Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Itis our function to remember Him on earth, as it is given us to be His Own completion in reality

0 views
Skip to first unread message

crunch

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 2:29:52 PM12/26/09
to
This is not Historical Christ.

Peace (after the Quaker fashion),
David Christainsen
Newton, Mass. USA

(<<Kelly>>)

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 5:08:52 PM12/26/09
to
On Dec 26, 11:29 am, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is not Historical Christ.

Neither is your version.

> Peace (after the Quaker fashion),

What you really should say: "Confusion (after the Soggy fashion)"

crunch

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 1:23:35 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 26, 5:08 pm, "(<<Kelly>>)" <rosie_be...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 11:29 am, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > This is not Historical Christ.
>
> Neither is your version.

Kelly has next to no understanding of my version; her bad.

If Kelly wants to, she may investigate the matter of my
version as the result of her own free choice. If Kelly did so,
I daresay she would disagree with my version and say so
on usenet.

Howsoever, I propose that any resulting future conversation
between me and Kelly on this matter would be educational
for others because they would see clearly the difference
in viewpoint and test on their own who was right.

Further, in real life, as opposed to the shadow world of
usenet, I have dropped Historical Christ in favor of the
Spirit of Christ as I continue to interact with Cambridge
Meeting as a person who plays at quakerism without
being a RSOF member anymore.

> > Peace (after the Quaker fashion),
>
> What you really should say: "Confusion (after the Soggy fashion)"

By now Kelly really should have dropped her massive
outpouring of bunk.

Peace (after the Quaker fashion),

igor

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 3:53:07 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 10:23 am, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 5:08 pm, "(<<Kelly>>)" <rosie_be...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 11:29 am, crunch <pchristain...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > This is not Historical Christ.
>
> > Neither is your version.
>
> Kelly has next to no understanding of my version; her bad.
>
> If Kelly wants to, she may investigate the matter of my
> version as the result of her own free choice.  If Kelly did so,
> I daresay she would disagree with my version and say so
> on usenet.
>
> Howsoever, I propose that any resulting future conversation
> between me and Kelly on this matter would be educational
> for others because they would see clearly the difference
> in viewpoint and test on their own who was right.
>
> Further, in real life, as opposed to the shadow world of
> usenet, I have dropped Historical Christ in favor of the
> Spirit of Christ


This comes as a huge relief, cant speak for everybody here but
personally for myself, this day I will never forget. Amen.

0 new messages