US free press: Selling story conforming to US view, not reporting facts

[ltl...@hotmail.com]

The latest CBS report on the Shane Todd case:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-504083_162-57585864-504083/shane-todd-update-parents-are-withdrawing-from-official-inquiry-into-sons-death-leaving-singapore/

It is obvious that the report is totally one sided. It repeats Mrs
Todd's groundless accusation against the Singaporean court system and
at the time conveniently omits the question the Singaporean official
had raised concerning whether Mrs Todd was telling the truth on some
important issues.

http://news.xin.msn.com/en/singapore/unfortunate-that-todd-family-chose-to-walk-out-on-inquiry-shanmugam

"Mr Shanmugam said: "It would have been useful if the family had
continued (to participate in the inquiry). I will mention two facts
which the family's evidence would have been particularly useful.

"A key point, which had been made previously, was that the family had
said that they found the external hard drive themselves in the
apartment and they asserted that this hard drive had been processed by
a third party after Dr Todd's death and that hard drive contained
important information which had been overlooked by the Singapore
Police.

"Evidence has come out that that hard drive was something which the
police had looked at and something the police handed over to the
family in the presence of US Embassy officials.

"It would have been useful to hear the family's side as to how they
came to a different view of the facts."

[rst0]

American journalists, news media, and the TV industry are the biggest
American propaganda tools in the whole.
they brainwash Americans from birth to death on a daily basis.

[rst0]

The scariest part is:

Americans don't even know or recognize it.

[SS 777]

No entirely true. You talked cock and bull story.

"rst0" wrote in message
news:f2deb5ce-9fbd-4746...@v10g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...

[SS 777]

Not doubt, Propaganda exists in the US, but it is also such propaganda that
also attracted other countries to use similar tool to the same to its people
and other countries.


"rst0" wrote in message
news:0b9be902-8af6-4329...@z10g2000pbn.googlegroups.com...

[rst0]

On May 23, 10:33 am, "SS 777" <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> No entirely true. You talked cock and bull story.

Yes, it's true.

[Satish]

The CCP Mandarins are dragging PRC down the same slippery path that
was forced upon Japan by the Tojo regime and for the same reason - its
unabashed expansionism.


Beijing regime's lust for raw materials has fueled its colonial
agenda. In this, it is behaving exactly as the Tojo regime had during
the WW II era.

The Pacific nations are all aware that imperialist China has come to
believe like rstx that "Today, it's all about military power, the only
thing counts." In 1979, the CCP dictatorship under Deng Xiaoping's
helmsmanship caused the death of nearly 150,000 human soldiers just to
"teach Vietnam a lesson". It is another matter that a significant
proportion of the dead were Chinese soldiers. But that mattered very
little to lull the blood-lust of the CCP dictatorship in Beijing.


In fact, China's small neighbors thank USA for the fact that China
hasn't dared since 1979 to launch a bloody invasion to teach any of
its small neighbors a lesson. As far as the Pacific nations are
concerned, it is the USA that is providing a shield against the blood
lust of the CCP dictatorship.


As far as the Pacific countries (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, the
Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, New
Zealand etc.) are concerned, it is the CCP dictatorship in Beijing
that is the greatest menace to world peace.



The Munich agreement gave in to Nazi regime's demand for Sudetenland.
But this only whetted the Nazi regime's addiction to aggrandizement.
The Nazi regime went on to lay claims on Austria and then to Poland
and then to Russia and France and then to the whole world.

The Beijing bandit regime's imperialist agenda is expanding
exponentially. Now it is disputing Japan's sovereignty over Okinawa on
the basis of Okinawa's tributary relationship with China some 500
years ago. The CCP dictatorship in Beijing is becoming as much a
menace to world peace as the Tojo regime and the Hitler regime were in
their days:

**************



http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/17-07-2012/121658-china_territorial_claims-0/

China has territorial claims to nearly 20 countries

17.07.2012

Chinese leader Mao Zedong not only built a strong country but also
outlined a global goal: "We must conquer the globe where we will
create a powerful state." Today, China has territorial claims to all
its neighbors. Naturally, the U.S. is dreaming of becoming a mediator
in resolving disputes in the region. But it seems that Beijing
absolutely does not care about their opinion.

Burma, Laos, Northern India, Vietnam, Nepal, Bhutan, Thailand,
Malaysia, Singapore, the Ryukyu Islands, 300 islands of the South
China, East China and Yellow Seas, as well as Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia,
Taiwan, South Kazakhstan, the Afghan province of Bahdashan,
Transbaikalia and the Far East to South Okhotsk - here is the complete
list of areas that, according to Zedong, were lost due to the fall of
the Qing empire. All of these countries and regions combined exceed
the territory of modern China. Not all complaints are voiced by the
Government of China in the international arena, but within the country
the imperialist ambitions have not been lost, but rather, are actively
promoted.

The PRC authorities talk out loud only about the areas that, at least
theoretically, can be taken away from Japan and Korea. Tokyo is
regularly frustrated not only because of the travel of the Russian
leaders to the Kuril Islands, but also about the Chinese ships freely
entering the disputed Senkaku Islands waters. Beijing believes that
the Islands are called Diaoyu, and they belonged to China, but the
malicious Japanese tricked the U.S. into giving them to Japan because
after World War II the uninhabited archipelago was in the US
jurisdiction.

Significant reserves of natural gas were found on the islands. For the
growing industry of China and stagnant Japan it is more than a serious
argument in favor of the struggle for the archipelago, no matter what
it is called. Not to mention the fish that is found there in large
quantities. To date, the only agreement the parties have reached in
the negotiations is on the joint development of oil fields. In
addition, if the Japanese behave more or less decently, the Chinese
are regularly caught for illegal fishing in the area.

Any territorial dispute, but rather, its resolution, is a serious
precedent. If China's claim in respect of at least one territory from
the list of the "lost" is satisfied, the Chinese machine would be
unstoppable. Despite the fact that the Chinese are very pleased to
partner with Russia and have always supported Russia in the UN
Security Council, in person, on the sidelines, its diplomats
supposedly jokingly hint to their Russian colleagues: you must
understand that soon you will have to share the Far East? China has
more than a billion people, while Russia's vast territory barely has
150 million.

These dangerous trends - demographic, and as a result, geopolitical -
must sound scary to the Russian government, but so far it seems that
it is happy with the fact that Beijing makes territorial claims only
to Seoul and Tokyo. In 2005 Russia had already given China a bounty in
the form of 337 square kilometers of land in the area of Big Island
(upper Argun River in the Chita region) and two sites in the vicinity
of the islands Tarabarov and Big Ussuri near the confluence of the
Amur and Ussuri.

However, none of the leaders of the military departments of ASEAN that
includes all debating countries agree to recognize, for example, the
fact that Diaoyu belongs to Japan. Instead, the defense ministers of
Vietnam, Indonesia, Australia, Thailand and Singapore urged the
Japanese authorities to proceed with caution and within the framework
of the international law. These countries certainly do not need a
resolution to the dispute because in that case their territory will be
separated from China only by perseverance of the latter.

They are silent about the "Iodo island" (the Chinese version is
Suenchzhao. - Ed) in the East China Sea. The sneaky Chinese took the
principle of dividing the Arctic as an example and now claim that the
underwater ridge of this tiny piece of land is under close control of
the Chinese. Since the Iodo is closer to Korea, in 2003 the Koreans
built an uninhabitable marine research station there. From the
standpoint of the international law, this rock in general should not
be the subject of a debate.

In any case, the controversy continues, Japan and South Korea remain
to be supported by their all-time ally - the United States. For the
US, the unification of Southeast Asian Nations is a chance to save
their own economy, because in that case the World Trade Center will
move there, where currently there are no transnational corporations in
the amount sufficient for the U.S.

The success of the White House in the region does not depend on the
strength that America loves to show any chance it has, but rather,
diplomacy, as the countries of ASEAN and Asia-Pacific region do not
trust each other or anyone outside the regional boundaries. However,
Washington is trusted here because of the support of Seoul and Tokyo.
However, China has already pushed Japan out of the ranks of the
largest economies in the world, and the structure of the region is no
longer formed on spatial basis.

Therefore, territorial claims of China, and not Russia, India or, for
example, Australia are so important for Washington. Beijing is the
only capital of the world, ready to use force in the struggle for the
sake of expansion. During the last ten years, while America was
blowing up its financial bubble, China has not only developed the
industry, but also equipped its area of interest with military
equipment. China has placed 38 new diesel and nuclear submarines in
the region, purchased four destroyers of class "Modern" from Russia
and built another dozen on its own, and has launched a network of
ground-based ballistic missiles to destroy naval targets.

Only one other country has done this before - the Soviet Union during
the "Cold War". It is no wonder that the Americans are very concerned
with the regular quarrels between China and its major allies.
Construction of a naval base on Hainan Island does not add confidence
to the U.S. The proximity to the Malacca Strait poses a threat to the
smooth supply of Washington's main allies in the region - Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan - this is the way the US sees the situation. The
American senators have already decided that such behavior is a threat
to Beijing's regional peace and stability, economic development and
even "food security". The international community is well aware what
usually follows such wording.

Ilona Raskolnikova

Pravda.Ru

*******************

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/26/inside-china-436801701/?page=all#pagebreak


Threat against ‘little countries’
By Miles Yu
mmil...@gmail.com


China’s official communist newspaper, the Global Times, published a
chilling editorial warning several “little countries” that are
disputing China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea, notably the
Philippines and Vietnam, to “get ready to hear the sound of gunfire.”


Headlined “China Cannot Resort Only to Negotiations Over Maritime
Conflicts, We Must Kill One to Deter One Hundred If Necessary,” the
editorial published Tuesday asked, in a tone of condescension, where
these “little neighboring countries” got the nerve to challenge China.
It called such challenges an “opportunistic strategic offensive
launched by little countries against a big country.”


The newspaper further threatened that the game these countries play
against China would not be easy to win because “China possesses the
force to end such game anytime.”


The report said any fear of a naval war is unnecessary because the
Chinese public had been psychologically getting used to such a naval
conflagration in recent years.


According to the newspaper, the root cause of China’s trouble with
these “little countries” is the United States. “At present various
disputants behave with imperial swagger [against China],” the
commentary said, “as if with the support from the United States, they
all had the force and capabilities to subjugate China.”


The newspaper used the phrase “bodies of waters in East Asia” to
include areas other than the South China Sea where China has
territorial disputes — a clear reference to South Korea and Japan.


Since April 2010, China began deliberately sending regular fishing
fleets accompanied by official government escort ships to disputed
areas of the Spratly’s Island, Senkaku islands, the Korean littoral
area and other murky waters.


These China fishing and escort ships routinely clash with other
nations’ naval patrol ships, including incidents with the Philippine
navy, the South Korean navy and the Japanese coastal patrol vessels
just within the past week, dramatically escalating tensions with
several “little countries.”


Underground Great Wall


The U.S. government this week announced that it had dismantled and
destroyed the last and the largest Cold War-era nuclear weapon, the
B53 gravity bomb, in Amarillo, Texas.


Meanwhile, China is increasing its stockpile of nuclear weapons under
the rubric of a mammoth project called the Underground Great Wall that
includes a 3,000-mile-long subterranean tunnel system used to store
and operate the many thousands of China’s nuclear-carrying missiles.
The system is under the direct supervision of China’s strategic
missile forces known as the Second Artillery Corps.


First reported by the Chinese state television in March 2008 and
confirmed by the Chinese military a year later, the Underground Great
Wall runs several hundred feet below the ground, said James Holmes of
the U.S. Naval War College.


Mr. Holmes wrote in the Japanese-based electronic journal the Diplomat
in August that “the very scale of the underground network opens up new
vistas for Chinese nuclear strategy.”


On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal quoted former Pentagon nuclear
weapons specialist Philip Karber as fundamentally challenging the
West’s conventional assumption about the size of China’s nuclear
stockpile, officially estimated to include several hundred warheads.


Mr. Karber said gauging the size of China’s nuclear arsenal is
difficult, but the Wall Street Journal article urged an immediate
reconsideration of the underestimated arsenal because “the alternative
is for China, steeped in a 2,500 year military tradition of
concealment, deception and surprise, to announce — at a time and in a
manner of its choosing — its supremacy in a field that we have
foolishly abandoned to our dreams.”

soc.culture.china, soc.culture.indian, soc.culture.malaysia,
soc.culture.filipino, soc.culture.vietnamese
Anti-terrorism law proposed


China announced Monday that it would enact a sweeping law to combat
what the communist state would define as “terrorists” or “terrorist
acts.” These acts include creating public disorder and social panic,
causing public property damage and threatening government agencies.
The law would target international organizations and all others that
abet and finance such “terrorists” and “terrorist acts.”


Human rights activists and thousands of netizens immediately reacted
with anger and protest. Li Tiantian, a Shanghai-based human rights
lawyer, was quoted by overseas Chinese news media as saying: “This law
aims to protect the power structure of the state, to guarantee the
security, stability and power of the government. It is the same as
calling all actions jeopardizing the regime’s rule terrorism,
deserving suppression.”

*************

[rst9]

If you want to do something about it, join the army and fight against
them.
Otherwise, Shut your big trap.

[beware o New CPC, New Lama Itigilov]

You need a stub in your mouth.

"rst0" wrote in message
news:d6f7c86c-b800-4688...@a9g2000pbq.googlegroups.com...

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

For you, they don’t even want you in their army.

"rst9" wrote in message
news:55ed7492-e384-41a2...@zo5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[beware of the New Jeus Christ posting which is fresxh on Board]

You might don't know, but they know, - even they know you.

"rst0" wrote in message
news:f2deb5ce-9fbd-4746...@v10g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...

[ltl...@hotmail.com]

On May 23, 1:33 pm, "SS 777" <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> No entirely true. You talked cock and bull story.

Of course they are the biggest propaganda tools for American
capitalists first and foremost and secondarily the US government.
How else could they exist?

In this case, they, at least most of them, choose not to inform the
US public concerning the external hard drive which contains the key
evidence linking Shane Todd's death and the Chinese company Huiwai.

[this is the Original Jesus Christ , the ONLY ORIGINAL SON of WHITE GOD .]

US FREE PRESS is a Giant Jewish PROPAGANDA Machine



the AIPAC rules USA




US press is World Jewish Press which always sides with the
JEWS

On May 23, 11:52 pm, "ltl...@hotmail.com" <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The latest CBS report on the Shane Todd case:
>

> http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-504083_162-57585864-504083/shane-todd-upd...

>
> It is obvious that the report is totally one sided. It repeats Mrs
> Todd's groundless accusation against the Singaporean court system and
> at the time conveniently omits the question the Singaporean official
> had raised concerning whether Mrs Todd was telling the truth on some
> important issues.
>

> http://news.xin.msn.com/en/singapore/unfortunate-that-todd-family-cho...

[rst0]

On May 23, 4:02 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For you, they don’t even want you in their army.

You are way too late to say that.
I served my time in the U.S. Army in 1960.
Before the Vietnam War got hot, very hot.

[rst0]

On May 23, 4:04 pm, "beware of the New Jeus Christ posting

which is fresxh on Board" <veak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You might don't know, but they know, - even they know you.

I know they know me.
I have nothing to hide.

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

You were in the army? What for when it is not mandatory.? Have you fight in
overseas enemy lands?

"rst0" wrote in message
news:0a8a572e-129b-4077...@v10g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...

On May 23, 4:02 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> For you, they don�t even want you in their army.

[Satish]

On May 23, 8:31 pm, rst0 <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 23, 4:02 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For you, they don’t even want you in their army.
>
> You are way too late to say that.
> I served my time in the U.S. Army in 1960.
> Before the Vietnam War got hot, very hot.
>

Of course it is too late. Which army would recruit anyone who needs a
catheter to pee and must carry diapers to replace the ones that he
soils?

[SS 777]

The US journalists told the American public of what they were told Todd's
mother who did not tell them of the drive was in fact handed to her in
Singapore by the Singapore police through the presence of officials of the
US embassy in Singapore.



wrote in message
news:6f3ee8af-c10e-48c1...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

[SS 777]

The US journalists told the American public of what they were told by Todd's
mother to them in whom Todd's mother did not tell them of the drive was in

fact handed to her in Singapore by the Singapore police through the presence

of officials from the US embassy in Singapore.

When the US media and FT news media in the UK media publicized of her case
and hard drive concerned, it was not appropriate for the US embassy in
Singapore to intervene and disclose in their media accusation of the
Singapore Police for their mishandling of the evidence on site until the
corona of enquiry .

wrote in message
news:6f3ee8af-c10e-48c1...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

[ltl...@hotmail.com]

On May 24, 7:07 am, "SS 777" <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The US journalists told the American public of what they were told by Todd's
> mother to them in whom Todd's mother did not tell them of the drive was in
> fact handed to her in Singapore by the Singapore police through the presence
> of officials from the US embassy in Singapore.
>
> When the US media and FT news media in the UK media publicized of her case
> and hard drive concerned, it  was not appropriate for the US embassy in
> Singapore to intervene and disclose in their media accusation of the
> Singapore Police for their mishandling of the evidence on site until the
> corona of enquiry .

No, I am not talking about US embassy not informing the journalists. I
am talking
the journalists no reporting on Shanmugam's statement that the
external hard drive
was given to Mrs Todd in the presence of US embassy official.
>
> wrote in messagenews:6f3ee8af-c10e-48c1...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

[SS 777]

Oh I see. Wonder why their news and newspapers in the US have not covered
the reporting on Shanmugam's statement that the external hard drive was
given to Mrs. Todd in the presence of US embassy official in Singapore.

I think these US journalists who attended the Shanmugam's media statement
are still digesting it, are on the way back to US before they "work
together" to come up a media report to make the story of the Todd's
withdrawal from the corona case into face saving conclusion and closure.

[ltl...@hotmail.com]

On May 24, 10:07 am, "SS 777" <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Oh I see.   Wonder why their news and newspapers in the US have not covered
> the reporting on Shanmugam's statement that the external hard drive was
> given to Mrs. Todd in the presence of US embassy official in Singapore.
>
> I think these US journalists who attended the Shanmugam's media statement
> are still digesting it, are on the way back to US before they "work
> together" to come up a media report to make the story of the Todd's
> withdrawal from the corona case into face saving conclusion and closure.

Actually, there is not much to digest. Shanmugam's statement is an on
your
face "Mrs Todd is lying and US embassy official can prove it." The
journalists
can choose not to believe Shanmugam and call the US Embassy. The real
problem is that they choose to believe. They then have to suppress
the
statement. "Godly American mother fight evil Singapore Court" is an
inspiring
story about Americans and American values. In contrast, a title like
"Greedy
American mother falsely accused Singapore Court" is just another piece
of bad
news about America and such news article probably won't sell many
papers.
What do you think?

[rst9]

On May 24, 12:13 am, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You were in the army?

Yes, I was.

> What for when it is not mandatory.?

That shows how young you are.

Up to the time of the Vietnam War, the U.S. had what was called a
"draft".
I was drafted into the army after college graduation. I was one of
the very few enlisted men who had a college degree.

During the Vietnam War, families with money had their sons in college
so their sons won't be drafted. Sons of families had no money were
drafted to fight in Vietnam. That was why the Vietnam War was called
"a poor man's war". And their were a lot of demonstrations in
colleges where ROTC were part of the college program. In those days,
all male students under the age of 22 were required to take ROTC
classes. All land-grant colleges/universities were requirement to
offer military training for all male students under the age of 22.
Because of that, state universities became a battleground against the
draft.

As the result, after the Vietnam War, the draft was eliminated, and
ROTC were dropped completely from most colleges/universities.. Today,
you are lucky not to require to register for the draft because of the
Vietnam War.
I was lucky to serve before the Vietnam War, but I was in guided
missiles repair, My job was to protect the B-52 strategic air force
bases. So even if they send to to Vietnam War, I wouldn't be closed
enough for the Vietcong to shoot at me. Most likely I would serve in
Guam, or the Philippines, or Thailand where the B-52 air forces bases
were at that time.

> Have you fight in
> overseas enemy lands?

No, I was stationed at Loring Air Force Base in Maine, nice cold
country. Potato country during the summer time.

But later on, I worked at Pacific Missile Range where I was assigned
to work on a tracking ship, I traveled all over the Pacific Ocean for
4 years during the time of the Gemini Space Program, and the initial
stages of the Apollo program.

>
> "rst0"  wrote in message
>
> news:0a8a572e-129b-4077...@v10g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
>
> On May 23, 4:02 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > For you, they don t even want you in their army.

[rst9]

By the way, I was paid $79.00 a month initially.
My father had to send me spending money.

Today, Serving in the army is just another job.

http://www.todaysmilitary.com/military-benefits/military-compensation/results?campaign_id=SEM2012:on:google:Salary-pay_scale_military:broad

Lowest pay scale:
$17,612/yr. plus all other benefits.

[Satish]

On May 24, 9:43 am, rst9 <rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> By the way, I was paid $79.00 a month initially.
> My father had to send me spending money.
>
> Today, Serving in the army is just another job.
>

> http://www.todaysmilitary.com/military-benefits/military-compensation...

>
> Lowest pay scale:
> $17,612/yr. plus all other benefits.

Your biological father was generous beyond reason. But, then, with an
idiot like you at hand, he didn't have that many options open.

Sorry rst0/7/9, ioining the army isn't the only way to do "something
about it", that's not how the world works.

If it were, you wouldn't be whiling away your time earning 50 cents
per post from the CCP. You would have gone to islands like Taiwan,
Senkaku, Spratly or Paracel with guns in hand, the catheter in your
penis and the soiled diaper on your arsehole.

If the CCP dictatorship wants Taiwan, it can pursue the goal without
asking the PLA to start a war.

Your flippancy might earn you 50 cents from the CCP dictatorship but
not much else.

Look once again at the the photo you have posted from your younger
days. You were a CCP fan even in those days.


http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3928/chineseman.gif

That might earn you 50 cents from the CCP dictatorship but not much
else.

http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3928/chineseman.gif ;

You have no mind of your own - your mind is a slave to CCP's
imperialist designs against China's neighbors. You have sold your mind
not for the proverbial "thirty pieces of silver" but for 50 cents per
post from the CCP:

*****************
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

The 50 Cent Party are Internet commentators (网络评论员, 網絡評論員, wǎnglù
pínglùn yuán) hired by the government of the People's Republic of
China (both local and central) or the Communist Party to post comments
favorable towards party policies in an attempt to shape and sway
public opinion on various Internet message boards. The commentators
are said to be paid for every post that either steers a discussion
away from anti-party or sensitive content on domestic websites,
bulletin board systems, and chatrooms, or that advances the Communist
party line.

*******************


rst0/9, you know which side of the bread is buttered. You know enough
of the life under the Beijing regime not to relocate to the land of
your birth to live under CCP dictatorship. You will rather shack up
with your gf in USA and live off US social security checks. But you
have no qualms about turning yourself into a stooge and cheerleader of
the CCP dictatorship in Beijing. Mr. Quisling would have been proud of
you.



PRC is a one-party state. The Communist Party has a monopoly of power.
No other party/opinion is allowed to coexist.

The CCP dictatorship is much like the military dictatorship in
Myanmar. The Military had a monopoly on power. When a General retired
as the top honcho of the state, another General succeeded him.

The CCP dictatorship is no different.

And your step mother knew that too. That is why, as soon as the CCP
captured power in 1949, she had her 11 year old step son (you) flee
Mainland China. You sought refuge in USA with a "father" whom you had
never met before.

BTW, how did your absentee father impregnate your mother? Did he send
his seeds to your mother by courier service?


Before bad mouthing USA, remember, if USA had not taken on Tojo's
Japan, China would have become a part of the Japanese "co-prosperity
sphere".


PRC's colonial claim against all neighbors of the Beijing regime rest
firmly on imperialist actions of the past. It cannot be justified.
Before callingthe kettle black, the pot should look at itself more
critically. The way the CCP dictatorship is advancing its imperialist
ambitions is truly breath-taking. It has taken a lot of chutzpah for
it to carve out that U-shaped claim on the South China Sea for itself.
The whole purpose of the CCP regime's obscene claim is to claim most
of the South China Sea as its territorial waters for the purpose of
usurping the natural resources in the sea and on the sea-bed and under
for itself.

China, for example, has a long history of imperial campaigns against
Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh had led the struggle for many many years against
the French and the USA. But he well knew who were the worst enemy.That
is why he had commented at the height of his fight against French
colonial rulers, "It is better to sniff French dung for a while than
to eat Chinese dung all our lives".

CCP's imperialist campaign against its neighbors well proves how right
Ho Chi Minh was.

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

1. What do you mean by "draft"?. Is it a law that was enacted to draft any
men for national service to prepare for war with another country?

2. So, a "poor man war". you joined the army because of your family was
poor. But were you not aware that they became poorer because of you?.

3. What is ROTC?




wrote in message
news:24a62baf-2816-477a...@be10g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

So, being a veteran, have they reserved you place in Arlington National
Cemetery ?



"rst9" wrote in message
news:24a62baf-2816-477a...@be10g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...

[rst9]

On May 24, 5:58 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. What do you mean by  "draft"?.

Before the Vietnam War,every city, every small town in America had a
"draft board" to "pick" or select someone within the community to
serve in our armed forces. As a matter of fact, all American males at
age 18 or older must still register in the selective service even
today.

> Is it a law that was enacted to draft any
> men for national service to prepare for war with another country?

The words are "national emergency service".

>
> 2. So, a "poor man war". you joined the army because of your family was
> poor.

The "draft board" "selects" a person in the community.
But if the person is still in college, he has "college deferment"
which allows this person to stay in college.
If he is NOT in college, he must go. That was why it was called a
"poor man's war", the poor man has no money to stay in college which
allows this man to stay in college. And many young men escape to
Canada and Europe to get out of the draft.

When Jimmy Carter became president, he pardoned all those draft
dodgers.

> But were you not aware that they became poorer because of you?.

Explain yourself for the above sentence.

>
> 3. What is ROTC?

Reserved Officers Training Corp.
All male college students under 22 must take the first 2 years of ROTC
to graduate.
If you don't take it, you can not graduate unless you had served in
the armed forces already.
And you must present your discharge paper to get out of it.

4 years of ROTC training and you earned a commission as an officer in
the armed farces.

Where are you from? and how old are you?
If you live in the U.S. you should know all these stuff.

[rst9]

On May 24, 6:03 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, being a veteran, have they reserved you place in Arlington National
> Cemetery ?

Space in Arlington is very limited. You have to serve in war-zone to
have the honor in Arlington.

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

But were you not aware that you had made your parents poorer because of you
in having your father to send you some spending money to support your
expenditure in the army when it was their purpose of sending you to the army
was to intend you to work and earn some wages and to expect you to send back
some wage money to save them from being poor?



"rst9" wrote in message
news:2c694c80-778b-4e05...@pd6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

[rst9]

On May 24, 9:18 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But were you not aware that you had made your parents poorer because of you
> in having your father to send you some spending money to support your

A hundred dollars a month is of no consequences.

> expenditure in the army when it was their purpose of sending you to the army

My father didn't send me to the army. IT WAS A NATIONAL POLICY OF THAT
TIME.

> was to intend you to work and earn some wages and to expect you to send back
> some wage money to save them from being poor?

The pay for a draftee was never meant to build wealth. It was
spending money for all who were serving their country.
You don't get rich being an enlisted men in the armed forces.

Where are you?
You are too ignorant of the U.S. to be living in the U.S.

>
> "rst9"  wrote in message
>
> news:2c694c80-778b-4e05...@pd6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>
> By the way, I was paid $79.00 a month initially.
> My father had to send me spending money.
>
> Today, Serving in the army is just another job.
>

> http://www.todaysmilitary.com/military-benefits/military-compensation...

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

So America is so nationalistic that only those who swerved in war-zone were
eligible to be placed in Arlington National Cemetery, when they were others
doing their supporting services in the lands and seas in the outside of the
war-zone areas were not given the same accord to be placed in the Arlington
burial ground upon death.

So do you intent to be placed in US or in China?




Rt9" wrote in message
news:32118d28-a5ac-44ba...@fq2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[rst9]

On May 24, 11:00 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So America is so nationalistic that only those who swerved in war-zone were
> eligible to be placed in Arlington National Cemetery,

Today, yes, that must be a requirement for burial at Arlington.
But during the Korean War, a Black American soldier was killed in the
Korean War,
His parents wanted him to be buried at Arlington Nation Cemetery. The
families
of those buried in Arlington created a huge problem against it because
he was black.
It took an intervention by President Harry S. Truman to allow him to
be buried there.

Arlington National Cemetery was the private property of General Robert
E. Lee of the Confederacy States of America.

> when they were others
> doing their supporting services in the lands and seas in the outside of the
> war-zone areas were not given the same accord to be placed in the  Arlington
> burial ground upon death.

There are many other national cemeteries to select from.

>
> So do you intent to be placed in US or in China?

I have said many many times, I will be buried in Arizona, a place I
have always called "home".

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

"rst9" wrote in message
news:290eb9fe-03a8-421b...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 24, 11:00 pm, "Ayaz Siddiqi" <ayaz.s.sidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So America is so nationalistic that only those who swerved in war-zone
> were
> eligible to be placed in Arlington National Cemetery,

Today, yes, that must be a requirement for burial at Arlington.
But during the Korean War, a Black American soldier was killed in the
Korean War,
His parents wanted him to be buried at Arlington Nation Cemetery. The
families
of those buried in Arlington created a huge problem against it because
he was black.
It took an intervention by President Harry S. Truman to allow him to
be buried there.

Arlington National Cemetery was the private property of General Robert
E. Lee of the Confederacy States of America.

Why those who fought but not killed in war-zone but died in their retirement
back home were buried in Arlington?

Why those astronauts who died but had not fought in war-zone were buried in
Arlington?

> when they were others
> doing their supporting services in the lands and seas in the outside of
> the
> war-zone areas were not given the same accord to be placed in the
> Arlington
> burial ground upon death.

There are many other national cemeteries to select from.

So there are other national cemeteries in other States in America?.
So that means veterans have choices to choose from. But, isn't Arlington
being more famous, is naturally a choice for families of their deceased
would prefer to choose Arlington instead?.

> So do you intent to be placed in US or in China?

I have said many many times, I will be buried in Arizona, a place I
have always called "home".

So Arizona is the place where you were raised in America?. It is nearby to
California.

Life in that place at that time in those early days must be quite harsh and
lonely as it is in remote place in sparsely big area.

[BYS]

On 5/23/2013 12:52 PM, ltl...@hotmail.com wrote:
> The latest CBS report on the Shane Todd case:
>

> http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-504083_162-57585864-504083/shane-todd-update-parents-are-withdrawing-from-official-inquiry-into-sons-death-leaving-singapore/

>
> It is obvious that the report is totally one sided. It repeats Mrs
> Todd's groundless accusation against the Singaporean court system and
> at the time conveniently omits the question the Singaporean official
> had raised concerning whether Mrs Todd was telling the truth on some
> important issues.
>

> http://news.xin.msn.com/en/singapore/unfortunate-that-todd-family-chose-to-walk-out-on-inquiry-shanmugam

>
> "Mr Shanmugam said: "It would have been useful if the family had
> continued (to participate in the inquiry). I will mention two facts
> which the family's evidence would have been particularly useful.
>
> "A key point, which had been made previously, was that the family had
> said that they found the external hard drive themselves in the
> apartment and they asserted that this hard drive had been processed by
> a third party after Dr Todd's death and that hard drive contained
> important information which had been overlooked by the Singapore
> Police.
>
> "Evidence has come out that that hard drive was something which the
> police had looked at and something the police handed over to the
> family in the presence of US Embassy officials.
>
> "It would have been useful to hear the family's side as to how they
> came to a different view of the facts."
>
>

我們的李先生，現在對美國自由媒體的有色眼鏡報導新聞感到很憤怒。
不過對大陸祖國的新聞封鎖，全球知道的防火長城，在他短暫回國訪問中
證實為子虛烏有。因為他感覺到中國完全沒有新聞封鎖，報導沒有美國
今日的偏袒報導。

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

Why do you want to bury in Arizona?. Is that your hometown?

"rst9" wrote in message
news:290eb9fe-03a8-421b...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[rst9]

When life becomes a lemon, you make lemonade.
as the old saying goes.

[this is the Original Jesus Christ , the ONLY ORIGINAL SON of WHITE GOD]

You are a Cambodian. Why do you need to fake here with 118 usernames?. Why
fake your to and fro with so many usernames?. You should go back to your
Cambodian culture.


"this is the Original Jesus Christ , the ONLY ORIGINAL SON of WHITE GOD ."
wrote in message
news:ecfa43ae-6afa-4847...@fq2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

When life becomes a lemon, you make lemonade, as the old saying goes - Are
you are saying your choice of burial is decided by your existing location of
where you live. By the way, where do you live?. Is it nearby to your burial
ground in Arizona?
Rst9, is lemonade your only choice? Can you not make lemonade with lime?



"rst9" wrote in message
news:38123f86-837a-4ff9...@ua8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[Satish]

Ol' Guen Mar's heart has always been, and still is, with the CCP
dictatorship in Beijing. Regardless of what is done with the rest of
his body, rst0/7/9's heart should most certainly be buried in a
cemetery that's the last resting place for at least a few honchos of
the CCP. Needless to say, that will have to be in mainland China.

As for the grave for the rest of the body,it can be in Arizona (even
though he lives in Merced, CA). And it will be most fitting if the the
epitaph on the grave of his heartless body reads:

Lies here Yale Guen Mar with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
'This is my own, my native land!'

[rst0]

Brainless Satish Kumar has nothing better to do than making up lies
and being stooge and pawn all through his life.

[Ayaz Siddiqi]

Rst9, you live in Merced, CA? Are you?







"rst0" wrote in message
news:7ea202a0-b60f-4426...@zo5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[ltl...@hotmail.com]

On May 25, 7:13 am, BYS <B...@bys.com> wrote:
> On 5/23/2013 12:52 PM, ltl...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The latest CBS report on the Shane Todd case:
>

> >http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-504083_162-57585864-504083/shane-todd-upd...

>
> > It is obvious that the report is totally one sided. It repeats Mrs
> > Todd's groundless accusation against the Singaporean court system and
> > at the time conveniently omits the question the Singaporean official
> > had raised concerning whether Mrs Todd was telling the truth on some
> > important issues.
>

> >http://news.xin.msn.com/en/singapore/unfortunate-that-todd-family-cho...

>
> > "Mr Shanmugam said: "It would have been useful if the family had
> > continued (to participate in the inquiry). I will mention two facts
> > which the family's evidence would have been particularly useful.
>
> > "A key point, which had been made previously, was that the family had
> > said that they found the external hard drive themselves in the
> > apartment and they asserted that this hard drive had been processed by
> > a third party after Dr Todd's death and that hard drive contained
> > important information which had been overlooked by the Singapore
> > Police.
>
> > "Evidence has come out that that hard drive was something which the
> > police had looked at and something the police handed over to the
> > family in the presence of US Embassy officials.
>
> > "It would have been useful to hear the family's side as to how they
> > came to a different view of the facts."
>
> 我們的李先生，現在對美國自由媒體的有色眼鏡報導新聞感到很憤怒。
> 不過對大陸祖國的新聞封鎖，全球知道的防火長城，在他短暫回國訪問中
> 證實為子虛烏有。因為他感覺到中國完全沒有新聞封鎖，報導沒有美國
> 今日的偏袒報導。

这种不负责任的报导可能成为是将来中美战争的伏笔。

[BYS]

願聞其詳!