ET Interstellar UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac of Venus
Brad Guth
in plain sight, as situated right up next to a fairly substantial
township that seems to have it's fair share of nearby reservoirs,
multiple high-rise structures, somewhat interesting roadbed and/or
railbed like attributes and otherwise more than it's fair share of
large circular/dish-like formations that are seemingly nowhere other to
being identified throughout the same format of satellite visualized
geology maps of places other than as existing upon Earth, such as a
substantial canyon/rille requiring of all things a bridge, along with
those equally massive nearby rock quarry sites and, there's even
something of good size that looks a little rigid-airship like. There's
even an interesting natural wonder of a massive fluid/mud like arch
that'll absolutely knock whatever's left of your socks off, and so much
more.
Unlike stealth/invisible WMD observationology that's not only entirely
bogus from the very get-go, thus sucks especially bad if you're Muslim,
whereas of what's to being realized as situated upon Venus isn't of
bogus observations nor of intentionally skew interpretations. The
tarmac isn't merely a simplistic flat zone that's situated all by
itself in some god forsaken mountainous terrain, as this one includes
those somewhat unusual shaped sub-bays and the overall rational
alignments with the surrounding terrain as well as for it's close
association with the nearby township that's fairly obvious, that is
unless you're one of those intellectually blind brown-nosed and thus
sanctimonious all-knowing bigots of the mainstream status quo that
actually sees WMD hidden under every Muslim oily rock.
If you've ever suggested as having some expertise in PhotoShop image
processing, and as such I certainly could use your expertise and
valuable assistance since my version of such photo software and PC
capability is rather outdated. For the sport and/or good intentions of
it all, would you mind accomplishing a little B&W/8-bit worth of image
processing on behalf of just a small portion of an image that'll match
up with the area of Venus which I believe has been worth another good
look-see and better image processing effort. If you could resample the
small cropped area rather than attempt to photo process upon the entire
image should allow your better software and most likely newer than my
computer to generate an even better result in less time.
The original and official Magellan image:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
The slight area of what's been most interesting represents less than
10% of this very official Magellan image, that of a highly mountainous
and thus elevated terrain that's situated roughly less than a third of
the way up from the bottom and just to the right of center, although
I'd advise that you should first study the entire image as is, in order
to get a learning-curve grip upon what the 12 looks/pixel having 8-bits
worth of what this Magellan/SAR image has to offer. This composite
image was obtained at a 43° perspective view of radar illuminating and
thus allowing a nearly 3D like presentation of the Venus surface,
whereas at the 1:1 pixel resolution is quite large at 225 meters/pixel,
but try not to let such scale of that resolution fool whatever's left
of your brain until after having a good overall image look-see before
focusing down upon the relatively small portion that I'd very much like
your best effort at photo polishing to whatever the best and honest
level that yourself and that of your latest PhotoShop applied efforts
can accomplish. Then we should share images and talk about the
subjectively interpretive specifics of what our ET Gods have allowed to
coexist upon Venus.
Instead of our having to process upon the entire image, try cropping
out this small area (extracting as little as 5% of the entire image)
and at first try resampling that portion at not more than 3X, meaning
this would offer the cropped image with having 9 times as many pixels
to work with (4X=16 fold pixels and so forth), then using the PhotoShop
or whatever "unsharp mask" along with trying out a few other image
filtering process steps and viable (non-distorting) enhancements should
start to accomplish at least as good as if not somewhat better results
than what I've managed (don't over magnify because, everything gets too
pixelated for the average eye and brain to interpret right off the
bat), though easier said than done at first unless you're near-expert
with using PhotoShop enlarging that can otherwise be intentionally
distorted well beyond the point of no-return.
Thus far the orchestrated opposition to whatever's Venus or of ETs as
well as to their being very much anti-God haven't bothered to put-up or
shut-up as to their supposed superior observationally as having
contributed squat. Of course, that's because they're all nothing but
the worst possible LLPOF intellectual bigots (incest cloned borgs) with
all of their perpetrated cold-war ulterior motives and hidden agendas
to boot, thus about as anti-science as they've been anti-truth seeking
as to accepting only whatever supports their pagan notions of our
singular existence and thus excluding whatever's ET remains as their
status quo priority without a stitch of remorse.
~
Life on Venus includes your basic Township, Bridge & Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Russian/Chinese LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
A few other sub-topics of interest by Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
Brad Guth
status quo inability as to share and share alike by way of their not
delivering whatever's supposedly their better math and/or of whatever
better hard-science is merely proving that the mainstream status quo
borg collective of MI5/NSA(MI6) is as usual nothing but another
butt-load of absolute incest infested cesspool worth of
disinformation-R-us moles and spooks working on behalf of our very own
NASA moderated and thus skewed world as having been cloaking on behalf
of running humanity amuck. Talk about more of the same infomercial
dog-wagging spin and hype worth of LLPOF damage-control and, that of
sustaining an ongoing perpetrated cold-war that sucks. However, it
seems their latest WMD version of WAG-THE-DOG actually sucks and blows
blood and guts of the innocent and at the remorseless expense of our
environment at the same time.
The entire mainstream collective lies, just as they've lied from the
very get-go and thus apparently we've nearly all become nothing but a
pathetic bunch hypocrite bloody liars that'll knowingly lie our
stinking global energy dominating butts off rather than include a gram
worth of the truth, nor show a stitch worth of remorse. Thus no wonder
it's been anti-ET as well as anti-God all the way into the nearest
space-toilet of continued nondisclosure and disinformation whenever the
usual evidence exclusion method isn't sufficient.
Interesting as to taking further notice as to all of the USENET forum
of incest borgism that's responsible for their creating all of those
nifty text format distortions as though some GOOGLE V-Chip ET form of
AI is hard at their collective damage-control and/or banishment
(evidence exclusion) work whenever I've discussed or shared upon the
likes of whatever's regarding ice in space, the vast He3/fusion and
other energy as related to our moon or, God forbid upon a few other
significant topics regarding other life as having been coexisting upon
Venus seems to remain as an absolute taboo no-no, especially if there's
any possible shred of truth or God forbid any remorse getting involved.
Of course I'm also that village idiot messenger of that highly apparent
fool on the hill that's 100+% anti-Bush and thus anti-LLPOF as well as
anti blood-letting while otherwise being entirely pro-environment to
boot, so that obviously makes myself into the worst possible bad-guy
and otherwise the worst possible messenger and/or horn-blower from
hell.
BTW; besides my USENET access having been remotely sequestered into a
crawling mode if working at all, and of my closing comments and
associated links being all that's ever displayed within the USENET
topic index page, it seems of these all or nothing global warming and
fuzzy days is becoming more and most often where my PC frequently goes
down in flames from all the overloads of the usual MI5/NSA(MI6) usenet
spermware accomplishing as much internet obstructions, diversions and
internal damage as possible, thus I'm often having to reboot in order
to purge and clean out their infections spermware and having to reboot
again for good measure, has having become a regular process of
resolving what the mainstream status quo has been capable of doing to
any of our computers and/or per getting their incest sperm deep into
damaging and/or extracting corporate files to almost any extent they
want to. I actually have loads of ongoing proof-positive of this that's
sitting right on my desk, and yourself as well as most anyone can stop
by for a first hand look see. Thus apparently I'm the one that's
telling the truth and nothing but the truth, whereas
they(MI5/NSA~CIA/FBI and thus MI6 and NASA) are not about to tell us
anything except MOS dog-wagging LLPOF disinformation-R-us and
infomercial hype crapolla.
Since I'm a real person with an actual real street address, real phone
number and perfectly real email accounts that are usually kept chuck
full of badly infected and/or the most disgusting forms of smut and
disinformation that only further proves that I'm right, and because I
actually have that real phone number to boot while having no such cloak
and dagger aspects of having prevented honest folks from identifying
and/or communicating with myself, and since I'll always read whatever's
appropriately forwarded and/or answer whatever's being called to my
attention, thus unlike your cloak and dagger self, there's no good
reason(s) as to why I can't be reached, other than the ongoing
damage-control of disinformation crapolla as being MI5/NSA(MI6) and
NASA orchestrated and having been deployed on behalf of keeping those
perpetrated cold-wars and apparently dozens of LLPOF lids on tight.
~
Life on Venus, a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus a few other sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
In closing; please take note that our MI5/NSA~NASA sucks, GW Bush
clearly sucks and the whole damn American/British worth of blood and
oil sucking bunch of incest cloned borgs sucks and blows far worse off
than the likes of Hitler or even of Popes going absolutely postal over
Cathars.
William Mook
Duncan Young
It has been god-knows how many years and you are still not using the
full resolution data of Lo Shen Vallis.
Enjoy.
Left look at 43 degrees:
<http://tinyurl.com/d9ctt>
Left look at 22 degrees:
<http://tinyurl.com/bvkjb>
Right look at 25 degrees:
<http://tinyurl.com/86kbf>
Brad Guth
Thanks again for all the positive feedback that's certainly helpful
though somewhat contributing squat.
A long time ago I had my look-see at those individual images of roughly
75 m/pixel and, I still happen to enjoy the 12 look/pixel composite
because it's obviously 3 times as believable though obviously of
somewhat piss poor resolution unless we're identifying upon really
massive structures and rational community like attributes that simply
should not be there to begin with.
Left look at 43 degrees:
<http://tinyurl.com/d9ctt>
Left look at 22 degrees:
<http://tinyurl.com/bvkjb>
Right look at 25 degrees:
<http://tinyurl.com/86kbf>
The original composite and official Magellan image at roughly 225 m and
12 looks/pixel:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
BTW; since you're so gosh darn smart and all-knowing, as such don't you
have a PhotoShop effort on anything to contribute?
How about contributing something/anything from a similar imaging format
of whatever's existing upon Earth that looks quite structurally
artificial and/or community like but actually isn't?
How about the 'FLUID ARCH' item that by my limited accounting offers a
perfectly natural though quite large form of interesting geology,
hydraulics and subsequent erosion in action?
What's the Venus EXPRESS radar image resolution going to deliver?
~
Life on Venus, a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
Duncan Young
There are just as many independent coherent looks in each FMAP pixel
as there are in each C1-MIDR pixel; the C1 product is derived from the
full resolution data by a straightforward incoherent averaging of the
linearized power.
>What's the Venus EXPRESS radar image resolution going to deliver
Alas, the proposed VENSIS radar was dropped from VEX after JPL backed
out - so there will be no new radar data from Venus for quite a while.
While VEX and MESSENGER may do some IR imaging of the surface,
scattering means you cant see much below 100 km across.
Brad Guth
Thanks for that terrific feedback as to the Russian/ESA Venus EXPRESS
mission backing out of obtaining such terrific SAR images at the mere
request of our NASA, of their excluding the latest of improved radar
imaging capability which apparently neither ESA nor Russia knows
anything about accomplishing nor utilizing such technology, which seems
rather gosh darn odd since the current level of such technology is so
bought and paid for, as in somewhat within existing inventory. Is this
the same reason why the ESA SMART-1 mission is so technically
dumbfounded, as in nondisclosure about their depicting images of all
those supposed Apollo landing sites, that which so happen to look
exactly like meteor impacts?
Actually, your previous positive contribution as to the PDS
Map-A-Planet resource that gives us the new and improved
end-user-friendly access to the maximum available resolution is still
of exactly what I'd reviewed several years ago, and I'd just rechecked
those files in order to see that the images remain the same as before.
As such, I couldn't detect any change from what I'd previously
interpreted. Thus all remains as the same image data, except that is
for your suggestion that others and myself should have been using these
4 looks/pixel worth of 75 m/pixel images instead of the lesser though
more robust resolution composite of 12 looks/pixel and 225 m/pixel.
Within reason, regardless of either resolution factor, especially of
the "Left look at 43 degrees" is one and the same basic image as
offered by the "mgn_c115s095_1.gif", thus further proving that merely
pixel resolution is not the most important criteria in SAR imaging to
behold, as well as further proving that 12 looks per pixel is in some
ways better off than a 4 look/pixel alternative. Once taking into
account the 8-bit/look/pixel factor is where the 12 look/pixel is more
clearly offering the greatest degree of pixel truth upon items large
enough to count. Obviously somewhat smaller details can be
taken/extracted from the 75 m/pixel format, and though the truth within
those pixels is usable it isn't offering a third as good of image data
truth as taken from the 12 look/pixel format, therefore the 75 m/pixel
easily becomes more subjectively interpretive than what most folks can
manage without their seeing the likes of WMD or Osama bin Laden.
Of course, within the NIMA.MIL realm of their superior level of
PhotoShop processing is where such raw original digital images can be
extrapolated to factor of 10:1 if not 16:1, thus pushing the given raw
resolution to a potential of 7.5 meters as being near the limits of
what such processing can accommodate, whereas my old version of
PhotoShop starts having a CPU melt-down much above 8:1, meaning that I
can still see and appreciate the magnification but, to most folks
there's only increased fuzzyness and/or distortions contributed. Thus
I've asked of folks to stick with their resampling at 3:1 or perhaps
4:1 as taken off the more robust 225 m/pixel format and, for using
limited amounts of their photo software filters, such as the poorly
named "unsharp mask" utility that's actually quite good in the latest
versions of PhotoShop and, is usually capable of somewhat similar
results within various other photo software alternatives.
Since there are numerous +/- adjustments in the usage of such complex
PhotoShop filters, it's likely the each and every individual is going
to obtain a slightly different though the same result each time the
same parameters are applied, meaning that a reverse step by step or if
need be restart from the raw 1:1 original is always within the eye of
the beholder as to compare and to generally improve upon those end
results that can be impressive, unless image distorting is the intended
goal, in which case there's absolutely nothing you or I can do that'll
prove a damn thing, other than it possible to entirely distort any
image into whatever you'd care to accomplish, but that's not what I'm
doing nor of what I'm asking of others to be doing.
Of course, if the regular laws of physics could stipulate that it's
technically impossible for other life and/or of ETs to have been
surviving upon Venus, as then we'd have a real perception as well as a
negative mindset of a problem with seeing much of anything except hot
rocks, that is unless we're seeing the remains of whatever used to be a
pre-greenhouse portion of their habitat infrastructure. The problem is,
the regular laws of physics simply can't rule out what's entirely
doable and thus survivable considering the availability of such
accessible green/renewable energy and having absolute loads of nifty
mineral resources as so easily at their disposal on behalf of
accommodating whomever or whatever is toughing it out on Venus.
BTW; that unusually darkish amount nearby surroundings, of what isn't
actually of any dark color because these are of radar and not optical
CCD images, is actually highly suggestive of a vegetation/forest like
radar imaging signal, the very same as having been depicted via SAR
imaging of what's situated here upon Earth. Thus comparing what's
perfectly natural about Venus, such as a few small lakes or ponds, thus
forming as perfectly natural fluid like reservoirs, as well as of
various flowing fluids or perhaps lava or hot muds, of what a forest
like covered terrain looks like, of otherwise massive canyons and/or
rilles and of all the expected mountainous rock formations, plus
there's whatever large scale erosion patterns that are seemingly one
and the same as extracted from the 75 m/pixel as opposed to the 225
m/pixel format which look exactly like the same sorts of perfectly
natural attributes upon Earth.
Oddly, it seems that I can identify upon all sorts of such perfectly
natural attributes that look essentially identical to Earthly examples.
However, for the life of myself nor can others seem to locate upon any
Earthly complex community, bridge, tarmac and rational infrastructure
looking terrain without such patterns being those of what's man made,
thus artificial instead of being some weird freak of nature and of
erosion running amuck. Although it's still certainly possible that of
nowhere other than upon Venus is where mother nature has been
functioning purely upon hard drugs and steroids by way of defying the
laws of gravity and thus creating entirely new (one of a kind) forms of
geological and erosion patterns.
We've certainly been fooled if not snookered by photographs before;
such as via those EVA moonsuit surface images as recorded via the
unfiltered Kodak moments that simply can't be remotely identified from
even their own best efforts of otherwise terrific telephoto images as
obtained from such a nearby orbit at roughly 100 km, which having
confirmed our moon as hosting a typically dark 11~12% albedo, and
indicates as potentially of what such a cosmic and solar dust loaded
morgue worth of a lunar surface has to offer, that's absolutely chuck
full of the most interesting vertical and horizontal extrusions as
having been depicted as to what's upon the lunar terrain, as such
having been strewn with all sorts of nasty old and newish meteorites
plus the subsequent impacted debris of dark lunar basalt of such shards
as strewn about such an extremely dark terrain (we're talking nearly
coal like reflective index that's otherwise covered in meters deep
layers of nasty raw carbon, iron and titanium deposits) that's somewhat
of a dark golden hew that's simply not at all nor the least bit of what
was otherwise being recorded as apparently situated below the
protective argon atmosphere, whereas those moonsuit EVAs upon their
average lunar terrain was actually 55+% albedo reflective for as far as
their unfiltered Kodak eye could see, hardly at all dusty and even
offering quit a thin clumping soil at that and, not even the least bit
reactive as to affording one near-blue tinted image worth of
secondary/recoil photons nor of any hard-X-rays to being recorded by
the unfiltered and quite near-blue and near-UV spectrum sensitive Kodak
eye. Thus obviously the laws of Kodak physics works entirely
differently upon the moon than here upon Earth. Perhaps we'll need to
reconsider that the SAR physics of imaging Venus works entirely
differently than of imaging Earth or even that of our moon as being
entirely different again.
Brad Guth
> There are just as many independent coherent looks in each FMAP pixel
> as there are in each C1-MIDR pixel; the C1 product is derived from the
> full resolution data by a straightforward incoherent averaging of the
> linearized power.
Good grief and no kidding folks; you're certainly a whole lot better
off at fancy/complex words than I am. Would you like a seriously tough
job of polishing and refitting some of my dyslexic words into english,
and/or into a few other languages to boot?
How about just saying that the
<http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif> image is
offering less rsolution/pixel as based upon the very same raw combined
radar data as per the "Left look at 43 degrees" is good enough. I mean
obviously the <mgn_c115s095_1.gif> image had to come from somewhere.
Averaging those 3 X 3 individual 75 meter pixels into becoming a
composite of 225 meter/pixel actually requires the combining of 9 of
those little 4-looks of 8-bits and of 75 meter/pixel, of merging all 9
of them little interesting suckers into becoming the more robust 225
meter/pixel format, thus it's actually amounting to 36 looks/pixel as
better off than the raw 75 meter and 4 look/pixel. Therefore I was
wrong about the 3:1 advantage, as it's actually a 9:1 pixel per pixel
advantage and that of a 36:4 radar look-see per radar look-see
advantage as to creating what the 225 meter pixel format has to work
with.
I'm not so much discounting the raw 75 meter/pixel data as I'm merely
qualifying as to what myself and of my somewhat limited or outdated
PhotoShop software can manage without going postal or otherwise
toasting my CPU. Most folks can't seem to process a 1:1 digital image,
much less crop and then enlarge upon and/or reasonably improve upon
that enlargement is simply asking way too much of even NASA staffed
individuals that have to ask permission and file multiple reports in
order to take a whizzzz.
I'm still assuming that NIMA.MIL is capable of knocking each of our
socks off, although I believe the German team of such digital image
enhancement capability seems to be better than 10 fold more advanced
than our crack MI5/NSA~NASA team.
BTW; our NASA nondisclosure policy is just as cloak and dagger lethal
as MI5/NSA(MI6) is about moderating absolutely everything to death
prior to allowing anything out their front, side or back doors.
Brad Guth
interpretation of what's situated upon Venus, of the related topics and
of whatever research has become just as taboo and/or just as
nondisclosure as our moon. Asking and/or implying anything Venus
becomes another topic/author death sentence of my getting stalked,
summarily bashed and/or simply banished for the mere thoughts of
whatever's the least bit outside the existing mainstream box that's
testing and/or stressing whatever our highly snookered and thus easily
dumbfounded humanity has become collectively assimilated into
believing, and that's obviously in spite of whatever's the truth as
having been easily avoided via evidence exclusions from the very
beginnings of recorded time. Selectively exclude upon evidence and you
can be made to believe in anything, including in the virtues of
creating and sustaining a perpetrated cold-war, as well as that of
inventing WMD that were supposedly so well hidden under each and every
one of those Muslim oily rocks.
Mention, suggest or request most anything as to the subjective
interpretations of a given surface image that's offering a healthy or
robust composite of 36 looks per pixel and providing an 8-bit depth
worth of contrast, as to whatever the radar signal is returning as
depicting such interesting patterns of highly unusual (one of a kind)
formations that so happen to look exactly like a rational community
plan of highrise structures, a bridge, reservoirs and a nearby tarmac
that's otherwise surrounded by perfectly natural looking terrain
features is obviously a bit of asking for another pot load of trouble
in NASA's River City. Even several of the most likely natural
attributes that are out of this world, such as the massive 'fluid arch'
that's perhaps accommodating a mud like substance that's responsible
for the leading and trailing patterns of erosions, all of which is
absolutely quite large and spectacular to say the least. Although, of
whatever's flowing under that much atmospheric pressure and subsequency
buoyancy, it seems there's all sorts of viable alternatives of fluid
elements that could safely coexist, with little if any vapor phase
taking place.
Of course, it doesn't seem to help whenever I've tossed in a few of the
most common/basic laws of physics, such as regarding the rather
enormous availability of various green/renewable energy via geothermal
and/or as derived from the rather considerable vertical differentials
of such a downright nifty atmosphere. Whereas having such spare and
100% renewable energy at the local disposal of whomever is making a go
of it, along with the easily extracted raw elements, whereas obviously
having all the energy in their world as to process upon and/or to
properly utilize such abundant raw elements isn't limited by other than
our arrogance and of our ET bigotry that's just about anywhere and
everwhere there's been an associanion with the likes of our NASA. Even
the physics of what's doable as to accommodating a massive rigid
airship is way more than just another what-if sort of interpretation
that's worth an open minded review and look-see, plus loads of somewhar
testy topics worth of tit-for-tat physics and science issues, that is
unless you're afraid of learning about whatever's there as having been
easily seen and/or easily realized once you get your head unstuck from
having been so otherwise brown-nosed into the nearest NASA certified
space-toilet.
Actually, a nicely pressurized and bone dry CO2 environment isn't all
that anti-life supportive as you'd think, especially of the CO2 and S8
that's surrounding Venus is quite dry until you're situated well above
a somewhat cooler nighttime season of perhaps 35~45 km as being within
the acidic and thus wet haze zone of the thick clouds situated above,
which of course represents of where such megatonnes worth of sulphuric
acid (SO3+H2O-->H2SO4) resides and, whereas that nasty acidic substance
can be easily processed via vacuum distillation, so as to efficiently
extract such elements as pure H2O from those massive clouds.
Without the likes of physically sequestered CO2 within our wet
environment is where the likes of diatoms might be happy campers but,
we'd all be quite dead. Upon Venus is where the vast bulk of their CO2
is essentially in dry-storage, as being sequestered throughout the dry
lower atmosphere. Without an external abundance of moisture is where
CO2 is not all that life threatening of an element, not any more so
than dry S8 or most any nasty element you'd care to investigate. Above
the acidic nighttime clouds of Venus is where there's even a good layer
of O2 as re-identified by team KECK. Imagine that, loads of H2O and O2
being just about anywhere you'd care to look, and of applied technology
that would have allowed even human forms of life to coexist upon the
surface, though I'd have to assume not naked unless we're talking about
cold-blooded exoskeletals.
The fact that applied technology could have resolved most if not all of
the life support upon Venus that's required of sustaining humans is
what's so gosh darn interesting, especially of these days when there's
been ample observational evidence of what's looking so darn artificial
that's hard to pass up unless you're anti-ET no matters what.
As to the notions of air conditioning and/or whatever refrigeration
can't possibly be an insurmountable physics worth of a thermodynamics
problem when you're essentially surrounded by what's better off than
most freons, that being plain old dry as a bone CO2 (R-744) that can be
either further compressed and/or vacuum processed in order to achieve
whatever pressure differentials and thus thermal energy
transfer/extractions worth of Venus Thermal Units (VTUs) you'd care to
accomplish. How hard could it possibly be as to creating a pressure
differential, by which the available energy can then be converted from
one thermal energy level to that of another? Thus the real question
with regard to absolute loads of applied physics that'll require a wee
bit of the local process energy shouldn't be about the amount of
required energy, as much as it's about what to do with and/or to fully
utilize with having so freaking much spare and easily obtained energy.
In other words; if the mainstream status quo is insisting that
intelligent life supposedly can't possibly make even a tough go of it
upon Venus, then perhaps the likes of you and I can't possibly survive
on any other planet, especially not upon a Mars like planet where
nearly 100% of the necessary energy and all other items in support of
human life must be imported. Whereas the essentials for sustaining
other significant life upon Venus might be slight if requiring much of
anything from Earth, although I still wouldn't go there unless invited.
Falling whatever onto our moon isn't a doable option, nor is that of
humanity walking naked upon Venus a viable option within the levels of
applied physics and technology at hand. However, unlike our moon, it is
and has been quie doable for getting up close and quite robotically
personal within the Venus lower atmospheric environment and upon the
Venus surface. There is no longer the sorts of instrument nor
survivability issues with regard to the hot surface environment,
whereas an elevated site and within the nighttime season could offer as
little as an extremely dry and thus relatively safe 600°K. Science has
already been there and done that, which after 15+ years certainly can
be advanced upon and thereby of reapplied efforts having far greater
results than ever before. Of course Venus being from time to time just
a little better than 100 fold the distance of our moon is asking of
folks to accept way too much honest bang for their hard earned bucks,
not to mention taking a fraction of the time as compared to
accomplishing another sub-frozen, easily pulverised and otherwise
thoroughly TBI to death planet such as Mars that's none the less been
terminally core dead for tens of thousands if not millions of years.
In fact; I believe if you were to custom design the most ideal other
planet that's worth exploring, and for being the most physically and
affordably obtainable for the near furture of science and humanity, it
certainly wouldn't be the likes of Mercury, Mars or of those planets
and moons further away. Even our own moon offers far more doom and
gloom as being downright lethal if not technically impossible with the
applied echnology at hand, thus our moon remains as far less
surmountable than Venus.
The orchestrated avoidance of our moon and that of Venus has become
another absolutely pathetic dog-wag of a space-toilet form of retarded
science and of skewed conditional physics in order to suit government
and religious ulterior motives and hidden agendas to boot. It's that
simple; we've been and are currently being officially snookered to our
dumbfounded content, of having to accept whatever dog-wagging,
collateral damage and the carnage of the innocent that it takes for
sustaining a perpetrated cold-war and, of the ongoing LLPOF global
pollution and lethal energy fiasco of today that taking it's albedo
toll and thus global warming impact that's going very much against our
very survival.
~
Life upon Venus offers a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride
Tarmac: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) at ME-L1
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus an updated topic list; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
Meaning; there has nearly always been other significant life that's
perfectly capable of their having been situated upon Venus (at least on
behalf of accommodating ETs), and otherwise of that little issue about
our moon that's actually perfectly good for so many things once the
LSE-CM/ISS up and running and of sufficient robotics having been
efficiently and safely deployed, as for those functioning on behalf of
science, clean energy and for the very salvation of humanity. Unlike
what we've been told, there's nothing insignificant nor without good if
not essential cause and rewards pertaining to our moon, and unlike
those opposing absolutely anything and everything that represents
change, I simply can't but hardly think of anything but positive
thoughts about our moon as well as for Venus as being another perfectly
good thing for the salvation of Earth and humanity.
Though God forbid, should there be any hard-science truth and nothing
but the truth, especially whenever and wherever the likes of religion
and politics are focused upon exchanging their mutually brown-nosed
benefits at the expense and if need be demise of the lower 99.9% (scum
of the Earth) worth of humanity. It seems that we don't even have the
truth as to raw H2O/ice, nor even that of raw CO2/ice in space that's
having to survive anywhere as near to the sun as Jupiter, much less
having to get closer. There's still no lunar ice proof-positive, as in
hard-science pertaining to raw H2O/ice upon or within our own moon is
still anyone's guess, whereas of whatever's ice upon Mars and even
Titan is still up for grabs, yet we've got lots if not a bit more than
our fair share of somewhat salty and now quite polluted H2O/ice and/or
of the ocean brine. There's been a little ongoing evaporation cycle of
providing solar/atmospherically distilled fresh water, plus absolute
loads of those essential CO2-->CO/O2 processing diatoms, all on behalf
of what's supposedly 99.9% of what our carbon and silica diatom based
life is about, or is this all about my posting way more than my fair
share of those - don't ask don't tell - sorts of topics that we'll have
to continue making due with the usual need-to-know of whatever our
incest of infomercialism cares to share, while otherwise we get to
continue fighting as to manage within the mainstream box, or else we
get to prematurely die while trying our best as certain LLPOF resident
warlords apply their "high standards and accountability" that's backed
up with their "so what's the difference" policy that sucks.
Brad Guth
Evidence Exclusion works most every time, though life somewhat sucks if
you're a Muslim that hiding those WMD while sitting upon an oily rock.
However, topic/author banishment isn't going to work this time around.
Thus what's the difference if we've lied our beloved stinking butts off
about walking on the moon?
In order to properly snooker thy humanity, and since there are no
actual rules of war (other than for the one about your not getting
caught), one needs a high standard and accountability (so what's the
difference) policy of excluding upon whatever evidence benefits the
other side. It has certainly worked for most religions, obviously
politics is based almost entirely upon either a lack of truthful
information or that of liars telling us lies that beget more lies. Thus
what's keeping the likes of brown-nosed physics and science (especially
of astronomy related astrophysics) outside the mainstream box worth of
the very same evidence exclusion loop?
>From before recorded time, folks have been excluding whatever
represents a threat or that of change, thus physics and of the science
of discovering and proving such things out has always been under the
thumbs of religious and/or government moderation as to not rocking
their precious status quo boat. There's countless examples of what has
eventually become well accepted as of today as having previously been
banished if not officially and quite maliciously stalked and bashed for
all it's worth. Many scientist and physics researchers have not
survived their ordeals, while others that were instrumental in research
and discoveries were in every way possible denied the necessary
resources and/or that of any positive support for the benefit of
attracting private support, much less of actual credits for their pure
of heart and simple fact of their not being a long standing member of
some required social/political/religious club/cult of that day.
Observationology is clearly about the science of subjectively
interpreting a given image. For the same reasons and criteria that
folks have been insisting that I qualify and/or quantify whatever I'm
interpreting as being most likely artificial about Venus, thus having
been most likely ET made and otherwise not so likely natural, is
exactly if not more so required of what's required by those insisting
that all is entirely natural. Thus my view upon what's to be seen as
ET/artificial is of the one and the same basis as for folks insisting
that such community like structures and rational infrastructure are
that of perfectly natural formations that just so happen to exist
nowhere other, at least upon all recorded images of other moons and
planets including that of mother Earth (we're talking of millions of
such images) there's been nothing that comes close to that of such
scale or magnitude and complexity of being artificial looking that
wasn't artificial. I mean to say that, we're not talking about small
stuff, nor are we talking about one individual item being out of place,
whereas we've got a good dozen massive and quite sizable attributes
that seem entirely unusual if not one of a kind spectacular and very
ET/artificial like.
However, it seems no matters what there is to being discovered and/or
uncovered, the common soul among us isn't to receive an iota worth of
credit nor the least bit of positive support, even if it's pertaining
to someone about to go extremely postal hasn't been given so much as
credit for taking the risk and efforts of honestly attempting to avoid
yet another national/international fiasco.
Another example of physics/science running amuck; Even though there's
no physics nor hard-science as proof that icy proto-moons if not entire
icy proto-planets didn't arrive from far and wide, as to such icy orbs
essentially representing the infusion of other(ET) life sequestered
with such ice, or perhaps just for their intelligently intended task of
terraforming a given hot and nasty planet with the all essential shot
of water and life within, whereas it seems just the slightest mention
of our moon having once been such an icy delivery/depository of what
likely created our oceans and of the vast bulk of complex life upon
Earth isn't accepted as even a viable topic of discussion, especially
when the opposition is 100+% mainstream status quo as well as anti-ET
and thus essentially anti-God since apparently their terrestrial
limited god and therefore the laws of their conditional physics and of
any associated social/political skewed science hasn't the ability to
function outside of Earth. Thus apparently our frame of
existence/coexistence is but all there is, and obviously all that
matters to those having such ulterior motives, hidden agendas and a
solid mindset to boot.
Many folks, even devout diehard SETI/ETI individuals keep asking as to
why we haven't been contacted by ETs, yet they continually refuse to
accept within their religion and realm of social/political notions as
stipulated by whatever their government having refused upon whatever
evidence might suggest that most life upon Earth is basically from ET
stock, not to mention of what the extremely nearby proto-Earth like
planet of Venus might have to contribute.
Taking a fair and open minded look-see at the likes of just one
interesting example as being the silica based GLASS SPONGE is offering
but one of the specialized forms of highly evolved ET encoded life,
that which insufficient if any fossil remains hasn't been uncovered as
to such having evolved entirely here upon Earth. The superior survival
intelligence and complex interactions of the vast verity of life upon
Earth isn't purely via terrestrial happenstance out of somewhat limited
basis of random atoms being assimilated and DNA/RNA encoded into
collectives having truly incredible survival and adaptation logic, into
the sorts of highly complex life that's been at least 99.9% more
important to the global environment than humans. Of all the known life
upon Earth, of which some folks think that we've discovered as much as
10% of what's previously been here and of whatever's still surviving in
spite of humanity, whereas humans are of the least important in the
grand cycle of sustaining the global environment, though we're
certainly 99.9% responsible as to the demise of other life (including
our own kind) and of the measurably negative impact upon the
environment, whereas even though our bones and teeth are relatively
large and fossil robust items, there's little if any such fossilized
remains of our lineage when there's otherwise megatonnes worth of all
sorts of other forms of fossilized life that's also missing a few
billion or so years, most of such life if naturally evolving from UV
interactions with the available elements as having taken millions if
not billions of evolutionary years in order to have developed in the
first place, that is unless there was some ET genetic help evolved in
their creation. By way of ET/cosmic influx or perhaps other nearby
folks(ETs) providing some if not the entire genetic intelligent design
basis or seed-stock of their DNA/RNA from the very beginning (exactly
what the Mars or bust teams of terraformers have been intending to
accomplish once they set their contaminated human foot on Mars, if not
via robotics before then).
Intelligent design simply isn't the least bit anti-God. If there's
anything of greater importance about intelligent design it's that it's
entirely pro-God because, being pro-ET is simply allowing for the
greater extension and/or worth of whatever a very far reach of such
creation happenings should have been the case. Of course, all of hell
upon Earth is busting lose by way of merely suggesting upon the notions
that there has been other significant life that should have been
capable of emerging if not accommodating of ETs surviving on Venus, and
of an icy proto-moon topic via the Sirius star system Oort zone/cloud
as having terraformed an Earth like planet into a survivable status is
every bit as worthy of WW-III, as were those phony baloney WMD that a
certain LLPOF born again and supposedly God feering soul of a warlord
has given his all towards creating such new and improved dog-wagging
disinformation. It seems that our resident warlord has been in favor of
actually continuing our physical pollution by the mega tonnes and,
therefore on our behalf expediting global warming, and unfortunately as
of lately responsible for the rather massive collateral damage and the
ongoing carnage of the innocent as though it's become his religious
cult sort of good christian thing to be doing to one another (I think a
couple of Popes had that same notion about Cathars).
As long as evidence has been and is still being officially excluded,
and of such research and authors being banished by those in power that
represent far less than 0.1% of this humanly populated Earth, whom are
not about to allow such truth and nothing but the truth be told,
whereas there's no amount of applied-physics nor of hard-science
that'll emerge unscaved, much less become mainstream accepted without
horrific trials and bloodshed, or haven't you noticed the vicious wars
upon wars and of the ongoing perpetrated cold-wars of how we humans are
of the one and only species upon Earth that would utilize it's
intelligence and resources in order to go out of it's way as to provoke
others, to the point where they'd much rather prematurely die and/or
cause folks to live poorly within a substandard level of life, rather
than to accept whatever someone other is suggesting as a better
alternative, and apparently much less for accepting whatever's
different than the old ways. The 0.1% of humanity (upper class of
roughly 6.7 million of us) are of those encharge and/or most benefiting
from either pulling our strings or allowing of whatever transpires to
benefit those only they'll allow and/or accept into their cultism of
whatever keeps their mainstream boats from rocking, be that of some
major religion or of some Skull and Bones social/political cultism
that's focused upon their survival at all cost as having been imposed
upon the lower 99.9% remainders (apparent scum/minions of the Earth) as
having always been their subservient minions as to sustaining this
upper most 0.1%, of supposed all-knowing individuals that for the most
part haven't contributed squat of their own unless it's been of
whatever's directly beneficial to their offshore tax shelters or
whatever safely keeps their unearned/pillaged loot secure.
Thus if your cozy world has been that of a flat Earth as being situated
as a result of the supposed one and only godly BIG-BANG center of the
known universe, whereas you're having to remain anti-UFO, thus anti-ET
and therefore anti-God, and if that narrow if not pagan formula suits
your mainstream status quo, then there's obviously no further point
within your mindset as to others or myself sharing whatever has been
observed about and having been survivable about Venus, any more so than
as to sharing positive issues pertaining to that of our moon, or even
that of having involved the interstellar astrophysics and science
probability of what the nearby Sirius star system has to offer, as
we'll as such topics always having to remain as officially
taboo/nondisclosure as per our usual hocus pocus of conditional physics
and social/politically accepted science of our supposedly walking upon
the moon, as intended so as to keep from rocking their pathetic
mainstream boat that's been accommodating all of those easily snookered
fellow fools as their dumbfounded crew and soul mates of their good
ship LOLLIPOP. Whereas God forbid, you wouldn't want the supposed
expertise from all of our supposed talents and remaining energy
resources to being properly utilized, much less see fewer wars and/or
lesser strife upon folks just having to survive in spite of the ongoing
artificial energy inflation (nearing $10/gallon of gasoline in places
where less than $1/hr is the norm) caused directly by way of our
collateral damage and carnage of the innocent, not to mention upon ways
of avoiding the artificial pollution as having generated the global
albedo shift that's been measurably and directly contributing so much
to our mutual demise.
It seems as though science has become summarily stuck within their very
own brown-nosed cesspool rut of life as only we know it, therefore
whatever other life is an option for consideration unless it looks
exactly like yourself and is entirely subservient at that. Personally,
I'd be a whole lot more surprised if such other life actually did look
human, rather than independently evolved and adapted to some other
world.
ETs must be absolutely impressed if not thoroughly amazed at all the
new and improved levels by which such easily snookered and thereby
dumbfounded souls have managed to accomplish just about everything
wrong that can be imagined, whereas the far greater importance of the
vast bulk life that's other than human isn't the least bit at fault nor
entirely unable to survive in spite of the latest infestation of what
humanity has been knowingly doing towards global energy and mineral
pillaging along with the ultimate failure of their own environment, all
at the ongoing demise of their own kind. Perhaps the sooner humanity
has exterminated the vast bulk of itself, the sooner the truly
important forms of life will emerge, as per the intended terraforming
goal all along.
Of what the salvation of Earth needs most is a darn good butt-kicking
dictator, instead of yet another LLPOF worth of perpetrated cold-war
enthusiastic pairs of incest cloned warlords running us amuck. At least
that way we'd all have the extra trillions as well as the spare talents
and resources needed as to invest into accomplishing our moon and so
much more. Unfortunately, our John Kerry offers 0% interest in such
matters of ET explorations, thus whatever other Skull and Bones
alternatives are either nonexistent or simply too afraid to emerge from
their intellectual cesspool that'll dog-wag and/or take whatever
actions as to preserving their cultism, instead of their contributing
to the greater good and benefit of humanity and that of our
environment.
BTW; you might want to reconsider that there's sufficient
proof-positive as to the US/USSR moon race that actually wasn't, and of
most everything else having since been a grand ruse/sting of the
century, though having worked quite nicely for making the already rich
and powerful richer and thus even more powerful, while the rest of us
village idiots remain as their loyal brown-nosed minions are on the
receiving end of their warm and fuzzy flak tossing benefits, of our
being entertained while having remained socially as well as
scientifically disinformed, subsequently either unemployed/poor
(insurmountably in debt over our eyeballs) or having become quite
prematurely dead.
~
Life upon Venus offers energy to burn within a Township, Bridge and
ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The ESA Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as situated
within ME-L1/EM-L2
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus another updated topic list; Brad Guth /
GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
The meaning of all this rant is besides if not in spite of our NOT
quite having walked upon the moon;
There has nearly always been other significant life that's perfectly
capable of their having been situated upon Venus (at least on behalf of
accommodating ETs), and otherwise of that little issue about our moon
that's actually perfectly good for so many things once the LSE-CM/ISS
is up and running and of sufficient robotics having been efficiently
and safely deployed, as for those items functioning on behalf of
science, clean energy and for the very salvation of humanity. Unlike
what we've been told over and over by all of those folks supposedly
having 'the right stuff', there's nothing the least bit insignificant
nor without good if not of essential cause and rewards pertaining to
our moon, and unlike those opposing absolutely anything and everything
that represents change, I simply can't hardly think of anything but
positive thoughts about our moon as well as for Venus as being yet
another perfectly good thing for the greater salvation of Earth and
advancement of humanity. How can anything pertaining to our moon or
that of Venus become such a taboo/nondisclosure negative that which
such topic/authors deserve getting stalked, bashed and/or banished?
Alan Anderson
> Ever since I shared my interpretation of what's situated upon Venus,
> the topic has become just as taboo and/or nondisclosure as our moon.
That's actually not a bad observation, Brad. I'm pretty sure that just
about everyone thinks you're loony.
Perhaps if you restricted your rants to a single point each, you might
find that people could actually read them well enough to respond with
helpful advice.
Brad Guth
Thanks for the feedback. However, I've tried that, as in been there and
done that at least a thousands times. It didn't work then and obviously
if I'm having to go by your reply it's not working now because, you can
pick whatever you'd like from the heap and spit it out, yet instead
you've elected to contributing nada, zilch and otherwise just plain old
squat.
I've actually held myself back upon what I really think is capable of
being interpreted from just that one primary image of GUTH Venus, as
well as there are a few other images that'll look a wee bit interesting
if you believe in ETs. Obviously if you're anti-ET is where absolutely
nothing matters since evidence exclusions will easily avoid and/or
disqualify nearly everything under the sun.
Of course, if it wasn't for the regular laws of physics being on my
side of this argument, as then I'd be having a really bad ET day of it
all.
Here's a rather simple question;
What's so entirely ET insurmountable about Venus?
Or do I need to make another list of multiple choices?
~
Don't look: in spite of the orchestrated status quo, it seems there's
been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as situated within the
ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy topics by; Brad
Edward Cherlin
> Russia, China, the USofA, Britten
Benjamin?
> and you name it,
> Evidence Exclusion works most every time, though life somewhat sucks if
> you're a Muslim that hiding those WMD while sitting upon an oily rock.
Um, Brad, the deal was that they *weren't* hiding WMD. I know it's easy to
get confused about this, since we have the receipts, but it looks like they
used up the chemical stuff and never had anything else. But whatever, the
whole point of Islam is to accept whatever happens as the will of God. They
should try it. You, too.
> However, topic/author banishment isn't going to work this time around.
> Thus what's the difference if we've lied our beloved stinking butts off
> about walking on the moon?
I must say that I am greatly relieved at the thought that nobody has ever
done that.
Brad Guth
OK, so you're thinking there's absolutely nothing seriously rotten
about our resident warlord(GW Bush)?
How many additional trillions are you willing to blow, and at the
demise of how many tens of thousands of innocent folks none the less?
Clearly you're also not actually from this LLPOF and perpetrated
cold-war Earth, are you?
Why are you actually being quite anti-ET and thus anti-God?
I think it's considered bad form being pro-warlord and pro-God at the
same time.
I'm not sure that we should accept your "whatever happens as the will
of God", especially since that method hasn't worked thus far, at least
not on this planet.
Are you a Skull and Bones certified member in good standing?
~
Don't look: in spite of the orchestrated status quo, it seems there's
been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as situated within the
ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy topics by; Brad
Brad Guth
our moon, this topic is about other life (ETs) coexisting if not having
originated upon Venus. It's entirely pro-ET and thus pro-God and as
such offering a positive spin worth of interpretations of the given
images and hard-science at hand. There's no intentional evidence
exclusions nor any cloak and dagger hidden agenda policy of conditional
physics or that of ulterior motives, just somewhat typical math and
grammar/syntax errors which others or yourself can correct and receive
the credits for doing such.
Further proving that my interpretations are sufficiently correct is the
ongoing matter of fact that this topic and myself are being stalked and
summarily bashed and/or banished, via an orchestrated driving force
from within the mainstream status quo point of view that ETs apparently
do not exist, in that apparently regardless of whatever's biologically
and/or applied physics surmountable, in that such other life remains as
somehow entirely taboo/nondisclosure, as in remaining impossible that
such ETs have ever existed, much less better adapted and/or forbid
become smarter ETs at their surviving than us humans, and God forbid
having coexisted within our solar system or upon any other solar system
within a thousand light years is just out of the question. Of course,
it's perfectly OK that we humans can't seem to ever stop lying our
bigoted and blood-thirsty butts off over just about anything (as of
lately over WMD and that of our global energy domination quest at all
human and resource cost) without so much as a shred of remorse (are we
good at sucking the life out of a planet or what?).
Thus a pro-life, pro-ET and thereby pro-God topic gets automatically
proven to being even more correct because, the mainstream opposition
(typically of their extremely flat-Earth and of those insisting we're
at the center of their singular and ever expanding BIG-BANG Skull and
Bones universe of a terrestrial limited pagan form of cultism) can't
seem to muster up the hard-science nor even via their
social/politically conditional and thus skewed laws of physics as to
arguing appropriately against whatever I've learned and/or discovered
about our moon, Venus and a little something worthy about our 105,000
some odd year association of an interstellar cycle with the older
Sirius star system that's been perfectly capable of shifting our
illumination influx, plus at least once upon a time hosting a viable
planet or two along with a few icy moons to spare in case the need for
somewhat serious terraforming arises.
Of course, attempting to communicate whatever to a certified
intellectual bigot if not an actual biological bigot is one and the
same as asking the Pope to being nice to Cathars or, for that of a Pope
becoming Jewish or vise versa is apparently far worse, by which
obviously either side would much rather die while taking as many
innocent souls as possible along for the ride before switching sides.
Likewise, I have no intentions of joining up with such a nasty cloak
and dagger collective of incest cloned Hitlers as per becoming another
member of their borg mainstream collective. Although, if I had but no
option other than to pick between our resident warlord(GW Bush) and
Hitler, I'm not exactly certain that I could support the LLPOF factors
of such "high standards and accountability" of our very own "so what's
the difference" policy that sucks, especially if you're sitting within
the wrong target aircraft or even that of a Muslim sitting upon your
very own oily rock that's apparently hiding Osama bin Laden in addition
to all of those WMD. It seems some humans are born-again liars, and
unfortunately we've acquired one as our commander and chief village
idiot moron president that's about to get us into WW-III over fossil
fuels.
So, if you have something to contribute that's topic positive or even
as a worthy negative that's supported by way of whatever hard-science
and by the regular laws of physics, or even via soft-science might
suffice as long as you're not going absolutely postal, is just fine and
dandy by what I'd expect of others. You can even make your fair share
of mistakes in the process without myself returning the warm and fuzzy
favor of my having to shove it right back at your pie-hole. In other
words of my limited wisdom; think first and then contribute outside the
box because, we already know of what's supposedly inside the box.
~
Don't look now: in spite of the orchestrated status quo, it seems
there's been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as situated within the
ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy topics by; Brad
Brad Guth
I happen agree that the potentially long-term lethal folly of nuclear
energy is our only last ditch hope of humanity surviving without our
going absolutely postal into WW-III. Although, since energy-in =
energy-out, I'm not at all certain the long term solution is nuclear,
especially once we've utilized most all accessible nuclear materials
that aren't necessary for sustaining all of our vast global cash of WMD
and, we've obviously run ourselves out of safe places to burry the
nasty remains, and we've obviously sucked ours as well as whomever
else's last oil wells dry as a bone by then (shifted the albedo of
Earth down another good 10% from what's become so nicely polluted and
thus global warming as of today), whereas perhaps it'll become good
timing that we transport a fair amount of squeaky clean He3/fusion
energy as taken from the moon to Earth, as then we're all set for
WW-IV. Of course, we could have been 100% solar-stirling/PV/wind energy
driven as of a decade ago, with loads of spare/surplus energy for the
productions of LH2 and H2O2.
On a similar testy topic of what we should or should not be doing.
Since there's been no stinking methane sign as derived from any such
Mars thermal signiture, not even a worthy warm spot worth of any dead
body or of their poop from within. Thus nowhere upon such a
geothermally dead and mostly sub-frozen planet such as Mars should
there remain any active cash of methane, unless it's of a sub-frozen
reserve from whatever had previously died off as of tens of thousands
if not millions of years ago?
I believe whatever existing life upon Mars is actually less likely than
upon and/or within our moon.
Obviously there's always been one absolute certain and proof-positive
method of sufficiently smart folks detecting the likes of really dumb
and dumber and thus easily snookered fools as being dumbfounded and
thereby bigoted and methane/fart generating ETs of this Earth, that is
for the likes of outsider ETs to tap into this pathetic USENET that
99.9% sucks (how hard could that be?).
Actual nonterrestrial ET's do not need any stinking microwave signals,
nor even a laser cannon as affording any such beacon as to detecting
our existence, as for just easily recording the ripe atmospheric
spectrum of methane and rotten-egg/sulphur stench of the rotting flesh
of countless millions upon millions of innocent souls as having been
sequestered upon this artificially global warming Earth, that should
have permeated our entire solar system by now, along with enough of our
living bio and fossil pollution plus the ongoing carnage generated
freons as created in sufficient volume and mass as to cause a galactic
fart that's equal to a local supernovae.
What a pathetic bunch of such LLPOF SETI/ETI freaks and absolute
three-faced bigots of anti-ET and thus anti-God pervert heathens that
are exactly like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), in that you can't
admit you've been snookered into making a few mistakes. How sad for
humanity that we'll all have to continue suffering over and over until
the very last two remaining bigots are having their final LLPOF contest
over those missing NASA/Apollo cows, as to their mutual auto-destruct
deaths.
Past life (once upon a time) upon Mars was likely of something doable
for perhaps 10,000 years at a time. Would you honestly like to
reconsider as to how that could have been the case?
Here's another interesting topic of typical MI5/NSA usenet banishment;
No Venus, No Sirius = No Apollo (at least not as upon the surface of
the highly reactive moon).
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.censorship/browse_frm/thread/81925634199bd523/8be7b7dd252d2157?hl=en#8be7b7dd252d2157
~
Don't look now: in spite of the orchestrated status quo, it seems
there's been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as situated within the
ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy topics by; Brad