The Shake Down.
amigocabal
Anonymous <nob...@noisebox.remailer.org> wrote in message
news:b77a554f424b033a...@noisebox.remailer.org...
> Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
hands her a bag, and
> demands that she put all the money from her cash drawer in it. At first
she protests, but then,
> after he threatens to shoot, she fills the robber's bag with cash. And
then imagine that, as the
> robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard opens
the door for him, smiles
> at him, offers to hail a cab for him, and tells him to come again soon.
After that it's not
> difficult to imagine that he probably will.
>
> That's about the way it's been with the Jews recently. Two years ago they
put a gun to the head
> of the Swiss people collectively and demanded billions of dollars in
reparations for Swiss bank
> accounts they claimed had been owned by Jews who disappeared during the
Second World War. The
> Swiss initially protested that unclaimed Jewish bank accounts from the
1930s and 1940s amounted
> at most to a few million dollars, not to billions, and besides the war
ended more than 50 years
> ago and claims should have been filed long ago. The Jews threatened to
shoot, figuratively
> speaking, by having their bought politicians in the United States prevent
Swiss banks from doing
> business in America. Eventually they walked away with $1.25 billion in
loot, with the Swiss
> apologizing for not having coughed it up sooner.
>
> After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the Jews
to give up extortion
> and go straight. So anyway, they were back again soon, with demands
against the Volkswagen
> Company for having used Jewish workers during the Second World War and
providing them only with
> room and board but not paying them union-scale wages. One might think that
these Jewish workers
> would be grateful to Volkswagen for keeping them alive during the war,
feeding them, and giving
> them a roof over their heads, when so many German civilians had only
bombed-out ruins to live
> in. Well, if you thought that, you just don't understand Jews. The Jews
told the Volkswagen
> Company that if it ever wanted to sell any more cars in America, it had
better cough up -- soon.
> And the bought politicians and the media bosses in America began rattling
their sabres and
> talking loudly about sanctions of various sorts against Volkswagen. And
so, like the Swiss
> banks, Volkswagen coughed up the money.
>
> Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two years
ago, when I predicted
> that after the Jews had cleaned out the Swiss they would go after other
victims in a long list.
> Volkswagen wasn't the only company which had used involuntary labor during
the war. The Jews
> went after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.
>
> And Switzerland wasn't the only country where Jews could claim that Uncle
Abe had stashed some
> of his loot sixty years ago, before the war. So they sued banks in France
and in Britain and
> began moaning and whining in the media that the banks were being
"insensitive" to poor,
> deserving "Holocaust survivors," who suddenly had remembered Uncle Abe's
millions and needed it -
> - now! And then they remembered the insurance companies in Italy and
Switzerland and Britain and
> elsewhere from whom they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a
life-insurance policy. Then
> they remembered that the Swedes owed them gold, and the Danes and the
Norwegians. Even the
> Poles, whom the Jews had ruled as Bolshevik commissars for nearly 50 years
after the war, owed
> them, they claimed.
>
> The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have our
bought Gentile
> politicians pass laws making it impossible for you to continue doing
business, and our people in
> the media will paint you as monsters who want to hang onto the profit you
made when poor Uncle
> Abe and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the gullible
Gentile lemmings won't
> buy your products. If you give us any trouble or resist our demands we'll
make an example of
> you, the way we did with the Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred
million dollars we're
> demanding now, and we'll leave you alone. Otherwise, it'll end up costing
you a lot more.
>
> And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood up
to them and flatly
> refused to pay. Not one president or prime minister has said to them, "All
right, Jew boys! You
> try a boycott against my country, and we'll organize a boycott against
Israel. We'll round up
> all the Jews in our country and send them packing." Not one has called the
Jews' bluff. They've
> all calculated that it is cheaper to pay the gangsters than to fight them,
and so they pay.
> Honor means nothing to these businessmen and politicians. Principles mean
nothing to them. All
> they care about is continuing to make money, continuing to stay in office.
>
> With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can hardly
blame the Jews for
> turning to extortion on a larger scale than ever before. They are
successful at it; therefore
> they continue to do it. And they don't limit themselves to Europe or to
those who allegedly
> cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations. A few months
ago they filed a claim
> against Britain for $600 million they claim the British government
confiscated from Jews between
> 1940 and 1942 when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the Jews were
waging a guerrilla
> war against the British prior to 1948, when the British finally gave up
and pulled out, letting
> the Jews slaughter the Palestinians and establish the Jewish state of
Israel on Palestinian
> land. The Jews were kidnapping and murdering British soldiers in Palestine
and assassinating
> diplomats. In 1946 the Jews used a terrorist bomb to blow up the King
David Hotel in Jerusalem,
> which was the British government headquarters. This Jewish forerunner of
the Oklahoma City
> bombing killed a large number of British civilians and military people.
And now the Jews are
> demanding $600 million in reparations from the British!
>
> And of course, the Jews also are expecting payoffs from American
companies. Both Ford and
> General Motors had subsidiaries working in Germany when the Second World
War began. The Ford
> plant in Germany made military vehicles for the Germans throughout the
war, and the General
> Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Jews are claiming
that both Ford and
> General Motors owe them a great deal of money because of that. The Jews
already have filed a
> class-action suit against Ford in a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking
hundreds of millions of
> dollars in wages plus interest for Jews who worked in Ford's German plant
during the war. And
> because the businessmen who run Ford and General Motors today are the same
sort as those who run
> the Volkswagen Company, they undoubtedly will pay off the Jews rather than
risk having the media
> portray them as "insensitive" types who profited from the so-called
"Holocaust" and now refuse
> to share their loot with the poor, deserving Jewish "survivors." Two
hundred years ago the
> American motto was, "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
But in those days
> Americans were made of sterner stuff -- and I assume that our people in
Europe were too.
>
> Cash isn't the only thing the Jews are going after. They have decided that
a substantial portion
> of the art treasures of Europe really belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years
ago and ought to be
> returned to the Jews now. It is true, of course, that during the war the
German government had a
> keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art as possible back under
German protection. They
> bought all the Vermeers and Rembrandts and Holbeins and Dürers and Halses
and other Germanic art
> works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and brought
them back to Germany. And
> when the works the Germans were interested in were in the hands of Jews,
they often brought
> pressure to bear and obtained the works at low prices. The Germans,
however, generally weren't
> interested in modern art -- certainly not in Jewish paintings by Chagall
or Modigliani, for
> example -- and a great many such modern paintings ended up in the hands of
Jewish art dealers.
> In fact, the Germans often had agreements with Jewish art dealers,
swapping the modern paintings
> they weren't interested in for the Germanic paintings they were interested
in. The biggest of
> these Jewish dealers, Georges Wildenstein, was in Paris, and he acquired
an enormous number of
> modern paintings during the war. After the war he brought them to New York
and later sold
> hundreds of them to museums and private collectors around the world. The
Jews currently are
> engaged in a huge treasure hunt for those paintings now in Gentile hands
which formerly belonged
> to Jews. The facts that most of these paintings were acquired by their
present owners from
> Jewish dealers such as the Wildensteins and that many of them were legally
purchased from their
> Jewish owners during the war are glossed over. All of these paintings are
characterized by the
> Jews as -- quote -- "art stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the
Nazis," -- end quote -- and
> they want it all back now.
>
> There's an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the
Wildenstein family attracted
> public attention last year to the Jewish family's business dealings in
Paris during the war, and
> another Jewish family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that
actually should be
> returned to them, because they were forced to sell them at fire-sale
prices during the war. The
> Wildensteins told them to buzz off: the statute of limitations for such
claims expired long ago,
> the Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such an
assertion. But in
> fact, there are statutes of limitations for most claims. Dormant bank
accounts typically become
> the property of the government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so,
but when the Swiss
> brought up that legality two years ago, the Jews went into their
"persecuted victim" act,
> feigning outrage that the Swiss should try to let a mere law stand between
the Jews and what
> they were claiming in reparations.
>
> Whenever the Jews, in order to remind the world for the six-millionth time
of their "victim"
> status, have accused some elderly German or Pole or Ukrainian or
Lithuanian of having mistreated
> Jews 55 years ago during the war, there is no question of a statute of
limitations. If anyone
> mentions that legality, Jewish shrieking in all of their media quickly
drowns him out. For an
> injury, real or imaginary, done to a Jew by a Gentile there is no statute
of limitations, no
> matter how much time has passed. The Jews still celebrate every year in
their Purim festival the
> revenge their ancestors took on the ancient Persians 2,500 years ago
through their control of a
> corrupt king.
>
> Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few months
ago to extradite a
> Jewish mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so that he could be tried in Poland
for genocide, the Jews
> refused. "There's a statute of limitations for extradition," the Israelis
told the Poles, "and
> you're too late." Morel was the Jew-communist commissar of a concentration
camp in Poland after
> the war, and he had tortured hundreds of Poles and Germans to death. When
he saw the possibility
> of retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other Jewish criminals
before him, fled to
> Israel. The horrifying atrocities committed by Solomon Morel have been
described in the 1993
> book An Eye for an Eye by John Sack.
>
> This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction between
Jews and non-Jews. It is
> a fact that in wars people suffer losses. Usually, within a few years
after the wars are over,
> people try to get on with their lives, and they consider what is past to
be past. If other
> people behaved the way the Jews behave, then every Englishman whose family
residence got hit by
> a bomb during the "blitz" of the Second World War would be clamoring now
for the German
> government to reimburse him for the repairs that his grandparents had to
make 55 years ago --
> plus interest, of course. And if it's all right to go back 55 years for
claims, why not go back
> 135 years and let all of the Americans whose ancestors' homes and farms in
Georgia were burned
> by General Sherman collect damages from the U.S. government now -- plus
interest, of course? Or
> why not go back 220 years and demand that Tony Blair's government pay
reparations to all of
> those Americans whose ancestors suffered property loss from the Redcoats
during the First
> American Revolution -- plus interest, of course? I mean, if the Jews are
allowed to keep score,
> without regard for time, why shouldn't everyone else? Why not set up some
sort of World Court
> for Reparations? I imagine that there are a lot of Palestinians who would
like to file claims
> against the state of Israel.
>
> The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody behaved
the way the Jews do. So
> this raises two interesting questions: Why do the Jews behave the way they
do? And why do we let
> them get away with it?
>
> Well, I've already given an answer of a sort to the first question: the
Jews behave the way they
> do because we let them behave that way; it's just like the case of the
bank robber, who will
> keep coming back until the bank guard stops being nice and shoots the
robber. But there's really
> more to it than that. No one else is even inclined to make the sort of
demands on the rest of
> the world that the Jews do. The Jews really are different. Their religion
provides a few clues
> in this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the property of
the Gentiles really
> should belong to Jews, that the Jews are entitled to it. It's as blatant
as anywhere in the 60th
> chapter of the book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are
told to keep their gates
> open all the time, so that all the wealth of the Gentiles can be brought
to them. "Thou shalt
> suck the milk of the Gentiles," the Jews are told. And if you think that
doesn't really mean
> what it sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud, where the
Jewish sages, the
> Jewish interpreters of the Bible, explain to the rest of the Jews what it
means. The Talmud
> tells the Jews that only Jews are human beings, that the Gentiles are just
animals created by
> the Jewish tribal god Yahweh to be used by the Jews, like other animals
are used. Because
> Gentiles are merely animals, they can't really own anything, and it is the
duty of the Jews to
> make sure they don't.
>
> Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and quaint
and might seem
> irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor Company by the Jews today.
But this old and
> quaint stuff is the basis of the Jews' religion today. The religious Jews
really believe it. And
> the non-religious Jews, the atheist Jews, behave as if they believe it.
And I think that in a
> certain sense they do. I think this belief is in their blood. I think that
this is what accounts
> for their almost incredible arrogance in their dealings with non-Jews.
>
> And of course, there's not just belief: there's also calculation. They
understand that the
> success of their current effort to swindle the rest of the world out of
every cent they can
> depends on three factors: it depends on their control of the mass media;
it depends on the
> unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost
everywhere in the Western
> world, on the unprecedented degree of democracy; and it depends on the
confused and demoralized
> state of Gentiles everywhere.
>
> There never before has been a time when the Jews have wielded as much open
power as they do
> today. No previous government in the United States has had as many Jews in
positions of power as
> the present Clinton government. And that's pretty much the way it is
everywhere in Europe too.
> The Jews around Clinton are mirrored by high-ranking Jews around Tony
Blair in Britain. In
> Russia, the Jews not only hold most of the key posts around the alcoholic
and ailing Boris
> Yeltsin, they have one of their own as prime minister. And nearly
everywhere except in the
> United States the Jews have succeeded in having laws passed making it
illegal for a patriot to
> tell his countrymen what the Jews are up to. In Britain, in France, and in
Germany hundreds of
> patriots are rotting in prisons today because they dared to speak the
truth about the Jews. In
> Switzerland the Jews succeeded in having similar laws passed before they
began extorting money
> from the Swiss. Only in Russia today are any significant number of
patriots speaking out against
> the Jews and daring the government to try to silence them.
>
> And I suppose it seems reasonable to the Jews that when they have so much
power they should use
> it to their advantage. They should go for everything they can get. The
opportunity may pass. And
> they are going for it, everywhere and in every way. It's interesting to
note that this display
> of unbridled greed and arrogance has made even some of their fellow Jews a
little nervous.
> Charles Krauthammer, a Jewish writer for the Washington Post, the second
most powerful Jewish
> newspaper in the United States, wrote a column last month which begins
with the words, and I
> quote: "The pursuit of billions in Holocaust guilt money has gone from the
unseemly to the
> disgraceful." -- end quote -- Krauthammer refers to the whole racket as a
"Holocaust shakedown."
> It's not that Krauthammer doesn't think the Jews should have all the money
they can get from the
> Gentiles. It's just that he's appalled by the reckless display of naked,
unprincipled greed as
> more and more Jewish shysters -- that's what Krauthammer calls them --
trample each other in
> their current feeding frenzy. What if the Gentiles notice? What will the
Gentiles think?
>
> Now, the unfortunate fact is that no non-Jewish writer for a major
newspaper would dare to write
> what Krauthammer wrote. Not even in the United States, where it's still
legal to write such
> things. They're all afraid. For two generations the Jewish media have
conditioned them by
> instantly and loudly accusing anyone who opens his mouth of being a
"racist" or a "hater" or an
> "anti-Semite." They've been conditioned to run for cover whenever they
hear one of those
> accusations. And that is the answer to our second question, why do we let
them get away with it?
>
> Their media control keeps the couch potatoes confused and unaware; the
corrupt politicians who
> have come to characterize our democracy are always ready to front for them
and betray the people
> whose interests they are supposed to be representing; and those among us
who are perceptive
> enough and independent-minded enough to understand what is happening are
nearly all too cowardly
> to speak out. So it is easy enough for me to predict that the Jews will
keep coming back for
> more -- and more -- and more -- until they either have it all, as in
Russia today, or what
> Charles Krauthammer is concerned about happens, and the Gentiles notice.
But really, the former
> outcome is much more likely.
>