Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalances...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Subject: Re: King's Kinsfolk: Richard II's kinsman, Edmund Stafford
Date: 27 Nov 2005 15:56:14 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <1133135774.710651.229500@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <2b4.adf5ef.30bb4a08@aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.177.16.102
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1133135779 16367 127.0.0.1 (27 Nov 2005 23:56:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <2b4.adf5ef.30bb4a08@aol.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.177.16.102;
   posting-account=zS1atwwAAAATOhUcPgQjQeTsigMirKOo

WJhon...@aol.com wrote:
<  The Visitation is
< worthless, discussing people several hundred years earlier, in my
opinion.
< Will Johnson

Visitations are often quite helpful.   However, they should always be
verified for accuracy with contemporary records.  Peter Sutton has done
that.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: www.royalancestrynet