Received: by 10.66.86.72 with SMTP id n8mr1751786paz.24.1348790555810;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: t10ni23590437pbh.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: singhals <singh...@erols.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.computing
Subject: Re: Entering place names, deja-vu all over again
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:02:35 -0400
Organization: http://www.linkpendium.com/ | The definitive directory to genealogical resources
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <mailman.8.1348790555.5679.gencmp@rootsweb.com>
References: <mailman.2.1346419528.30613.gencmp@rootsweb.com>
	<aac12iFq1tU1@mid.individual.net>
	<mailman.3.1346451207.4752.gencmp@rootsweb.com>
	<1726e5e0-52a6-4322-8187-3ac08b099988@googlegroups.com>
	<s1k168p41rrboinn9amsujhh0j03kfn7jr@4ax.com>
	<4587e98a-f1ff-40e7-85e5-379f349ee3f2@googlegroups.com>
	<mailman.2.1348581311.12369.gencmp@rootsweb.com>
	<a241c9d3-c06b-4c45-ac58-398e3fc10ec2@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: gen...@rootsweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lists2.rootsweb.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: askin-17.linkpendium.com 1348790555 11120 66.43.28.157 (28 Sep 2012 00:02:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@linkpendium.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
To: gen...@rootsweb.com
Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=66.44.56.213;
	receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net;
	envelope-from="singh...@erols.com";
	x-sender="singh...@erols.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Neutral identity=mailfrom; client-ip=66.44.56.213;
	receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net;
	envelope-from="singh...@erols.com";
	x-sender="singh...@erols.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
	x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=66.44.56.213;
	receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net;
	envelope-from="singh...@erols.com";
	x-sender="postmaster@[66.44.56.213]";
	x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-Auth-ID: singhals
In-Reply-To: <a241c9d3-c06b-4c45-ac58-398e3fc10ec2@googlegroups.com>
X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 192.168.26.64
X-BeenThere: gen...@rootsweb.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7
Precedence: list
List-Id: <gencmp.rootsweb.com>
X-Loop: GEN...@rootsweb.com
X-Member: GEN...@rootsweb.com
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists2.rootsweb.ancestry.com/mailman/listinfo/gencmp>, 
	<mailto:gencmp-requ...@rootsweb.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index?list=gencmp>
List-Post: <mailto:gen...@rootsweb.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gencmp-requ...@rootsweb.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists2.rootsweb.ancestry.com/mailman/listinfo/gencmp>, 
	<mailto:gencmp-requ...@rootsweb.com?subject=subscribe>
Bytes: 3274
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tom Wetmore wrote:
> Cheryl: "I came down firmly against including the parish name.  This week that viewpoint hardened even more, thanks to a relative-by-marriage who died about a year ago."
>
> Tom's translation: "Don't record parish names."

I believe the last paragraph of that OP mentioned the 
inclusion or omission of the word "parish"?

Cheryl