Received: by 10.68.230.98 with SMTP id sx2mr6977333pbc.1.1336162071335;
        Fri, 04 May 2012 13:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path: pr3ni4184pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "bmo...@nyx.net" <bmo...@nyx.net>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.singapore,soc.culture.malaysia,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: What other choice does he has? Blind Chen is a mere pawn in this
 US game in China...US lost. Chen lost (May be US provocateur will arrange for
 him to be killed....to create social unrest China)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <4adc46a1-624c-458b-a822-ab54a6fd2f53@m13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References: <jnqqed$h0a$1@dont-email.me> <97f98c67-c205-48d2-ac65-d8934853073c@2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <c2186e58-42b0-4434-ad63-df7e2db0fbb3@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>
 <69f92a6a-8d7a-4ac3-9761-5a3eb9f58cae@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <jnt45o$g6m$1@dont-email.me> <62456e3b-6a3b-4665-be48-223a079006a9@c4g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <jnul5b$3ia$1@dont-email.me> <fdd80d0b-db73-48f5-8f05-a5dbaeac176a@y3g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <jnv9ig$qko$1@dont-email.me> <c5a6dc3c-7a05-4d3f-a383-d75907a4f546@q24g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
 <jo1aek$n9p$2@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.182.56.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1336162071 12123 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2012 20:07:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 20:07:51 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=198.182.56.5; posting-account=uS2ZEAoAAADkO_NCIqKMiPP4yKkLnhs3
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 localhost.localdomain 0A0C8821
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 4, 12:25=A0pm, TheInquirer <alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> On 4/05/2012 9:19 AM, bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
>
> > That would be silly. Anyone who almost always defends something and
> > doesn't respond to rational discourse is an apologist.
>
> does your "rational discourse" include considering things from your
> enemy's point of view, or is it merely justifying your own point of view
> with your own point of view (a thinly-veiled form of circular logic used
> by Baldeagle)?
>
> why are you like Baldeagle? =A0i thought you are better?

I don't use circular logic. You must be misunderstanding. Rational
discourse is about honest discussion from the POV of truth. There is
truth. The sky is blue, for example. It's not all relative to a POV.