Nhu+~ng Thu+? Tha'ch DDang Cho+` DDo+.i Chi'nh Quye^`n Obama
irene...@yahoo.com
ng
www.daiviet.org
Nhu+~ng Thu+? Tha'ch DDang Cho+` DDo+.i Chi'nh Quye^`n Obama
Bu`i Hoa`i Nam
LTS: Xin gio+'i thie^.u dde^'n quy' ddo^.c gia? ba`i nha^.n ddi.nh
ve^` nhu+~ng thu+? tha'ch ddo^'i no^.i ma` ta^n chi'nh quye^`n Obama
se~ pha?i gia?i quye^'t, pha^`n nha^.n ddi.nh ve^` nhu+~ng thu+?
tha'ch ddo^'i ngoa.i se~ ddu+o+.c chu'ng to^i dda(ng trong so^' ba'o to
+'i\.
Sau nhu+~ng lo+`i hu+'a he.n cu?a tho+`i ky` tranh cu+? va` sau ba^`u
kho^ng khi' tu+ng bu+`ng, hu+'ng kho+?i nha^n nga`y le^~ tuye^n the^.
nha^.m chu+'c cu?a vi. ta^n To^?ng Tho^'ng Hoa Ky` Obama, nhu+~ng
nga`y ga^`n dda^y, chi'nh quye^`n mo+'i cu?a nu+o+'c My~ dda~ ba('t
dda^`u bu+o+'c va`o giai ddoa.n pha?i ddo^'i pho' vo+'i thu+.c te^'\.
Tho+`i ky` “tra(ng ma^.t” thu+o+`ng va^~n ddu+o+.c da`nh cho ngu+o+`i
mo+'i le^n ca^`m quye^`n xem ra kho^ng ddu+o+.c be^`n la^u trong tru+o
+`ng ho+.p o^ng Obama\. Chu+a ki.p tho+`i sa('p xe^'p ddu+o+.c nha^n su
+. va`o nhu+~ng co+ ca^'u co^ng quye^`n, o^ng dda~ pha?i ddo^'i pho'
ngay vo+'i nhu+~ng thu+? tha'ch lo+'n ca? ve^` hai ma(.t no^.i bo^.
va` ddo^'i ngoa.i\. Ne^`n kinh te^' thi` ca`ng nga`y ca`ng xuo^'ng
do^'c, kho^ng nhu+~ng dda~ suy tra^`m ma` co`n ddang tre^n dda` nguy
hie^?m co' the^? tro+? tha`nh suy thoa'i, trong khi ddo' thi` trong
la~nh vu+.c kinh te^' cu~ng nhu+ trong la~nh vu+.c chie^'n lu+o+.c,
ti`nh hi`nh tre^n the^' gio+'i va^~n bie^'n chuye^?n ngoa`i su+. tie^n
lie^.u cu?a nu+o+'c My~, ma(.c da^`u mo^.t so^' du+ lua^.n va^~n co`n
tro^ng cho+` va`o nhu+~ng lo+`i hu+'a he.n “thay ddo^?i” cu?a o^ng
Obama\.
O^ng Obama ddu+o+.c ba^`u le^n la`m To^?ng Tho^'ng va`o mo^.t tho+`i
ddie^?m he^'t su+'c dda(.c bie^.t\. O^ng la` mo^.t ngu+o+`i go^'c da
dden la^`n dda^`u tie^n trong li.ch su+? Hoa Ky` ddu+o+.c ba^`u le^n
dda?m nha^.n chu+'c vu. cao nha^'t cu?a dda^'t nu+o+'c na`y, nhu+ng
cu~ng va`o lu'c ne^n kinh te^' cu?a nu+o+'c na`y ddang tra?i qua mo^.t
cuo^.c khu?ng hoa?ng kinh te^' va` ta`i chi'nh ma` dda.i dda so^' kinh
te^' gia cho la` to lo+'n va` dda'ng lo nga.i kho^ng ke'm cuo^.c dda.i
khu?ng hoa?ng na(m 1929, nghi~a la` tu+` 80 chu.c na(m nay\.
Tha^.t va^.y, chi? mo^.t va`i con so^' cu~ng co' the^? cho tha^'y
ta^`m quan tro.ng cu?a ti`nh tra.ng na`y\. Rie^ng trong tha'ng gie^ng
vu+`a qua, ngu+o+`i ta dda~ tha^'y ho+n nu+?a trie^.u ngu+o+`i la^m
va`o ca?nh ma^'t vie^.c va` ne^'u to^?ng ke^'t la.i con so^' ngu+o+`i
tha^'t nghie^.p trong na(m vu+`a qua thi` con so^' le^n to+'i ho+n 3
trie^.u 600 nga`n ngu+o+`i\.
Trong ca'c nga`nh hoa.t cu?a ne^`n kinh te^' Hoa Ky`, kho^ng co'
nga`nh na`o thoa't kho?i ti`nh tra.ng ha`ng sa?n xua^'t ra bi. u+'
ddo.ng, buo^.c ca'c co+ so+? thu+o+ng ma.i pha?i sa tha?i nha^n vie^n
\. DDa(.c bie^.t ngu+o+`i ta pha?i ke^? dde^'n nga`nh sa?n xua^'t xe ho
+i (General Motors, Chrysler va` Ford) va` nga`nh xa^y ca^'t nha` cu+?
a vo+'i ha`ng trie^.u xe ho+i va` nha` cu+?a kho^ng ba'n cho ai ddu+o
+.c\. Ra^'t nhie^`u nhu+~ng co+ so+? ta`i chi'nh lo+'n nhu+ Lehman
Brothers, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, co^ng ty ba?o hie^?m AIG, hoa(.c nhu
+~ng nga^n ha`ng kho^?ng lo^` nhu+ Wachovia, Merrill Lynch, Bank of
America va` Citi Group dde^`u pha?i chi.u chung so^' pha^.n su.p ddo^?
hay suy su.p\. Co`n thi. tru+o+`ng chu+'ng khoa'n thi` chi? so^' Dow
Jones, tie^u bie^?u cho su+'c so^'ng cu?a ne^`n kinh te^' My~, trong ho
+n 13 tha'ng vu+`a qua dda~ tu+` 14,000 tu.t xuo^'ng co' lu'c du+o+'i
7, 200, mu+'c tha^'p nha^'t tu+` 12 na(m nay, nghi~a la` ma^'t ddi
ga^`n 50 %\. Ha`ng nga`y, tu+` sa'ng cho dde^'n to^'i khuya, kho^ng
lu'c na`o la` lu'c ca'c dda`i truye^`n hi`nh hay ca'c co+ so+?
truye^`n tho^ng kho^ng nha('c dde^'n ti`nh tra.ng ddi xuo^'ng cu?a
ne^`n kinh te^' My~ va` ne^`n kinh te^' cu?a nhu+~ng nu+o+'c kha'c tu
+` A^u sang A', ke`m theo vo+'i nhu+~ng con so^' dda'ng lo nga.i ve^`
so^' ngu+o+`i bi. sa tha?i\. Ba^`u kho^ng khi' bi quan na`y la`m cho
ngu+o+`i da^n My~ mo^.t pha^`n lo la('ng cho tu+o+ng lai, nhu+ng mo^.t
pha^`n kha'c la.i cho+` ddo+.i nhu+~ng “thay ddo^?i” ma` o^ng Obama
dda~ tu+`ng hu+'a he.n\.
Mo^.t va`i bu+o+'c dda^`u tra('c tro+?
Trong khoa?ng tho+`i gian tu+` nga`y tro+? tha`nh vi. to^?ng tho^'ng
dda('c cu+? cho dde^'n nga`y tuye^n the^. chi'nh thu+'c nha^.m chu+'c,
o^ng Obama dda~ co' hai tha'ng dde^? sa('p xe^'p nha^n su+. va` nhu
+~ng chu+o+ng tri`nh hay du+. a'n se~ ddu+a ra dde^? mo+? dda^`u cho
nhie^.m ky` cu?a o^ng\. Du+ lua^.n ho^` ho+~i cu?a dda?ng Da^n Chu?
va` cu?a nhu+~ng tha`nh pha^`n thie^n ta? trong chi'nh gio+'i Hoa Ky`
cho+` ddo+.i nhie^`u o+? no+i o^ng, dda(.c bie^.t trong khi o^ng
tha`nh la^.p no^.i ca'c\. Ve^` phu+o+ng die^.n na`y, ngu+o+`i ta ghi
nha^.n o^ng ddu+a va`o chi'nh phu? ra^'t nhie^`u nha^n va^.t dda~ tu
+`ng phu.c vu. du+o+'i tho+`i o^ng Clinton (ke^? ca? ba` Clinton nay
ddu+o+.c cu+? la`m Ngoa.i Tru+o+?ng) nhu+ ca'c o^ng Larry Summers (tru
+o+'c dda^y la`m Bo^. Tru+o+?ng Nga^n Kho^', nay ddu+o+.c mo+`i giu+~
mo^.t tro.ng tra'ch ve^` ma(.t kinh te^' ta.i to`a Ba.ch O^'c), o^ng
William Richardson (tru+o+'c dda^y la`m Bo^. Tru+o+?ng Na(ng Lu+o+.ng
va` DDa.i Su+' ta.i Lie^n Hie^.p Quo^'c, nay ddu+o+.c dde^` cu+? la`m
Bo^. Tru+o+?ng Thu+o+ng Ma.i) va` o^ng Tom Daschle (tru+o+'c dda^y
la`m La~nh Tu. DDa So^' ta.i Thu+o+.ng Vie^.n, nay ddu+o+.c dde^` cu+?
la`m Bo^. Tru+o+?ng Y te^' va` Nha^n Lu+.c)\. Nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i na`y
cu`ng vo+'i mo^.t so^' nhu+~ng nha^n va^.t kha'c co' te^n tuo^?i trong
chi'nh gio+'i hay trong gio+'i khoa ba?ng, xua^'t tha^n tu+` nhu+~ng
tru+o+`ng DDa.i Ho.c lo+'n nhu+ Harvard, Yale hay Princeton la`m cho
mo.i ngu+o+`i co' ca?m tu+o+?ng ra(`ng mo.i su+. cho.n lu+.a cu?a o^ng
dde^`u xu+'ng dda'ng ca?\. Nhu+ng ro^`i trong ca'i may la.i co' ca'i
kho^ng may\. Ba'o chi' chi? trong va`i nga`y dda~ kha'm pha' ra ddu+o
+.c la` o^ng Richardson, hie^.n ddang la`m Tho^'ng DDo^'c tie^?u bang
New Mexico co`n ddang bi. die^`u tra ve^` vie^.c o^ng co' the^? di'nh
li'u dde^'n mo^.t vu. ho^'i ma.i quye^`n the^', co`n o^ng Daschle thi`
ma~i dde^'n lu'c ddu+o+.c dde^` cu+? la`m Bo^. Tru+o+?ng mo+'i chi.u
ddo'ng ho+n 200 nga`n tie^`n thue^' co`n thie^'u nha` nu+o+'c tu+` khi
o^ng ra kho?i Thu+o+.ng Vie^.n va` la`m vie^.c vo+'i nhu+~ng nho'm“
quye^`n lo+.i” o+? be^n ngoa`i\. O^ng la^'y co+' la` dda~ so+ xua^'t,
“que^n” ha(?n vie^.c dda'ng le~ o^ng dda~ pha?i la`m tu+` tru+o+'c\.
Cu~ng la.i trong tru+o+`ng ho+.p thie^'u thue^' va` nay vu+`a mo+'i
ddo'ng la` o^ng Tim Geithner ddu+o+.c dde^` cu+? la`m Bo^. Tru+o+?ng
Nga^n Kho^' va` ba` Nancy Killefer ddu+o.c dde^` cu+? la`m Tru+o+?ng
Ban theo do~i vie^.c thu+.c hie^.n nhu+~ng ke^' hoa.ch cu?a chi'nh phu?
\. Trong bo^'n tru+o+`ng ho+.p tre^n dda^y, ta^'t ca? co' ba ngu+o+`i
du+o+'i a'p lu+.c cu?a du+ lua^.n pha?i ru't lui la` hai o^ng
Richardson, Daschle va` ba` Killefer, chi? rie^ng co' o^ng Geithner
la` ddu+o+.c cu+'u vo+'t va`o phu't cho't vi` lo^~i tu+o+ng ddo^'i
nhe. (chi? “que^n” co' ho+n hai chu.c nga`n tie^`n thue^' chu+a no^.p)
va` vo+'i ly' do la` o^ng la` ngu+o+`i he^'t su+'c ca^`n thie^'t
kho^ng the^? thay the^' ddu+o+.c trong vie^.c su+?a soa.n nhu+~ng chu+o
+ng tri`nh phu.c ho^`i kinh te^'\. The^m va`o nhu+~ng chuye^.n lu?ng
cu?ng na`y la.i co`n mo^.t chuye^.n lu?ng cu?ng kha'c nu+~a: ddu+o+.c
mo+`i giu+~ chu+'c Bo^. Tru+o+?ng Thu+o+ng Ma.i, Thu+o+.ng Nghi. Si~
Co^.ng Ho`a, o^ng Judd Gregg co^ng khai nha^.n lo+`i nhu+ng chi? mo^.t
tua^`n le^~ sau la.i xin ca'o lui, vie^.n co+' la` kho^ng the^?
ddo^`ng y' vo+'i chu? tru+o+ng cu?a phi'a Da^n Chu?\.
Tre^n dda^y la` nhu+~ng vu. tai tie^'ng ma` gio+'i truye^`n tho^ng
la^'y la`m thi'ch thu' mang ra pho+i ba^`y, kho^ng i't la`m gia?m uy
ti'n ddang le^n cu?a vi. ta^n To^?ng Tho^'ng, nhu+ng no'i cho cu`ng
thi` cu~ng chi? la` nhu+~ng bu+o+'c dda^`u tru.c tra(.c cu?a mo^.t
chi'nh quye^`n mo+'i co`n ddang say men chie^'n tha('ng ne^n thie^'u
tha^.n tro.ng trong vie^.c sa('p xe^'p nha^n su+.\. Vie^.c he^. tro.ng
ho+n ca? la` la`m sao bie^'t lo+.i du.ng ddu+o+.c su+. u?ng ho^. cu?a
ngu+o+`i da^n trong nu+o+'c va` su+. tro^ng cho+` cu?a the^' gio+'i
be^n ngoa`i dde^` phu.c ho^`i ddu+o+.c ne^`n kinh te^' My~\. Ve^` phu
+o+ng die^.n na`y, dda.o lua^.t ki'ch thi'ch kinh te^' ma` o^ng Obama
vu+`a ky' ta.i Denver, Colorado nhu+~ng nga`y mo+'i dda^y cu`ng vo+'i
mo^.t loa.t nhu+~ng chu+o+ng tri`nh nhu+ o^?n ddi.nh la~nh vu+.c ta`i
chi'nh, cu+'u vo+'t con so^' ga^`n mo^.t chu.c trie^.u nha` ddang bi.
de do.a ti.ch thu hay tro+. giu'p nga`nh sa?n xua^'t xe ho+i mo+'i
chi'nh la` nhu+~ng ddie^`u ma` ngu+o+`i da^n My~ ca^`n pha?i theo do~i
\. Co' thu+.c hie^.n ddu+o+.c nhu+~ng chu+o+ng tri`nh na`y kho^ng, hay
la` thu+.c hie^.n ddu+o+.c to+'i mu+'c na`o, ta^'t ca? la` nhu+~ng thu
+? tha'ch to lo+'n ma` chi'nh quye^`n Obama se~ pha?i vu+o+.t qua
trong nhu+~ng na(m sa('p to+'i \.
Stimulus, dda.o lua^.t ki'ch dda^?y kinh te^'
Ne^`n kinh te^' cu?a My~ cha^.m la.i tu+` cuo^'i na(m 2007 nhu+ng ma~i
dde^'n mu`a thu na(m ngoa'i, 2008, mo+'i bu`ng no^? lo+'n tha`nh mo^.t
cuo^.c khu?ng hoa?ng\. Lu'c ddo' ddu'ng la` lu'c cuo^.c cha.y ddua
va`o to`a Ba.ch O^'c giu+~a hai o^ng Obama va` McCain ddang o+? va`o
giai ddoa.n cho't, do ddo' ma` dda~ ta.o lo+.i the^' lo+'n cho o^ng
Obama, ngu+o+`i ddu+a ra nhu+~ng hu+'a he.n thay ddo^?i, ddie^`u ma`
ai cu~ng mong muo^'n\. O^ng dda(.c bie^.t dde^` nghi. la` ne^'u dda('c
cu+? o^ng se~ ye^u ca^`u Quo^'c Ho^.i cha^'p thua^.n mo^.t chu+o+ng
tri`nh ta'o ba.o chu+`ng 700 ty? nha(`m mu.c ddi'ch dda^?y ma.nh ne^`n
kinh te^', kho^ng ke^? ha`ng tra(m ty? kha'c ma` chi'nh quye^`n Bush
tru+o+'c lu'c ra ddi cu~ng dda~ pha?i ye^u ca^`u Quo^'c Ho^.i cha^'p
thua^.n\. Chi'nh dde^` nghi. na`y mo+'i dda^y dda~ tro+? tha`nh dda.o
lua^.t ma` gio+'i truye^`n tho^ng no^m na go.i la` stimulus (co'
nghi~a la` thu'c dda^?y, ki'ch thi'ch)\.
Ve^` dda.o lua^.t na`y, dda'nh da^'u bu+o+'c dda^`u cu?a chi'nh
quye^`n Obama, thi` dda?ng Da^n Chu? cho dda^y la` mo^.t tha('ng lo+.i
lo+'n cu?a ca' nha^n vi. ta^n To^?ng Tho^'ng vi` trong mo^.t tho+`i
gian nga('n chu+a dda^`y mo^.t tha'ng sau khi nha^.m chu+'c o^ng dda~
thuye^'t phu.c ddu+o+.c ca? du+ lua^.n la^~n Quo^'c Ho^.i cha^'p
thua^.n tre^n ca(n ba?n nhu+~ng gi` o^ng dda~ dde^` nghi.\. Thu+.c ra,
ca? ve^` hai ma(.t no^.i dung va` chi'nh tri., vie^.c cha^'p thua^.n
dda.o lua^.t cu~ng kho^ng pha?i de^~ da`ng\. Nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i chi?
tri'ch dda.o lua^.t, dda(.c bie^.t ve^` phi'a dda?ng Co^.ng Ho`a, thi`
ma(.c da^`u kho^ng ai phu? nha^.n su+. ca^`n thie^'t pha?i ca^'p ba'ch
co' nhu+~ng bie^.n pha'p ma.nh, nhu+ng cho ra(`ng nga^n khoa?n 787 tra
(m ty? qua' lo+'n va` chi? mo^.t pha^`n nga^n khoa?n na`y co' the^? thu
+.c su+. ki'ch thi'ch ddu+o+.c kinh te^' ngay trong ca^'p tho+`i,
trong khi ddo' thi` mo^.t pha^`n kho^ng nho? la.i nha(`m tho?a ma~n nhu
+~ng du+. a'n trong tu+o+ng lai hay nhu+~ng ddo`i ho?i cu?a mo^.t va`i
ddi.a phu+o+ng\. Chi'nh vi` va^.y ma` o^ng Obama kho^ng dda.t ddu+o+.c
mu.c ddi'ch ti`m kie^'m su+. ho+.p ta'c cu?a dda?ng Co^.ng Ho`a, ke^'t
qua? la` o+? Ha. Vie^.n, kho^ng mo^.t Da^n Bie^?u Co^.ng Ho`a na`o bo?
phie^'u cho ddao lua^.t\. Va` cu~ng may la` o+? Thu+o+.ng Vie^.n co'
ddu+o+.c 3 Thu+o+.ng Nghi. Si~ Co^.ng Ho`a bo? phie^'u thua^.n ne^n
dda.o lua^.t mo+'i ra ddo+`i ddu+o+.c\. Ve^` phu+o+ng die^.n na`y thi`
ngu+o+`i ta cho ra(`ng o^ng Obama dda~ qua' la.c quan, ga^`n nhu+
dde^? ma(.c cho phe nho'm cu?a ba` Pelosi, Chu? Ti.ch Ha. Vie^.n,
go^`m co' mo^.t so^' ngu+o+`i thie^n ta?, toa`n quye^`n soa.n tha?o
dda.o lua^.t ne^n kho' lo`ng ma` co' the^? la^'y phie^'u ddu+o+.c cu?a
dda?ng Co^.ng Ho`a\.
Kho^ng nhu+~ng the^', kho^ng ai co' tho+`i gio+` hay kha? na(ng ddo.c
mo^.t dda.o lua^.t vo+'i nhu+~ng ddie^`u khoa?n da`i ho+n 1.000 trang
\. Da^`u sao thi` vo+'i mo^.t va`i thay ddo^?i va`o phu't cho't, dda.o
lua^.t cu~ng ddu+o+.c cha^'p thua^.n va` dda~ ddu+o+.c To^?ng Tho^'ng
Obama ky' trong tua^`n vu+`a qua ta.i Denver, Colorado\.
Ngoa`i dda.o lua^.t, co`n ca^`n nhie^`u chu+o+ng tri`nh kha'c nu+~a
Vo+'i dda.o lua^.t tre^n dda^y va` 787 ty? dda~ ddu+o+.c chua^?n chi,
chi'nh quye^`n Obama hy vo.ng se~ ta.o ra ddu+o+.c tu+` 3 dde^'n 4
trie^.u co^ng a(n vie^.c la`m mo+'i trong nhu+~ng na(m to+'i\. DDa^y
la` mo^.t thu+? tha'ch kho^ng nho? (mo^.t co+ quan du+. ba'o cu?a
Quo^'c Ho^.i My~ tha^.n tro.ng ddu+a ra con so^' co' the^? dda.t ddu+o
+.c la` 1,5 trie^.u), va? la.i co`n cuo^.c khu?ng hoa?ng ta`i chi'nh
ddo`i ho?i mo^.t gia?i pha'p thi'ch ho+.p va` ca? ha`ng tra(m ty?
dde^? tie^'p ho+i cho nhu+~ng nga^n ha`ng ddang no^'i dduo^i nhau su.p
ddo^?, a^'y la` chu+a ke^? nhu ca^`u pha?i bo? ra 75 ty? dde^? cu+'u
vo+'t ga^`n 10 trie^.u ca(n nha` sa('p bi. tich tha^u va` 22 ty? dde^?
tro+. giu'p the^m nga`nh sa?n xua^'t xe ho+i (GM va` Chrysler)\.
No'i to'm la.i, nhi`n va`o cuo^.c khu?ng hoa?ng kinh te^', ta`i chi'nh
cu?a nu+o+'c My~ lu'c na`y va` nhu ca^`u ca^'p ba'ch pha?i ta.o co^ng a
(n vie^.c la`m mo+'i cho ngu+o+`i da^n, o^?n ddi.nh la.i he^. tho^'ng
ca'c nga^n ha`ng, kho^i phu.c la.i su+. la`nh ma.nh trong la~nh vu+.c
xa^y ca^'t nha` cu+?a va` tro+. giu'p nga`nh sa?n xua^'t xe ho+i,
ta^'t ca? ddo`i ho?i kho^ng nhu+~ng ha`ng nga`n ty? dollars de^? ta`i
tro+. cho he^'t chu+o+ng tri`nh na`y dde^'n du+. a'n kha'c, mo^.t
ga'nh na(.ng cho co^ng quy~ cu?a nu+o+'c My~, ma` co`n ca^`n su+.
kho^ng ngoan cu?a nha` ca^`m quye^`n, thi` ai cu~ng pha?i nhi`n tha^'y
la` chi'nh quye^`n Obama trong nhu+~ng nga`y to+'i se~ pha?i ddo^'i
pho' vo+'i nhie^`u kho' kha(n\. DDa.o lua^.t 787 ty? dde^? ki'ch dda^?
y kinh te^' dda~ ddu+o+.c cha^'p thua^.n va` ban ha`nh, nhu+ng co`n nhu
+~ng thu+? tha'ch kha'c, lie^.u trong tu+o+ng lai chi'nh quye^`n na`y
co' kha('c phu.c ddu+o+.c kho^ng va` vie^.c la`m cu?a o^ng Obama co'
ddi ddo^i vo+'i lo+`i no'i kho^ng, ngu+o+`i da^n My~ cha('c pha?i co`n
cho+` ddo+.i mo+'i co' ca^u tra? lo+`i\.
(Pha^`n dde^` ca^.p to+'i chi'nh sa'ch ngoa.i giao cu?a chi'nh quye^`n
Obama va` nhu+~ng thu+? tha'ch ve^` phu+o+ng die^.n na`y se~ ddu+o+.c
dda(ng trong so^' to+'i)
Bu`i Hoa`i Nam
Hoa Thi.nh DDo^'n, nga`y 21 tha'ng 2, 2009
n.t.
>
> Bu`i Hoa`i Nam
>
> LTS: Xin gio+'i thie^.u dde^'n quy' ddo^.c gia? ba`i nha^.n ddi.nh
> ve^` nhu+~ng thu+? tha'ch ddo^'i no^.i ma` ta^n chi'nh quye^`n Obama
> se~ pha?i gia?i quye^'t,
Ba`i nha^.n ddi.nh tuo+ng ddo^'i kha' chi'nh xa'c. Tuy nhie^n co'
mo^.t va`i ddie^?m quan tro.ng ma` kho^ng bie^'t vi` ta'c gia? kho^ng
nhi`n tha^'y dduo+.c hay chi? vi` o^ng ta kho^ng muo^'n pha?i vie^'t
da`i do`ng the^m? :-)
Cho ne^n, vo+'i nha~ y' bo^? tu'c, to^i xin ne^u ra mo^.t va`i gia?
thuye^'t va` nghi va^'n ma` co' the^? cu~ng co' ra^'t nhie^`u nguo+`i
kha'c cu`ng nghi~ gio^'ng nhu+ to^i.
> Tho+`i ky` “tra(ng ma^.t” thu+o+`ng va^~n ddu+o+.c da`nh cho ngu+o+`i
> mo+'i le^n ca^`m quye^`n xem ra kho^ng ddu+o+.c be^`n la^u trong tru+o
> +`ng ho+.p o^ng Obama
No'i kho^ng pha?i dde^? be^nh vu+.c TT Obama, nhu+ng "tua^`n tra(ng
ma^.t" ky` vu+`a qua cu?a o^ng tha^.t ra kho^ng the^? ddem so sa'nh vo
+'i ba^'t cu+' cu?a mo^.t vi. To^?ng Tho^'ng na`o kha'c trong ne^`n
li.ch su+? ca^.n dda.i cu?a Hoa Ky`.
Ti'nh tu+` nga`y o^ng Obama dduo+.c dda('c cu+? cho dde^'n nga`y o^ng
tuye^n the^. nha^.m chu+'c tha^.t ra chi? vo~n ve.n chu+a dda^`y hai
tha'ng ruo+~i. Trong khi o+? ca'i quo^'c gia na`y, ti'nh tu+` nga`y
TT Lincoln (TT thu+' 16) xo'a bo? dduo+.c te^. na.n no^ le^. cho
quo^'c gia cho dde^'n gio+`, dda~ ma^'t ga^`n 160 na(m! Chu+a ke^?,
trong mo.i na(m kha'c, nga`y le^~ sinh nha^.t cu?a Dr. Martin Luther
King, thuo+`ng chi? dduo+.c xem nhu+ "Mo^.t nga`y nhu+ mo.i nga`y"
trong khi ddo^'i vo+'i cuo^.c dda.i tha('ng cu?a Obama va` dda.i dda
so^' ddo^`ng ba`o, nga`y le^~ na`y la.i mang mo^.t ta^`m vo'c vo^
cu`ng quan tro.ng.
Cho ne^n, co' the^? chi? co' co+~ nhu+ to^?ng tho^'ng Obama, vu+`a
tre? vu+`a ma.nh mo+'i co' nhie^`u na(ng lu+.c nhu+ va^.y dde^? ma`
to^? chu+'c, da`n xe^'p cho qua' nhie^`u hoa.t ddo^.ng trong mo^.t tho
+`i gian tha^.t qua' nga('n.
> \. Trong bo^'n tru+o+`ng ho+.p tre^n dda^y, ta^'t ca? co' ba ngu+o+`i
> du+o+'i a'p lu+.c cu?a du+ lua^.n pha?i ru't lui la` hai o^ng
> Richardson, Daschle va` ba` Killefer, chi? rie^ng co' o^ng Geithner
> la` ddu+o+.c cu+'u vo+'t va`o phu't cho't vi` lo^~i tu+o+ng ddo^'i
> nhe. (chi? “que^n” co' ho+n hai chu.c nga`n tie^`n thue^' chu+a no^.p)
> va` vo+'i ly' do la` o^ng la` ngu+o+`i he^'t su+'c ca^`n thie^'t
> kho^ng the^? thay the^' ddu+o+.c trong vie^.c su+?a soa.n nhu+~ng chu+o
> +ng tri`nh phu.c ho^`i kinh te^'\. The^m va`o nhu+~ng chuye^.n lu?ng
No'i la` "cu+'u vo+'t" cu~ng ddu'ng vi` Geithner truo+'c dda^y coi nhu
+ dda~ tu+`ng la`m vie^.c cho TT Bush. Y dda~ la` mo^.t dda(.c tra'ch
vie^n trong Bo^. Thue^' Vu., la`m vie^.c tru+.c tie^'p duo+'i ddie^`u
khie^?n cu?a Bo^. Truo+?ng Henry Paulson. Cha(?ng le~ nhu+~ng Nghi.
Si~ pha'i CH la.i ddi va.ch la' ti`m sa^u cho ddo^`ng bo.n cu?a ho.
a`? :-)
> co' nhu+~ng bie^.n pha'p ma.nh, nhu+ng cho ra(`ng nga^n khoa?n 787 tra
> (m ty? qua' lo+'n va` chi? mo^.t pha^`n nga^n khoa?n na`y co' the^? thu
> +.c su+. ki'ch thi'ch ddu+o+.c kinh te^' ngay trong ca^'p tho+`i,
> trong khi ddo' thi` mo^.t pha^`n kho^ng nho? la.i nha(`m tho?a ma~n nhu
> +~ng du+. a'n trong tu+o+ng lai hay nhu+~ng ddo`i ho?i cu?a mo^.t va`i
> ddi.a phu+o+ng\. Chi'nh vi` va^.y ma` o^ng Obama kho^ng dda.t ddu+o+.c
> mu.c ddi'ch ti`m kie^'m su+. ho+.p ta'c cu?a dda?ng Co^.ng Ho`a, ke^'t
> qua? la` o+? Ha. Vie^.n, kho^ng mo^.t Da^n Bie^?u Co^.ng Ho`a na`o bo?
> phie^'u cho ddao lua^.t\. Va` cu~ng may la` o+? Thu+o+.ng Vie^.n co'
DDie^`u na`y xa?y ra chi? la` na(`m trong ba`i toa'n dda~ ti'nh sa(~n
cu?a nho'm la~nh dda.o cu?a phi'a CH trong Ha. Vie^.n.
Truo+'c khi ca'c Da^n Bie^?u CH dduo+.c nhu'c nhi'ch, ru.c ri.ch dde^?
ddo.c qua du+. lua^.t cu?a Chu? Ti.ch Ha. Vie^.n Pelosi, Pho' Chu?
Ti.ch (xin ta.m go.i la` va^.y), o^ng John Boehner, nguo+`i la~nd
dda.o cu?a phi'a CH, dda~ go+?i ddie^.n thu+ dde^'n ta^'t ca? nhu+~ng
tha`nh vie^n kha'c trong QH dde^? khuye^'n ca'o ho. la` ba^'t cu+' ai
cu~ng ca^'m, kho^ng dduo+.c ba^`u phie^'u thua^.n cho du+. lua^.t.
Ne^'u kho^ng nghe lo+`i, mai mo^'t to+'i nga`y tranh cu+? ta'i nhie^.m
thi` ddu+`ng co' tra'ch ca'c o^ng ddo^.c a'c ca'c con nhe'!
Heheheh!!!
> ddu+o+.c 3 Thu+o+.ng Nghi. Si~ Co^.ng Ho`a bo? phie^'u thua^.n ne^n
> dda.o lua^.t mo+'i ra ddo+`i ddu+o+.c\. Ve^` phu+o+ng die^.n na`y thi`
Truo+`ng ho+.p 2 vi. Phu Nho+n TNS Snowe va` TNS Collins cu?a tie^?u
bang Maine thi` to^i nghi~ la` do ho. sa'ng suo^'t va` uye^?n chuye^?
n. Co`n truo+`ng ho+.p cu?a TNS Arlen Specter thi` tha^.t la` ra^'t
de^~ hie^?u. Truo+'c ddo', TNS Specter co' dduo+.c TT Obama mo+`i va`
dde^'n du+. Super Bowl Party ta.i Nha` Tra('ng.
Trong khi tie^?u bang Pennsylvania la.i la` mo^.t trong nhu+~ng tie^?u
bang vu+`a dda~ mo+'i ba^`u cho o^ng Obama la`m To^?ng Tho^'ng. Nhu+
va^.y, chi? ca^`n TT Obama hu+'a la` mai mo^'t ddu+`ng co' dde^'n tie^?
u bang cu?a o^ng dde^? va^.n ddo^.ng ba^`u cu+? cho phi'a ddo^'i phuo
+ng thi` TNS Specter se~ ra'ng cho the^m ca'i phie^'u thua^.n thu+' 61
dde^? la`m "insurance" cho dda.o lua^.t ki'ch dda^?y kinh te^' dduo+.c
ra ddo+`i :-)
Va^'n dde^` chi'nh tri. tha^.t ra cu~ng ra^'t de^~ ddoa'n. Pha'i CH
dda~ ma^'t ddi tie^'ng no'i va` a?nh huo+?ng cu?a ho. va` ddang pha?i
hoang mang ga^`n ca? ma^'y tha'ng nay. (Nhi`n tha^'y QDH va` Chi. Mai
cu+' no'i xa`m ha`ng nga`y tre^n cho+. cu~ng ddu? tha^'y ro~ ddie^`u
ddo'! Heheheh!!!)
Ba^y gio+`, ho. chi? co`n bie^'t ca'ch pha?i cho+i ma`n "xin xa^m"
trong ca'i vu. ba^`u ba'n cho ca'c dda.o lua^.t ki'ch dda^?y hoa(.c
phu.c ho^`i kinh te^' vu+`a qua va` sa('p dde^'n.
Va`i na(m sau, ne^'u TT Obama tra^.t, kinh te^' My~ va^~n bi. suy
thoa'i thi` lu'c ddo' ho. se~ nha?y ra ddo^~ thu+`a om so`m dde^?
la^'y phie^'u ba^`u va` la^'y dda so^' trong quo^'c ho^.i. Ngoa`i ra,
hy vo.ng co`n se~ la^'y luo^n dduo+.c ca? chu+'c TT.
Nhu+ng ne^'u TT Obama ddu'ng, thi` ho. se~ la.i va^~n no'i xa`m,
ddoa'n mo`, no'i ba^ng quo+ dde^? kho^ng cho TT Obama va` Quo^'c Ho^.i
"Da^n Chu?" dduo+.c huo+?ng la.c mo^.t ca'ch de^~ da`ng o+? mo^.t
cuo^.c dda.i tha('ng kha'c :-)
No'i to'm la.i, ne^'u trong lu'c na`y ma` pha'i CH kho^ng ddem du`ng
la.i ca'i danh nghi~a "gia~m thue^', bo+'t tie^u xa`i" (which has been
proven destrimentally wrong with the current economy), cha(?ng le~ ho.
pha?i cu`ng nhau cuo^'n go'i do.n qua be^n phi'a DC dde^? xin dduo+.c o
+? chung a`? :-)
Heheheh!!!
n.t.
Mua Mua Thu
the United States of America.
Now the USA is going to lose its position to a new superpower.
The new superpower will neither be China nor India.
That new superpower was formed in Rome in 1957 and now it is fully matured.
Just a little bit longer and it will flex its muscles around the globe.
Who is this new superpower? It is the United States of Europe, or the EU or
whatever it is going to call itself. Its head will be Germany.
It is the revived Roman empire rising up for the very last time.
Also, now with our very own eyes we see the start of a new superpower in
Middle East, namely Iran.
What about the USA? It is at the start of a "going down hill" process. Obama
will not be able to prevent it. No matter how many plans he is going to
make. He will not succeed. The whole contry will only goes from bad to
worse.
The fate of the USA has been determined .
Mu+a Mu`a Thu
Mai Dao
>
> - Show quoted text -
To^?ng Tho^'ng nu+o+'c my~ ma` cu+' nhu+ la` ... Michael Jackson
tri`nh die^~n nha.c Rock.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29441863/
DDo.c xem Warren Buffett no'i xa`m ca'i gi`. Ma` he la` con buo^n,
ne^n va^~n co`n pha?i tra^'n an kha'ch ha`ng vo+'i lifetime guarantee
chu+' hi?. DDe^? Tui high light cho va`i ha`ng ddo.c cho+i:
"Buffett: Economy will remain in 'shambles'"
NEW YORK - Billionaire investor Warren Buffett predicted Saturday that
"the nation's economy will be in shambles throughout 2009" and
probably "well beyond."
"Profit fell 96 percent, the fifth straight quarterly decline, and
Berkshire's net worth tumbled $10.9 billion in the year's final three
months. "
Da.y dda'm ngo^' cha'n la('m. ... ai ma` ham HeHe ...
Tui cu~ng co' a(n, co' la`m, co' dde^?. Chu+a pha?i so^'ng ba'm va`o
nga^n sa'ch hay tro+. ca^'p cu?a chi'nh pha?o na`o dda^u nhen.
n.t.
> After the second world war the United Kingdom lost the superpower status to
> the United States of America.
>
> Now the USA is going to lose its position to a new superpower.
>
> The new superpower will neither be China nor India.
>
> That new superpower was formed in Rome in 1957 and now it is fully matured.
> Just a little bit longer and it will flex its muscles around the globe.
>
> Who is this new superpower? It is the United States of Europe, or the EU or
> whatever it is going to call itself. Its head will be Germany.
>
Co' pha?i a^?n y' cu?a ba'c la` su+'c ma.nh ma` mo^.t dda.i cuo+`ng
quo^'c chu? ye^'u co' the^? co' dduo+.c cha(?ng qua chi? la` do tu+`
quo^'c ti.ch hay go^'c ga'c cu?a mo^.t DDu+'c Gia'o Hoa`ng cu?a tho+`i
dda.i ma` ra ? :-)
Nhu+ va^.y, kho^'i CS DDo^ng A^u, including Poland, bi. su.p ddo^? cha
(?ng qua chi? la` nho+` va`o Pope John Paul II, chu+' hong co' a(n
nha^.p gi` dde^'n TT Ronald Reagan cu?a phi'a CH (XHCN Hue^ Ky` cu?a
nha` to+') ca??? :-)
Heheheh!!!
n.t.
Mai Dao
>
> - Show quoted text -
BTW: Ma^'y fan cu?a Obama la`m ti'nh thu+? xem. Sa(~n co' ma^'y con
so^' la^'y tu+` report cu?a Buffett.
"For all of 2008, profit at Berkshire fell 62 percent to a six-year
low of $4.99 billion, or $3,224 per share, from $13.21 billion, or
$8,548. Revenue fell 9 percent to $107.8 billion. Buffett called full-
year results "unsatisfactory."
Berkshire Class A shares closed Friday at $78,600 on the New York
Stock Exchange. They have fallen 44 percent since the end of February
2008, while the Standard & Poor's 500 has dropped 45 percent."
...
Na(m nay, gia? nhu+ ta(ng luo^n 1 ma.ch 50% thue^' dda'nh le^n income
cu?a nha` gia`u Berkshire thi` nha` nu+o+'c la^'y the^m ddu+o+.c bao
nhie^u $? + hay tru+`. DDe^? y' chu+~ "the^m" Tui du`ng ddo' nhen.
Tui e ra(`ng vi` kho^ng ddu? kha? na(ng dde^? suy nghi~ "ho+i"
complex, la^~n kho^ng bie^'t la`m ti'nh, cha('c the^' na`o fan cu?a
Obama cu~ng se~ kie^'m ra ddu+o+.c the^m $ dde^? chia cho ngu+o+`i
nghe`o ddang ha^n hoan cho+` bo^?ng lo^.c nho+` Robin Wood Obama la^'y
cu?a nha` gia`u chia cho nha` nghe`o. He co`n ca('t gia?m deficit nhu+
dda~ hu+'a nu+~a. HeHe .... .
Tui cho+i sang, xi' xo'a luo^n ca'i vu. tie^`n lo+`i na`y se~ ddu+o+.c
chia ca? cho nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i na(m nay bi. ma^'t vie^.c, se~ ddu+o+.c
gia?m thue^' (Obama cha(?ng tha^u the^'u cu?a ho. the^m ddu+o+.c)
dde^? ba`i ti'nh tro+? tha`nh ddo+n gia?n ho+n.
n.t.
> > the United States of America.
>
> > Now the USA is going to lose its position to a new superpower.
>
> > The new superpower will neither be China nor India.
>
> que^. ne^`n kinh te^', ro^`i a?nh hu+o+?ng luo^n to+'i ngo.ai giao, ro^`i
> qua^n su+. cu?a Me~o chu+ theo tui nghi~ Trung Quo^'c va` A^'n DDo^. kho^ng
> the^? tro+? tha`nh DDa.i Cu+o+`ng Quo^'c theo kie^?u Me~o hie^.n nay.
>
Tu.i ho. ddo^ng da^n qua', cu`ng la('m la` chi? bo+'t ddo'i ra'ch hoa
(.c dduo+.c dda^`y ddu? chu't ddi?nh tho^i. "Cuo+`ng ha`o a'c ba' "
thi` ho.a may chu+' dda.i cuo+`ng quo^'c ca'i gi`? :-)
> Tuy nhie^n Trung Quo^'c se~ tro+? tha`nh quo^'c gia gia^`u co' ho+n, ne^`n
Ma~i cho dde^'n gio+`, China va^~n chi? dduo+.c xem la` "emerging
market". Co' nghi~a la` cho^~ ddang le^n va` dduo+.c the^' gio+'i
cha.y to+'i bo? tie^`n vo^ dde^? dda^`u tu+.
Trung Quo^'c ddang che^'t nga('t ve^` commercial real estate, dda(.c
bie^.t la` sau ky` Olympic vu+`a ro^`i! Tha`nh ra da^n dda^`u tu+ va`o
"Chun cuo^'c" cu~ng ddang bi. thua te tua! :-)
> kinh te^' se~ ma.nh ho+n nhie^`u. A^'n DDo^. thi` kho' ddoa'n ddu+o+.c, vi`
> co' the^? Trung Quo^'c pha?i ti`m ca'ch ha~m ta`i A^'n DDo^. kho^ng cho
> pha't trie^?n qua' ma.nh.
>
> Co`n DDe^' Quo^'c Me~o thi` mo^.t va`i khuye^'t ddie^?m nhu+ sau.
>
> - Su+. va(n minh cu?a nha^n loa.i, hoa(.c no'i tha(?ng ra thi` su+. pha't
> trie^?n cu?a Internet la` mo^.t trong nhu+~ng nguye^n nha^n ddu+a nu+o+'c
> Me~o tie^'n xa^u va`o ddo^? vo+~. Ly' do ra^'t ddo+n gia?n la` gio+'i tri'
> thu+'c tre? cu?a ca'c quo^'c gia tre^n the^' gio+'i dda~ qua he^. tho^'ng
> Internet dde^? hie^?u bie^'t ho+n ve^` nu+o+'c Me~o. Ne^`n gia'o du.c theo
> kie^?u nho^`i so., bu+ng bi't, hu+'a he.n, cu~ng nhu+ ba.o ddo^.ng v.v dda~
> la`m the^' gio+'i cha'n ghe't chi'nh quye^`n Me~o. Ngay ca? ngu+o+`i Me~o
> cu~ng kho^ng ddu+o+.c coi tro.ng nhu+ xu+a
>
Ne^`n gia'o du.c va` va(n minh o+? dda^y ma` bu+ng bi't ca'i no^~i gi`
ba'c? :-)
> - Ha^`u he^'t ta^'t ca? ca'c ne^`n gia'o du.c, kinh te^', chi'nh tri.,
> ngoa.i giao, qua^n su+., lua^.t pha'p v.v nhie^`u tha^.p nie^n ga^`n dda^y
> dda~ ddu+o+.c dda`o luye^.n theo chi'nh sa'ch, ddu+o+`ng lo^'i thu'i na't,
> chuye^n quye^`n, ddo^.c ta`i, ba.o lu+.c v.v
Chi'nh quye^`n trong nga`nh Ha`nh Pha'p tho^'i na't thi` co'. Co`n
La^.p Pha'p va` Tu+ Pha'p, co^.ng va`o gio+'i ba'o chi' truye^`n hi`nh
thi` co`n ra^'t ma.nh va` ra^'t da^n chu?.
>
> Hai dda?ng Da^n Chu? va` Co^.ng Ho`a choa?ng nhau nhu+ cho', ca'c nha`
> la~nh dda.o ha^`u he^'t dde^`u la` nhu+~ng pha^`n tu+? vo^ y' thu+'c, kho^ng
> nhu+~ng nhu+~ng nha` la~nh dda.o trong chi'nh quye^`n ma` ca? to+'i nhie^`u
> la~nh dda.o to^n gia'o cu~ng la` nhu+~ng phu+o+`ng lu+`a dda?o.
>
DDie^`u na`y cu~ng co' pha^`n co' tha^.t. Nhu+ng vo+'i ca'i nhi`n tuo
+ng ddo^'i thi` dda so^' va^~n la` nguo+`i to^'t, co' dda.o ddu+'c.
> Va` nhu+~ng gio+'i tre? tri' thu+'c cu?a ca'c quo^'c gia kha'c kho^ng ngu
> dda^`n to+'i kho^ng the^? nha^.n die^.n ra bo^. ma(.t thu+' hai cu?a chi'nh
> quye^`n Me~o. Ro^`i khi gio+'i tri' thu+'c tre? kho^ng u+a thi` nhu+~ng
> nha` la~nh dda.o cu~ng pha?i to? tha'i ddo^..
>
Nobody's perfect. Theo tui bie^'t, ba^'t cu+' chi'nh quye^`n cu?a nuo
+'c na`o cu~ng kho^ng mang ti'nh da^n chu? ba(`ng hoa(.c ho+n chi'nh
quye^`n cu?a My~.
> Thie^.t ti`nh ma` no'i thi` sau chie^'n tranh A? Ra^.p, A Phu' Ha~n
> nhie^`u ngu+o+`i dda~ ba^'t ma~n. Ro^`i khi theo do~i tin tu+'c qua nhu+~ng
> VIDEO (youtube cha(?ng ha.n) ho. nha^.n ra su+. ba.o ddo^.ng, ngu dda^`n,
> ddo^.c ta`i, thu'i na't v.v cu?a chi'nh quye^`n va` nho'm ba.o ddo^.ng Me~o.
> Ho. coi nhu+~ng chu+o+ng tri`nh nhu+ COP, Future Weapon etc. ma` ngu+o+`i
> Me~o coi nhu+ mo^.t ddie^`u ha~nh die^.n, nhu+ng ddo^'i vo+'i nhie^`u gio+'i
> tre? tri' thu+'c tre^n the^' gio+'i thi` dda^y la` ddie^`u khinh bi? (kho^ng
> pha?i khinh bi? ve^` va(n minh ma` thuo^.c loa.i ddo^.c ta`i, ba.o ddo^.ng,
> da~ man v.v).
>
Cu~ng co' ra^'t nhie^`u nguo+`i My~ kho^ng thi'ch thu+' vu~ khi' da~
man ddo'. Nhu+ng dda'm rednecks, ha'o chie^'n thi` quo^'c gia na`o
la.i kho^ng co'? :-)
> - Tu+` tru+o+'c to+'i gio+` DDe^' Quo^'c Me~o lua^n du`ng su+'c ma.nh qua^n
> ddo^.i dde^? ta.o a'p lu+.c cho kinh te^', ma` kho^ng co' mo^.t quo^'c gia
> na`o da'm xung phong ddu+'ng ra cho^'ng ddo^'i. To+'i khi ddi qua' mu+'c
Co' thie^.t kho^ng? Tui tha^'y chi'nh phu? My~ chi tie^`n lung tung
beng thi` ddu'ng ho+n? :-)
> (ma^'y vu. chie^'n tranh Trung DDo^ng) dda~ ta.o di.p cho nhie^`u quo^'c gia
> ngoa?nh ma(.t quay lu+ng, va` to+'i ba^y gio+` thi` ho. kho^ng co`n so+. a'p
> lu+.c nhu+ xu+a nu+~a.
>
There is hope. Chi'nh trong da^n chu'ng Do Tha'i cu~ng co' ga^`n
pha^n nu+?a da^n so^' bie^'t ye^u chuo^.ng ho`a bi`nh cho nhu+~ng
ddo^`ng ba`o cu?a ca'c nuo+'c co' chi'nh quye^`n ca^m ghe't Do
Tha'i...
Hy vo.ng kho^ng bao la^u, su+. kha'c bie^.t to^n gia'o kho^ng co`n la`
va^'n dde^` hay ly' do dde^? ho. gie^'t cho^'c la^~n nhau.
> - Kinh te^'? ne^'u Me~o trong vo`ng 20-30 na(m sau ma` kho^ng so+'m thu+'c
> ti?nh dde^? loa.i bo? nhu+~ng pha^`n tu+? thu'i na't, chi'nh sa'ch ddo^.c
> ta`i vo^ nha^n dda.o dde^? ca?i tie^'n ddu+o+`ng lo^'i la~nh dda.o v.v thi`
> kinh te^' se~ co`n to^`i te^. ho+n nu+~a.
>
> Chi? nhi`n so+ nhu+
>
> - Lu+o+ng tra? cao thi` la`m sao co' the^? xua^'t ca?ng vo+'i gia' tha^'p
> dde^? ca.nh tranh vo+'i ca'c nu+o+'c kha'c nhu+ Trung Quo^'c, A^'n DDo^.
> v.v.
>
> - Hie^.n gio+` nhie^`u khi ddo^` MADE IN CHINA co`n ngon ho+n nhu+~ng ddo^`
> xua^'t ca?ng tu+` nhie^`u nu+o+'c kha'c ky~ thua^.t co`n ke'm ho+n CHINA.
> Va` hie^.n tho+`i ha^`u he^'t dde^`u la` nha^.p ca?ng tu+` dde^. tam quo^'c
> gia, va` nhie^`u ca'i chu+a ro+` to+'i dda~ hu+
>
> - Ro^`i la.i ddu+o+.c hai dda?ng pha' hoa.i nhau, kho^ng nhu+~ng va^.y ma`
> co`n ca? lu~ ruo^`i bu cu?a hai dda?ng cu~ng vo^ a(n ke'. Va` kho^ng pha?i
> la` be^nh nho'm la~nh dda.o cu?a dda?ng Da^n Chu? ma` ngay ca? dda so^' da^n
> chu'ng theo dda?ng Da^n Chu? cu~ng to? ra o^n ho`a ho+n nho'm ba.o ddo^.ng
> Co^.ng Ho`a. Va` ddie^?m na`y la`m tui lo+'n le^n trong dda?ng Co^.ng Ho`a
> cu~ng pha?i cha'n ghe't nho'm extreme na`y.
>
Tui hay no'i vo+'i ba` xa~, muo^'n la`m da^n CH chuye^n chi'nh ra^'t
la` kho'. Theo ly' thuye^'t thi` ra^'t la` hay, nhu+ng nhu+~ng nguo
+`i tu+. cho mi`nh la` CH thi` chi? gio?i ca'i mie^.ng tho^i. Co`n thu
+.c cha^'t thi` toa`n la` da^n ddo^.i lo^'t hong ha`! :-)
Cho ne^n, since there is none left, if we are lucky, nowaday, the only
people we hope to see are the honest liberal ones :-)
No'i ca'ch kha'c la` khi tha^'y da^n no'i chuye^.n vo+'i lua^.n
ddie^.u CH thi` run and stay far away from them :-)
Co`n tha^'y da^n cho^'ng CH thi` ra'ng ti`m nhu+~ng nguo+`i tha^.t
tha`, vo^ tu+ dde^? ma` enjoy their point-of-views vi` cu~ng co' ra^'t
nhie^`u loa.i nguo+`i DC chi? chuye^n mo^n lo+.i du.ng da^n nghe`o,
vo^ tu+ dde^? ga(.t ha'i tha`nh qua? chi'nh tri. cu?a ho. :-)
> Ro^`i, tui ca.n y' tu+o+?ng ro^`i nhu+ng tui tha^'y ti`nh hi`nh tu+o+ng
> lai cu?a DDe^' Quo^'c Me~o kho^ng ddu+o+.c thanh cho la('m. Va` cu~ng vi`
> va^.y ne^n tui no'i vo+'i ma^'y ddu+'a cha'u la` muo^'n ca.nh tranh vo+'i
> ngu+o+`i kha'c thi` i't nha^'t pha?i la^'y ddu+o+.c ca'i ba(`ng cu+? nha^n,
Hie^.n gio+` ba(`ng ca^'p ddang bi. la^m nguy. Ho.c nghe^` plumbing
thi` la` cha('c a(n nha^'t! :-)
Co`n co' cha'u ga'i thi` ho.c la`m y ta' hoa(.c co^ gia'o thi` mo+'i
kho^ng so+. bi. tha^'t nghie^.p :-)
To^i cu~ng co' tha(`ng con se~ ra truo+`ng na(m to+'i. Tui se~
khuye^n no' xin vo^ la`m nha^n vie^n chu+?a lu+?a hoa(.c ve^` que^
la`m ruo^.ng cho cha('c a(n :-)
Heheheh!!!
n.t.
> va` tie^'p tu.c ho.c la^'y ba(`ng tie^'n si~ ne^'u co' the^?. Chu+' ba^y
> gio+` ca^`m ca'i ba(`ng 4 na(m dda.i ho.c ra ti`m vie^.c thi` may ra kie^'m
> ddu+o+.c vie^.c ru+?a che'n, hay ca('t co? thue^ heheheh.
ww
> nghe`o ddang ha^n hoan cho+` bo^?ng lo^.c nho+` Robin Wood Obama la^'y
It's Robin Hood, babe! -)
ww
> Tuy nhie^n Trung Quo^'c se~ tro+? tha`nh quo^'c gia gia^`u co' ho+n, ne^`n
> kinh te^' se~ ma.nh ho+n nhie^`u.
per capita? co`n na^u na('m! -)
> - Ha^`u he^'t ta^'t ca? ca'c ne^`n gia'o du.c, kinh te^', chi'nh tri.,
> ngoa.i giao, qua^n su+., lua^.t pha'p v.v nhie^`u tha^.p nie^n ga^`n dda^y
> dda~ ddu+o+.c dda`o luye^.n theo chi'nh sa'ch, ddu+o+`ng lo^'i thu'i na't,
> chuye^n quye^`n, ddo^.c ta`i, ba.o lu+.c v.v
>
> Hai dda?ng Da^n Chu? va` Co^.ng Ho`a choa?ng nhau nhu+ cho', ca'c nha`
> la~nh dda.o ha^`u he^'t dde^`u la` nhu+~ng pha^`n tu+? vo^ y' thu+'c, kho^ng
> nhu+~ng nhu+~ng nha` la~nh dda.o trong chi'nh quye^`n ma` ca? to+'i nhie^`u
> la~nh dda.o to^n gia'o cu~ng la` nhu+~ng phu+o+`ng lu+`a dda?o.
ne^'u de.p -du*o*.c hay reduce their influences: K Street, the
pharmaceutical industry, nho'm military-industrial complex ma` chi'nh
Dwight D. Eisenhower -da~ so*. (both part of now K Street) va` ca'i
religious machine thi` se~ kha' ho*n! hihi
ww
> Who is this new superpower? It is the United States of Europe, or the EU or
> whatever it is going to call itself. Its head will be Germany.
>
> It is the revived Roman empire rising up for the very last time.<
hihi...not if the US or Israel could help it (especially if Germany is
leading that group). Don't underestimate the Jewish influence among
the leadership groups in the countries you'd mentioned)!
> Also, now with our very own eyes we see the start of a new superpower in
> Middle East, namely Iran.
see Israel! :o)
Mua Mua Thu
leading that group). Don't underestimate the Jewish influence among
the leadership groups in the countries you'd mentioned)!
***** To establish a country it needs people, laws, currency, border, army
and the president. The EU now only lacks the last two. However, the election
for the EU president is on the agenda and will happen soon.
Currently the EU has a rapid reaction force, but not a full EU army. It will
have the president and then the army.
When these two happen. A new superpower will make itself known to the world,
and the world will have to accept it.
> Also, now with our very own eyes we see the start of a new superpower in
> Middle East, namely Iran.
see Israel! :o)
***** Israel is a powerful country in the Middle East. However, it will not
be the superpower in that region. The removal of Saddam Hussein, an enemy of
Iran, gives Iran a free ride to the superpower status. As soon as Iran has
nuclear weapons it will be the big brother to all Arab nations in that
region.
The USA will fail miserably in Iraq, and Afganistan. Coupled with the
financial crisis it will not have any stomach for a confrontation with Iran.
Does anyone here believe that there will be a war between the EU and the
Arab nations which are led by Iran?
I do.
What about Israel? It will be caught in the middle.
Mu+a Mu`a Thu
Mua Mua Thu
news:vskjq41qs5i97ignt...@4ax.com...
> "Mua Mua Thu" <muam...@forest.co.uk> wrote:
> Trung quo^'c va` A^'n DDo^. chi? co' the^? co' kha? na(ng la`m kie^.t
> que^. ne^`n kinh te^', ro^`i a?nh hu+o+?ng luo^n to+'i ngo.ai giao, ro^`i
> qua^n su+. cu?a Me~o chu+ theo tui nghi~ Trung Quo^'c va` A^'n DDo^.
> kho^ng
> the^? tro+? tha`nh DDa.i Cu+o+`ng Quo^'c theo kie^?u Me~o hie^.n nay.
***** Ddu'ng va^.y. La`m mo^.t dda`n anh cha(?ng nha^'t thie^'t pha?i co'
nhie^`u dda^'t, tie^`n va` ngu+o+`i.
> Tuy nhie^n Trung Quo^'c se~ tro+? tha`nh quo^'c gia gia^`u co' ho+n, ne^`n
> kinh te^' se~ ma.nh ho+n nhie^`u. A^'n DDo^. thi` kho' ddoa'n ddu+o+.c,
> vi`
> co' the^? Trung Quo^'c pha?i ti`m ca'ch ha~m ta`i A^'n DDo^. kho^ng cho
> pha't trie^?n qua' ma.nh.
***** Theo nhu+ to^i nghi~ thi` Trung Quo^'c se~ ca^`n ra^'t nhie^`u na(m
mo+'i hy vo.ng dda.t ddu+o+.c to+'i lo^'i so^'ng cu?a ta^y phu+o+ng.
A^'n Ddo^. cu~ng nhu+ va^.y.
> Co`n DDe^' Quo^'c Me~o thi` mo^.t va`i khuye^'t ddie^?m nhu+ sau.
> (snipped)
> ddu+o+.c vie^.c ru+?a che'n, hay ca('t co? thue^ heheheh.
***** To^i xem chu+o+ng tri`nh be^n Anh. Theo nhu+ ddo' thi` ca`'i ne^`n
ta?ng cu?a mo^.t xa~ ho^.i la` gia ddi`nh. Gia ddi`nh be^n Anh nga`y nay ddi
xuo^'ng ho^' nhanh co`n ho+n ho?a tie^~n.
Con ca'i cha(?ng co`n coi tro.ng cha me/ nu+~a. Ma` nhie^`u cha me. thi`
ch(?ng ra gi`.
Ti`nh tra.ng xa~ ho^.i la` ddie^`u chu? ye^'u cu?a su+. xa^.p ddo^? cu?a
mo^.t quo^'c gia.
Mu+a Mu`a Thu
Mua Mua Thu
news:59918a91-aa40-49b8...@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
Co' pha?i a^?n y' cu?a ba'c la` su+'c ma.nh ma` mo^.t dda.i cuo+`ng
quo^'c chu? ye^'u co' the^? co' dduo+.c cha(?ng qua chi? la` do tu+`
quo^'c ti.ch hay go^'c ga'c cu?a mo^.t DDu+'c Gia'o Hoa`ng cu?a tho+`i
dda.i ma` ra ? :-)
***** Co' ca? tra(m o^ng Gia'o Hoa`ng ngu+o+`i DDu+'c cu~ng cha(?ng pha?i
la` ye^'u to^' ve^` su+. tha`nh la^.p EU. The Treaty of Rome na(m 1957
cha(?ng di'nh da'ng gi` to+'i o^ng Pope nga`y nay.
Nhu+ va^.y, kho^'i CS DDo^ng A^u, including Poland, bi. su.p ddo^? cha
(?ng qua chi? la` nho+` va`o Pope John Paul II, chu+' hong co' a(n
nha^.p gi` dde^'n TT Ronald Reagan cu?a phi'a CH (XHCN Hue^ Ky` cu?a
nha` to+') ca??? :-)
Heheheh!!!
n.t.
***** Su+. su.p ddo^? cu?a kho^'i Ddo^ng A^u tra?i ddu+o+`ng cho su+. tha`nh
la^.p EU va` su+. ho^`i hu+o+ng cu?a da^n Do Tha'i.
Ca'c nu+o+'c Ddo^ng A^u nga`y nay da^`n da^`n tro+? tha`nh tha`nh vie^n cu?a
EU.
Pope John Paul II va` Reagan la`m ddu+o+.c gi` ne^'u lu'c ddo' Lie^n Xo^
tha^.t ta^m muo^'n nga(n cha^.n su+. xu.p ddo^? cu?a Ddo^ng A^u.
Mu+a Mu`a Thu
:))
>> Con ca'i cha(?ng co`n coi tro.ng cha me/ nu+~a. Ma` nhie^`u cha me. thi`
>> ch(?ng ra gi`.
>>
>> Ti`nh tra.ng xa~ ho^.i la` ddie^`u chu? ye^'u cu?a su+. xa^.p ddo^? cu?a
>> mo^.t quo^'c gia.
>
> Tui ra^'t ddo^`ng y' ddie^?m na`y, va` vi` va^.y cho ne^n tui mo+'i co'
>ca'i y' nghi~ nhu+ tre^n ve^` chi'nh sa'ch cai tri. cu?a Trung Quo^'c vo+'i
>dda` tie^'n hoa' hie^.n nay. Hoa(.c ho. chi? lo+'i lo?ng to+'i mo^.t gio+'i
>ha.n na`o tho^i chu+' kho^ng the^? cho phe'p buo^ng lo?ng nhu+ Me~o, Anh v.v
>dde^? khi lu'n xa^u vo^ thi` kho^ng the^? ru't cha^n le^n ddu+o+.c.
>
>> Mu+a Mu`a Thu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ca'c cu. dza` nha^.n xe'c vo*' va^?n va` bi`nh lua^.n chu*a dda.t
ddu*o*.c to*'i chie^`u sa^u cu?a nhu*~ng kha'c bie^.t giu*~a ca'c xa~
ho^.i...
:-))))
Heck, du` muo^'n du` kho^ng thi` xa~ ho^.i cu?a A^u, A', A? Ra^.p va`
mo.i da dden, da ddo? , va^n va^n... va^~n so^'ng va` va^~n to^`n ta.i
tu*` nga`n na(m xu*a cho to*'i nga`n na(m nay.
:-))))))))))
Bon appetit ! :))
jupiterean
> Ca'c cu. dza` nha^.n xe'c vo*' va^?n va` bi`nh lua^.n chu*a dda.t
> ddu*o*.c to*'i chie^`u sa^u cu?a nhu*~ng kha'c bie^.t giu*~a ca'c xa~
> ho^.i...
Đọc một bài rất dài, nhưng nếu gạn ra những lời chửi bới và rủa sả thì
chỉ còn cái nồi không, một chút meat để làm thuốc cũng không có :-)))
Talk about inanity :-))))
tuna
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:41:29 -0600, w...@cares.net wrote:
> >> Con ca'i cha(?ng co`n coi tro.ng cha me/ nu+~a. Ma` nhie^`u cha me. thi`
> >> ch(?ng ra gi`.
>
> >> Ti`nh tra.ng xa~ ho^.i la` ddie^`u chu? ye^'u cu?a su+. xa^.p ddo^? cu?a
> >> mo^.t quo^'c gia.
>
> > Tui ra^'t ddo^`ng y' ddie^?m na`y, va` vi` va^.y cho ne^n tui mo+'i co'
> >ca'i y' nghi~ nhu+ tre^n ve^` chi'nh sa'ch cai tri. cu?a Trung Quo^'c vo+'i
> >dda` tie^'n hoa' hie^.n nay. Hoa(.c ho. chi? lo+'i lo?ng to+'i mo^.t gio+'i
> >ha.n na`o tho^i chu+' kho^ng the^? cho phe'p buo^ng lo?ng nhu+ Me~o, Anh v.v
> >dde^? khi lu'n xa^u vo^ thi` kho^ng the^? ru't cha^n le^n ddu+o+.c.
>
> >> Mu+a Mu`a Thu
>
> Ca'c cu. dza` nha^.n xe'c vo*' va^?n va` bi`nh lua^.n chu*a dda.t
> ddu*o*.c to*'i chie^`u sa^u cu?a nhu*~ng kha'c bie^.t giu*~a ca'c xa~
> ho^.i...
>
> :-))))
>
> Heck, du` muo^'n du` kho^ng thi` xa~ ho^.i cu?a A^u, A', A? Ra^.p va`
> mo.i da dden, da ddo? , va^n va^n... va^~n so^'ng va` va^~n to^`n ta.i
> tu*` nga`n na(m xu*a cho to*'i nga`n na(m nay.
>
> :-))))))))))
>
> Bon appetit ! :))
hahh a ha
cu. za` "de who cares" bi. cu. za` boo boo bo+.p tai !
tuna,
ww
> ***** To establish a country it needs people, laws, currency, border, army
> and the president. The EU now only lacks the last two. However, the election
> for the EU president is on the agenda and will happen soon.
>
> Currently the EU has a rapid reaction force, but not a full EU army. It will
> have the president and then the army.
>
> When these two happen. A new superpower will make itself known to the world,
> and the world will have to accept it. >
over the weekend, members of the EU met and the eastern EU asked for
money, but the german declined; half of the eu is dirt poor, the other
half is made up of former enemies (france, the uk, and the germans/
italians); do you really believe that they could unite?; again, most
of these countries have major major jewish influence in their
governments. this along with the 800 pounds gorrilla called the u.s.,
will never allow anything bad to happen to Israel!
> ***** Israel is a powerful country in the Middle East. However, it will not
> be the superpower in that region. The removal of Saddam Hussein, an enemy of
> Iran, gives Iran a free ride to the superpower status. As soon as Iran has
> nuclear weapons it will be the big brother to all Arab nations in that
> region.<
Iran doesn't have 1 nuclear weapon, yet! israel has more than 100
warheads. its air force is only second to the u.s, in terms of
technical supremacy (not #); the general fear about iran getting the
nuke is not just the weapon itself; the west is worry about the saudis
and the egyptians, who would try to get some of these to protect
themselves! if it weren't for the u.s., israel would have attacked the
plants in iran already!
Mua Mua Thu
difficult the situation is at the moment. Roman empire began over 2000 years
ago. It has never dies. It has been in hibernation and now it rises up for
the last time.
Hitler tried to resurrect the Roman empire by means of force and he failed.
Now all the countries in Europe volunteer to enter the EU.
Paul Henri, a Belgian politician said at the Treaty of Rome:-
"We felt like Romans on that day. We were consciously recreating the Roman
Empire once more."
How right he was.
***** A king can not be a king if he has no subjects. A general can not be a
general if he has no soldiers. A big brother can not be a big brother if he
has no little brothers.
Israel is a powerful country in the Middle East. But she is on her own in
that region. Whereas Iran can become a big brother to the Arab countries in
the Middle East.
It is true that Iran has no nuclear weapon at the moment. But its success in
launching a satellite means its has technological capabilities in developing
long range missiles. If the world is right, I am sure it is, Iran will
pursue the nuclear ambition and it will succeed.
Arab nations always want to annihilate the Jews. It is their ultimate goal.
Arab nations will put their hope in Iran to do the job for them.
I am pretty sure that Iran will be the big brother (superpower) in the
Middle East.
There were crusades in the past and there will be one more time. This time
will be most severe and horrific.
Taking about Israel having nuclear weapons. Israel never admits it to the
world. But I am sure that it has. However, having nuclear weapons and using
them are two different things. I think it will use it one day, and Damascus
will be its target.
But that another story.
Mu+a Mu`a Thu
:))
> Vo^ dda^y coi nhu+~ng "anh hu`ng" (brave, hero) vo+'i su'ng M-16 ba('n
>nhu+~ng em be' he`n nha't (coward) vu~ khi la` nhu+~ng vie^n ga.ch vu.n.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P-U4rerXf0&NR=1
Ca'c em be' na`y dda~ ddu*o*.c tuye^n truye^`n va` nho^`i so. ra(`ng
ne^'u da'm ca^`m dda' ne'm va`o kha^?u su'ng M16 thi` se~ ddu*o*.c
le^n thie^n dda`ng la`m vo*. vo*'i dda^'ng Allah ! -- Seriously !
(Di~ nhie^n chie^'n tranh la` ta`n sa't. Qua^n ddo^.i Do Tha'i thi`
cu~ng kho^ng hie^`n gi` dda^u. Nhu*ng Palestinian thi` cu~ng thuo^.c
loa.i VC cu?a xu*' Trung DDo^ng.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Co`n nhie^`u nhu+ng chi? mo+'i coi co' 2-3 ca'i. Va` ca`ng nhi`n thi` tui
>la.i nghi~ to+'i nhu+~ng tu?i nhu.c cu?a ngu+o+`i Vie^.t sau bao nhie^u
>nga`n na(m chie^'n tranh.
>
>- Anh hu`ng, du~ng si~ toa`n la` nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i li'nh tha? nhu+~ng tra'i
>bom tu+` vu't ta^.n ma^y xanh, nhu+~ng tra'i hoa? tie^~n kho^ng ngu+o+`i
>la'i tu+` nhu+~ng chie^'n ha.m dda^.u tu+` ti't mu` bie^?n kho+i.
>
>- Tha(`ng "he`n nha't" (coward) la` nhu+~ng tha(`ng be' vo+'i nhu+~ng vie^n
>ga.ch vu.n na't, nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i ddeo bom dde^? ddo^?i ma.ng vo+'i qua^n
>thu`, nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i chie^'n dda^'u khi bie^'t khi ddi thi` 70-80% kho^ng
>tro+? la.i ma` va^~n ddi v.v.
:))
>Hehehehe va` dda^y cu~ng la` mo^.t trong nhu+~ng ly' do ma` tui khinh khi
>lu~ thu'i mu~i hehehehe. Tui u+o+'c gi` Chu'a cu?a T.T Bush co' di.p nghe
>em be' no'i ve^` y' nghi~a cu?a chu+~ "Tu+. Do"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ho^`i tho*`i boat people ddi ti`m Tu* Do, Ha.nh Phu'c & A^'m No thi`
cu~ng co' ma^'y ngu*o*`i trong the^' gio*'i dde^? y' quan ta^m dda^u ?
Ho^` Chi Minh dda~ no'i ddu'ng:
"Kho^ng Gi` Quy' Ho*n DDo^.c La^.p & Tu*. Do !"
Va` Nguyen Chi Thie^.n thi` la.i tra? lo*`i ra(`ng:
"Tao bie^'t tha(`ng no'i ca^u ddo' va` ca? mie^`n Ba('c dde^`u bie^'t
ca'i tha(`ng no'i ca^u ddo'...." -- NCT- Ta^.p tho* Hoa DDi.a Ngu.c
ww
> Co`n va^;n dde^` no'i ne^'u kho^ng co' Me~o nga(n ca?n thi` Do Tha'i dda~ Iran thi` tui hoa`n
> toa`n kho^ng nghi~ nhu+ va^.y.
oh, tui -da^u co' no'i la` DT se? go all out war vo*'i iran! na(m
ro^`i DT co' thu*? trial run (air attack; same distance to iran)
nhu*ng my~ ca?n vi` lu'c -do' the surge was working (my~ bought off
tu.i sunis, former enemies, -de^? -da'nh tu.i shiites) va` ho. cu~ng
lo iran pha' o*? iraq; ly' do chi'nh la` ho. o/ muo^'n drawn in other
players.
ma^'y na(m ve^` tru*o*'c DT bombed plants cu?a xa` -dam lu'c ho. ga^`n
tha`nh co^ng; DT cu~ng cay iran vi` ho. giu'p nho'm he^t'z ba` la va`
nho'm na^`y giu'p tu.i hamas!
:))
wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're right.
Mo^.t khi Iran co' kha? na(m nguye^n tu*? + ho?a tie^~n lie^n lu.c
ddi.a thi` ba(`ng mo.i gia' Israel se~ pha' hu?y cho ba(`ng ddu*o*.c.
-- Hoa-Ky` cha^'p thua^.n hay kho^ng cha^'p thua^.n. Bo*?i vi` ddo'
la` su*. to6`n ta.i cu?a quo^'c gia Do Tha'i.
Phi co^ng Do Tha'i bay ra^'t gio?i va` ho. nha^'t tri' pha?i pha' hu?y
cho ddu*o*.c ca'i lo` nguye^n tu*? cu?a Saddam ho^`i xu*a.
Trong dda^`u o'c cu?a ho. lu'c ra ddi thi` ho. dda~ co' y' ddi.nh ca?m
tu*? va` tu*. sa't ro^`i. Nhu*ng may qua' li'nh cu?a Saddam ra^'t be^
bo^'i, che^?nh ma~n vie^.c pho`ng thu? radar cho ne^n phi co^ng Do
Tha'i dde^`u tro*? ve^` an toa`n. -- Pretty sure (hi`nh nhu* kho^ng
co' ai bi. tru'ng dda.n pho`ng kho^ng ca?)
;-)
ww
> Arab nations always want to annihilate the Jews. It is their ultimate goal.
> Arab nations will put their hope in Iran to do the job for them.
>
> I am pretty sure that Iran will be the big brother (superpower) in the
> Middle East.
you do know that arabs and persians are different people, right? those
guys don't care much for each other! even the sunis and shiites don't
like each other; they do have one common enemy in DT.
i'm sure the saudis or egyptians had rather be the big brother,
though!
you are getting religious with your posts, again! :o)