Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Der Spiegel: JTEM is right and Giwer is an ass clown!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Matt Giwer  
View profile  
 More options Apr 17 2012, 2:00 am
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology, soc.history.ancient, soc.history, soc.history.medieval, soc.history.what-if
From: Matt Giwer <jul...@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:00:51 -0400
Local: Tues, Apr 17 2012 2:00 am
Subject: Re: Der Spiegel: JTEM is right and Giwer is an ass clown!
On 4/16/2012 1:47 AM, JTEM wrote:
> Matt Giwer<jul...@tampabay.rr.com>  wrote:

>>          Excuse me. The this temple has NEVER been unknown. Josephus mentions
>> its destruction.

> The writings attributed to Josephus give it
> the wrong age. The date it to a much more
> recent times. In fact, according to Josephus
> the Samaritans were asking Alexander the
> Great permission to build it, and it was
> already more than a century old when Alexander
> was on the scene...

> Funny how you cite an appallingly inaccurate
> source in an attack on an inaccurate source...

> "Hypocrisy."

>>          Yet the lead to the story declares it was DISCOVERED!

> It's common for "Stories" to get major
> facts wrong. As I pointed out, it dates
> the split/rewrite to the Assyrians, and
> the Assyrians arrived on the scene centuries
> before the temple at the heart of the split.

>>          What kind of an idiot would cite an article that only a low life
>> journalism major could produce? Your kind obviously.

> It's amazing that you claim to be able to
> wade through the inaccuracies of a Josephus
> to arrive at the truth, but you are completely
> lost at an English-language translation of a
> German news piece (NOT field report, NOT
> scholarly article).

        Channel one or Channel 2?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.