For instance, your early communications with your man is a good time to discuss important online women seeking men in Perth relationship fundamentals such as money and children with him prior to you committing your valuable time and most importantly your feelings to him. http://www.searchsingles.com.au/blogs/online-women-seeking-men-in-per...
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:45:09 -0700 (PDT), juliejvar...@gmail.com
wrote:
>For instance, your early communications with your man is a good time to dis=
>cuss important online women seeking men in Perth relationship fundamentals =
>such as money and children with him prior to you committing your valuable t=
>ime and most importantly your feelings to him. http://www.searchsingles.com= >.au/blogs/online-women-seeking-men-in-perth-searchsingles-com-au/
Speaking as a man can they prove their ancestry and how far back can
they go?
> Speaking as a man can they prove their ancestry and how far back can
> they go?
Hugh, surely you know better then to repeat a spam.
In fact, don't even bother to reply. Look at the headers, find the posting host, use whois to find its abuse address and complain.
Also, f the poster has a gmail address complain at http://support.google.com/mail/bin/request.py?contact_type=abuse&rd=1... and if, as is usually the case, they posted via Google Groups note that in the Additional Information box together with a reminder that they're supposed to be experts at semantic processing so why don't they demonstrate this be rejecting spam.
-- Ian
The Hotmail address is my spam-bin. Real mail address is iang
at austonley org uk
If the spam is plugging a webside ping it, run whois on the IP address to get the hosting company and complain there; their T&Cs are almost certain to forbid advertising by spam.
-- Ian
The Hotmail address is my spam-bin. Real mail address is iang
at austonley org uk
<godda...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>If the spam is plugging a webside ping it, run whois on the IP address >to get the hosting company and complain there; their T&Cs are almost >certain to forbid advertising by spam.
>Ian
You didn't like the way I turned it into genealogy?
Those guys post one time and run - seldom if ever get caught. It's not
like I responded to him with feedback. He will never see what I said.
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:54:55 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
<snip>
> He will never see what I said.
If you believe that, then why bother replying? Dull day at home?
Smilin' Ol' Bob
>Hugh
-- Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:10:21 -0600, Bob Melson <amia9...@mypacks.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:54:55 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
><snip>
>> He will never see what I said.
>If you believe that, then why bother replying? Dull day at home?
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:48:21 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
>On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:10:21 -0600, Bob Melson <amia9...@mypacks.net>
>wrote:
>>On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:54:55 GMT J. Hugh Sullivan opined:
>><snip>
>>> He will never see what I said.
>>If you believe that, then why bother replying? Dull day at home?
>>Smilin' Ol' Bob
>I was looking for you and Ian. My turn to hide.
>Hugh
Now, Commander ....
Snippy Ol' Bob
-- Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
