Re: 25-year-old massacre haunts India's Sikhs
uNmaiviLambi
> Not what was asked. From the list above, what in fact do you do? How
> about in your home? It is not about food traditions.
I cannot ever eat if I am given food that I do not consider edible and
ethical. Nor would a muslim eat pork
I do not mind eating with a muslim in my home.
I answered your questions. Cant help if you are not satisfied
hari....@indero.com
=A0Ho=
w
> about in your home? =A0It is not about food traditions.
"I cannot ever eat if I am given food that I do not consider edible and
ethical. Nor would a muslim eat pork
I do not mind eating with a muslim in my home.
I answered your questions. Cant help if you are not satisfied"
The test was to see if in fact you do have social interactions over a
meal in either house. Eating is a situation of equals sitting down in
an intimate social setting. I do not care what either has as a food
tradition.
So the answer is no, you do not have social interaction with muslims in
adomestic setting. One might guess that on an individual basis as equal
to equal and with all of the humanity and concern one for another you
have little to do with muslims. One might guess to you all of them,
individual or collectively, are a monolithic "other" not quite as equal
as you nor not quite as humane nor moral nor of a character every bit as
good as your own.
In fact one might well guess that you have no idea as to their thoughts
and response to islam, or absence thereof as well. That you are in the
dark as to their thoughts about the radical islamic elements who are as
equally bad as are the radical nationalists in india. Further you are
fully ignorant of the interpretations of islam that would be the equal
in every way to your own as to humanity and moral behavior toward
others.
You blather on about food instead.
uNmaiviLambi
> > Not what was asked. =A0From the list above, what in fact do you do?
> The test was to see if in fact you do have social interactions over a
> meal in either house. Eating is a situation of equals sitting down in
> an intimate social setting. I do not care what either has as a food
> tradition.
Nonsense. So you will eat shit if some one gives you!
hari....@indero.com
do?
> The test was to see if in fact you do have social interactions over a
> meal in either house. =A0Eating is a situation of equals sitting down
in
> an intimate social setting. =A0I do not care what either has as a food
> tradition.
"Nonsense. So you will eat shit if some one gives you!"
Avoiding the point, it was a test of you to see if muslims are known to
you on an individual and equal socially intimate basis or merely on the
stereotypical "other" into which all manner of foolishness is too often
poured.
We have our answer.
As for eating shit, if one eats in many places in india one eats it
daily. It is in the grain and rice and lentiles and other such foods as
rodent and insect shit and it is on and in many other vegetable foods
because human and animal shit is used to fertilize the fields and
polluted by human shit water to water crops.
uNmaiviLambi
> > > Not what was asked. =3DA0From the list above, what in fact do you
> As for eating shit, if one eats in many places in india one eats it
> daily. It is in the grain and rice and lentiles and other such foods as
> rodent and insect shit and it is on and in many other vegetable foods
> because human and animal shit is used to fertilize the fields and
> polluted by human shit water to water crops.
So for you eating shit as a meal is showing socially intimate basis!
because sometimes rice may have contaminarion, eating aplate of shit
is fine for you!!
hari....@indero.com
foods a=
s
> rodent and insect shit and it is on and in many other vegetable foods
> because human and animal shit is used to fertilize the fields and
> polluted by human shit water to water crops.
So for you eating shit as a meal is showing socially intimate basis!
"because sometimes rice may have contaminarion, eating aplate of shit is
fine for you!!"
Not sometimes, on a regular basis; don't forget the rest of the food
supply for reasons mentioned on a regular basis also.
There is nothing to preclude being socially intimate while consuming
shit, it is illustrated in millions upon of millions of homes daily.
ModerateMallu
Finally some candor and honesty from the swamp critter. You finally
admitted that you are so full of (**)it.
To misquote "Seshappa Ayyer" from "Romeo and Juliet" (Act II/Scene II)
"What's in a 'label?' that which we call (**)it,
By any other word would smell..."
uNmaiviLambi
> hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
> Finally some candor and honesty from the swamp critter. You finally
> admitted that you are so full of (**)it.
You noticed that some one loves excreta so much! He thinks it is okay
to eat a plateful to show social intimacy
hari....@indero.com
> admitted that you are so full of (**)it.
"You noticed that some one loves excreta so much! He thinks it is okay
to eat a plateful to show social intimacy"
Smile, taking great amusement when those who have in the end only silly
word play left them for some small support.
The reality of the extent of shit eating in india, and other places for
that matter, is something they would rather not consider. But when it
was brought up as a slander, one thinks a bit of reality has served its
purpose as we see to what they are reduced.
Now getting back to the topic, to what degree is your information about
muslims based on tea house sterotypes and upon knowing on the basis as
would be found when eating and visiting exchanges would provide.
We have the answer by already, and as seen that the shit slander is the
only response to that reality.
Their viewsof the "other", in this example muslims, is of the tea house
variety and not of the human to human variety.
Returning to the original post an important lesson is learned. When
this is the case the "other" can easily be made less then human and to
less then humans all manner of evil is all the more easily excused.