Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Online Women Seeking Men In Perth – Searchsingles.com.au

34 views
Skip to first unread message

juliej...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 2:45:09 AM8/11/12
to
For instance, your early communications with your man is a good time to discuss important online women seeking men in Perth relationship fundamentals such as money and children with him prior to you committing your valuable time and most importantly your feelings to him. http://www.searchsingles.com.au/blogs/online-women-seeking-men-in-perth-searchsingles-com-au/

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 9:11:56 AM8/11/12
to
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:45:09 -0700 (PDT), juliej...@gmail.com
wrote:

>For instance, your early communications with your man is a good time to dis=
>cuss important online women seeking men in Perth relationship fundamentals =
>such as money and children with him prior to you committing your valuable t=
>ime and most importantly your feelings to him. http://www.searchsingles.com=
>.au/blogs/online-women-seeking-men-in-perth-searchsingles-com-au/

Speaking as a man can they prove their ancestry and how far back can
they go?

Hugh

Ian Goddard

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 9:46:13 AM8/11/12
to
J. Hugh Sullivan reposted a spam andwrote:

> Speaking as a man can they prove their ancestry and how far back can
> they go?

Hugh, surely you know better then to repeat a spam.

In fact, don't even bother to reply. Look at the headers, find the
posting host, use whois to find its abuse address and complain.

Also, f the poster has a gmail address complain at
http://support.google.com/mail/bin/request.py?contact_type=abuse&rd=1&&hl=en
and if, as is usually the case, they posted via Google Groups note that
in the Additional Information box together with a reminder that they're
supposed to be experts at semantic processing so why don't they
demonstrate this be rejecting spam.

--
Ian

The Hotmail address is my spam-bin. Real mail address is iang
at austonley org uk

Ian Goddard

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 9:48:33 AM8/11/12
to
If the spam is plugging a webside ping it, run whois on the IP address
to get the hosting company and complain there; their T&Cs are almost
certain to forbid advertising by spam.

Steve Hayes

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 1:39:30 PM8/11/12
to
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:45:09 -0700 (PDT), juliej...@gmail.com wrote:

> Online Women Seeking Men In Perth � Searchsingles.com.au

The answer to what you are looking for is here:

http://tinyurl.com/8rza96r
--
Steve Hayes
Web: http://hayesgreene.wordpress.com/
http://hayesgreene.blogspot.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/afgen/

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 1:54:55 PM8/11/12
to
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:48:33 +0100, Ian Goddard
<godd...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>If the spam is plugging a webside ping it, run whois on the IP address
>to get the hosting company and complain there; their T&Cs are almost
>certain to forbid advertising by spam.

>Ian

You didn't like the way I turned it into genealogy?

Those guys post one time and run - seldom if ever get caught. It's not
like I responded to him with feedback. He will never see what I said.

Hugh

Bob Melson

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 4:10:21 PM8/11/12
to
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:54:55 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
<snip>
> He will never see what I said.
If you believe that, then why bother replying? Dull day at home?

Smilin' Ol' Bob

>
>Hugh


--
Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing.
Ralph Waldo Emerson


J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,
Aug 11, 2012, 7:48:21 PM8/11/12
to
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:10:21 -0600, Bob Melson <amia...@mypacks.net>
wrote:

>On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:54:55 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
><snip>
>> He will never see what I said.
>If you believe that, then why bother replying? Dull day at home?
>
>Smilin' Ol' Bob

I was looking for you and Ian. My turn to hide.

Hugh


Bob Melson

unread,
Aug 12, 2012, 2:16:02 PM8/12/12
to
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:48:21 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
Now, Commander ....

Snippy Ol' Bob
0 new messages