty about targeting a
monastery than a village.

 Ken Young


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.