Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Russia - Killing women, children OK.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Larry

unread,
Jun 30, 2005, 11:04:52 AM6/30/05
to
Just like old Soviet times...Russia insists on making another unneccesary
political blunder by supporting Ukbek bloody supressions.

Why did Russia feel they needed to come out and support the murder of
defenseless people by a repressive regime? It missed a great opportunity to
shut up.

Another idiotic Putin blunder...like backing Yanokovich.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4633859.stm


stuart

unread,
Jun 30, 2005, 5:04:32 PM6/30/05
to
Yes, Mark Brooks the supporter of mass-murdering Islamist lunatics
threatened by female literacy can't understand why Russia dosen't want
Central Asia to collapse in chaos.

BTW Brooks, did you see how even Radio Free Europe has been driven to
conclude that Saakashvili's revolution in Georgia had nothing to do
with democracy or making Georgians better off, and everything to do
with giving Saakashvili power to loot the country?

http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/06/847aa7e2-b863-4184-93cf-3a63a9196f4f.html

And speaking of Yanokovich, do you think he would have bungled
Ukrainian energy policy so badly as to create lines for gasoline in
Ukraine, the way Yulia did?

And you criticize Putin for being skeptical of the value of
Western-encouraged "fruit revolutions". Looks like Mark Brooks the
supporter of mass-murdering Islamist lunatics threatened by female
literacy and serial prevaricator cares only for venting hatred, spite
and venom at Russia.

Stuart Wilkes

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4633859.stm.stm

tar...@ihed.ras.ru

unread,
Jul 1, 2005, 3:41:17 AM7/1/05
to

Larry писал(а):


> Just like old Soviet times...Russia insists on making another unneccesary
> political blunder by supporting Ukbek bloody supressions.
>
> Why did Russia feel they needed to come out and support the murder of
> defenseless people by a repressive regime?

Because Tashkent is our old, old stronghold and ally at the region.
Because Usbeks have thrown away US military crap and turned to Russia.
Recently Karimov agreed to give Russian busyness preferable access to
Uzbek oil and gaz deposits. Generaly speaking, US mindless propaganda
really pissed off Karimov. No more colored revolutions. It has to stop
now.

>It missed a great opportunity to
> shut up.

Whom?


> Another idiotic Putin blunder...like backing Yanokovich.

LOL. The politics of Yuschenko and Timoshenko gives completely new
definition for the word "blunder". After they stole 8 billion m3 of
Russian gas (in transit to Europe, BTW) Ukraine has quite a chance to
buy gas per $130-$160 per 1000 m3 rather than the usual preferential
$50.

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4633859.stm

MirTopolskiRexPrez

unread,
Jul 1, 2005, 3:50:30 AM7/1/05
to
Hey it would suffice to write 'Larry = Brookski' in the subject line.
For everybody in SCR knows that Mark Brooks(ki) = old nasty paranoid
android and a pathological liar 2. That's why his ass is being
permanently kicked from Usenet, so he's changing his nickname every
second week. But love is strange and Brookski reappears again and again
... poor fella just fell in love with SCR! Now think positive: Ergo SCR
is beautiful ... it's like Broadway's Beauty and the Beast soap ... :-D

MirTopolskiRexPrez

unread,
Jul 2, 2005, 6:10:25 AM7/2/05
to
_Bush_Buddies_Karimov_and_Musharraf_
http://counterpunch.org/brauchli07012005.html
> During Mr. Musharraf's Christmas time visit to the
> White House Mr. Bush said: "There is nobody more
> dedicated in the protection of his own people than
> President Musharraf." That was then and this is now
> and once again Mr. Bush is betrayed by a really good
> friend. It's all because of Mukhtaran Mahai who lives
> in rural Pakistan.
> Ms. Mukhtaran's younger brother had sex with a woman
> from a higher caste than he. The tribal council
> concluded that justice demanded that Ms. Mukhtaran
> be gang raped and then forced to walk home almost
> naked. [...]
> On June 18, 2005 she was to visit the Asian-American
> Network Against Abuse of Women in the United States.
> Upon learning of her intention to leave Pakistan Mr.
> Musharraf's government had her arrested because the
> government feared she might say things when abroad
> that would adversely affect Pakistan's image abroad.
> She might have told the world that the sentences of
> the six men who had been convicted of raping her
> had been overturned and five of the rapists set free.
0 new messages