By Eric Margolis
Contributing Foreign Editor Toronto Sun
4-15-2
Who really is running America's Mideast policy? Last week, the astounded world saw the grotesque
spectacle of President George W. Bush pleading in vain with Ariel Sharon, leader of a nation of only
6.3 million people which receives almost $5 billion in annual U.S. aid, to cease laying waste the
Occupied West Bank. Ignoring worldwide condemnation and demands from the UN Security
Council, Sharon ordered his armour, much of it American-supplied, to accelerate shooting up
and bulldozing Palestinian towns, refugee camps and all symbols of Palestinian identity or statehood.
Twenty years ago, Sharon invaded Lebanon, "to crush Palestinian terrorism." His big guns and
warplanes blasted Beirut for three weeks, killing 17,000 civilians. Today, he remains determined
to hold Arab lands Israel conquered in 1967 and to destroy any hopes or vestiges of a viable
Palestinian state. President Bush and senior aides Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell were
left looking weak, indecisive, and inept. Bush clearly is a political soulmate of ultra-hawk Sharon;
they share a mutual detestation for Yasser Arafat and, it would seem, for Arabs in general. Bush
has been encouraging Sharon's attacks on Palestine for months. But Israel's invasion of the West Bank
- reminiscent of Soviet tanks crushing Hungary in 1956 - gravely threatened America's Mideast client
regimes, so Bush had to demand Sharon relent. SHEER FARCE In an act of sheer farce, Powell
was sent on a slow boat to Israel, via Madrid and Morocco. Before Powell even arrived, former
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu summoned fawning U.S. senators and arrogantly informed them
Powell's mission would fail. While the rest of the world condemned Israel's invasion and destruction
of the Palestinian ghettos, not a peep was heard from the White House, Congress or America's
media about Israel's violation of U.S. law in using U.S.-supplied armour and warplanes against
civilians. Nor about Israel's violation of the Geneva Conventions and other international laws.
There were no protests when Israel's Shimon Peres described massacres of Palestinian civilians
by Israeli soldiers. Nor even a tut-tut when Sharon named to his cabinet a fanatical right-wing
general who advocates ethnic cleansing of Palestinians - the same crime for which the U.S.
pursued Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic. To be sure, there is deep and justified sympathy in the
U.S. for the frightful suffering Israel has endured at the hands of suicide bombers, and its need
for self-defence. Still, why was America alone in defending Israel's ruthless punishment of the
Palestinians? How could Bush, only a few weeks ago, still bathing in the bogus glory of a
military "triumph" against a few thousand medieval tribesman in Afghanistan, be so suddenly
made to look foolish and impotent by events in the Mideast? Simply put, Sharon's right-wing
Likud party has come to dominate U.S. Mideast policy through its powerful American lobby,
which "guides" Congress. Under pressure from the Israel lobby, 89 out of 100 senators and
at least 280 congressmen recently demanded Bush give Sharon carte blanche to crush Palestine.
As the Israeli writer Uri Avnery wryly noted, if the Israel lobby gave orders to repeal the Ten
Commandments, Congress would vote in favour. America's media is strongly pro-Israel and
averse to dissenting views. A coterie of hawkish, Israel-first neo-conservatives dominates
media opinion-making and the Pentagon, leading the charge for a war against Iraq, Iran, and
Syria. One even helped to write Bush's foolish "axis of evil" speech. Tight U.S. mid-term
elections are approaching. Bush does not want to anger American Jewish voters who believe
Israel is in mortal danger. GEORGE SR. ROASTED Bush obviously recalls that when his
father sought to pressure Israel to halt building illegal settlements, Bush Sr. was unfairly roasted
by the media as an anti-Semite and forced to back down. No wonder Sharon can thumb his
nose at the White House. Bush likes to talk tough, but this crisis has shown him to be the
exact opposite.
In Texas, they'd say, "big hat, no land." Bush has so far failed to take any real action to halt
America's Mideast interests being undermined by the bloodbath in Palestine and Israel. The
best way to protect Israelis from terror attacks is to withdraw their 200,000 illegal settlers
and end their colonial rule over the West Bank, Gaza and Golan; divide East Jerusalem into
Jewish, Muslim, and Christian sectors, have NATO troops police peace accords and either
normalize relations with the Arabs, as the Saudis propose, or build a wall to isolate Israel
from its neighbours. This cannot be done so long as settlements remain. Sharon is dead set
against this sensible idea. He needs to be pushed the way Dwight Eisenhower ordered Israel,
in 1956, to get out of the Sinai, which it had invaded and occupied - or else.
Had Bush Eisenhower's integrity or genuine patriotism, he would compel Sharon to accept
the wise Saudi peace plan and forget dreams of recreating biblical Greater Israel. This
would be a boon to Jews and Arabs alike. But Bush junior is no Eisenhower. His dithering
over the Mideast has made the United States appear both helpless and a tacit supporter of
Israel's West Bank repression - and made America the potential target of more terrorist
attacks from the enraged Arab world.
/polanski
"Amir.M" <am...@you.suck.it.down> wrote in message
news:__Ku8.172$1W3...@news01.t-net.net.ve...
Thanx
Any criticism of Israeli policies and you are labeled an "Anti Semite"
"Hitler Youth" or whatever derogatory reference to WWII comes to mind
and then subjected to a standard monologue of "Israel has a right to defend
itself" "Palestinians are Animals" blah, blah , blah
As for this author sitting on an American TV station I find rather surprising,
if this is so then he can look forward to a short career in the American media with
these kind of "radical" ideas (for the American jew dominated media mainstream that is)
"Amir.M" <am...@you.suck.it.down> wrote in message
news:TXLu8.174$1W3...@news01.t-net.net.ve...
Also the huge list of UN resolutions that the US has vetoed regarding
Palestine is helping.
Andy
That's often true. But *you* are a racist anti-Semite.
How could I be ?
I really like Mel Brooks, I admire Harvey Keitel ,Karl Marx
countless scientists including A.Einstein , Isaak Newton etc.
hell even Jesus Christ was Jewish !
The Israeli policies today and the Jewish lobby owned American Media
is what paints those people very negative IMHO
>
Nice try Amir but we have countless posts from you demonstrating your racism
and anti-Semitism in the most extreme form.
And trust us, we just repost it with the google link.
by Joseph Wallace
One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish media
is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
"The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than
to a small one."
Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray this
statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But if we read
this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of the Jews who had
ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how the German people fell
victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler even tells us what this great
lie is that duped the German people into being controlled by the Jews. He
continues:
"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the application
of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the Jews; for their
entire existence is built on one single great lie, namely, that here one had
to deal with a religious brotherhood, while in fact one has to deal with a
race  what a race! As such they have been nailed down forever, in an
eternally correct sentence of fundamental truth, by one of the greatest
minds of mankind; he called them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does
not realize this or does not want to believe this will never be able to help
truth to victory in this world."
Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th century
German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature of Jews. We
do not need to rely upon the opinions of German philosophers and political
leaders regarding this character trait of the Jews, for Jesus Christ has
said of the Jews,
"You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your father you
wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has not stood
in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he
speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44
AST).
Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing myths"
(Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed Germany and what
have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have been correct in what he
felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there are many, many more which have
had a damning effect on the white race. One of the greatest is certainly the
lie of the Hebrew Masoretic Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint
from the hands of white Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the
same poisonous venom. One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is
Albert Einstein.
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who
drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is made an
idol to young people and his very name has become synonymous with genius.
The truth, however, is very different. The reality is that Einstein was an
inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed
nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics or any other science, but
on the contrary he stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made
him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only
brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other people's ideas,
passing them off as his own. Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an
important part of this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's
early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says
that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and
languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a
school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895,
Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.
This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed
himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser
school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he
could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a
position at the engineering school! Unable to go to the school as he had
wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in
Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was
too incompetent for a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his
so-called groundbreaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent
office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing.
Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only
rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was
reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was
barely qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously
trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these
facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth. Supposedly, while working a
full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate
students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an
academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking
essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were
published in 1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a
feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to
believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue,
because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly
inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any
real education. However, a simpler explanation exists: he stole the ideas
and plagiarized the papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of
each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's
worshippers as totally new and completely different, each of which would
change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following
four ideas, respectively:
1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2) The equivalence of energy and mass;
3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4) The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity.
This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein.
Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special
Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915). This theory
contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two
premises: 1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same
for all observers; and 2) since the speed of light is independent of the
motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer
for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different
places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in
the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as
one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities
where time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for
modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally
Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the speed of light was a constant
and was independent of the motion of its source was not Einstein's at all,
but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell studied
the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was
electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an article to this effect for the 1878
edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and
by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific
community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the
conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the
observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27
years before Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to
conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained
by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but
they did not understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion
of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for
the propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald,
who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a
paper which stated that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could
be explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving
through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the square of the
ratio of their velocities to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed the
same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the
1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles
strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known
as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor
wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its
relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz
transformations, the series of equations explaining relativity, were
published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of
length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the
velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper
regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these
ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals.
The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as
the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the
statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the
similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we see
that the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of
Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over the next few years,
Poincaré became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding
relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert
Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic
world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the
patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it
necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these
early physicists knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another
of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of
a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in
which the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the
Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this phenomenon
has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah
Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence,
not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the
motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men,
they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper
regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third
paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous
equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous
and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious
conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in
that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still,
the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the
laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann
in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship
for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most
probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the
most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the
teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a
variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and
energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the
very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in
1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a
prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple
deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James
Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship
expressed by the equation E=mc2 was the logical result of Maxwell's work,
they just did not believe it. Thus, the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann,
and finally, and most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It
is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly
in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to
conduct the appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the
scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory
using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts
of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about
science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein
showed that he really did not understand basic scientific principles and
that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in
response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies
beyond the realm of possible experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of
the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect.
The photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or
semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is particularly
important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he
unjustly received his 1922 Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who deserve
the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he
is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets
called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect. The
photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and
others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.
Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in
the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but
by the frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day
quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had
shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called
quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905
was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of
energy  light energy. But the principles and equations governing the
process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself
admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also
existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of
Einstein's was original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community
took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until
1909 when it was arranged for him to take a position at a school by World
Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper headline that he gained any
notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position
where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly. He
engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had
supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could
present the research as his own or at least take partial credit. In this
vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in
terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to
understanding relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of
Relativity, which he would publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was
not done by Einstein  he was incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by
the mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical
principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a
sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used to
describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the
universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits,
and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive
object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work
which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this
paper was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It appears
that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So
Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory.
Einstein published his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and
said prior to its publication that he, "completely succeeded in convincing
Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most
brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another
mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of
calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity
for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe
that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General
Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking. However, the
exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his General
Relativity work from these two men, the rest being taken from Grossmann.
Hilbert submitted for publication, a week before Einstein completed his
work, a paper which contained the correct field equations of General
Relativity. What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same
paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have
had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were
Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary,
for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both
of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a
lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had
presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert
received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the
treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a
copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of
the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an
advance copy of his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that
Einstein quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat
Hilbert to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to
belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in
an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the
mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his work
first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher
quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with
assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that
Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of
the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work
of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum
mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the
ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along.
In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that
"before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc.,
had created the foundations of the theory of relativity." However, the
Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not
promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the
Jew Albert Einstein. As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as
postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second,
stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a massive object. In
1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close
to the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence
supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media
immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at
the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of
which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe -
Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding of
the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier
1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator
of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in
1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905
regarding the photoelectric effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been
established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his
image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to be
today. As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism.
The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to
change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we
ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues. This
is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of
social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert
to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a
strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names were
'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the
day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as
President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf
Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in
the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert
receiving the credit he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either.
This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German
theologians, and during World War II he would stay in Germany throughout the
war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be
heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to
teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter
expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the
unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had
been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius,
even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it
greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to
describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are
essential to modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted
as a genius because he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project
and serve prison time after the war for his involvement with the Third
Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white
Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even
Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from
which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to erect
Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often
embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding
the work he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic
denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of the
atom." The article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that
man will someday be able to harness this boundless energyÂto drive a great
steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instanceÂthen, according
to Einstein, you are wrong"
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had
supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical
research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy.
But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts
to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose Â
evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish
other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one
other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do
with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the
co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the
pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a
fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote
Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in a
Commission of the League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein visits
Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he becomes a founding member of the
Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break
from his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself
scientifically by criticizing the work of Schrödinger and Heisenberg.
Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting an
independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he
would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war
against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was
impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other
Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop
an atomic bomb to be used on Germany  not Japan. Einstein would have no
part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical,
because he lacked the skills for either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World Government,
with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continues
through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental
in the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically,
is offered the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his
time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as J.
Robert Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the
McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue
dies.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid
statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation
by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to promote the myth of
this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the men who
knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his
myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the
Jew-controlled Time magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century" at
the close of 1999. It may be demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become
more bold with the passage of time because Einstein was never named "Man of
the Year" while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he
is named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the
"Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the
Year" while he was still living by Time magazine, and according to a
December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf
Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would
accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished
third and was the top serious candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine
dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson,
Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one,
they found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did not
pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article
by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the theory of
relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the things in this article, such
as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before
Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity
long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,
"Einstein was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in
Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich, who
developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. Einstein was
horrified by this Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new
quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations They
are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and
electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the
world in the past half-century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of
the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so
stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern
science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field theory which
was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded"
Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity
and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the
unified field theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the
least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either
quantum theory or the unified field theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous
and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by
Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of
Time magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an inventor
or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert,
Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most
fundamentally changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the
obvious choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist
invented the transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices
and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches,
to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all
fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms of science today would
be basically in the same place that they were in the late 1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley
because he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the
genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their
sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially
destroy Shockley who founded the first company in the Silicon Valley, his
hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff
and used them to start Fairchild semiconductor, the company that today is
known as Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be
recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German scientists
who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who
was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not William
Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time.
Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who
hated everything white.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and
of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was asked what
he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war
and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870Behind
the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in
his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the
possibility of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained
after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of
thinking and acting"
Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that
this is the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one
thing, the Germans did knowingly support the cause of National Socialism,
but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was Christianity
that led the German people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It
was the German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of
men like Karl Lueger that led the German people to their understanding of
Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis of
National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary
Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by Prager and
Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call
'anti-Semitism.' Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews, hated
Christianity. So what Einstein was really advocating was the killing and
constraining of all true Christians, not just German Christians. This is the
true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a
tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.
Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the mortal
enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Nazi
Germany so much, for National Socialist Germany advocated primitive,
positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party Platform.
(Article used by permission of and © CSCS, POB 188, Kodak, TN 37764).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian - Researcher - Scholar.
From "Common Sense", p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59
"Christians have beed duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by
so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."
"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians into
believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that
so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was first made
in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the
so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th A.D. century to palm
themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ.
This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the
so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction
based on fable."
"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed twenty-four
hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and magazines,
by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office and
seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside their
churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside their
cirricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and
finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of
so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians are
subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to suspect.
Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic
accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern
European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the Khazars,
a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia,
according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the 1st
century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar kingdom. For
some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is conspicuous by
its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.
"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews", their
rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a nation
from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in about
740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from American
Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic Khazar
ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by them.
Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years
intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The
disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered
so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this author
since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a vicious
smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these facts, for
obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?
"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's Public
Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5 inclusive,
appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New York
Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and other
sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing with
Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by
contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that subject."
Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.
During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact
is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it
was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves
"Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time
in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the
manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or
referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth century
as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea
without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies a
person living in Texas.
In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they
have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record,
prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as
"Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which
self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees".
"Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.
Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you
Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WHO WAS THE FIRST JEW ?
John Standring
We know that Saul was the first king of Israel and that John was the first
man called Baptist, but who was the first jew? Neither Adam, Seth or Noah
are called jew. Nor were Abraham, Isaac or Jacob. Moses was not called a jew
and neither were Saul, David or Solomon called jew. In fact you will not
find the word jew in the first eleven books of the Bible. The first time
jews are mentioned in the Bible, is in 2nd Kings 16:6 (and then only in
translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at
war with the jews and drave the jews from Elath. Isn't it interesting that
we can read over five hundred pages of the Bible before we find a Jew
anywhere, yet those who call themselves jew today claim the first five books
of the bible and call it there Torah. Do you not find it very strange that
those who claim to have written the first five books of the Bible and call
themselves Jew, can't find the word jew written in the book anywhere, they
call there own bible and claim to have written? Jesus Christ tells John in
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are jews and are
not, but are the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN". We know that God changed the name of
Abram to Abraham, Gen. 17:5 and that God changed the name of Jacob to Israel
Gen. 32:28, but no where in the Bible do we find where God changed the name
of Israel to jew! There is therefore no authority by which those who say
they are jews can claim to be Israel!
By the time of Jesus the word Edom or Edomite had been translated by Greek
and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in
Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated
Idumaean-Judean into Iewes. It wasn't until the revised editions of the King
James Bible, that the word Jew appeared. The word Jew does not mean Israel
or Israelite! We must conclude therefore that the first "Jews" were
Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite. It is certain, according to the Bible, that Jews
are not Israel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/
Subscribe Bible Believers' Newsletter
Christianity as a religion was an opportunistic offshoot and cult of personality
scam doctored up by a bunch of power hungry men heavily engaged
in literary fiction and rewriting history way back in 70 AD
Jesus of Nazareth would have probably banned it as a cult
had it appeared during his short lifetime as a rabbi
"Rice Chek" <bone...@celtic.net> wrote in message news:SlWu8.1565$iP3.26...@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
"Amir.M" <am...@you.suck.it.down> wrote in message
news:vzWu8.179$1W3...@news01.t-net.net.ve...
"Rice Chek" <bone...@celtic.net> wrote in message
news:iBWu8.201$vO4.6...@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
The only people enraged are the fanatical, deviant assholes like you.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
He's engaging in a mature, adult conversation. Is this concept alien to
you? Perhaps you're out of your league.
Tom Fuller
--
Unlimited democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for
dinner.
"Tom Fuller" <TomF...@maxnet.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.17262327...@news.randori.com...
Levinson's into adult sex (at least I hope it's only adult), Cohen's into
fantasies about being a historian, RJGoldman's off in search of substitutes
for his mates in the navy.
I don't ever recall a Zionist admitting he/she was ever wrong about anything
(usurping God's role I would have thought, but never mind) and many times I
remember them simply ignoring "inconvenient" facts.
These 101 wonders are ultimately causing far more damage to Israel than the
Arabs are ever likely to.
>In article <3cbc21dc$2$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net>,
>leto...@nospam.net says...
>>
>>
>> The only people enraged are the fanatical, deviant assholes like you.
>>
>He's engaging in a mature, adult conversation. Is this concept alien to
>you? Perhaps you're out of your league.
Bullshit. Anyone with a brain can see him for what he is; Someone who finds a
problem with the US and Israel, and everyone else who does not see his
fanatical crap as the truth. E.g., a fanatical, deviant asshole -- where
fanatical means only the arab view is right, deviant where he launches into
emotional, psychotic uneducated tirades when he bullshit is pointed out, and
asshole means he will not learn.
In case you missed some of Amir.M's high level of "mature, adult
conversation," I found some for you to ponder:
*******
You got it the other way round donny boy , with all the lemming spindoctor
biased jew American TV sources available , there's really a good excuse for
ignorance
*******
As I said if you REALLY NEED TO WATCH the pos jew mouthpeace CNN
and the rest of the CBS'S, ABC's FOX jew lobby propaganda channels THEN I
reccomend the above method of jew propaganda filtration
OTOH
if you want to experience alt.sex.bestiality go visit your mother at the pig
farm
Dope
*******
Go fuck yourself Coles, you and your umpteenth lame
puppet
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
<snip>
Read the latest about your Israeli Heroes right here :
****************************************************************************
Children's Corpses Legacy of West Bank City Fight
April 16, 2002 04:55 PM ET
By Christine Hauser
NABLUS, West Bank (Reuters) - The dusty corpses of the al-Shabi children are frozen in time, testimony
to their last moments of life in the battle-scarred ancient quarter of this Palestinian city in the West Bank.
Seven-year old Azam's arms cover his head as if he was trying to shield himself from the rubble of his home
as it came crashing down, killing him and seven other members of his family more than a week ago during
an Israeli military offensive.
His four-year-old sister Anis has her little fists clenched to her stomach. She is curled up, still dressed in her
green sport shirt and pants.
"They were all together in a bombed building in the old city," said Anan Qadri, the head of the emergency
medical committee in Nablus. "The Israelis destroyed their house in a missile attack and then destroyed it
with bulldozers."
The eight members of the al-Shabi family were among 71 Palestinians killed in Nablus during the Israeli
sweep since April 3, according to Nablus's Rafidia Hospital records obtained by Reuters.
Nablus was viewed as a stronghold of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, linked to Palestinian leader Yasser
Arafat's Fatah movement, which has claimed responsibility for some of the recent suicide attacks inside Israeli.
Israeli armored personnel carriers and tanks churned up the hilly streets of the West Bank's largest
Palestinian city on Tuesday, enforcing a reoccupation in a campaign Israel says is aimed at uprooting terrorism.
Qadri had no breakdown for the number of gunmen and civilians killed in Nablus. "We are still working
on this but many of them are civilians," she said.
The military curfew imposed on the more than 100,000 residents of Nablus has grisly implications in a city
where tradition calls for mass public burials and three-day condolence visits.
"We have to prepare the tombs, and the families have to come but we are under curfew," said Qadri. "The
Israeli liaison officer said we will allow you to only bury them one by one, so we refused."
This means that the bodies of the Shabi family and 25 other Palestinians are kept in a refrigerated dairy
truck in a parking lot behind the hospital because the mortuary is overflowing with even more corpses.
"Good health and strength!" the advertisement on the side of the truck says above a collage of colored
milk cartons in vivid colors. A generator hums softly next to the vehicle, keeping its contents cold.
TEMPORARY GRAVES
The Israeli army said it had no figures for Palestinian fatalities in Nablus, and added it was checking
the policy on burials.
The dead are being lowered into shallow temporary graves, covered in palm leaves in the Islamic
tradition. Three corpses have been buried in the hospital garden.
And in the old quarter of Nablus, stone steps lead up a narrow alley toward a wooden door between
houses with arched windows their residents say are centuries old. The door swings open onto a lilac
-scented garden.
Under the shade of lush almond and peach trees, two indentations in the ground mark the spot where
13 Palestinians have been buried in a temporary mass grave.
Palm fronds fan across the soil. Two military-style olive green overcoats are splayed in the dirt, riddled
with what look like shrapnel perforations.
"We buried them here," said Nafez Eissa, whose home opens up onto the garden. "We will dig them up
when the Israeli army withdraws and give them a decent burial in the cemetery."
And in the Askar refugee camp near Nablus, the Abu Aisha family buried their 11-year old son Qusay
near their home. He was shot dead with two bullets in his chest during the Israeli army incursion into
the camp on Tuesday.
NABLUS'S BATTLE-SCARRED CASBAH
Inside the Old City, known locally as the Casbah, or bazaar, hundreds of fighters mingled with Palestinian
police and security forces of Arafat's Palestinian Authority in preparation before the Israeli incursion.
Graffiti on the walls urging more militant attacks is scrawled next to signs which urge residents not to park
in driveways.
Blood stains spatter the rubble in front of scorched groceries and shops. The facades of houses are busted
through with gaping holes residents say were made by helicopter rocket attacks. Bomb-blasted building
s have been reduced to mounds of yellow stone and dust.
The door of the 300-year old Al-Beik mosque in the old quarter is spattered with blood from the dead
and injured who were brought into the prayer room, which was transformed into a temporary operating
theater and first aid station.
Blood-caked surgical instruments soak in dirty water, and plastic sheeting covers the floors under the
mosque's sparkling chandeliers.
Israeli tanks had sealed off the narrow alleyways into the old quarter during days of fierce fighting.
"After the incursion we turned the mosque into a hospital," said Doctor Tawfik Ghazal. "We could not
evacuate injured Palestinians from the old city. We tried to save lives in the street under gunfire.
"I saw four patients due before my eyes because we had no blood for infusions and no proper facilities.
We worked under very difficult conditions."
> Christianity as a religion was an opportunistic offshoot and cult of
personality
> scam doctored up by a bunch of power hungry men heavily engaged
> in literary fiction and rewriting history way back in 70 AD
>
> Jesus of Nazareth would have probably banned it as a cult
> had it appeared during his short lifetime as a rabbi
Reply
It was Saul of Tarsus - also known as St. Paul (6 B.C. - 67 C.E.), who began
persecuting some of the true followers of Jesus for there were some. When
Saul realised that he was failing, he made up a story in 33 C.E. claiming
that on the road to Damascus he had a vision in which Jesus spoke to him!
Saul took the teachings of Jesus but in a corrupted form, to the Romans /
Europeans and mixed them up with existing pagan rituals, including retaining
their foreskins, accustomed diets and solar worship (Christmas, Easter,
Sunday, etc); notwithstanding that Jesus came from the nation called the
Children of Israel, and ONLY FOR the Children of Israel, to confirm what had
come before i.e. Prophet Moses and the Old Testament. Jesus was NOT a
Christian, nor did he preach Christianity, nor did he come for the Romans
(Europeans) nor for the whole of mankind.
The faith that Paul preached could as well take the name Paulianity . Those
who knew this were demonised as heretics and witches, and subsequently
burned at the stake.
This fact is even acknowledged by enlightened Europeans, for instance
ex-Anglican, A. N. Wilson, who in his book 'Paul: the mind of the Apostle',
claims that Saul was a Temple policeman ; paid by the Chief Priests;
co-operated with the Romans; who 'invented Christianity' by borrowing
largely from Greek and other pagan religious traditions such as Mytharism.
However, many Romans / Europeans believed the corrupt Saul because Romans
are theologically gullible people - hence the current Zionist manipulation
and control of the Gentile nations / people of the world today. For instance
see how gullible American taxpayers subsidise the Zionist State to the tune
of $3 billion annually.
Saul considered himself a master-builder - a pharaonic / masonic /
kabalistic / occult term, claiming to be an overseer, an inspector who had
the right to initiate others into his new ideology, Christianity. No wonder
he was persecuted and hated by Peter, John and James.
The ARE some serious problems with the US and Israel. Both of these
nations are completely out of control. There are serious problems with
the media in this country. The majority of the media in this country
strongly appear to be pro-jewish at the expense of the facts. I did not
see any examples of fanatical, deviant behavior in the quotes you pointed
out (but granted, I don't understand the reference to
alt.sex.bestiality).
To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
into personal attacks.
How about this one.
Democracy is where you pay taxes to someone who lets you believe you are in
control.
You are right though, insults are a substitute for lack of knowledge
therefore argument.
Andy
>
> How about this one. Democracy is where you pay taxes to
> someone who lets you believe you are in control. You are
> right though, insults are a substitute for lack of knowledge
> therefore argument.
> Andy
>
>
>
Andy, that description is about as good (and accurate) as any I have
seen. :-)
The original reference to alt.sex.bestiality was made by the poster "Don"
and I answered him in kind
Begin Quote :
> So, that's your technique for reading, Amir. No wonder you don't know
> very much. Probably prefer graphics I would expect. alt.sex.bestiality
> dr
End Quote
This first personal attack was of course omitted by leto...@nospam.net
and he only quoted my reply to "Don" and not the original reference to alt.sex.bestiality
Looks like leto...@nospam.net is taking his lessons on reporting
from the American media , you know , only covering the particulars facts of which
suit the agenda currently being pushed
I hope this clears up any misunderstanding being promoted by leto...@nospam.net
>In article <3cbc6cbd$1$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net>,
>leto...@nospam.net says...
>>
>> Bullshit. Anyone with a brain can see him for what he is; Someone who finds a
>> problem with the US and Israel, and everyone else who does not see his
>> fanatical crap as the truth. E.g., a fanatical, deviant asshole -- where
>> fanatical means only the arab view is right, deviant where he launches into
>> emotional, psychotic uneducated tirades when he bullshit is pointed out, and
>> asshole means he will not learn.
>>
>The ARE some serious problems with the US and Israel. Both of these nations
>are completely out of control.
Really. What is out of control are the terrorists who use children to carry
bombs to kill other children, and use airplanes to assassinate thousands.
We and Israel have said enough of this. -- If the terrorists can't stop
themselves from being child killers and assassin's -- they will be learn to
fear what they have unleashed by their own wish.
There are serious problems with the media in
>this country. The majority of the media in this country strongly appear to
>be pro-jewish at the expense of the facts. I did not see any examples of
>fanatical, deviant behavior in the quotes you pointed out (but granted, I
>don't understand the reference to
>alt.sex.bestiality).
Idiots seldom see other idiots for what they are.
>To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
>discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
>into personal attacks.
Assholes without a clue need to be pointed out.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
>Begin Quote :
>End Quote
And you bit on it and continued, like an asshole that you now want to deny
being.
>Looks like leto...@nospam.net is taking his lessons on reporting from the
>American media , you know , only covering the particulars facts of which
>suit the agenda currently being pushed
Its your agenda you are trying to push here. -- Check your facts and your
meds. They are clearly not working.
>I hope this clears up any misunderstanding being promoted by
>leto...@nospam.net
There was no misunderstanding. I can post more of your insults and drivel.
There are so many to choose from that I don't need to be fussy. -- And if you
had half a brain you would shut up before your own bullshit is over your head.
>>
>> To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
>> discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
>> into personal attacks.
>>
>>
>> Tom Fuller
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unlimited democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for
>> dinner.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
The only facts that need checked are how many civilians were slaughtered in Jenin,
and those facts are being hindered from coming out by Jew fascists with agendas like
you who deny everything and won't let reporters anywhere near the mass graves to verify
>
>
> >I hope this clears up any misunderstanding being promoted by
> >leto...@nospam.net
>
> There was no misunderstanding. I can post more of your insults and drivel.
> There are so many to choose from that I don't need to be fussy. -- And if you
> had half a brain you would shut up before your own bullshit is over your head.
This isn't jew owned America media dear boy , you can't shut me up
Frustratiningv , isn't it ?
Who is this "WE" ?
And why do you feel that ALL of the US has to join in your genocide in
Palestine ?
Because Jews the media in the US and think that you can convince ALL americans
to see this your way ?
You are underestimating the American people
> If the terrorists can't stop
> themselves from being child killers and assassin's -- they will be learn to
> fear what they have unleashed by their own wish.
I agree ,I'm sure the Israeli Distruction Forces are in fear of their lives in the future for what they
are doing
>
>
> There are serious problems with the media in
> >this country. The majority of the media in this country strongly appear to
> >be pro-jewish at the expense of the facts. I did not see any examples of
> >fanatical, deviant behavior in the quotes you pointed out (but granted, I
> >don't understand the reference to
> >alt.sex.bestiality).
>
> Idiots seldom see other idiots for what they are.
You next best favorite quote, I bet you have that bumper sticker on your trailer
where you live and repeat that quote in front of the mirror each morning
after the standard : "You Talkin' to Me " ?
>
> >To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
> >discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
> >into personal attacks.
>
> Assholes without a clue need to be pointed out.
You seem to be calling people derogatory names much too often
on these NG , some would say that that's a sign of an inferior intellect
>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> leto...@together.net
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbd8085$1$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
>The only reason the entire world hates the USA is because our government is
>backing Israel. Israel is the Terrorist and Sharon needs to be tried as a War
>Criminal. Bin Laden is a Bush partner in most of their operations.
We don't really give rats ass what you think -- But, Israel with stay. The
terrorists will go. Its that simple. Get use to it. Deal with it.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
><leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
>news:3cbd8085$1$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net... > In
><MPG.172726593...@news.randori.com>, on 04/17/02 > at 12:26 PM,
>Tom Fuller <Tomf...@maxnet.net> said:
>>
>> >In article <3cbc6cbd$1$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net>,
>> >leto...@nospam.net says...
>> >>
>> >> Bullshit. Anyone with a brain can see him for what he is; Someone who finds a
>> >> problem with the US and Israel, and everyone else who does not see his
>> >> fanatical crap as the truth. E.g., a fanatical, deviant asshole -- where
>> >> fanatical means only the arab view is right, deviant where he launches into
>> >> emotional, psychotic uneducated tirades when he bullshit is pointed out, and
>> >> asshole means he will not learn.
>> >>
>>
>>
>> >The ARE some serious problems with the US and Israel. Both of these nations
>> >are completely out of control.
>>
>> Really. What is out of control are the terrorists who use children to carry
>> bombs to kill other children, and use airplanes to assassinate thousands.
>>
>> We and Israel have said enough of this. --
>Who is this "WE" ?
Just about anyone who isn't an arab-terrorist-wannabe like you.
>And why do you feel that ALL of the US has to join in your genocide in
>Palestine ?
Its not genocide -- its a response to terrorists who attacked women and
children, and are now whining that someone is giving it back to them. Its not
going to stop until the terrorists stop. -- Cause and effect. Learn to
reason.
>Because Jews the media in the US and think that you can convince ALL
>americans to see this your way ?
>You are underestimating the American people
No. You do. If these arab nutjobs bring street bombing to the US, they haven't
even begun to imagine what is going to happen to them. -- And that just might
include rounding up people like you until we are sure you're not one of them.
Frankly, I think you are -- and should be reported to the FBI as a possible
terrorist.
>> If the terrorists can't stop
>> themselves from being child killers and assassin's -- they will be learn to
>> fear what they have unleashed by their own wish.
>I agree ,I'm sure the Israeli Distruction Forces are in fear of their lives
>in the future for what they are doing
Reaaaally? Didn't anyone ever tell you nut jobs that when you force a war with
someone bigger and stronger then you are -- you always lose -- especially when
the bigger guy has nukes and is willing to use them if necessary.
>>
>>
>> There are serious problems with the media in
>> >this country. The majority of the media in this country strongly appear to
>> >be pro-jewish at the expense of the facts. I did not see any examples of
>> >fanatical, deviant behavior in the quotes you pointed out (but granted, I
>> >don't understand the reference to
>> >alt.sex.bestiality).
>>
>> Idiots seldom see other idiots for what they are.
>You next best favorite quote, I bet you have that bumper sticker on your
>trailer where you live and repeat that quote in front of the mirror each
>morning after the standard : "You Talkin' to Me " ?
Ah. Your cognitive reasoning problem appears again.
>>
>> >To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
>> >discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
>> >into personal attacks.
>>
>> Assholes without a clue need to be pointed out.
>You seem to be calling people derogatory names much too often
>on these NG , some would say that that's a sign of an inferior intellect
Reaaally? And you think calling someone jew boy isn't derogatory. Your lack
of reasoning ability here is why I know you're a complete asshole.
Anyone else who can't see, it must be sharing a brain with you.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbd98b5$2$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
You seem to think that Israel has some "right" or "predestiny" to exist.
Crack a history book and you'll witness the fact that nations rise and
fall like the tides. There's a tremendous amount of money in the middle
east. In the worst case scenero, some of that money could be used to buy
one or more suitcase nukes. Israel could turn into a pile of glowing
rubble overnight.
I'm from Yugoslavia you degenerate dipshit , a
>
> >And why do you feel that ALL of the US has to join in your genocide in
> >Palestine ?
>
> Its not genocide -- its a response to terrorists who attacked women and
> children, and are now whining that someone is giving it back to them. Its not
> going to stop until the terrorists stop. -- Cause and effect. Learn to
> reason.
Suuuuuuuree, you must be an avid adict of Fox news channel ,
they like to "explain" the Middle East events to lemmings such as you
in such a digestive language
>
>
> >Because Jews the media in the US and think that you can convince ALL
> >americans to see this your way ?
>
>
> >You are underestimating the American people
>
> No. You do. If these arab nutjobs bring street bombing to the US, they haven't
> even begun to imagine what is going to happen to them. -- And that just might
> include rounding up people like you until we are sure you're not one of them.
> Frankly, I think you are -- and should be reported to the FBI as a possible
> terrorist.
BWBBWARHAHARRARHAARHHRAHRARHARHARHRHAHRARHARRHARHARHAA!!!!!!
What a moron ,
By this reasoning anybody on Usenet who doesn't agree with your genocidal remarks
about Palestinians should be "Reported to the FBI as a possible terrorist. "
You sure are a poster child for a degenerate TV Lemming made in the USA
What a sorryass spectacle you are
>
>
> >> If the terrorists can't stop
> >> themselves from being child killers and assassin's -- they will be learn to
> >> fear what they have unleashed by their own wish.
>
>
> >I agree ,I'm sure the Israeli Distruction Forces are in fear of their lives
> >in the future for what they are doing
>
> Reaaaally? Didn't anyone ever tell you nut jobs that when you force a war with
> someone bigger and stronger then you are -- you always lose -- especially when
> the bigger guy has nukes and is willing to use them if necessary.
Uooohhhhhhhh!!! You really are some kind of tough guy armchair worrior !
Threatening to use Nukes with sombody who won't agree with your Jew propaganda
Tut tut.......
>
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> There are serious problems with the media in
> >> >this country. The majority of the media in this country strongly appear to
> >> >be pro-jewish at the expense of the facts. I did not see any examples of
> >> >fanatical, deviant behavior in the quotes you pointed out (but granted, I
> >> >don't understand the reference to
> >> >alt.sex.bestiality).
> >>
> >> Idiots seldom see other idiots for what they are.
>
> >You next best favorite quote, I bet you have that bumper sticker on your
> >trailer where you live and repeat that quote in front of the mirror each
> >morning after the standard : "You Talkin' to Me " ?
>
> Ah. Your cognitive reasoning problem appears again.
What's this? You just leered a fancy word , don't wear it out , you've
only used it 10 times today !
>
> >>
> >> >To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
> >> >discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
> >> >into personal attacks.
> >>
> >> Assholes without a clue need to be pointed out.
What about degenerate Lemming idiots like you who are proud of their single digit IQ ?
>
>
> >You seem to be calling people derogatory names much too often
> >on these NG , some would say that that's a sign of an inferior intellect
>
> Reaaally? And you think calling someone jew boy isn't derogatory. Your lack
> of reasoning ability here is why I know you're a complete asshole.
Why ? Are you ashamed you are Jewish or being a boy ?
>
> Anyone else who can't see, it must be sharing a brain with you.
Your Fox channel TV overdose is showing in that last sentence,
It's incomprehensible
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> leto...@together.net
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> You seem to be calling people derogatory names much too often
> on these NG , some would say that that's a sign of an inferior intellect
Very amusing coming from you:
Here's a little selection of some of yours:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
"NOW START SUCKING YOU LITTLE FAGGOT AND BEND OVER SO I CAN RAM IT UP GOOD
UP YOUR HUNGRY WASP ASS."
Amir.M Tue, 13 Nov 2001
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: AMIGO NAZI COLLABORATOR
Date: 03 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90e7c5$l13$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
Suck off bitchey bitch Cole yoo fagot welsh floral wanker
You'l be kicking your wife up her fat cunt when I'm finished with you
...
We are gonna dig up the whole enshalada on you plant bicth
which includes phone,adress, faviorite brand of vaseline
even your wife's time of the month and that's when the fun starts
Subject: Re: 'I'm ready boys,' says Amir
Date: 03 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90dfa2$ds3$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
Fuck wifey Sarah up her tight ass baby , send the bitch over , I'l
even
pay for the air tickets for her limey ass ,
No baby , but I can teach , Give the whore's wifey booty up NOW !
I'l make her anus and mouth my own personal sperm bank
BBWBBWRARHAHAHAHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah baby , I'm listening, Now piss off you and put your whore wifey
on
line At least be gentleman enough to supply me with her phone No.
If you don't I'll just dig it up myself and place a midnight collect
call from 'ere to wifey Sarah and just whisper in her sexy whore ear
what a hot date I am and what I would do to her if we should ever meet
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: AMIGO WHAT HAPPENED???
Date: 03 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90egdo$4ng$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
You better back the fuck up mutherfucker with your crappy accusations
or
I will have your Welch pansyass cunt and you for my pleasure reel soon
you punkass bitch Adresses and telephone numbers will soon be posted
all
over the Net you insolent sorry ass bitch, I warned you !!!!!!!
You simple F'n shit - you are not good enough to suck the peanuts out
my shit! You were never fit to suck the cum residue off my pubic hairs
after I mastrubated when watching my dog buttfuck Cole's wifey Sarah
in
her ass and mouth.
I yawn at your pathetic attempts to mimic my well thought out posts
with
your yeastinfected pussyslop.
Now, I've been constipated all weekend, but have drank a quart of ex-
lax
and am ready to excrete the wet fecal matter I was saving for your
whoreass
wifey's face.
Get on your knees, in cocksucking position--you know the drill--and
get
ready for a big load in your face. It's McDonlad's time for you and
your
wifey whorebitch.
You are the sorriest dick I have seen on all the newsgroops, and I'v
fucked over many !
You are a filthy broken record.
Well BITCH - you have met your master.
Get down and start SUCKIN asswhipe! You and your cunt whore limey
whore
BBBWRRAHAHARRAHAHAHARAGGHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: AMIGO WHAT HAPPENED???
Date: 03 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90eqli$q4j$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
stick your "cut & paste dildo up your daughters slut anus you
mindless goatfucker
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: Benifit's of living in a 3rd World country
Date: 03 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90eqvq$rpo$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
If this makes your day after I butfucked and raped you and Sarah all
over SCY so be it ?
Give the junkyard fag dog a bone for charity i say
> and it hasn't gone unnoticed that you seem to read and comment on UK
affairs most of the time.
> Makes you think you're in England, eh Gaymir.
Make's me think I'm closer to wifey Sarah's cute little bootie now
doesn't it ?
BBBWWRRGGAHARRAAHHHAAAAAAAAA!!!
Give my regards to wifey ....
BBBWWRRGGAHARRAAHHHAAAAAAAAA!!!
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: Revelations (The Weird Peter Cole )
Date: 02 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90bc65$oio$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
He he, no amount of forging will help you this time Cole,
You might as well shut the fuck and post Sarah's telephone
so I might hava a friendly chit - chat with wifey bitch
on our own ...har,har
Boy oh boy would I teach her pleasures untold and push her to
the edges ecstasy she never imagined were possible (completly
unattainable with a lame welsh floral freakazoid fag like you )
The poor girl is probably sick of you masturbating around your
favorite carnivor plants who you probably have pet names for you
filthy limey freak Watch out she doesn't read up on your loser
fag exploits on SCY
or she might be tempted to dump you like an old fary bag and
E-Mail me at once coz she knows she just might get the best
powerfuck Balkan hombre deep destroyer up her ass and you know
she's longing for one good one don't you plant boy ?
Yeah baby , we got your number now.........
BWBBWAAARARAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: 'I'm ready boys,' says Amir
Date: 02 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <90c2e1$o0$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
Let me state some facts about you cocksmelling loser Welsh loser
Cole that we have gathered so far :
1. You probably dont even know which one of your sisters is your
mother.
2. You probably have never had sex with a anyone outside your
immediate family, and only with the men folk.
3 . The resemblance between you and the fag family dog is uncanny.
4. You have no friends apart from your plants - even your fag floral
customers slap the shit out of you.
5. Your fatass paroled father has sex sixteen times a day.
Twice with each one of your sisters and four times with you.
6. You are not on welfare because your family too stupid to fill out
the application.
7. You will probably die from a dickwhippin after you failed to suck
a floral fag customer completely dry.
8. If I ever meet you in person, I will pound your faggot ass all over
your pickup plant truck and stick my cock so far down your throat it
will come out your ass.
9. You will probably looking forward to # 8
10. Sooner or later I will fuck wifey Sarah up her tight brit ass and
you can count on it my little plant growing bitch
From: "Amir_M" <am...@you.suck.it.down>
Subject: Re: The Chickens Are Coming Home To Roost in Kosovo
Date: 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <909bo6$8il$1...@imsp026.netvigator.com>
Porque tu eres un coño de madre maricon juevon cultivador de
matas carnivoras , eso es porque
Punkass limey bitch , and fuck wifey Sarah up her cunt
OOhhhhhhhhh what fun , sarah me and another puta in a thre-way
deap anal fuckcfest over here dude, send the cunt over
BBWBWRARHAHARARAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SPECIFIC THREATS MADE BY AMIR
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SELECTED FROM THE ABOVE:
"If I ever meet you in person, I will pound your faggot ass all over
your pickup plant truck and stick my cock so far down your throat it
will come out your ass."
"Sooner or later I will fuck wifey Sarah up her tight brit ass and
you can count on it my little plant growing bitch"
"Yeah baby , we got your number now........."
"You better back the fuck up mutherfucker with your crappy accusations
or I will have your Welch pansyass cunt and you for my pleasure reel
soon you punkass bitch"
"Adresses and telephone numbers will soon be posted all over the Net
you insolent sorry ass bitch, I warned you !!!!!!!"
AND COUNTLESS OTHER SPECIFIC AND NONSPECIFIC THREATS TO HARRASS,
ABDUCT, RAPE AND INFLICT INJURY TO ADULTS AND CHILDREN OF BOTH SEXES
It can only be concluded that this is a very disturbed and dangerous
individual who is likely to present a considerable threat to public
safety.
" I'll cum round and shove a 2L coke bottle up your ass then maybe
you'll get that all together feeling you are obviously looking for you."
Amir M. amir@you_suck_it_down 8th Nov 2001
Oh. We try not to discriminate. You don't have to come from the sand piles to
be arab-terrorist-wannabe -- all you have to do is act like you do.
>>
>> >And why do you feel that ALL of the US has to join in your genocide in
>> >Palestine ?
>>
>> Its not genocide -- its a response to terrorists who attacked women and
>> children, and are now whining that someone is giving it back to them. Its not
>> going to stop until the terrorists stop. -- Cause and effect. Learn to
>> reason.
>Suuuuuuuree, you must be an avid adict of Fox news channel ,
>they like to "explain" the Middle East events to lemmings such as you
> in such a digestive language
Funny how assholes like you always change the subject when they shit on their
own points and can't get caught at it. -- Have you figured out yet, that
you're too stupid to win this with me?
>>
>>
>> >Because Jews the media in the US and think that you can convince ALL
>> >americans to see this your way ?
>>
>>
>> >You are underestimating the American people
>>
>> No. You do. If these arab nutjobs bring street bombing to the US, they haven't
>> even begun to imagine what is going to happen to them. -- And that just might
>> include rounding up people like you until we are sure you're not one of them.
>> Frankly, I think you are -- and should be reported to the FBI as a possible
>> terrorist.
>BWBBWARHAHARRARHAARHHRAHRARHARHARHRHAHRARHARRHARHARHAA!!!!!!
>What a moron ,
>By this reasoning anybody on Usenet who doesn't agree with your genocidal
>remarks about Palestinians should be "Reported to the FBI as a possible
>terrorist. "
>You sure are a poster child for a degenerate TV Lemming made in the USA
>What a sorryass spectacle you are
If public bombings started in the US -- how long do think how long do think it
would take before people started naming those likely to do more bombings? Do
you really think anything you have said here sounds reasonable?
Rephrased for your pea brain: you can't go around calling anyone who doesn't
see it your way a jew boy, without making yourself look like an
arab-terrorist-wannabe when it comes time to lock up the assholes for
protection.
>>
>>
>> >> If the terrorists can't stop
>> >> themselves from being child killers and assassin's -- they will be learn to
>> >> fear what they have unleashed by their own wish.
>>
>>
>> >I agree ,I'm sure the Israeli Distruction Forces are in fear of their lives
>> >in the future for what they are doing
>>
>> Reaaaally? Didn't anyone ever tell you nut jobs that when you force a war with
>> someone bigger and stronger then you are -- you always lose -- especially when
>> the bigger guy has nukes and is willing to use them if necessary.
>Uooohhhhhhhh!!! You really are some kind of tough guy armchair worrior !
>Threatening to use Nukes with sombody who won't agree with your Jew
>propaganda
No. Just stating facts. You can't deal with the reality that no matter what or
how it ends, Israel is not going to lose -- but you assholes are.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> There are serious problems with the media in
>> >> >this country. The majority of the media in this country strongly appear to
>> >> >be pro-jewish at the expense of the facts. I did not see any examples of
>> >> >fanatical, deviant behavior in the quotes you pointed out (but granted, I
>> >> >don't understand the reference to
>> >> >alt.sex.bestiality).
>> >>
>> >> Idiots seldom see other idiots for what they are.
>>
>> >You next best favorite quote, I bet you have that bumper sticker on your
>> >trailer where you live and repeat that quote in front of the mirror each
>> >morning after the standard : "You Talkin' to Me " ?
>>
>> Ah. Your cognitive reasoning problem appears again.
>What's this? You just leered a fancy word , don't wear it out , you've only
>used it 10 times today !
You haven't figured out what it means yet -- have you.
>>
>> >>
>> >> >To defend one's beliefs in a forceful way is normal. Even more so when
>> >> >discussing emotional subjects. You loose all credibility when you launch
>> >> >into personal attacks.
>> >>
>> >> Assholes without a clue need to be pointed out.
>What about degenerate Lemming idiots like you who are proud of their single
>digit IQ ?
I don't know any. Your the dumbest shit I've ever let take up part of my time.
So if you have a single digit IQ, you would certainly qualify as someone who
should be allowed out without a guard.
>>
>>
>> >You seem to be calling people derogatory names much too often
>> >on these NG , some would say that that's a sign of an inferior intellect
>>
>> Reaaally? And you think calling someone jew boy isn't derogatory. Your lack
>> of reasoning ability here is why I know you're a complete asshole.
>Why ? Are you ashamed you are Jewish or being a boy ?
There you go again. Not being able to read and understand is a mark of an
asshole. Why do you keep proving it!
>>
>> Anyone else who can't see, it must be sharing a brain with you.
>Your Fox channel TV overdose is showing in that last sentence,
>It's incomprehensible
It always will be to your arab-terrorist-wannabe brain. -- They really do
need more like you to carry bombs. They are losing. Do you need help getting
there?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
>And I see the Israel Snipers shooting kids throwing rocks and police trying
>to save people and put out a fire in a Christian church being killed by
>Israel. The whole world see it except American because of Jewish Censorship
>of the media. But they can't stop the internet.
You've never been closer to war then the TV screen or movie have you! -- It
shows, but what I don't understand is your urge to make an idiot out yourself.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
>Wanna put any money on it? Might not be in my life time but the United
>Nations will nuke Israel eventually.
What is the diagnosis and treatment of your mental problems?
><leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
>news:3cbd9926$3$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
>> In <D_fv8.160$Vb4.9...@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com>, on 04/17/02
>> at 02:52 PM, "Rice Chek" <bone...@celtic.net> said:
>>
>> >The only reason the entire world hates the USA is because our government
>is
>> >backing Israel. Israel is the Terrorist and Sharon needs to be tried as a
>War
>> >Criminal. Bin Laden is a Bush partner in most of their operations.
>>
>> We don't really give rats ass what you think -- But, Israel with stay.
>The
>> terrorists will go. Its that simple. Get use to it. Deal with it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> leto...@together.net
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
>In article <3cbd9926$3$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net>,
>leto...@nospam.net says...
>>
>> We don't really give rats ass what you think -- But, Israel with stay. The
>> terrorists will go. Its that simple. Get use to it. Deal with it.
>>
>>
>You seem to think that Israel has some "right" or "predestiny" to exist.
>Crack a history book and you'll witness the fact that nations rise and fall
>like the tides.
Crack a few books yourself -- you will find out both groups have a right to
the area. Then really open your brain and let the sun in -- figure out that
your hate will not prevail. Israel will survive -- then figure out that if any
of the ragheads use a nuke anywhere -- the already named targets will perish.
There's a tremendous amount of money in the middle east.
>In the worst case scenero, some of that money could be used to buy one or
>more suitcase nukes. Israel could turn into a pile of glowing rubble
>overnight.
Translation of my above statement for the ultra-dense; Perhaps you are right
-- but what you miss is that fact that there won't be any ragheads left to
gloat over it.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbdbec9$6$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
SYLLABICATION: Kol Nid·re
PRONUNCIATION: kl ndr, -r, kôl n-dr
NOUN: Judaism The opening prayer recited on the eve of Yom Kippur, declaring
the annulment of all personal vows made to God in the preceding year.
ETYMOLOGY: Aramaic kol nidrê, all vows (the opening words of the prayer) :
kol, all; see kll in Appendix II + nidrê, pl. bound form of nidr, vow (from
ndar, to vow; see nr in Appendix II).
SO HELP ME GOD! It voids all Oaths taken.
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbdb5d9$2$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
Our oath is to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies
either foreign or domestic. Sound like you fit that picture with your Kol
Nidre Oath.
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbdb81f$4$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
>Well Jew Boy I am a Marine and was on active duty from 1967 to 1974 now you
>tell me you halfwit if I had any experience in a Foreign Police Action while
>either you were not even born or you were in Canada hiding like a fag smoking
>pot and dropping LSD.
"Foreign Police Action?" That's a pretty big set of words for a Marine. Lets
see; Who was president then? Tell me your units and where you were and when.
Then I'll believe you -- maybe. Also tell me what your specialty code was? And
when did Ssn's change to SS numbers?
>Our oath is to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies either
>foreign or domestic. Sound like you fit that picture with your Kol Nidre
>Oath.
Lets see, you claim to be a marine -- but you hate the jews so much that you
now side with arabs terrorists that have attacks us and stated they will
continue!
I don't think Marines took people as dumb as you are, even in 1967. But you
say so. Tell me, did your sister pay off the recruiter so she could sleep
alone or what?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
>The ones to benefit from all the bombings are the Jews and no one else!
The jews benefit from being bombed? Hey rice chek -- check your meds --
because you have no clue about what is going on in this world.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Crack a few books yourself -- you will find out both groups have a right to
> the area. Then really open your brain and let the sun in -- figure out that
> your hate will not prevail. Israel will survive -- then figure out that if any
> of the ragheads use a nuke anywhere -- the already named targets will perish.
>
>
>
Ragheads huh? Let me guess, the term "sand nigger" is next. Do I sense
a wee bit of racism?
>
> Translation of my above statement for the ultra-dense; Perhaps you are right
> -- but what you miss is that fact that there won't be any ragheads left to
> gloat over it.
>
>
Supposing hot heads prevail and Israel is indeed nuked (or bio'ed or
chem'ed). Just who would be held accountable? Are you saying the entire
Arab world would be held accountable? Who would be performing the
payback? What is the source material for your opinion? Please
cite specific mutial defence pacts or other revelent treaties. Inquiring
minds (the ultra-dense) want to know!
2531,2571,2572,2574 MOS's now tell me what they stand for chump!
What stupid questions anyway
Change to SS# around 1972 but who really gave a shit and that was not
anything important to remember in the first place.
Lyndon Johnson when I went in
Nixon resigned when I got out in 1974
Now let have a little test for you:
What years were the following wars:
War of The Revolution
French Naval War
War with Tripoli
Battle of Quallah Batto
Battle of Ty-Ho Bay
Boxer Reb.
Capture of Veracruz
Who was the President of the Chu Lai Surf Team in 1969?
What did they call women Marines?
What did they call little Marines?(Under 5'5")
What was a M79?
What is a 1 Day Tear off Pad?
What is a AN PRC10?
In boot camp what did the sign say over the line in the mess hall?
What were the 2 main Gates at Camp Pendleton called?
Where was Communications Schools Battalion located?
What was the next training Battalion called before you went to Schools
Battalion and what was the Battalion called just before you went to NAM?
And I don't hate JEWS you dumbass. To question a Jew make you an
anti-semite. To an idiot like you and keep up the terrorism and you will see
the USA rid themselves of you like all the other countries have in the past.
Sharon makes Hitler look like a Saint.
All the other Nations are telling Sharon to get out of Palestine even Wimpy
Bush.
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbdd067$5$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbdca91$1$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...
>You dumbass mother breeder I don't post personal information on the Internet.
>But a few of the questions are on the top of my head.
Gee, now you do sound like a real marine, and not a wannabe playing on the
internet. I had to make sure.
>2531,2571,2572,2574 MOS's now tell me what they stand for chump!
How would I know. I was AF.
>What stupid questions anyway
Never been challenged before?
>Change to SS# around 1972 but who really gave a shit and that was not
>anything important to remember in the first place.
It was earlier. Sometime in 1968 I think. I asked because if you weren't a
real vet, it would show on that one.
>Lyndon Johnson when I went in
>Nixon resigned when I got out in 1974
>Now let have a little test for you:
>What years were the following wars:
>War of The Revolution
>French Naval War
>War with Tripoli
>Battle of Quallah Batto
>Battle of Ty-Ho Bay
>Boxer Reb.
>Capture of Veracruz
>Who was the President of the Chu Lai Surf Team in 1969?
>What did they call women Marines?
>What did they call little Marines?(Under 5'5")
>What was a M79?
>What is a 1 Day Tear off Pad?
>What is a AN PRC10?
>In boot camp what did the sign say over the line in the mess hall? What were
>the 2 main Gates at Camp Pendleton called?
>Where was Communications Schools Battalion located?
>What was the next training Battalion called before you went to Schools
>Battalion and what was the Battalion called just before you went to NAM?
Wow, a Marine that can write. -- I was AF, we didn't have battalions. I could
lookup the other stuff, but I don't feel like it.
>And I don't hate JEWS you dumbass. To question a Jew make you an anti-semite.
>To an idiot like you and keep up the terrorism and you will see the USA rid
>themselves of you like all the other countries have in the past. Sharon makes
>Hitler look like a Saint.
He's not a Hitler -- hes a combat vet fed up with the terrorists. -- Nor, am
I keeping up terrorism -- I'm just smart enough to know that when some bastard
has promised to kill you and is trying, you better get him first or you're
going to die. You know this too.
What is the marine plan for ending terrorism? Talking is over. Sept. 11 cured
that. We also know the arabs are engaged in a war of attrition. We tried
that in VN for 25 years -- its not going to happen again -- and the Israelis
aren't going to let it happen to them either.
You need to get use to the fact that the world changed on Sept 11, 2001.
Terrorism will now be met with overwhelming military force -- because death is
only thing terrorists understand.
>All the other Nations are telling Sharon to get out of Palestine even Wimpy
>Bush.
Only because they don't want it to erupt into a larger war that pulls the
whole mid-East in, disrupts oil supplies, grows to nukes, etc. -- not because
they think Israel is wrong to wipe out terrorists.
>
>What was a M79?
An M79 was and is an effective enima device for the GD butcher Sharon.
"Rice Chek" <bone...@celtic.net> wrote in message
news:zBmv8.4090$S_6.68...@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>You don't know what the hell your talking about. If you were referring to the
>SELECTIVE SERVICE NUMBER MAYBE. I had a Service Number in the USMC until I
>got out. The new guys started having Social Security Numbers around 1972
>instead of Service Numbers.
Oh. I get it now. The guys already in the marines kept their service number,
while the new ones used their SSN. -- They must have done this help simplify
the training. Isn't that the Marine Motto; Simplify?
For the USAF the actual change came in 1969, and don't tell me I'm worng
because I have orders right in front of me dated Jul 69 using my SSN. I still
think the orders for the change over came sometime in 1968.
>Noone paid any attention to that except maybe
>file clerks.
Well, that might be because of the training problem you pointed out.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
leto...@together.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
I had more military training in High School than a general in the Air Force
received at Kemper Military School.
<leto...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:3cbedb61$3$yrgbherq$mr2...@news.earthlink.net...