TRIAL FOR HIGH TREASON? FAILURE TO PROTECT THORIUM AND RAMASETU
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
Forwarded message from S. Kalyanaraman
[ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007
Trial for high treason? Failure to protect thorium and
Ramasetu
Upcoming trial for high treason? Failure to protect thorium
and Ramasetu
Mirrored at:
http://hinduthought.googlepages.com/thoriumramsetu.doc
If the nuke deal is forced in the present form, ignoring
the advice of Bharatam's nuclear scientists, try Sonia
Maino and Manmohan Singh for high treason, says Prof. Monu
Nalapat:
[quote] India: US ally or target? Manmohan stealthily works
India's nuclear surrender
By M. D. Nalapat
April 1, 2007
...Fortunately for their name in posterity, the country's
official nuclear establishment has explicitly raised
serious technical objections and efforts by Manmohan Singh
and Montek Ahluwalia to crush on behalf of Sonia Maino have
thus far failed...Given Sonia-Manmohan's demonstrated
aversion to India's nuclear weapons, the UPA seems on
course to destroy forty years of scientific attainment in
pulling down India to the level desired by Bush under GNEP,
that of Lesotho or Laos. The servitude of Sonia-Manmohan to
the diktat of Bush is evident in their acceptance of a
conditional engagement with the US, where India is clearly
being treated as a non-nuclear weapons state (NNWS) under
the NPT. In retrospect it appears that to make this bitter
pill easier to swallow, the first Joint Statement made by
both sides on July 18, 2005 was couched in misleading
language that could be twisted to mean that India would be
treated as a Nuclear Weapons State (NWS), when every action
of both governments has been to belie this assumption,
which even the present writer made in the heady days before
September 2005, when scientists first met him to explain
just how the pact was ruinous to India's strategic future.
Through the months that followed, all discussions were
concealed even from Parliament and much of the Union
Cabinet, in contrast to the transparency shown by the US
side...After the initial lapse from candour, George W. Bush
has to his credit been clear and consistent in his
determination to rid India of an independent deterrent and
thorium-based technology. The Indian position has been
deliberately made murky, given the lack of an adequate
official response to recent statements made by the US that
have described the proposed "strategic" partnership for
what it is -- a non-proliferation mechanism intended to bring
India into the now tattered NPT fold as a non-nuclear
weapons state. Should Congress finally get their way and
force this agreement on the nation, not only should the
pact be torn up by the successor government, but both
should be prosecuted for high treason.
In the present discussions for a bilateral agreement
between unequals, one core demand of the Indian scientific
establishment is our right to re-process spent fuel with
our own technology. This was made clear to the Bush Babies
at the earliest stages of the negotiations itself, as the
prohibition on doing so strikes at the very heart of
India's future energy security (the three-stage thorium
cycle).
What Bush seeks is to trap India into an endless uranium
demand-and-supply loop, which apart from keeping the
powerful international uranium lobby happy, would serve as
a useful controlling mechanism for bringing India to heel.
The often-sabotaged efforts (as any perusal of the files
will show, Montek and Manmohan were especially zealous in
their efforts at choking off funding to key projects,
including uranium mining) to achieve the commercialization
of a thorium-based programme would fly in the face of
international uranium interests (which the US has long
sought to control) while simultaneously helping this
country to becoming a future global contender for the
supply of both nuclear fuel and cutting edge indigenous
technology. Small wonder Sonia Maino Gandhi is upset at
such a prospect, and has got articulated the Jean Dreze
view that India should perennially remain an international
strategic pygmy... Without effective indigenous R&D, India
will forever be condemned to remain a technology slave of
nations such as Germany and Japan.
If Sonia-Manmohan have their way and a political decision
is taken to accept the US pact, enemies of India within and
without can rejoice at a technological and intelligence
coup that will ensure that India remains mired in an
endless import cycle for conventional technologies
associated with the previous century. Clearly, for the
"Hero of Iraq", George W. Bush, India is not a strategic
ally but a target.
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic?modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=177&page=2
[unquote]
Failure to protect thorium and Ramsetu (intertwined earth
science phenomena)
The extraordinary fact that the largest reserves of thorium
in the world occur on Kerala sands should force a pause in
studying, examining, exploring and evaluating the
geological forces and ocean currents at work in
accumulating these placer deposits which are vital for the
nation's nuclear programme. Any project in the region
should be subjected first to this imperative study and
evaluation.
http://maritime.haifa.ac.il/departm?lessons/ocean?wwr205.gif
This map shows the unique phenomenon of two ocean currents
in two opposing direcions operating like a cyclotron/sieve
to isolate heavier minerals with heavy atomic weights such
as Thorium 232 and Titanium.
The extraordinary monograph by Prof. Monu Nalapat, Prof. of
Geopolitics in Manipal University. Congratulations to Prof.
Nalapat for the forthrightness and clarity in unraveling
the shocking sell-out of the national interests, national
integrity and national security of Bharatam, ignoring the
sage advise of the nation's foremost nuclear scientists.
[quote] The Indian position has been deliberately made
murky, given the lack of an adequate official response to
recent statements made by the US that have described the
proposed "strategic" partnership for what it is -- a non-
proliferation mechanism intended to bring India into the
now tattered NPT fold as a non-nuclear weapons state.
Should Congress finally get their way and force this
agreement on the nation, not only should the pact be torn
up by the successor government, but both should be
prosecuted for high treason. [unquote]
The issue of thorium as the nuclear fuel which will unleash
the nuclear potential of Bharatam has been underscored in
the BARC website. One of the principal earth science
reasons for the accumulation of thorium resources on Kerala
beaches is the oscillating, sieving action of the ocean
currents around Ramasetu. Incursive channel in an
arbitrarily drawn medial line between Bharatam and Srilanka
as a defacto boundary of international waters, discarding
the age-old rights as 'historic waters' under the UN Law of
the Sea, is a serious dereliction of responsibility on the
part of the Sethusamudram Channel Project designers. PM and
UPA Chairperson have to explain to the nation for the undue
haste and carelessness in choosing an alignment impacting
on Ramsethu while five other alternative channels closer to
the Bharatam coastline were available. Was the new,
arbitrarily drawn medial line as the channel alignment
influenced by US Navy Operational Directives of 23 June
2005? Is it mere coincidence that the inauguration of SSCP
takes place within a week thereafter, on 2 July 2005
ignoring the imperative subjecting the impact of a future
tsunami on the integrity of the coastline if the present
chosen alignment is implemented? Together with the
destruction of Kerala, will it impact on the harnessing of
the thorium resource as the foundation fuel for the nuclear
programme of Bharatam? As the trial for treason unravels,
in case Bharatam succumbs to US geopolitical pressures, a
lot of questions will have to be raised and answered. Was
the PM satisfied by the answers (provided on 30 June 2005)
to the 16 questions raised by PMO on 8 March 2005?
Something is fishy in the state of Bharatam.
Glossary entry: Adam. ..."Narrow ridge of sand and rocks
mostly dry, nearly closing the Gulf of mannar on the north
and north-east. Western extremity joins the eastern point
of Rameshwaram island; eastern extremity joins the eastern
point of Mannar island; with these two islands it almost
connects Ceylon with peninsula. Called the bridge of Rama
by Bramins, as along it Rama sided by Hanooman with his his
host of monkeys marched when invading Ceylon. It really
joined Ceylon to India until 1480, when a breach was made
through rocks during a storm. A subsequent storm enlarged
this and foot traffic then ceased...Partly above and partly
below water; but when covered has now here above three or
four feet of water... " (Source: CD Maclean (ed.), 1903,
Manual of the Administration of the Madras Presidency, Vol.
III, Glossary, Madras, Superintendent Government Press;
repr. AES, 1983, New Delhi).
Scientific evidences point to human activity in ancient
times on both sides of Ramsetu as found by Dept. of Earth
Sciences and ocean technologists of Bharatam. This area
should be declared a protected monument under the
Protection of Monuments Act and declared as a World
Heritage site by the Govt. of India and advised to
UNESCO...
[quote]... During the glacial Maxima, the sea level was
about 130 m lower than what is today. This is evidenced
both on the east and west coast of India, where submerged
Corals occur around 1 to 2m water depths and they are clear
indicators of near coastal zone... However, during the last
ice age (18,000 year BP) the entire area from India to Shri
Lanka and further south and southeast were contagious land
due to the highly lowered sea level. As and when there were
major melting of glaciers both from the mountains as well
as from the Antarctic area, the sea level was rising. These
features were well recorded and studied by several
submerged Coral formations all over the world. About 7,300
years BP the sea level in the southern part of India was
about 3.5 m above the present level. This has been
deciphered by Dr.P.K.Banerjee, who studied Corals that
found in the land part as of Pamban, Rameswaram, and
Tuticorin etc. Subsequently the sea level went down and
rose +2m above than what is today between 5000 to 4000
years B.P... In almost of all the boreholes between 4.5 and
7.5m the borehole intersected hard formations, which have
been found to be calcareous sand stones and corals. It is
to be pointed out here that Corals are comparatively less
dense, compact and somewhat easy to carry. The Corals
normally grow atop compact to hard formations for the
purpose of stability, and as the sea level rises, the Coral
colony grows up vertically to maintain water depth of 1 to
2 m, which is essential for their survival. It is always
observed that these Corals have continuous vertical growth
like Lakshadweep, Andaman's, and Gulf Of Mannar Natural
Park. These have always been found to grow on hard rock
bottom. In the case of Adams bridge area we observe that
the Coral formations hardly occur 1 to 2.5m in length and
resting on loose marine sands. Most of these coral rock
pieces are seem to be rounded pebbles of corals. These
things appear to point these coral rock pieces and pebbles
have been transported and placed in these areas. Since the
calcareous sand stones and Corals are less dense than
normal hard rock and quite compact, probably these were
used by the ancients to form a connecting link to Shri
Lanka, on the higher elevations of the Adams bridge ridge
and this is analogous to modern day causeway. In support of
these observations there are many archaeological and
geoarchaeological evidences on the south east coast of
India around Rameswaram, Tuticorin and the western coast of
Shri Lanka. There are raised Teri formations that supported
a rich assemblage of mesolithic -- microlithic tools
indicating the presence of strong human habitation and
activity in these areas as early as 8000 to 9000 years B.P
and as recent as 4000 years B.P. On Shri Lanka side there
are indications of human habitation extending to late
Pleistocene (about 13,000 B.P) based on bone and fossils of
human and animal form. All these point to a flourishing
human activity on both side of Adams Bridge and probably
when the sea levels were just right the link between India
and Shri Lanka could have been established. [unquote]
Source: Dept. of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India (March
2007)
http://hinduthought.googlepages.com/
Importance of Thorium for Bharat, f rom BARC website:
Thorium deposits - ~ 3,60,000 tonnes
o The currently known Indian thorium reserves amount to
358,000 GWe-yr of electrical energy and can easily meet the
energy requirements during the next century and beyond.
o India 's vast thorium deposits permit design and
operation of U-233 fuelled breeder reactors.
o These U-233/Th-232 based breeder reactors are under
development and would serve as the mainstay of the final
thorium utilization stage of the Indian nuclear programme.
http://www.barc.ernet.in?webpages?about/anu1.htm
The US study can be downloaded from
www.carnegieendowment.org/publications
Tellis notes that India reserves f 78,000 metric tons of
uranium.
o eight reactors allocating a quarter of their cores for
the production of weapons-grade material, uranium needed
would be: 19,965 to 29,124 tons. T two research reactors
will need 938 to 1,088 tons.
o These would yield India 12,135 to 13,370 kilograms of
weapons-grade plutonium. o Thorium blanket as fuel will
be the nuclear fuel of the future for Bharatam, which has
the largest reserves of thorium in the world. A team of
scientists led by Dr. VJ Loveson of the CISR New Delhi,
studying placer deposits in the area, says an estimated 40
million tonnes of Titanium alone has been deposited in the
entire stretch of 500 km. coastline.
Bye-bye to historic waters
US Navy operational directive, 23 June 2005: Historic
waters, intl. Waters; 30 June 2005, Chairman TCPT replies
to PMO; 2 July 2005, inauguration. The haste is fishy.
Aug 76 Act No. 80 Enables government to declare waters as
historic. June 79 Law No. 41
Waters of Palk Bay between coast and boundary with Shri
Lanka claimed as internal waters; waters of Gulf of Mannar
between coast and maritime boundayr claimed as historic
waters. This claim is not recognized by the United States.
US conducted operational assertions in 1993 and 1994, to
Gulf of Mannar claim in 1999 (jiski laathi uski bhains;
tadi eduttasvan tandalkaaran). UN Conf. on the Law of the
Sea (1958), Convention of the Territorial Sea and and
contiguous zone recognizes HISTORIC waters Agreement
between Shri Lanka and India on the Maritime Boundary
between the two countries in the Gulf of Mannar and the Bay
of Bengal and Related Matters 23 March 1976 on Historic
Waters.
Implications of intrusive identification of 'international
waters boundary' drawn by Sonia Maino-Manmohan.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline?fl2201/images?20050114005902402.jpg
U. Arulanandam, President, Singaravelar Fishermen's Forum :
the project is being implemented to enforce the
international boundary line in the waters.
Once the canal is a reality, it will become an unofficial
boundary line on the sea between India and Shri Lanka.
Fisherpeople are afraid: the catch is that it is in the
Shri Lankan waters that fish thrive. The canal would seal
their entry into those waters for fishing.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline?fl2201/stories?20050114005902400.htm
End of forwarded message from S. Kalyanaraman
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/yhjyp5
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
crushdbox
> If the nuke deal is forced in the present form, ignoring
> the advice of Bharatam's nuclear scientists, try Sonia
> Maino and Manmohan Singh for high treason, says Prof. Monu
How does it goes...
well... whatever:
http://click.adultsingles.com/partner/click.asp?id=72473&site=ads&typ=click
...
the idea is to get settled
not affected