Holy Virging and elephant's dung defaced at Brooklyn Museum.
polin
Good evening,
The New York Post reported and illustrated today an act at the Brooklyn
Museum of defacing of a painting of Holly Virgin adorned with heaps of
elephant dung created by some African painter from London.
A few days ago I have written that our news media, {some call them 'jews
media'] perennially come up with anti-Christian slaps around Christmas
time and I gave in that essay some poignant examples. In the area of
art, about three or four years ago a Marrano painter with Italian name
was popularized in the media around Christmas time because of his
painting illustrating Crucifix submerged in a bottle half filled with
urine. That painting was clearly blasphemous.
The exposition of the offensive African Madonna was undoubtedly meant to
be such a slap and it created pro and con brouhaha in the politically
correct press.
However, despite my ferverent Catholicism I did not joined the cries of
condemnation, because as historical and holocaust revisionist I do not
express opinions based on hear says or eyewitness testimonies, unless
they can be substantiated by physical facts i.e. exhumations of mass
graves hundreds of thousands of machine-gunned Jews or wartime airphotos
showing them being burned on pyres.
In the field of art, I withdrew my opinion until the time I see the
painting myself, and I am proud of it. The painting of the Black
Madonna is ugly. She is huge busted and with equally vulgar fat Negroid
lips.
The painting is "splattered" with small and large vignettes of elephant
dung which from the distance create even pleasing pattern, reminiscent
of the the stars painted on the background of Eastern Orthodox icons, or
especially on the blue interior of the Orthodox churches.
From the distance, the elephant dung heaps appear as ill-defined
butterflies. The artist claims that he is using the decorative motive
of the elephant dung on many of his paintings, and he did not meant to
demean Christianity.
As a revisionist I have to go along with him. I think that the defacing
of this painting by an elderly retired teacher Dennis Heiner was
inappropriate. This is why:
1) While the huge lips and enormous breast are vulgar and revolting to
most Caucasoid they might be extremely appealing to Africans.
2) Customs vary. Should we be upset to see a naive and unsophisticated
Chinese to appear at the Christian funeral in a smashing white attire?
No! Because for Orientals, the white is the color of grief and
mourning.
3) In Bulgaria nodding means "no" and swaying one's neck mean's yes. We
must get used to the fact that there are various customs and cultures.
4) For thousands of years Koreans enjoy "men's best friend" meat and
some even torture them before killing ("to improve meat's taste by
subcutaneous hemorrhages or sort of in vivo tenderizing ... I, along
with Bridget Bardot fight with it). While this is repulsive to us, we
MUST understand that this is NORMAL for Koreans.
5) I am not specialist on African culture, but perhaps their mind-set is
such that they find the elephant's dung attractive ... perhaps due to
the elephantine matriarchs long term memory, power and intelligence.
I think Mr. Heider attack against the painting was misguided. I think
he should attack the Jewish administration of the Museum for presenting
the painting without any contextual explanation, in order to inflame and
irritate Christians around Christmas time.
Sincerely,
Polina Borowska.
PS
1) We all, Blacks, Orientals and Anglo-Saxons are Gods children, and,
clearly, He did not create us equal. Even among siblings we find tall
and short, smart and stupid and none should be for it persecuted.
Despite incessant attacks on Christianity and Catholicism in particular
I wish to all Merry Christmas.
2) Mr. Heider a ferverent Catholic, would better spent his energies on
the protests against Holocaustianity impounded on all Christians, than
his futile effort of defacing African Madonnas. (He nearly completely
smeared it with a white paint but the paintings was restored within an
hour)