Fw: TNB - MUSLIM RAPE GANGS VS. WESTERN FEMALES
TheSecularist
Makes disturbing reading if true...(expecially the reports from Scandinavia)
> http://americandaily.com/article/12464
>
> By J. Grant Swank Jr. (03/19/2006)
>
> Western females are not considered moral. Because they don’t garb
> themselves from head to toe, they are asking for rape. And they get
> it—from Muslim males.
>
> There are Muslim male gangs now who are raping Western females as I type.
> These women are called "whores" by the gang members. Therefore, they
> deserve what they get.
>
> Female Muslims who cover themselves are cursed with ten curses upon
> conception, according to Islamic legalists. One curse is lifted if the
> female marries. A curse is defined as exposing one’s genitals in public.
> Therefore, Muslim females are considered worse than dung. If they get out
> of line, a Muslim male can beat or kill them.
>
> Muslim females who disgrace the clan in any way can be slain via bullet in
> head or neck slit by Muslim male clan members. Saddam Hussein’s soccer
> stadiums were used more for murdering Muslim females than athletics. Right
> now some Muslim woman is being caned because her ankles are showing or is
> being slaughtered for dishonoring her clan; this is called "honor
> killing."
>
> But Western females appear to be far worse than even Muslim females.
> Western females are just waiting to be molested, raped and then tossed
> aside, according to Sharon Lapkin of FrontPageMagazine.com
> http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=20646
>
> Is there any question as to the "reason" these Muslim males rape Western
> women? No. They quickly inform the non-Muslim why.
>
> From 1998 until 2002, Muslim male gangs taunted Australian girls,
> particularly in Sydney. The females were labeled "sluts" and "Aussie
> pigs," therefore, they were bait for rape.
>
> "In Australia's New South Wales Supreme Court in December 2005, a visiting
> Pakistani rapist testified that his victims had no right to say no,
> because they were not wearing a headscarf.
>
> "And earlier this year Australians were outraged when Lebanese Sheik Faiz
> Mohammed gave a lecture in Sydney where he informed his audience that rape
> victims had no one to blame but themselves. Women, he said, who wore
> skimpy clothing, invited men to rape them."
>
> As more and more Muslims move into Western nations, this gang rape will
> increase because it is part of the Muslim male killing cult, otherwise
> known as their "religion." It is all goes back to their cultic beliefs
> woven into their irrational, immoral folklore that has grown up with them.
>
> When these street Muslim males get the academic support from professors,
> then all the more they consider themselves on a legitimate, Allah-
> ordained, Koran-sanctioned mission. This is the part of Islam world rule.
> This is to be. This is part of the overall program.
>
> "A few months earlier, in Copenhagen, Islamic mufti and scholar, Shahid
> Mehdi created uproar when – like his peer in Australia – he stated that
> women who did not wear a headscarf were asking to be raped.
>
> "And with haunting synchronicity in 2004, the London Telegraph reported
> that visiting Egyptian scholar Sheik Yusaf al-Qaradawi claimed female rape
> victims should be punished if they were dressed immodestly when they were
> raped. He added, ‘For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must
> have shown good conduct.’"
>
> Consequently, one can follow the "reasoning" to its logical conclusion
> which is that if the street kids can get by with it, the supposed
> sophisticated, educated Muslim males can, also.
>
> Therefore, for all this talk among Muslims about the West being decadent,
> the Muslim settlements themselves are rife with lust and mistreatment of
> females. It goes back to females cursed from conception. It would have
> been better for them if they had never been born. Earthly existence is
> imprisonment. It is hell.
>
> This is what Islamic outspoken Ghada Jamshir repeats over and over again.
> She, a Muslim, speaks worldwide, seeking to change Islam regarding
> females. She proclaims that Muslim females are imprisoned for life;
> therefore, if Muslims put her in jail, it will be no harsher fate that
> what Muslim females endure now.
>
> Read http://www.americandaily.com/article/10998
>
> ISLAM FEMALE KICK-BUTT : GHADA JAMSHIR
>
> Ghada Jamshir has been put on trial, accused of defaming Sharia law and
> insulting an Islamic judge. She, leading her women’s rights conclave,
> lobbied for a personal status law which would shift jurisdiction over
> family and women’s affairs to civil courts.
>
> When she went to court, she was accompanied by her women activist
> supporters.
>
> The judge read out three charges against her: public defaming of Islamic
> judiciary through distribution of literature, insulting a judge and
> defaming him.
>
> Of course Ghada Jamshir plead innocent.
>
> "The charge of insulting a Sharia judge during a phone call is
> fabricated," she said.
>
> "All these charges against me have been compiled since 2001 because of a
> vigil we [committee] organized two months ago, in which we demanded the
> resignation of the general prosecutor," she said, instigating a round of
> applause from the female audience in the courtroom.
>
> Ghada Jamshir’s group collected 1700 signatures demanding legislative and
> judicial reforms to family courts.
>
> "I do not care if I go to prison, because we already live in a big prison.
> I will never stop, nor go silent nor give up my position," she said. She
> sought to ban Shairia judges from dealing with marriage contracts.Do the
> statistics show this increase trend of Muslim gang rape against Western
> females? Yes.
>
> "In Norway and Sweden, journalist Fjordman warns of a rape epidemic.
> Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen stated that the steady increase of rape-
> cases and the link to ethnicity are clear, unmistakable trends. Two out of
> three persecutions for rape in Oslo are immigrants with a non-Western
> background and 80 percent of the victims are Norwegian women.
>
> "In Sweden, according to translator for Jihad Watch, Ali Dashti, ‘Gang
> rapes, usually involving Muslim immigrant males and native Swedish girls,
> have become commonplace.’ A few weeks ago she said, ‘Five Kurds brutally
> raped a 13-year-old Swedish girl.’"
>
> Again, this is not considered crime. It is considered "meant to be." For
> some Muslim males, rape is an act of piety. It is following what Allah
> would want. Non-Muslims, after all, are infidels who should be enslaved or
> slain; therefore, what is wrong with rape if murder is better?
>
> However, Western women are not the only victims. "In Indonesia, in 1998,
> human rights groups documented the testimony of over 100 Chinese women who
> were gang raped during the riots that preceded the fall of President
> Suharto. Many of them were told: ‘You must be raped, because you are
> Chinese and non-Muslim.’"
>
> Consequently, the Muslim male definition for a rape victim is not
> nationality but religion. If one is not Muslim, one is rape bait.
> Actually, again, it must be pointed out that Islam is not a religion among
> world religions. It is a killing cult. All other world religions tolerate
> those who do not agree with their tenets. Islam does not; death to those
> who do not convert to Islam.
>
> "Christian Solidarity Worldwide reported that in April 2005, a 9-year-old
> Pakistani girl was raped, beaten with a cricket bat, hanged upside down
> from the ceiling, had spoonfuls of chillies poured into her mouth, and
> repeatedly bashed while handcuffed. Her Muslim neighbors told her they
> were taking revenge for the American bombing of Iraqi children and
> informed her they were doing it because she was an ‘infidel and a
> Christian.’
>
> "In Sudan – where Arab Muslims slaughter black Muslim and Christian
> Sudanese in an ongoing genocide – former Sudanese slave and now a human
> rights’ activist Simon Deng says he witnessed girls and women being raped
> and that the Arab regime of Khartoum sends its soldiers to the field to
> rape and murder. In other reports, women who are captured by government
> forces are asked; ‘Are you Christian or Muslim?’ and those who answer
> Christian, are gang raped before having their breasts cut off."
>
> Is there an outcry from the National Organization for Women? Not that I
> know of.
>
> Is there a worldwide feminist rebuff of these Muslim rape gangs? What
> about Muslim women and men in Western countries who claim to be "moderate"
> Muslims? Do we hear from them in protesting this mistreatment of non-
> Muslim females? I have not heard a clamor.
>
> Because NOW and like liberal organizations remain in the killing mode via
> their own agendas, they are hardly going to champion fighting Muslim rape
> gangs. NOW supports killing womb babies, including female babies,
> therefore, NOW is in no moral shape to complain about anything done by the
> Muslim males. NOW favors killing of morality, Judeo-Christian ethics, the
> biblical definition of masculinity, femininity, marriage, family, and so
> forth. NOW is not life-focused. It is death-entrenched; therefore, it
> could not fight against Muslim mistreatment of females for NOW does the
> same.
>
> To speak out against Muslim rape gangs is to take the risk of being called
> "racist." Today it is becoming posh to say nothing factually negative
> about Muslims. They can get by with anything, demand anything, and expect
> to get it for the liberal segments of nations are supporting them. No
> wonder the zealots believe that Islam world rule is on its way.
>
> "In Australia, when journalist Paul Sheehan reported honestly on the
> Sydney gang rapes, he was called a racist and accused of stirring up anti-
> Muslim hatred. And when he reported in his Sydney Morning Herald column
> that there was a high incidence of crime amongst Sydney’s Lebanese
> community, fellow journalist, David Marr sent him an e-mail stating, "That
> is a disgraceful column that reflects poorly on us all at the Herald."
>
> As soon as facts are shown concerning Islam atrocities, Muslims scream
> that they are being mistreated. As soon as it was known that US President
> George W. Bush had surveillance operating in America to spy out enemies of
> the nation, Muslims appealed for a meeting in Washington DC so that they
> could speak with top executives. They got their wish.
>
> Muslims meet with high US government officials in DC. They get the red
> carpet treatment. Why?
>
> Read from the Muslims’ own web site what they are doing in DC?
>
> Read http://www.mpac.org/home_article_display.aspx?ITEM=860
>
> MPAC Coordinates Meeting with FBI on Surveillance Reports
>
> This is the first paragraph from that link on that web site:
>
> "The Muslim Public Affairs Council today was invited to meet with FBI
> Deputy Director John Pistole in mid-January to address reports of
> widespread surveillance and radiation monitoring of more than 100 Muslim
> American mosques, homes and businesses. MPAC will facilitate the
> participation of leaders from other prominent national American Muslim
> institutions in the Jan. 11 meeting."
>
> Read from the Muslims’ own web site what they are doing in DC?
>
> Read http://www.mpac.org/home_article_display.aspx?ITEM=859
>
> MPAC Calls for Meeting with Mueller & Gonzalez on Surveillance Reports
>
> This is the first paragraph from that link on that web site:
>
> "The Muslim Public Affairs Council today called for Attorney General
> Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller to meet with American
> Muslim leaders in response to reports of widespread surveillance and
> radiation monitoring of more than 100 Muslim American mosques, homes and
> businesses. John Miller, FBI Assistant Director of Public Affairs, said
> such a meeting to address civil rights concerns is imminent."
>
> "Keysar Trad, vice-president of the Australian Lebanese Muslim Association
> said the gang rapes were a ‘heinous’ crime but complained it was ‘rather
> unfair’ that the ethnicity of the rapists had been reported.
>
> "Journalist Miranda Devine reported during the same rape trials that all
> reference to ethnicity had been deleted from the victim impact statement
> because the prosecutors wanted to negotiate a plea bargain.
>
> "So when Judge Megan Latham declared, ‘There is no evidence before me of
> any racial element in the commission of these offences,’ everyone believed
> her. And the court, the politicians and most of the press may as well have
> raped the girls again."
>
> No one will use the "M" word when reporting news. "Muslim" cannot be used
> in the liberal newsfeeds for it smacks of prejudice, they say. But these
> killers are not merely "insurgents" and "terrorists." They are Muslim
> murderers global and Islamic killers international. That fact must be
> mentioned or those intent on Islam world rule will get their dream.
>
> "According to The Guardian, during the recent French riots, a Saudi Prince
> with shares in News Corporation boasted to a conference in Dubai that he
> had phoned Rupert Murdoch and complained about Fox News describing the
> disturbances as ‘Muslim riots.’ Within half an hour he said, it was
> changed to ‘civil riots.’"
>