The Fraud of Zionism - Part II: The History of Zionism
Anyone who wishes to understand the real history of Zionism should consult all the reports of the British mandate authorities and the various international investigation committees prior to the establishment of the Zionist state in 1948. We would also recommend consulting the various Arab "position" papers submitted to the British authorities in London and to the Royal Investigating commissions visiting Palestine to gather evidence. Biases though those reports may be they provide a useful corrective and "alternative point of view" to the ubiquitous philo-Zionist perspective. The major historical documents bearing on Jewish-Arab tensions in palestine are as follows: (1) The King-Crane Commission Report of 1919. Authorized by President Woodrow Wilson to determine the opinion of the Arabs of Syria-Palestine toward a Jewish state in Palestine, the commissioners found Arab opinion overwhelmingly in the negative. The report recommended against the Zionist program. It predicted, accurately, that a Jewish state could be created only through massive immigration and eventual armed violence. The report was suppressed by Zionists surrounding the dying Woodrow Wilson, most probably by Rabbi Stephen Wise and Supreme court justice Louis Brandeis. (2) The Palin Report of 1920. An investigation into the Arab riots of that year, this unpublished Royal Investigation concluded, as did all the others, that the fundamental, as opposed to surface cause of the rioting, was Arab resentment at the impending Jewish colonization and conquest of their country. (3) The Haycraft Report of 1921. This Royal Investigation of the Jaffa riots reached the same conclusion as the Palin Report. Dr. Chaim Weismann, the famous Zionist and later first President of Israel, stated in his autobiography, Trial and Error, that the Haycraft Report was the beginning of Zionisms difficulties with the British military authorities. (4) The Shaw Report. This was a Royal Investigation of the riots of 1929 sparked by Zionist ambitions over the "Wailing Wall". The fundamental cause of Arab resentment, mass Jewish immigration and eventual takeover, remained the same. (5) The White Paper of 1930, the Passfield White Paper. This official Royal Investigation determined that Arabs in Palestine were being subjected to discriminatory labor practices and recommended that those labor practices be abolished to promote better Jewish-Arab relations. Lord Passfield was Sidney Webb, a famous Marxist and co-author with his wife, Beatrice Webb of a whitewash of communism entitled Soviet Russia: A New Civilization? The White Paper of 1930 was as perceptive of the real causes of Zionist-Arab tension as the whitewash of soviet communism was ridiculous. (6) The "Black Letter" of May, 1931. This was a letter written by British Prime Minister Ramsey MacDonald to president of the World Zionist organization. Chaim Weizmann, repudiating the White Paper of 1930 and its recommendations. MacDonald conceded that the Jewish Agency in Palestine could continue with its discriminatory labor practices but warned that if such practices continued the British Government could not be held responsible for the Arab resentment. (7) The Lewis French report. Lewis French was a British agricultural expert. His report claimed that the water resources and arable acreage in Palestine did not allow for a Jewish population of the size envisaged by the Zionists. French's report was denounced as unscientific and founded on faulty data and assumptions by the Zionists. The French report was offered by the Arabs as further proof of the unfeasability of Zionist ambitions for their native Palestine. (8) The Royal Investigating Commission of 1936. This commission was sent to Palestine in the midst of the Arab riots of 1936-39. Known as the Peel commission because it was chaired by Lord Robert Peel, the Commission found that Arab claims had "more force than was previously realized". The basic cause of problems - mass Jewish immigration into an already Arab land - was once again recognized, with the British reasserting a "dual obligation": to provide for a Jewish national homeland and to protect the rights of the native Arabs. ( This obligation traces directly back to the language of the Balfour Declaration itself.) The Report recommended the partitioning of Palestine into seperate Jewish and Arab states with the British holding onto a "Polish corridor" through the center of the country. The Arabs said no to the proposal, the Zionists gave a no which was a conditional yes. The plan was ultimately found unworkable and never implemented. (9) The Wodehouse Report. This report simply found that the recommendation of the Royal Commission for partition was unworkable. (10) The White Papers of 1938 and 1939. These were continuing investigations of the riots of 1936-1939. The White Papers concluded the Jewish immigration to Palestine should be allowed for another five years, then cut off unless the Arabs voted to allow immigration to continue. These reports also provided for eventual Palestinian statehood. (11) The London Crown Conference of January - March 1939. Called in an effort to bring Jews and Arabs together this conference led to no results. The Conference failed in March, 1939 when Adof Hitler occupied the remainder of Czechoslovakia. The English confessed to the Arab delegates that they could no longer support Arab statehood. This would offend the Zionist dominated Roosevelt administration whose support for British war aims against Hitler was essential. (12) The Morrison-Grady Report, the Anglo-American Joint Committee of Inquiry of 1946 and the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP). All the post World War II investigations of Palestinian problems were basically a reversion to the Peel partition plan of 1936- 1937. In November, 1947 the United Nations voted to partition Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. In May, 1948 with the withdrawal of British forces and the relinquishment of the Mandate, civil war in Palestine between the Zionist colonizers and the native Arabs broke out. The Zionists succeeded in seizing segments of Palestine and proclaimed a "Jewish state". Strife has been never ending since.
Mustafa Naqib wrote: > The Fraud of Zionism - Part II: > The History of Zionism
> Anyone who wishes to understand the real history of Zionism should consult > all the reports of the British mandate authorities and the various > international investigation committees prior to the establishment of the > Zionist state in 1948. We would also recommend consulting the various Arab > "position" papers submitted to the British authorities in London and to the > Royal Investigating commissions visiting Palestine to gather evidence. > Biases though those reports may be they provide a useful corrective and > "alternative point of view" to the ubiquitous philo-Zionist perspective. > The major historical documents bearing on Jewish-Arab tensions in palestine > are as follows: > (1) The King-Crane Commission Report of 1919. > Authorized by President Woodrow Wilson to determine the opinion of the Arabs > of Syria-Palestine toward a Jewish state in Palestine, the commissioners > found Arab opinion overwhelmingly in the negative. The report recommended > against the Zionist program. It predicted, accurately, that a Jewish state > could be created only through massive immigration and eventual armed > violence. The report was suppressed by Zionists surrounding the dying > Woodrow Wilson, most probably by Rabbi Stephen Wise and Supreme court > justice Louis Brandeis. > (2) The Palin Report of 1920. > An investigation into the Arab riots of that year, this unpublished Royal > Investigation concluded, as did all the others, that the fundamental, as > opposed to surface cause of the rioting, was Arab resentment at the > impending Jewish colonization and conquest of their country. > (3) The Haycraft Report of 1921. > This Royal Investigation of the Jaffa riots reached the same conclusion as > the Palin Report. Dr. Chaim Weismann, the famous Zionist and later first > President of Israel, stated in his autobiography, Trial and Error, that the > Haycraft Report was the beginning of Zionisms difficulties with the British > military authorities. > (4) The Shaw Report. > This was a Royal Investigation of the riots of 1929 sparked by Zionist > ambitions over the "Wailing Wall". The fundamental cause of Arab > resentment, mass Jewish immigration and eventual takeover, remained the > same. > (5) The White Paper of 1930, the Passfield White Paper. > This official Royal Investigation determined that Arabs in Palestine were > being subjected to discriminatory labor practices and recommended that those > labor practices be abolished to promote better Jewish-Arab relations. Lord > Passfield was Sidney Webb, a famous Marxist and co-author with his wife, > Beatrice Webb of a whitewash of communism entitled Soviet Russia: A New > Civilization? The White Paper of 1930 was as perceptive of the real causes > of Zionist-Arab tension as the whitewash of soviet communism was ridiculous. > (6) The "Black Letter" of May, 1931. > This was a letter written by British Prime Minister Ramsey MacDonald to > president of the World Zionist organization. Chaim Weizmann, repudiating > the White Paper of 1930 and its recommendations. MacDonald conceded that > the Jewish Agency in Palestine could continue with its discriminatory labor > practices but warned that if such practices continued the British Government > could not be held responsible for the Arab resentment. > (7) The Lewis French report. > Lewis French was a British agricultural expert. His report claimed that the > water resources and arable acreage in Palestine did not allow for a Jewish > population of the size envisaged by the Zionists. French's report was > denounced as unscientific and founded on faulty data and assumptions by the > Zionists. The French report was offered by the Arabs as further proof of > the unfeasability of Zionist ambitions for their native Palestine. > (8) The Royal Investigating Commission of 1936. > This commission was sent to Palestine in the midst of the Arab riots of > 1936-39. Known as the Peel commission because it was chaired by Lord Robert > Peel, the Commission found that Arab claims had "more force than was > previously realized". The basic cause of problems - mass Jewish > immigration into an already Arab land - was once again recognized, with the > British reasserting a "dual obligation": to provide for a Jewish national > homeland and to protect the rights of the native Arabs. ( This obligation > traces directly back to the language of the Balfour Declaration itself.) > The Report recommended the partitioning of Palestine into seperate Jewish > and Arab states with the British holding onto a "Polish corridor" through > the center of the country. The Arabs said no to the proposal, the Zionists > gave a no which was a conditional yes. The plan was ultimately found > unworkable and never implemented. > (9) The Wodehouse Report. > This report simply found that the recommendation of the Royal Commission for > partition was unworkable. > (10) The White Papers of 1938 and 1939. > These were continuing investigations of the riots of 1936-1939. The White > Papers concluded the Jewish immigration to Palestine should be allowed for > another five years, then cut off unless the Arabs voted to allow immigration > to continue. These reports also provided for eventual Palestinian > statehood. > (11) The London Crown Conference of January - March 1939. > Called in an effort to bring Jews and Arabs together this conference led to > no results. The Conference failed in March, 1939 when Adof Hitler occupied > the remainder of Czechoslovakia. The English confessed to the Arab > delegates that they could no longer support Arab statehood. This would > offend the Zionist dominated Roosevelt administration whose support for > British war aims against Hitler was essential. > (12) The Morrison-Grady Report, the Anglo-American Joint Committee of > Inquiry of 1946 and the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine > (UNSCOP). > All the post World War II investigations of Palestinian problems were > basically a reversion to the Peel partition plan of 1936- 1937. In > November, 1947 the United Nations voted to partition Palestine into Jewish > and Arab states. In May, 1948 with the withdrawal of British forces and > the relinquishment of the Mandate, civil war in Palestine between the > Zionist colonizers and the native Arabs broke out. The Zionists succeeded > in seizing segments of Palestine and proclaimed a "Jewish state". Strife has > been never ending since.
You can cry Holowcause as much as you like, it is not our problem, sooner or later you WILL HAVE TO give up the land you stole from us. Every inch of it .
> From Russgranata with links to David Irving, CODOH & Holocaust Deniers
> Mustafa Naqib wrote:
> > The Fraud of Zionism - Part II: > > The History of Zionism
> > Anyone who wishes to understand the real history of Zionism should consult > > all the reports of the British mandate authorities and the various > > international investigation committees prior to the establishment of the > > Zionist state in 1948. We would also recommend consulting the various Arab > > "position" papers submitted to the British authorities in London and to the > > Royal Investigating commissions visiting Palestine to gather evidence. > > Biases though those reports may be they provide a useful corrective and > > "alternative point of view" to the ubiquitous philo-Zionist perspective. > > The major historical documents bearing on Jewish-Arab tensions in palestine > > are as follows: > > (1) The King-Crane Commission Report of 1919. > > Authorized by President Woodrow Wilson to determine the opinion of the Arabs > > of Syria-Palestine toward a Jewish state in Palestine, the commissioners > > found Arab opinion overwhelmingly in the negative. The report recommended > > against the Zionist program. It predicted, accurately, that a Jewish state > > could be created only through massive immigration and eventual armed > > violence. The report was suppressed by Zionists surrounding the dying > > Woodrow Wilson, most probably by Rabbi Stephen Wise and Supreme court > > justice Louis Brandeis. > > (2) The Palin Report of 1920. > > An investigation into the Arab riots of that year, this unpublished Royal > > Investigation concluded, as did all the others, that the fundamental, as > > opposed to surface cause of the rioting, was Arab resentment at the > > impending Jewish colonization and conquest of their country. > > (3) The Haycraft Report of 1921. > > This Royal Investigation of the Jaffa riots reached the same conclusion as > > the Palin Report. Dr. Chaim Weismann, the famous Zionist and later first > > President of Israel, stated in his autobiography, Trial and Error, that the > > Haycraft Report was the beginning of Zionisms difficulties with the British > > military authorities. > > (4) The Shaw Report. > > This was a Royal Investigation of the riots of 1929 sparked by Zionist > > ambitions over the "Wailing Wall". The fundamental cause of Arab > > resentment, mass Jewish immigration and eventual takeover, remained the > > same. > > (5) The White Paper of 1930, the Passfield White Paper. > > This official Royal Investigation determined that Arabs in Palestine were > > being subjected to discriminatory labor practices and recommended that those > > labor practices be abolished to promote better Jewish-Arab relations. Lord > > Passfield was Sidney Webb, a famous Marxist and co-author with his wife, > > Beatrice Webb of a whitewash of communism entitled Soviet Russia: A New > > Civilization? The White Paper of 1930 was as perceptive of the real causes > > of Zionist-Arab tension as the whitewash of soviet communism was ridiculous. > > (6) The "Black Letter" of May, 1931. > > This was a letter written by British Prime Minister Ramsey MacDonald to > > president of the World Zionist organization. Chaim Weizmann, repudiating > > the White Paper of 1930 and its recommendations. MacDonald conceded that > > the Jewish Agency in Palestine could continue with its discriminatory labor > > practices but warned that if such practices continued the British Government > > could not be held responsible for the Arab resentment. > > (7) The Lewis French report. > > Lewis French was a British agricultural expert. His report claimed that the > > water resources and arable acreage in Palestine did not allow for a Jewish > > population of the size envisaged by the Zionists. French's report was > > denounced as unscientific and founded on faulty data and assumptions by the > > Zionists. The French report was offered by the Arabs as further proof of > > the unfeasability of Zionist ambitions for their native Palestine. > > (8) The Royal Investigating Commission of 1936. > > This commission was sent to Palestine in the midst of the Arab riots of > > 1936-39. Known as the Peel commission because it was chaired by Lord Robert > > Peel, the Commission found that Arab claims had "more force than was > > previously realized". The basic cause of problems - mass Jewish > > immigration into an already Arab land - was once again recognized, with the > > British reasserting a "dual obligation": to provide for a Jewish national > > homeland and to protect the rights of the native Arabs. ( This obligation > > traces directly back to the language of the Balfour Declaration itself.) > > The Report recommended the partitioning of Palestine into seperate Jewish > > and Arab states with the British holding onto a "Polish corridor" through > > the center of the country. The Arabs said no to the proposal, the Zionists > > gave a no which was a conditional yes. The plan was ultimately found > > unworkable and never implemented. > > (9) The Wodehouse Report. > > This report simply found that the recommendation of the Royal Commission for > > partition was unworkable. > > (10) The White Papers of 1938 and 1939. > > These were continuing investigations of the riots of 1936-1939. The White > > Papers concluded the Jewish immigration to Palestine should be allowed for > > another five years, then cut off unless the Arabs voted to allow immigration > > to continue. These reports also provided for eventual Palestinian > > statehood. > > (11) The London Crown Conference of January - March 1939. > > Called in an effort to bring Jews and Arabs together this conference led to > > no results. The Conference failed in March, 1939 when Adof Hitler occupied > > the remainder of Czechoslovakia. The English confessed to the Arab > > delegates that they could no longer support Arab statehood. This would > > offend the Zionist dominated Roosevelt administration whose support for > > British war aims against Hitler was essential. > > (12) The Morrison-Grady Report, the Anglo-American Joint Committee of > > Inquiry of 1946 and the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine > > (UNSCOP). > > All the post World War II investigations of Palestinian problems were > > basically a reversion to the Peel partition plan of 1936- 1937. In > > November, 1947 the United Nations voted to partition Palestine into Jewish > > and Arab states. In May, 1948 with the withdrawal of British forces and > > the relinquishment of the Mandate, civil war in Palestine between the > > Zionist colonizers and the native Arabs broke out. The Zionists succeeded > > in seizing segments of Palestine and proclaimed a "Jewish state". Strife has > > been never ending since.
"Mustafa Naqib" <m.na...@gte.net> writes: > You can cry Holowcause as much as you like, it is not our problem, sooner or > later you WILL HAVE TO give up the land you stole from us. Every inch of it
You Muslim filth stole the homes of Jews in 1929 and continued to try this for 19 years before you got a dose of your own medicine.
> . > "Henry" <herm...@mindspring.com> wrote in message > news:3C8230D2.F3BCAF47@mindspring.com... > > From Russgranata with links to David Irving, CODOH & Holocaust Deniers
> > Mustafa Naqib wrote:
> > > The Fraud of Zionism - Part II: > > > The History of Zionism
> > > Anyone who wishes to understand the real history of Zionism should > consult > > > all the reports of the British mandate authorities and the various > > > international investigation committees prior to the establishment of the > > > Zionist state in 1948. We would also recommend consulting the various > Arab > > > "position" papers submitted to the British authorities in London and to > the > > > Royal Investigating commissions visiting Palestine to gather evidence. > > > Biases though those reports may be they provide a useful corrective and > > > "alternative point of view" to the ubiquitous philo-Zionist perspective. > > > The major historical documents bearing on Jewish-Arab tensions in > palestine > > > are as follows: > > > (1) The King-Crane Commission Report of 1919. > > > Authorized by President Woodrow Wilson to determine the opinion of the > Arabs > > > of Syria-Palestine toward a Jewish state in Palestine, the commissioners > > > found Arab opinion overwhelmingly in the negative. The report > recommended > > > against the Zionist program. It predicted, accurately, that a Jewish > state > > > could be created only through massive immigration and eventual armed > > > violence. The report was suppressed by Zionists surrounding the dying > > > Woodrow Wilson, most probably by Rabbi Stephen Wise and Supreme court > > > justice Louis Brandeis. > > > (2) The Palin Report of 1920. > > > An investigation into the Arab riots of that year, this unpublished > Royal > > > Investigation concluded, as did all the others, that the fundamental, as > > > opposed to surface cause of the rioting, was Arab resentment at the > > > impending Jewish colonization and conquest of their country. > > > (3) The Haycraft Report of 1921. > > > This Royal Investigation of the Jaffa riots reached the same conclusion > as > > > the Palin Report. Dr. Chaim Weismann, the famous Zionist and later > first > > > President of Israel, stated in his autobiography, Trial and Error, that > the > > > Haycraft Report was the beginning of Zionisms difficulties with the > British > > > military authorities. > > > (4) The Shaw Report. > > > This was a Royal Investigation of the riots of 1929 sparked by Zionist > > > ambitions over the "Wailing Wall". The fundamental cause of Arab > > > resentment, mass Jewish immigration and eventual takeover, remained the > > > same. > > > (5) The White Paper of 1930, the Passfield White Paper. > > > This official Royal Investigation determined that Arabs in Palestine > were > > > being subjected to discriminatory labor practices and recommended that > those > > > labor practices be abolished to promote better Jewish-Arab relations. > Lord > > > Passfield was Sidney Webb, a famous Marxist and co-author with his wife, > > > Beatrice Webb of a whitewash of communism entitled Soviet Russia: A New > > > Civilization? The White Paper of 1930 was as perceptive of the real > causes > > > of Zionist-Arab tension as the whitewash of soviet communism was > ridiculous. > > > (6) The "Black Letter" of May, 1931. > > > This was a letter written by British Prime Minister Ramsey MacDonald to > > > president of the World Zionist organization. Chaim Weizmann, > repudiating > > > the White Paper of 1930 and its recommendations. MacDonald conceded > that > > > the Jewish Agency in Palestine could continue with its discriminatory > labor > > > practices but warned that if such practices continued the British > Government > > > could not be held responsible for the Arab resentment. > > > (7) The Lewis French report. > > > Lewis French was a British agricultural expert. His report claimed that > the > > > water resources and arable acreage in Palestine did not allow for a > Jewish > > > population of the size envisaged by the Zionists. French's report was > > > denounced as unscientific and founded on faulty data and assumptions by > the > > > Zionists. The French report was offered by the Arabs as further proof > of > > > the unfeasability of Zionist ambitions for their native Palestine. > > > (8) The Royal Investigating Commission of 1936. > > > This commission was sent to Palestine in the midst of the Arab riots of > > > 1936-39. Known as the Peel commission because it was chaired by Lord > Robert > > > Peel, the Commission found that Arab claims had "more force than was > > > previously realized". The basic cause of problems - mass Jewish > > > immigration into an already Arab land - was once again recognized, with > the > > > British reasserting a "dual obligation": to provide for a Jewish > national > > > homeland and to protect the rights of the native Arabs. ( This > obligation > > > traces directly back to the language of the Balfour Declaration itself.) > > > The Report recommended the partitioning of Palestine into seperate > Jewish > > > and Arab states with the British holding onto a "Polish corridor" > through > > > the center of the country. The Arabs said no to the proposal, the > Zionists > > > gave a no which was a conditional yes. The plan was ultimately found > > > unworkable and never implemented. > > > (9) The Wodehouse Report. > > > This report simply found that the recommendation of the Royal Commission > for > > > partition was unworkable. > > > (10) The White Papers of 1938 and 1939. > > > These were continuing investigations of the riots of 1936-1939. The > White > > > Papers concluded the Jewish immigration to Palestine should be allowed > for > > > another five years, then cut off unless the Arabs voted to allow > immigration > > > to continue. These reports also provided for eventual Palestinian > > > statehood. > > > (11) The London Crown Conference of January - March 1939. > > > Called in an effort to bring Jews and Arabs together this conference led > to > > > no results. The Conference failed in March, 1939 when Adof Hitler > occupied > > > the remainder of Czechoslovakia. The English confessed to the Arab > > > delegates that they could no longer support Arab statehood. This would > > > offend the Zionist dominated Roosevelt administration whose support for > > > British war aims against Hitler was essential. > > > (12) The Morrison-Grady Report, the Anglo-American Joint Committee of > > > Inquiry of 1946 and the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine > > > (UNSCOP). > > > All the post World War II investigations of Palestinian problems were > > > basically a reversion to the Peel partition plan of 1936- 1937. In > > > November, 1947 the United Nations voted to partition Palestine into > Jewish > > > and Arab states. In May, 1948 with the withdrawal of British forces > and > > > the relinquishment of the Mandate, civil war in Palestine between the > > > Zionist colonizers and the native Arabs broke out. The Zionists > succeeded > > > in seizing segments of Palestine and proclaimed a "Jewish state". Strife > has > > > been never ending since.
> > -- > > And the star spangled banner in triumph shall wave > > O'er the land of the free, and the home of the brave! > > Francis Scott Key
-- Omri Schwarz --- ocsc...@mit.edu ('h' before war) Timeless wisdom of biomedical engineering: "Noise is principally due to the presence of the patient." -- R.F. Farr
> > You can cry Holowcause as much as you like, it is not our problem, sooner or > > later you WILL HAVE TO give up the land you stole from us. Every inch of it
> You Muslim filth stole the homes of Jews in 1929 > and continued to try this for 19 years before > you got a dose of your own medicine.
> You have no bitching rights.
Remember: history falsification is one of the basic pilars of ZIONISM. What else do we expect from a Zionist like you, really?!! To tell the truth??
1929-1939 Fifth wave of over 250,000 Zionist immigrants increases Jewish population in Palestine to 30% of total. Registered Jewish landownership (1939) totals 5.7% of area of country. 1929 August Riots arise out of dispute between Jews and Palestinians over claims to Wailing (Western) Wall in Jerusalem, a site holy to Muslims and Jews. In resulting clashes 133 Jews killed and 339 wounded, 116 Palestinians killed and 232 wounded, the latter mainly by British military . October General Palestinian conference meets in Jerusalem to formulate position on Wailing Wall controversy.
Neatly missing out the Ottoman period when Jews began to settle and develop an empty land.
> Anyone who wishes to understand the real history of Zionism should consult > all the reports of the British mandate authorities and the various > international investigation committees prior to the establishment of the > Zionist state in 1948. We would also recommend consulting the various Arab > "position" papers submitted to the British authorities in London and to the > Royal Investigating commissions visiting Palestine to gather evidence. > Biases though those reports may be they provide a useful corrective and > "alternative point of view" to the ubiquitous philo-Zionist perspective.
###
British documents relating to the Mandate were destroyed. Richard Crossman let that cat out of the bag. Where is Richard Crossman in the propagandists' account?
> bearing on Jewish-Arab tensions in palestine > are as follows: > (1) The King-Crane Commission Report of 1919. > Authorized by President Woodrow Wilson to determine the opinion of the Arabs > of Syria-Palestine toward a Jewish state in Palestine, the commissioners > found Arab opinion overwhelmingly in the negative. The report recommended > against the Zionist program. It predicted, accurately, that a Jewish state > could be created only through massive immigration and eventual armed > violence. The report was suppressed by Zionists surrounding the dying > Woodrow Wilson, most probably by Rabbi Stephen Wise and Supreme court > justice Louis Brandeis. > (2) The Palin Report of 1920. > An investigation into the Arab riots of that year, this unpublished Royal > Investigation concluded, as did all the others, that the fundamental, as > opposed to surface cause of the rioting, was Arab resentment at the > impending Jewish colonization and conquest of their country. > (3) The Haycraft Report of 1921. > This Royal Investigation of the Jaffa riots reached the same conclusion as > the Palin Report. Dr. Chaim Weismann, the famous Zionist and later first > President of Israel, stated in his autobiography, Trial and Error, that the > Haycraft Report was the beginning of Zionisms difficulties with the British > military authorities.
###
Omitting the visit of Churchill and TE Lawrence to Egypt and the Mandated land.
Omitting the appointment of the rotten old (later Nazi) Mufti of Jerusalem.
Omitting the rotten old Nazi Mufti's import of Arab mercenaries.
Omitting the large-scale immigration of Arabs, largely from Egypt who were attracted by the Jewish development of the land.
Omitting the apportioning of 80% of the national home for the Jews to an Arab to make into Transjordan. 80%! What an omission.
> (4) The Shaw Report. > This was a Royal Investigation of the riots of 1929 sparked by Zionist > ambitions over the "Wailing Wall".
###
Omitting the aforesaid Nazi Mufti, the aforesaid Arab mercenaries and the aforesaid Arab alien immigrants.
Omitting the slaughter of the Jews of Hebron. Here it is with witness testimony:
> You Muslim filth stole the homes of Jews in 1929 > and continued to try this for 19 years before > you got a dose of your own medicine.
You are mistaken Mr. Black. There were no Muslims in Eastern Europe and Russia in 1929.
> You have no bitching rights.
Why? Do Jews have a monopoly on that?
-- Naturally, everything I write on usenet is entirely my own opinion, based solely on rumor, supposition, innuendo and damned lies. It should be interpreted in a spirit of fun. My memory is quite faulty, and my grammar, spelling, tact and fact are less reliable than a dirty wing on a hot and humid day; sometimes I inadvertently write the opposite of what I mean.
> > > You can cry Holowcause as much as you like, it is not our problem, > sooner or > > > later you WILL HAVE TO give up the land you stole from us. Every inch of > it
> > You Muslim filth stole the homes of Jews in 1929 > > and continued to try this for 19 years before > > you got a dose of your own medicine.
> > You have no bitching rights.
> Remember: history falsification is one of the basic pilars of ZIONISM.
The Hebron massacre of 1929, mastoul?
63 dead, 5,000 Jews "cleansed" out of the town.
Not a single Zionist among them.
Are you going to deny this happened, mastoul?
What
> else do we expect from a Zionist like you, really?!! To tell the truth??
> 1929-1939 > Fifth wave of over 250,000 Zionist immigrants increases Jewish population in > Palestine to 30% of total. Registered Jewish landownership (1939) totals > 5.7% of area of country. > 1929 > August > Riots arise out of dispute between Jews and Palestinians over claims to > Wailing (Western) Wall in Jerusalem, a site holy to Muslims and Jews. In
Bullshit.
Look it up, moron.
The massacres were started by a rumor regarding the wall, a rumor launched by Haj Amin. There was no dispute.
> resulting clashes 133 Jews killed and 339 wounded, 116 Palestinians killed > and 232 wounded, the latter mainly by British military . > October > General Palestinian conference meets in Jerusalem to formulate position on > Wailing Wall controversy.
-- Omri Schwarz --- ocsc...@mit.edu ('h' before war) Timeless wisdom of biomedical engineering: "Noise is principally due to the presence of the patient." -- R.F. Farr
