Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Accuracy of 1881 census??
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alice Cooper  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 5:20 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: "Alice Cooper" <s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:24:13 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 5:24 am
Subject: Accuracy of 1881 census??
I am having great trouble locating the birth certificate of William Henry
Barker age 27 on marriage certificate in oct 1902. His fathers occupation is
listed as Platelayer and his name is also William. From the 1881 census on
the LDS site, I can only find one family that fits fathers name, occupation
and sons name. I have not been able to trace a birth certificate however on
this information. My question is, there is another family fitting the names,
but the occupation is brick layer. Is it likely to be a transcription error,
and I should be looking at this family instead?
Any help gratefully received!!!

--
Suzanne

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/03


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rob Dewsall  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 7:08 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: Rob Dewsall <rob.dews...@acdb.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:00:36 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 7:00 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
In article <bfivjv$f9qh...@ID-172162.news.uni-berlin.de>, Alice Cooper
<s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com> writes

>I am having great trouble locating the birth certificate of William Henry
>Barker age 27 on marriage certificate in oct 1902. His fathers occupation is
>listed as Platelayer and his name is also William. From the 1881 census on
>the LDS site, I can only find one family that fits fathers name, occupation
>and sons name. I have not been able to trace a birth certificate however on
>this information. My question is, there is another family fitting the names,
>but the occupation is brick layer. Is it likely to be a transcription error,
>and I should be looking at this family instead?
>Any help gratefully received!!!

>--
>Suzanne

Hi Suzanne,

It has to be said that *any* transcript will have errors and the LDS'
1881 census index is no exception!

The *only* way to solve this mystery is to get copies of the original
census enumerators' pages, which will be very easy as you already have
the piece and folio numbers from the index.  If you contact the Family
Records Centre in London they may be able to help.

Best wishes
Rob Dewsall
--

ARCHIVE CD BOOKS -
A project to reproduce old books on CD for genealogists
and pay for the restoration of books in Record Offices, Libraries, etc.
Mailing list : cdbo...@british-genealogy.com (for discussions)
Weekly News  : cdbooks-n...@british-genealogy.com (weekly announcements & news)
E-mail       : enquir...@archivecdbooks.org
Web          : http://www.archivecdbooks.org


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
"Clive Holden" <cliverholden  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 9:05 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: "Clive Holden" <cliverholden<remove>@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:04:47 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 9:04 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
Hi Suzanne,

"Alice Cooper" <s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message

news:bfivjv$f9qhn$1@ID-172162.news.uni-berlin.de...

Don't know if this really helps but there's a William Barker, Platelayer,
with his family including 16yo son, William H Barker, Butcher's Asst on the
1891 Census, living in 10, Back Hall St, Bilston, Staffs.

Clive Holden (Kent GB)

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/2003


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alice Cooper  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 10:18 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: "Alice Cooper" <s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:22:56 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 10:22 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
Thanks - that would make sense (the 1902 marriage took place in Bilston).
Have you got any details of the mother? I think this may well prove I've
been looking at the wrong family! Just an aside, but William Henry is down
on the marriage as a baker, so all I need is to find he was a candlestick
maker and I've got the set!!
Thanks again
Suzanne

"Clive Holden @hotmail.com>" <cliverholden<remove> wrote in message
news:bfjcpf$681$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/03

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
"Clive Holden" <cliverholden  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 11:06 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: "Clive Holden" <cliverholden<remove>@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 11:05 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
Hi Suzanne,

Here's all the family's details:

William Head 48 Platelayer
Harriet Wife 46
Elizabeth J Dau 21 Domestic Servant
John J Son 18 Railway Goods Porter
Willaim H Son 16 Butchers Asst
Joseph Son 15 Tin Plate Worker
Alfred Son 13 Scholar
Ann Dau 11 Scholar
Samuel Son 8 Scholar

All born in Bilston

Clive Holden (Kent GB)

"Alice Cooper" <s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message

news:bfjh42$ekla6$1@ID-172162.news.uni-berlin.de...

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/2003

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
L. Bousbaine  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 11:27 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: "L. Bousbaine" <wayl...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:26:59 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 11:26 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
Have you picked up the family in 1881 now? William senior wasn't a
Platelayer then, but a Coal Miner -

       William BARKER   Head   M   Male   38   Bilston, Stafford, England
Coal Miner
       Harriet BARKER   Wife   M   Female   36   Bilston, Stafford, England
       Joan E. BARKER   Daur   U   Female   11   Bilston, Stafford, England
Scholar
       Enoch BARKER   Son   U   Male   10   Bilston, Stafford, England
Scholar
       John T. BARKER   Son   U   Male   8   Bilston, Stafford, England
Scholar
       William H. BARKER   Son   U   Male   6   Bilston, Stafford, England
Scholar
       Joseph BARKER   Son   U   Male   5   Bilston, Stafford, England
Scholar
       Alfred BARKER   Son   U   Male   3   Bilston, Stafford, England
Scholar
       Ann BARKER   Daur   U   Female   1   Bilston, Stafford, England

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
----
Source Information:
        Dwelling   Hall St
        Census Place Bilston, Stafford, England
        Family History Library Film   1341674
        Public Records Office Reference   RG11
        Piece / Folio   2814 / 79
        Page Number   4

"Alice Cooper" <s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message

news:bfjh42$ekla6$1@ID-172162.news.uni-berlin.de...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alice Cooper  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 11:45 am
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: "Alice Cooper" <s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:49:30 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 11:49 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
Thanks - it gets odder and odder! I already have this birth certificate, but
had discarded it as a dead end because it said fathers occupation was a
miner, and I was convinced it should be platelayer! Is it likely that
between the ages of 38 and 48 William snr decided mining wasn't for him, and
moved into platelaying? Perhaps ill health, or would platelaying be an
equally demanding job? Sorry for all the questions. I am still quite new at
this! Unfortunately I think I was getting a bit cocky, assumed a connection
that wasn't there and went off looking at completely the wrong family! Still
I suppose that happens a lot to the unsuspecting and over eager and at least
I'll be more cautious next time!
Suzanne

"L. Bousbaine" <wayl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:bfjl43$688$1@south.jnrs.ja.net...

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/03

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eve McLaughlin  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2003, 6:03 pm
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.britain
From: Eve McLaughlin <e...@varneys.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:14:09 +0100
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2003 11:14 am
Subject: Re: Accuracy of 1881 census??
In article <bfivjv$f9qh...@ID-172162.news.uni-berlin.de>, Alice Cooper
<s.fisher6xxxnospam...@ntlworld.com> writes

>I am having great trouble locating the birth certificate of William Henry
>Barker age 27 on marriage certificate in oct 1902. His fathers occupation is
>listed as Platelayer and his name is also William. From the 1881 census on
>the LDS site, I can only find one family that fits fathers name, occupation
>and sons name. I have not been able to trace a birth certificate however on
>this information. My question is, there is another family fitting the names,
>but the occupation is brick layer.

It is quite a common surname, so I am faintly surprised there are only
twoi who fir. Go for the platelayer. These men moved around a fair
amount with the railways and it is quite possible the father  was a
railway navvy when the son was born. They didn't bother all that much
about registration, working in remote places.
  If yer man has the railway company for whom he worked stated in 1881,
then there may be railway compnay records at PRO or possibly York.  GWR
is best covered, (See D Hawkings, Railway Records)

--
Eve McLaughlin

Author of the McLaughlin Guides for family historians
Secretary Bucks Genealogical Society


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »