On May 15, 1:42 am, cyberhinwa <CYBERHIN...@gmail.com> wrote:
> THIS IS A HINDU COUNTRY !!!!!!!!!!!
Irrelevant. What is relevant is that according to the Constitution, of all langauges of India, only Hindi is an official language of the Central Government.
On May 15, 1:42 am, cyberhinwa <CYBERHIN...@gmail.com> wrote:
> THIS IS A HINDU COUNTRY !!!!!!!!!!!
Sheesh! Tiresome twit, do you have caps lock on all the time? Spare us your perennial high-pitched hysteria.
I don't believe that you ever had a lesson in Civics. In fact, I don't believe that you've even been to school. God bless India! With ill- educated, intolerant, neanderthals like you, the country does not really need any enemies. You could have come up with a semi-coherent argument about why you agree or disagree with the original poster's (or at least Mr. Unni's via the URL) contention. Instead you decided to just bang away on your keyboard to come up with one irrelevant line - what has "Hindu Country" (sic) got to do use of "Hindi" in Parliament? Did you even bother to read the article (i.e., follow the URL), or did you decide that you wanted to vent your spleen with a one- liner anyway, bloody git?
My take on Mr.Unni's contention, I think that some Indians (from all States) are a real thin-skinned, hypersensitive lot about languages, and perceive insults in the smallest things. I couldn't really give a rat about about which language got how much air time in Parliament - the debate content in the limited air time is more important than the language used to express it. What I do care about is the lack of will and good faith on the Union Government's part to ensure availability of translators, esp. when the parliament is in session. I strongly believe that the "lack of applicants excuse" is a canard. After all, where there is a will there is way. A good pay with assured short-term accommodation could work, no? I think it is either sheer laziness (highly likely) or utter contempt (somewhat likely) on the part of the "babus" (culturally a breed apart although they could be from the north, south, east, or west in India).
Think you can understand this "Cyberhinwa"? If so, please do reply, preferably without caps lock on. If you feel like replying like a uncivilized idiot, you will treated accordingly.
> On May 15, 1:42 am, cyberhinwa <CYBERHIN...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > THIS IS A HINDU COUNTRY !!!!!!!!!!!
> Sheesh! Tiresome twit, do you have caps lock on all the time? Spare us > your perennial high-pitched hysteria.
> I don't believe that you ever had a lesson in Civics. In fact, I don't > believe that you've even been to school. God bless India! With ill- > educated, intolerant, neanderthals like you, the country does not > really need any enemies. You could have come up with a semi-coherent > argument about why you agree or disagree with the original poster's > (or at least Mr. Unni's via the URL) contention. Instead you decided > to just bang away on your keyboard to come up with one irrelevant line > - what has "Hindu Country" (sic) got to do use of "Hindi" in > Parliament? Did you even bother to read the article (i.e., follow the > URL), or did you decide that you wanted to vent your spleen with a one- > liner anyway, bloody git?
> My take on Mr.Unni's contention, I think that some Indians (from all > States) are a real thin-skinned, hypersensitive lot about languages, > and perceive insults in the smallest things. I couldn't really give a > rat about about which language got how much air time in Parliament - > the debate content in the limited air time is more important than the > language used to express it. What I do care about is the lack of will > and good faith on the Union Government's part to ensure availability > of translators, esp. when the parliament is in session. I strongly > believe that the "lack of applicants excuse" is a canard. After all, > where there is a will there is way. A good pay with assured short-term > accommodation could work, no? I think it is either sheer laziness > (highly likely) or utter contempt (somewhat likely) on the part of the > "babus" (culturally a breed apart although they could be from the > north, south, east, or west in India).
> Think you can understand this "Cyberhinwa"? If so, please do reply, > preferably without caps lock on. If you feel like replying like a > uncivilized idiot, you will treated accordingly.
> On May 15, 1:36 pm, The Deep <dinpra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 15, 1:42 am, cyberhinwa <CYBERHIN...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > THIS IS A HINDU COUNTRY !!!!!!!!!!!
> > Sheesh! Tiresome twit, do you have caps lock on all the time? Spare us > > your perennial high-pitched hysteria.
> > I don't believe that you ever had a lesson in Civics. In fact, I don't > > believe that you've even been to school. God bless India! With ill- > > educated, intolerant, neanderthals like you, the country does not > > really need any enemies. You could have come up with a semi-coherent > > argument about why you agree or disagree with the original poster's > > (or at least Mr. Unni's via the URL) contention. Instead you decided > > to just bang away on your keyboard to come up with one irrelevant line > > - what has "Hindu Country" (sic) got to do use of "Hindi" in > > Parliament? Did you even bother to read the article (i.e., follow the > > URL), or did you decide that you wanted to vent your spleen with a one- > > liner anyway, bloody git?
> > My take on Mr.Unni's contention, I think that some Indians (from all > > States) are a real thin-skinned, hypersensitive lot about languages, > > and perceive insults in the smallest things. I couldn't really give a > > rat about about which language got how much air time in Parliament - > > the debate content in the limited air time is more important than the > > language used to express it. What I do care about is the lack of will > > and good faith on the Union Government's part to ensure availability > > of translators, esp. when the parliament is in session. I strongly > > believe that the "lack of applicants excuse" is a canard. After all, > > where there is a will there is way. A good pay with assured short-term > > accommodation could work, no? I think it is either sheer laziness > > (highly likely) or utter contempt (somewhat likely) on the part of the > > "babus" (culturally a breed apart although they could be from the > > north, south, east, or west in India).
> > Think you can understand this "Cyberhinwa"? If so, please do reply, > > preferably without caps lock on. If you feel like replying like a > > uncivilized idiot, you will treated accordingly.
> > Cheers > > Dinesh
> I hope you are from Hawai in another name.
I have absolutely no clue what the above statement means. Could you be a little less cryptic? Thanks