Făcut Talat Pasha A trimite Secret Telegramă Ordine Genocide? www.habercagi.com
yunus emre
propaganda claiming that so - chemare genocide was un Ottoman guvern
politică a cere proof that such un decision was înăuntru fracţiune
made. Pentru this purpuriu art.hot. Armenians produs un număr de
telegramă attributed la spre Talat Pasha supposedly a întemeia by
Britanic forces commanded by General Allenby cînd ei seized Aleppo
înăuntru 1918. It was claimed that ei were a întemeia în serviciu de
un Ottoman oficial numit Naim Bey , şi that ei a putut a fi destroyed
unic fiindcă art.hot. Britanic occupation venit cu unexpected
cuvîntare. Mostră de aceştia telegramă were a publica înăuntru Paris
înăuntru by un Armenian autor numit Aram Andonian , (38) şi ei de
asemenea were presented la art.hot. Berlin proces de la Armenian
terrorist Tehlirian , cine killed Talat Pasha. Nevertheless , art.hot.
court nici un a considera aceştia documente as evidence " nici was
involved înăuntru orice decision claiming art.hot. authenticity de pe
ei. Aceştia documente were , totuşi entirely fabricated , şi art.hot.
claims deriving de la pe ei therefore abil a fi sustained. Ei were
înăuntru fracţiune a publica by art.hot. Daily Telegramă de London
înăuntru 1922, (39) care de asemenea attributed pe ei la spre un
descoperire made by Allenby's armată. Numai cînd art.hot. Britanic
Codru Serviciu enquired despre pe ei la art.hot. Război Serviciu , şi
cu Allenby se it was a descoperi that ei aveau nu been a descoperi by
art.hot. Britanic armată numai rather had been produs by un Armenian
teren înăuntru Paris. Înăuntru addition examination de la fotografie
provided în Andonian volume manifestare clar that nici un înăuntru
format script sau phraseology făcut ei resemble normal Ottoman
administrative documente , şi that ei were therefore rather crude
forgeries.
Following the Entente occupation of Istanbul, the British and the
French arrested a number of Ottoman political and military figures
and
some intellectuals on charges of war crimes. In this they were given
substantial assistance by the Ottoman Liberal Union Party, which had
been placed in power by the Sultan after the war, and which was
anxious to do anything it could to definitively destroy the Union and
Progress Party and its leaders, who had long been political enemies.
Most of the prisoners were sent off to imprisonment in Malta, but the
four Union and Progress leaders who had fled from the country just
before the occupation were tried and sentenced to death in absentia
in
Istanbul. Three other Government officials were sentenced to death
and
executed, but it was discovered later that the evidence on which the
convictions had been based was false.
In the meantime, the British looked everywhere to find evidence
against those who had been sent to Malta. Despite the complete
cooperation of wome enthusraztic supporters such as the Ottoman
Liberal Union (38) ANDONIAN, Aram, Documents Qfficiels concernant les
Massacres Armmiens, Paris, Armenian National Delegation, 1920. (39)
Daily Telegraph, 29 May 1922. government, nothing incriminating could
be found among the Ottoman government documents. Similar searches in
the British archives were fruitless. Finally, in desperation, the
British Foreign Office turned to the American archives in Washington,
but in reply, one of their representatives, R. C. Craigie, wrote to
Lord Curzon:
"I regret to inform your Lordship that there was nothing therein
which
could be used as evidence against the Turks who are at present being
detained at Malta ...no concrete facts being given which could
constitute satisfactory incriminating evidence.... The reports in
question do not appear in any case to contain evidence against these
Turks which would be useful even for the purpose of corroborating
information already in the possession of His Majesty's
Government.''(40)
Uncertain as to what should be done with prisoners, who already had
been held for two years, without trial and without even any charges
being filed or evidence produced, the Foreign Office applied for
advice to the Law Officers of the Crown in London, who concluded on
29
July, 1921:
"Up to the present no statements have been taken from witnesses who
can depose to the truth of the charges made against the prisoners. It
is indeed uncertain whether any witnesses can be found." (41)
At this time the "documents" produced by Andonian were available, but
despite their desperate search for evidence, which could be presented
in a court of law, the British, never used them because it was
evident
that they were forgeries. As a result, the prisoners were quietly
released in 1921, without charges ever having been filed or evidence
produced.
It is useful to reiterate that the main elements in the chain of
evidence constructed in proving that Andonian's "documents" were all
patent forgeries:
1. To show that his forgeries were in fact "authentic Ottoman
documents" Andonian relied on the signature of the Governor of
Aleppo,
Mustafa Abdiilhalik Bey, which he claimed was appended to several of
the "documents" in question. By examining several actual specimens of
Mustafa Abdülhalik Bey's signature as preserved on contemporary
official documents, it is established that the alleged signatures
appended to Andonian's "documents" were forgeries.
2. In one of his forged documents, Andonian dated the note and
signature attributed to Mustafa Abdülhalik Bey. Again, by a
comparison
with authentic correspondence between the Governor (40) 13 July 1921;
British Foreign Office Archives 371/6504/8519 (41) British Foreign
Office Archives 371/6504/E8745
Aleppo and the Ministry of the Interior in Istanbul, on the date in
question, it is proven that the Governor of Aleppo on that date was
Bekir Sami Bey, not Mustafa Abdulhalik Bey.
3. Consistently, Andonian's forgeries attest to the fact that he was
either totally unaware of, or carelessly neglected to account for,
the
differences between the Muslim Rumi and Christian calendars. The
numerous errors he made as a result of this oversight are, in and of
themselves, sufficient to prove the fabricated nature of his
"documents". Among other things, the errors Andonian made in this
respect served to destroy the system of reference numbers and dates
that he concocted for his "documents".
4. By way of a detailed comparison of the entries made in the
Ministry
of the Interior's Registers of outgoing Ciphers, wherein are recorded
the date and reference number of every ciphered communication sent
out
by the Ministry, with the dates and reference numbers placed by
Andonian on his forgeries, it is proven that his so-called "ciphered,
telegrams" bear no relationship whatsoever to the actual ciphers sent
by the Ministry to Aleppo in the period in question.
5. Again, by comparing the Turkish "originals" of Andonian's "
ciphered telegrams" with actual examples of contemporary Ottoman
ciphered messages, it is shown that the number groupings he employed
bear no relationship to the actual ciphers the Ottomans were using in
that period. Thus, in his attempt to make his forgeries appear
credible, he created a whole series of unusable, non-existent
ciphers.
Further, from the dates he affixed to his forgeries in this category,
the Ottomans would have had to use the same ciphers over a six-month
period which was impossible. By publishing a series of documents
instructing officials to change the ciphers they were using, it is
shown that, in fact, the Ottomans were changing their cipher codes on
average once every two months during the war years.
6. By comparing the manner in which the common Islamic injunction,
Besmele, was written on Andonian's two forged letters with numerous
examples of the way in which it appears on authentic contemporary
Ottoman documents, it is suggested that Andonian's clumsy forgery of
this term may well have stemmed from the fact that non-Muslims, even
those who knew Ottoman Turkish, did not employ this injunction.
7. A number of examples from Andonian's forgeries show that it is
simply inconceivable that any Ottoman official could have used such
sentence structures and make such grammatical errors. In the same
vein, a host of expressions; allegedly uttered by prominent Ottoman
officials are used, which no Ottoman Turk would ever have used.
Andonian's intention in these instances was clear: he wanted nothing
less than the Turks themselves to be seeming to confess to crimes
which he had manufactured for them.
8. The forged documents, with two exceptions, were written on plain
paper with none of the usual signs found on the official paper used
by
the Ottoman bureaucracy in this period. The fact that one of the
forged Turkish originals was written on a double-lined paper, which
the Ottomans did not even use for private correspondence, constitutes
an even more serious error on Andonian's part. Even the two forgeries
which appear at first glance to have been written on some kind of
official Ottoman stationery are actually written on blank telegraph
forms, which anyone wishing to send a telegram could pick up in any
Ottoman post office.
9. At a time when the British were frantically searching the world's
archives for anything to be used as "evidence" against the group of
Ottoman officials whom they were holding for trial as being
"responsible for the Armenian incidents", their failure to utilize
Andonian's "documents" which were readily available in their English
edition, strongly suggests that the British Government was fully
aware
of the nature of these forgeries.
10. Had documents of the nature of those concocted by Andonian ever
actually existed, their confidential nature would have dictated that
they be sent by courier for security reasons; rather than through the
easily breachable public telegraph system. Likewise, had such
documents really ever been written; it is inconceivable that they
could have lain around in a file for three years, instead of being
destroyed as soon as they had been read.
11. There are also numerous differences between the French and
English
editions of Andonian's book. Indeed, these variations are of such
significance that it is absolutely impossible to ascribe them to
printing errors, or errors in translation.
12. Finally, the fact that even some authors with close links to
Armenian circles, who serve as spokesmen for Armenian causes, have
indicated their own doubt as to the veracity of Andonian's
"documents"
should not be overlooked. In short, from start to finish the so-
called
"Talat Pasha Telegrams" are nothing more than crude forgeries,
concocted by Andonian and his associates. Moreover the Ottoman
archives contain a number of orders; whose authenticity can
definitely
be substantiated, issued on the same dates, in which Talat Pasha
ordered investigations to be made to find and punish those
responsible
for the attacks which were being made on the deportation caravans. It
is hardly likely that he would have been ordering massacres on one
hand and investigations and punishments for such crimes on the other.
A letter forged by Aram Andonian with the date, February 18, 1331
(March 2,1916) opens with a "bismillah" (blessing), which would never
have been written by a Moslem. The forger, Andonian, made his most
fatal mistake with the date, however. He was obviously not well
enough
versed in the tricks of converting to the Rumi year of the Ottomans,
where a difference of thirteen days between the Rumi and Gregorian
calendars must be taken into account.
The date he put on the letter was off by a full year. Instead of 1330
(1915), he wrote 1331 (1916). The contents of the letter are supposed
to be evidence of the long advance planning of the resettlement
operation of 1915.(42) (42) Feigl, Erich. A Myth of Terror, 1991,
Edition zeitgeschichten-Freilassing- Salzburg, p. 85
An American aid organization called "the Near East Relief Society"
was
allowed by the Ottoman Government to stay and fulfill its functions
in
Anatolia during the deportations. Even following the entry of U.S.A.
into war on the side of Entente powers against Ottoman Empire, the
same organization was permitted to remain in Anatolia. This was dealt
in the reports of the American Ambassador Elkus in Istanbul. In this
case, if an order for "massacring Armenians" had been given, would
the
Ottoman Government have allowed to an American organization to be
witness to the "massacres". In other words, it is ridiculous to
suppose that the Ottomans said to America: "We are massacring
Armenians. Why don't you have a look at it." Such an allegation could
never be a logical explanation of historic facts. Finally, and in the
end most important, when the war came to an end, the Armenian
population still was substantially in place in Western Anatolia,
Thrace and Istanbul. Had the Ottoman government ordered massacres,
evidently they too would have been killed. And for that matter, had
the Ottoman government wanted to eliminate all the Armenians in the
Empire, it could have done so far more easily by killing and
disposing
of them where they lived, rather than undertaking a large-scale
deportation of those in the Eastern war zones under the eyes of
foreign observers.
The claim, thus, that the Ottoman government ordered and carried out
a
general massacre of Armenians in the Empire cannot be sustained and
is
disproved by the facts.
- Do you know while diaspora Armenians spend million dollars for
anti-
turkish propaganda, their own people Armenians are dying of hunger
and
cold weather in Yerevan / Armenia?
- Do you know that 20% of Azerbaijan Lands have been under Armenian
occupation since 1992?
ARMENIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS
ASALA-"Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia"
ASALA is the most talked-about Armenian terrorist organization, in
the
new period of the Armenian terrorism between 1973 and 1985. The firm
information about its foundation, organization structure and
activities are yet to be published. Various Armenian sources and
publications give some information about some people and ASALA, and
they often announce the results obtained from the publications of
this
organization and terrorist group. The information includes those
desired to be disseminated or those which are not found inappropriate
to announce. From one standpoint, ASALA's foundation is attributable
to incidents emerged in Lebanon, it is regarded as part of activities
of Palestinian Liberation Organizations in Lebanon, and it is
supported that it is these activities which have inspired its
foundation. On the other hand according to some publications, several
Armenians gathered and founded a new terrorist organization which
created the most striking and efficient terrorist activities in a
short period of time. All of these are far from fully explaining the
foundation of ASALA. The existing hesitations will continue for a
long
time unless the conditions under which ASALA has emerged as an
organization, is known and the gap it has filled has been
satisfactorily clarified.
- While some Armenians erect monuments dedicated to the memorial of
1.500.000" Armenians slaughtered by "Turkish Government" in 1915
without knowing that there had not been a Turkish Government in 1915.
- Also Armenian Diaspora and its strong supporters used distorted
photos in order to propagate world public opinion about so-called
Armenian Genocide, lets discover the truth behind them.Do not let
one-
sided Armenian propaganda take you in forgeries and do not let
Armenians make you know both-sided 1915 tragedy as "Armenian
Genocide".
First of all, it must be known that the first movements of the
Armenian terrorism in the new period have emerged as a requirement of
the policies and objectives of the Tashnak Armenian terrorist
organization. It has been clarified with various evidence that
Tashnaks have completely supported the western view in the historical
process and in the described period and that they have pursued a
policy based on the Turkish objectives and implementing terrorism at
a
limited level. Actually, neither their structure nor their historical
development is suitable to display any approach and conduct other
than
above. There is a gap in this environment. An attractive future,
closely concerning the Marxist and new revolutionary generations and
called new Armenian resistance organizations in particular as put in
France, is presumed to be a gap related to the Soviets and the
Eastern
countries. In fact, this field has been already filled long time ago
by Hýnchaks. And since 1960, Hýnchaks have been paving the ground for
the new terrorism with various views. However, Hýnchaks do not appear
around, and a new terrorist organization called ASALA emerges with
the
desire to be seen as new in every aspect. Considering the preparatory
factors of the new Armenian terrorism and reviewing in particular
Hýnchaks' goals, policies and objectives may lead us to think that
Hýnchaks constitute a terrorist group. Nevertheless, the conditions
in
Lebanon, new developments caused this group to appear before the
world
public opinion as a new Armenian Terrorist group, and this
organization has become known with the terrorist incidents for which
it has claimed responsibility. Actually, there is no remarkable
change
in the situation. In the historical process, both terrorist
organizations are on the stage. One is more evident with its
terrorist
groups and teams, while the other is invisible with all manpower,
experience in addition to the immaterial and psychological support
remain under a cover of an Armenian terrorist group, and this group
performs terrorist acts through groups and teams of lower level.
1. Foundation and Organization Structure
ASALA was founded in 1975. Of its founders comprised of 6-7 members,
Agop Agopyan, one of the two most active members of the terrorist
organization, was the known leader. The other was Agop Tarakçýyan who
performed the murder acts himself and terrorist incidents and who
made
the organization survive while Agop Agopyan was absent. The latter
died in 1981. The former remained as the leader of the organization
except the periods of various injuries and treatments. He came to be
known as a worker of the Palestinian Liberation Organizations. He
bore
the name Mucahit.
The structure of the organization was suitable for the model of the
Armenian terrorist organizations.
The Lebanese Central Committee assumed the top management of the
organization. In particular, in 1980, this committee took an
important
shape in Lebanon. And it got the air of Büron.
Some of the assigned affiliated sub-institutions and bodies to the
Central Committee were the Political Committee-Financial Committee
Propaganda and Publication Committee-Intelligence Committee and
Military Committee. The military committee was a body to which also
the act teams were affiliated.
2. Goals and Objectives
ASALA published to the world public its political program declared in
1981 with its goals and objectives. Accordingly, the goal of ASALA
was
to found a democratic, socialist and revolutionary Armenia united
under the leadership of the Government. It was clearly understood
where this defined Government was. The Soviet Union and socialist
states were requested every kind of assistance and the Soviet Armenia
was regarded as a base for the long war of the public.
The enemies fell under two groups in the political program. The first
of these was called local reactionaries who were the Armenians
against
ASALA or not for ASALA, being Tashnak Armenian terrorist group, while
the second was shown as the Turkish Imperialism supported by the
international imperialism.
ASALA accepted and proclaimed that the basic way for rescuing the
Armenian territory (?) is to commit revolutionary violent acts. Under
the program, ASALA would support those who refused the hegemony of
the
upper classes and make efforts to set up and strengthen coalitions
within the international revolutionary movement. For which violence
and terrorism were the bases.
In order for the objectives to be achieved within ASALA, it did not
matter if the terrorist acts were committed particularly against
Turks
or friends of Turks or if official or distinguished people were
selected. "Terrorism was an incident and what mattered was the
dimension of it. The objectives might be given secondary importance.
For this reason, massacres, killings which would cause great
repercussions and bombings were prioritized, and not much emphasis
was
placed on the casualties being a child, woman, Turk or being of any
other nationality. However, every tine, Turks and Turkey were
prioritized for the terrorist acts. The reasons of the attacks and
massacres at the Ankara-Paris Airports, Istanbul and Kapalýçarþý and
Orly attack were simply the effect and repercussion that the
dimension
of such incident would bring.
3. Strategies, approaches and conducts
The basic strategy in ASALA was to gather all the progressive
Armenian
movements all over the world at one point in Lebanon and to guide
them
from a center. . In short, the progressive Armenians would unite
under
one roof and initiate the "ASALA Public Movement". This would
consequently enable the progressive Armenian powers to engage in a
formal cooperation and to combine their powers.
ASALA tried to implement this part of its strategy by calling for a
meeting in Lebanon for all the progressive Armenians in the world.
The
wording "progressive" meant "socialist-Marxist".
The second stage of the strategy was to spread terrorism through this
union of power along with the assistance of the socialist
governments,
and start the war period. The Armenian terrorism was a part of the
liberation struggles in the Middle East, and could unite with any
movement against the integrity of Turkey. The cooperation between
ASALA and PKK occurred as a result of this strategy.
The approaches and conduct in ASALA reflected a full terrorism.
Terrorism at every level of administration and implementation was
considered to be symbol of this organization. Leaders killed one
another and liquidated those whom they did not like and made them
kill. Apart from these, every terrorist team was attempted to be
introduced to the world public as a new terrorist organization and
every kind of propaganda was made in this regard. The responsibility
for the murders were claimed by various, newly-known organizations.
Attached is a list at the end of the study regarding the efforts how
the death-killing-bombing-rebel teams was shown as an organization
under different names. The reader may carefully follow through this
list what such a great number of Armenian organization may do.
However, none of these could go beyond being a team or group, and
remained as the machines of murder affiliated to and guided by ASALA.
4. Political developments
Regarding ASALA, which had been accepted to be founded in 1975, the
political developments became effective in two phases. It was
strengthened with new powers it had been provided during the Paris
Armenian Conference held in 1979. It was reinforced in 1981. It was
divided into two in 1983.
The terrorist organization, which had been founded in 1975, performed
its first act by assassination of the first secretary of the Turkish
Embassy in Beirut, Oktay Cerit by one of its founders Agop Tarakçýyan
in 16 February 1976. It was involved in the conflicts among
Palestinians until 1979. Contacts were initiated with the Armenian
terrorists in France during the Armenian conference held in Paris in
1979. And the organization gained new members; new blood. The most
well-known ones among these were Alex Yenikomþiyan and Monte
Melkiyan.
In 1981,many terrorist acts were committed by these new groups. ASALA
started to threaten Switzerland on one hand and France on the other
hand. The New Armenian Resistance Organization in France announced
that "Azad Hay" in Canada and "Gaitzer" in United Kingdom joined
ASALA: The terrorism continued with great efficiency and became
common
during these years and conflicts started in the central staff In
particular, the terrorist acts performed by ASALA, targeting also the
innocent people discredited it in various public opinion polls.
Following the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the ASALA executives were
compelled to leave Lebanon along with the Palestinians. The
organization was divided into two in July 1983.
The Agop Agopyan Group were settled in Greece and the Middle East. It
continued terrorism without discriminating between the Turkish and
foreign people or woman or child. Orly continued massacres and
attacks.
In the Western Europe, it got the name "ASALA Revolutionary
Movement".
It followed a policy which was based upon a more moderate approach
and
targeting only Turkish people. The two leaders of this movement were
Monte Melkoyan and Ara Toranyan. Toranyan led a Paris-based group
called Armenian National Movement. This group qualified the Orly
attack as a completely Fascist attack.
Melkonyan, on the other hand, stated that they aimed at establishing
the political ground for the Armenian struggle. According to this,
the
movements had two aspects: (1) activate the Armenians (2)Cooperate
with other powers which are taking action against Turkey. Melkoyan
who
was born in Iran put forward the strategy to forge alliances at the
second stage. Agopyan continued his activities, too.
5. Support and relations
ASALA is provided a triple support as a result of its aims and
ongoing
policies: (1) Support by the Soviets-Eastern Block and Socialist
countries (2) Support of countries, with a policy based upon
weakening
Turkey through internal and external threats and terrorism, as
required by their geopolitical expectations: Greece, Syria etc. (3)
Support provided by communist parties, indirectly from Hýnchak
Armenian terrorist organization and its sympathizers, and from the
Armenian churches, though they hold counter-views.
ASALA's relations were arranged, in line with the strategy they were
implementing, by giving a priority to the non-Armenian terrorist
organizations, which were in an attempt to pose a threat, and use
terrorism against Turkey. These included at the stage between 1975
and
1980, the Palestinian Liberation Organization, communist parties,
activist groups and secret organizations of some states. In April
1980, ASALA expanded its relations with the joint act agreement
signed
with PKK in Sidon, Lebanon. It is by this way, a unity in view and
act
was established between ASALA and PKK.
In actuality, both organizations share the same aims, and have
similar
structure and views. At the stage starting after 1983, ASALA
developed
its relations in compliance with the strategy of Monte Melkoyan. The
basis of the strategy was to focusing on the use of terrorism in
Turkey, and establishing relations with every organization which was
directly or indirectly capable of implementing this strategy in the
form of acts. Some of the leading ones are PKK, similar institutions,
TKP and other communist organizations.
6. Publications and means of communication
The most important and official publication of ASALA is "HAYASTAN".
Besides, the magazines "Haykar", "Armenia" and "Kaytzer" published in
London are included among the leading publications.
ASALA started its radio broadcasts in Beirut in 1981, and made
broadcasts one hour a day with the title "Voice of Lebanese
Armenians". Apart from these, the communication means and public
communication systems of the countries with which it has relations,
are providing ASALA with support in broadcasting.
stran...@gmail.com
Ce e important foarte important este sa nu se faca pauza in momentul
asta in care am
oprit (razboaile civile ) . Exista o perioada unica din momentul in
care am oprit
(razboaiele civile si pina la crush total multymode daca nu) se face
full delivery la toate
cele definite toate fiind necesare interelated si conectate pentru a
iesii safe .
Asa ca fara intrerupere sub ww3 protocols all data out direct form si
scoatetii oamenii
pe strazii asa cum a fost defined safe si real full system change ca
definit .
Este clar ca totul dar absolut totul este distrus de cea ce ati
facut .
! nici un delay altfel va intoarcetii la (crush multymode de data asta
total !).
RAMINE EXACT ASA CUM AM HOTARIT .
G
PS
ALA CU TRIPUL REDUDANT FARA NICI O VALOARE DIN PSY, INTELUL MEU LOCAL
APARTININD VOUA CU PARCAREA SI TRIPUL ANAL VA FI EXECUTAT LA ICC ESTE
SAKED PARKED SI OUT OF WORK.
DE MINE NU MAI STIE DE EL IN CE TRIPURII PE INVERS E EL.
ESTE ACEIASII TEAM DIN ORASH CARE SUGE PULA SI DACA VREA SA II FIE
BINE SE MISCA DIN TRIP ACUM .