> Cocainer-in-Chief
>
> A U.S. president found to have snorted cocaine
> in violation of U.S. law.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Kelley on the
> Cocainer-in-Chief:
>
> Years later, George's sister-in-law Sharon Bush alleged that W.
> had
> snorted cocaine with one of his brothers at Camp David during the
> time their father was President of the United States. "Not once,"
> she said, "but many times."
>
I'm certainly happy to learn that all other presidential snorters of
cocaine did it in accord with U.S. law. What I want to know, though, is
how the law says that cocaine may be lawfully and legally snorted.
--
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
For email, replace numbers with English alphabet.
>No one in Washington has snorted more coke than Bill Clinton and Marion
>Barry. The latest Shop Vac is modeled after Clinton's sinuses.
source?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
>No one in Washington has snorted more coke than Bill Clinton and Marion
>Barry. The latest Shop Vac is modeled after Clinton's sinuses.
That does it. I'm not voting for Clinton now.
> No one in Washington has snorted more coke than Bill Clinton and Marion
> >Barry. The latest Shop Vac is modeled after Clinton's sinuses.
>
> That does it. I'm not voting for Clinton now.
That's a plus but Marion Barry is on the way back again. He's running for
city council. The dummies in DC will elect him mayor, again. And they
wonder why they can't become a state!
Probably Rush Limbaugh has the same dealer.
Yebbut, it would have been better if this were coming from anybody but Kitty
Kelley. She doesn't have super-huge credibility.
And anyway, isn't this an old story? I've been waiting for years for the
mainstream press to really get all over this one, the way they did with
every little pecadillo of Clinton's, but so far, zilch.
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:35:00 -0700, 4more4W <w...@aol.com> wrote or
> quoted :
>
>
>>No one in Washington has snorted more coke than Bill Clinton and Marion
>>Barry. The latest Shop Vac is modeled after Clinton's sinuses.
>
>
> source?
>
There is a diagram and parts list included with each Shop Vac.
Remember that in 2008 when the enabler is on the ticket.
Who's a Gore?
I always wondered why anyone was surprised that Barry was re-elected
after having been busted.
Who better to represent DC residents than a crack smoking whore
chaser? He's one of them; the perfect representative.
As for statehood, I don't think anyone wonders. Unless attitudes have
changed there in the last five years or so, I don't think they're
interested in statehood.
>>> Cocainer-in-Chief
>>>
>>> A U.S. president found to have snorted cocaine
>>> in violation of U.S. law.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Kelley on the Cocainer-in-Chief:
>>>
>>> Years later, George's sister-in-law Sharon Bush alleged that W. had
>>> snorted cocaine with one of his brothers at Camp David during the time
>>> their father was President of the United States. "Not once," she said,
>>> "but many times."
>>
>> Yebbut, it would have been better if this were coming from anybody
>> but Kitty Kelley. She doesn't have super-huge credibility.
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0385503245/ -- her book is
>credible. It makes one wonder how the Bush people got Sharon Bush
>to disavow her story about snorting cocaine at Camp David. Did they
>resort to financial incentive, or threat of bodily harm, or both?
>Imagine a phone call in the night: "Deny the cocaine, or you're dead."
>
>T-shirt makers should sell "Cocainer-in-Chief" T-shirts and
>protesters with "Cocainer-in-Chief" protest signs should laugh
>in Bush's smirking face, everywhere he goes. Not for spite, for USA.
You have a great career ahead of you as a fact checker for CBS News.
I'm glad you cleared that up. But as the first review on the page you refer
to says, "Those seeking a rock-solid and airtight indictment of the Bushes,
however, will be disappointed, since Kelley leans on anonymous sources and
rumors for some of the juicier bits." Actually, it's not clear that people
who get off on that kind of thing will be at all disappointed by Kitty's
book, any more than they are by the equally well-documented journalism in
the National Enquirer.
> I guess you missed his brother's statements to police when he was
> arrested for drugs.
I was about to mention that. And President Clinton either pardoned
Roger, his drug dealer or both. In fact, I think Clinton pardoned two
South American cocaine dealers, but because everyone was so outraged
over Marc Rich's pardon, the Columbian drug lord connection kind of
got overlooked.
Roger was never really a reliable source on much of anything, but then
again, neither was his brother. If Roger's testimony about his brother
doing drugs is reliable, then I suppose Sharon Bush's testimony is
reliable as well.
> Barry was arrested and is on video/audio tape
> using crack.
Roedy Green's question to you was: "Source?" My response to that is:
"Uh, hello! Watch much news?" Barry's arrest was front page scandal,
but not exactly shocking. His cocaine use was well known before he
finally got busted.
--
ICEBREAKER and The World of Tomorrow
www.ice-everlasting.blogspot.com
"We must rip out their entrails and drag them through the streets of
Damascus until they include us in the peace process!"
Roedy Green wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:35:00 -0700, 4more4W <w...@aol.com> wrote or
> quoted :
>
> >No one in Washington has snorted more coke than Bill Clinton and Marion
> >Barry. The latest Shop Vac is modeled after Clinton's sinuses.
>
> source?
>
There's FBI audio and video of Clinton's brother saying that Bill
Clinton has a nose like a vacuum cleaner. Meanwhile Kitty Kelly has no
actual first hand evidence for her claims about Bush snorting cocaine at
Camp David. Sharon Bush says that she never saw any such thing. Of
course what will you continue to believe? Let me guess.
--
"Scars are the paler pain of survival, received unwillingly and
displayed in the language of injury." +- Mark Z Danielewski, "House of
Leaves"
Feel free to write either one in in November.
The O'Breaker Factor wrote:
>
> "4more4W" <w...@aol.com> wrote in message news:G7Z2d.30765$aW5.13740@fed1read07...
>
> > I guess you missed his brother's statements to police when he was
> > arrested for drugs.
>
> I was about to mention that. And President Clinton either pardoned
> Roger, his drug dealer or both. In fact, I think Clinton pardoned two
> South American cocaine dealers, but because everyone was so outraged
> over Marc Rich's pardon, the Columbian drug lord connection kind of
> got overlooked.
>
> Roger was never really a reliable source on much of anything, but then
> again, neither was his brother. If Roger's testimony about his brother
> doing drugs is reliable, then I suppose Sharon Bush's testimony is
> reliable as well.
>
Since Sharon Bush has gone on TV and said that she never saw Bush use
cocaine, I doubt that is the direction that people trying to attack Bush
will want to go.
>We need the following items that say Cocainer-in-Chief:
>Drug net draws closer around Bill Clinton
>By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
>
>
>THE longer Bill Clinton resists pressure to release his medical records, the stronger the suspicions that he is hiding something important, perhaps even something that could affect the outcome of the presidential election.
>
>The White House press secretary, Michael McCurry, was distinctly ambiguous when reporters asked in public whether the president was suffering from a sexually transmitted disease. It seemed almost as if McCurry wished to encourage this line of inquiry. The White House calculation, apparently, is that nobody cares too much about encounters long ago. The impact in post-puritan America would be nil.
>
>But not everybody has fallen for this diversionary tactic. In a biting editorial last week the Wall Street Journal asked whether Clinton was covering up a history of drug use. Drugs are a much more serious matter. If the American people were ever led to believe that Clinton was a heavy user of cocaine while Governor of Arkansas, the scandal would be thermonuclear.
>
>Stories about past drug use by Bill Clinton are a staple of Right-wing radio talk programmes. But no major newspaper in the US has ever published an investigative exposé.
>
>This is not because drug use is too much of a tabloid issue. Far from it. The mainstream media were quick to print the uncorroborated allegations of a convicted felon who claimed to have sold marijuana to a young Dan Quayle.
>
>In the case of Bill Clinton, a number of people have come forward with direct knowledge of drug use, but the press always finds a reason to impugn the source's credibility. Nothing short of documentary proof will induce them to examine the claims. Hence the intense speculation in Washington about the medical records.
>
>But there are other records. A freelance journalist, Scott Wheeler, has obtained copies of the Arkansas State Police surveillance audio-tapes from the 1984 investigation of Roger Clinton, the President's younger brother. (Roger was eventually convicted for dealing in cocaine and sent to prison).
>
>The tapes reveal that Roger Clinton was a drug trafficker - not just an addict who crossed the line. He can be heard describing how he used to smuggle large amounts of cocaine through airports hidden under his clothes. But most interesting is the comment he makes about the Governor: "Got to get some for my brother; he's got a nose like a vacuum cleaner."
>
>Then there is the case of Sharlene Wilson, currently serving a prison term in Arkansas for drug offences. She told The Sunday Telegraph two years ago that she had supplied Bill Clinton with cocaine during his first term as Governor. "Bill was so messed up that night, he slid down the wall into a garbage can," she said.
>
>The story has credibility because she told it under oath to a federal grand jury in Little Rock in December 1990. At the time she was an informant for the Seventh Judicial District drug task force in Arkansas. Jean Duffey, the prosecutor in charge of the task force, talked to Wilson days after her grand jury appearance.
>
>"She was terrified. She said her house was being watched and she'd made a big mistake," said Duffey. "That was when she told me she'd testified about seeing Bill Clinton get so high on cocaine he fell into a garbage can . . . I have no doubt that she was telling the truth."
>
>Shortly after Wilson's testimony the drug task force was closed down. Duffey was hounded out of her job and now lives at a secret address in Texas.
>
>Wilson was charged with drug violations. In 1992 she was sentenced to 31 years for selling half an ounce of marijuana and $100- worth of methamphetamine to an informant.
>
>She protested that she was "set up" to eliminate her as a political liability and she appealed on the grounds of entrapment.
>
>With the help of a brilliant Arkansas lawyer, John Wesley Hall, her case went all the way to the US Supreme Court. Finding a violation of her constitutional rights, the court ordered the state of Arkansas to give Wilson a fresh trial or set her free. Her release date is now set for November.
>
>What about those grand jury transcripts? They are secret, of course, sealed in perpetuity. But every witness has the right to the transcripts of their own testimony, if they make a formal request.
>
>
> Neptuna wrote:
>
>>"James Monroe" <spam...@spamless.com> wrote in message
>>news:hf4ok0hu6kugrq3so...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:35:00 -0700, 4more4W <w...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>No one in Washington has snorted more coke than Bill Clinton and Marion
>>>>Barry. The latest Shop Vac is modeled after Clinton's sinuses.
>>>
>>>That does it. I'm not voting for Clinton now.
>>
>>Or Gore.
>>
>
> Feel free to write either one in in November.
Has not Florida already been punished by a plague of hurricanes for its
unwillingness to vote for Gore in the past?
--
Rob Bannister