Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 33 of 33 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Derek Howard  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 7:45 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Derek Howard <dhow...@skynet.be>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 7:45 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan

On Monday, October 29, 2012 9:28:33 PM UTC+1, Graham Milne wrote:
> Cor. It looks as though the Montolieus may have been Viscounts of Tripoli. See:

> http://www.templiers.net/symbolique/index.php?page=neuf-sceaux-orient...

> which refers to:

> http://archive.org/stream/lesfamillesdoutr01duca#page/974/mode/1up

> where it says that Gerard, brother of Raimond de Montolif signed a charter as Viscount of Tripoli.

> Any views on whether Montolieu and Montolif are the same?

> See also http://www.templiers.net/Chateaux-Orient-Latin/index.php?page=chateau... also.

M Balard: "Les Latins en Orient (XIe-XVe siècle)", 2006, 71, lists the Montolieu family, who held Chastel Rouge, as one of the Provençal families who dominated the settlment of the county of Tripoli. Balard does not mention any Montolif.

The family of Montolif is outlined in Du Cange "Les familles d’Outre-mer", ed Rey, 1869, pp 557-564, see
http://archive.org/stream/lesfamillesdoutr02duca#page/60/

Derek Howard


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Graham Milne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 9:01 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Graham Milne <grahammilne...@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 9:01 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan

Many, many thanks for that. It will take time to absorb. But there does seem to be a connection between Montolif and Montolieu. We seem to acknowledge that the Montolieu family held Chastel Rouge until 1177 when the castle was passsed to the Order of St. John. As I posted above, in November 1178 - 'Raymundus de Montolif et frater ejus renuntiant omnia jura quae habent in Castellum Rubrum quae possederant et Raymundus, comes Tripolitanus, Hospitali concesserat ex cambio CCCC bisantiorum [400 bezants].', 'Cartulary of the Hospitallers of Saint John of Jerusalem', Book I, pp. 371-372, no. 549; Reinhold Rohricht, 'Regesta Regni Hierosolymitani', Innsbruck, 1893, Add., p. 35, no. 562a. This would seem to indicate that Monolif and Montolieu are the same family. What do you think?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Graham Milne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 9:09 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Graham Milne <grahammilne...@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 9:09 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan
PS

http://archive.org/stream/lesfamillesdoutr02duca#page/60/mode/2up

actually states that the family were indifferently known as Montolif, Montolieu, de Monte Olivarum, de Monte Olivo, Montolivo or de Mont Oliu, being the name of a small village in Laguedoc where the family came from, being originally from Marseille. So it seems to be clear that we are dealing with branches of the same family. What does 'Nous n'oserions 'l'affirmer' (on that page) mean?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Topping  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 10:08 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: David Topping <davidt...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 10:08 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan

On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 13:09:16 UTC, Graham Milne  wrote:
> PS

> http://archive.org/stream/lesfamillesdoutr02duca#page/60/mode/2up

> actually states that the family were indifferently known as Montolif, Montolieu, de Monte Olivarum, de Monte Olivo, Montolivo or de Mont Oliu, being the name of a small village in Laguedoc where the family came from, being originally from Marseille. So it seems to be clear that we are dealing with branches of the same family. What does 'Nous n'oserions 'l'affirmer' (on that page) mean?

Essentially that there isn't enough evidence to be sure. In an idiomatic form - We wouldn't go that far.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wjhonson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 10:29 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Wjhonson <wjhon...@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:29:49 -0400 (EDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 10:29 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan
He starts off saying something like "did they have the same origin? were they members of the same family?"  And then he says "We dare to affirm it."

That's the basic sense, although my ability to read French is barely passable.
And I certainly can't speak it.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wjhonson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 10:31 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Wjhonson <wjhon...@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:31:14 -0400 (EDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 10:31 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan
Oops David is right!
He doesn't say "we dare to affirm it"
He says "We do NOT dare to affirm it...."

I skipped the n....


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Graham Milne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 11:31 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Graham Milne <grahammilne...@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 11:31 am
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan
I have summarized things so far at:

http://www.peerage.org/genealogy/hippolite.htm

I have written to the Austrian state archives to try to obtain a copy of the letters patent of 1706. It would be nice to resurrect the title (which looks as though it would go to the Stopford family).


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Derek Howard  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30 2012, 1:52 pm
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
From: Derek Howard <dhow...@skynet.be>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 1:52 pm
Subject: Re: Beatrix of Jerusalem d.o. Guy de Lusignan

On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 4:31:35 PM UTC+1, Graham Milne wrote:
> I have summarized things so far at:
> http://www.peerage.org/genealogy/hippolite.htm

Montolieu looks quite a nice village:
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/3580082
Easily found on Google maps.

Derek Howard


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »