FED Corporatocracy Versus the Constitution
Muhammad Javed Iqbal
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 3:34 AM
To: GeoNotes@mcn. net
Subject: FED Corporatocracy vs. the Constitution
Graphically Archived at:
<http://www.heartcom .org/FEDvsConsti tution.htm>
www.heartcom. org/FEDvsConstit ution.htm
by Christopher Rudy, Editor
GeoNotes <http://www.heartcom .org/GeonotesNew s.htm> News
<http://www.heartcom .org/GeonotesNew s.htm>
<http://www.facebook .com/l.php? u=http%253A% 252F%252Fdigg. com
%252Fd31I5O8% 253
Ff&h=4d721ecc3ece1b 04a6acd0fc4c87a7 5f&ref=mf> Image removed by
sender. []The
great contest of freedom and tyranny has come to a head. U.S. Founders
created a Republic, a government of laws to optimize core
Constitutional
freedoms for all. But the superlative notion of "best for all" got
hijacked
by powerful interests which discovered ways to vote money from the
public
treasury.
The last 100 years has vindicated the Founders' concern.
Witness subversion of the Republic by moneyed power
that talks democracy but walks a monopoly on power.
The pure intention of the Founders warned us to pay attention to the
greatest enemy threatening the health of the Republic. The Founders
warned
us repeatedly to watch for the abuse of power that would most likely
come
from powerful moneyed interests that have a vested interest in keeping
freedom and self-governing self control FROM the people rather than
of, by
and for the people. They were right then, and this should be self-
evident in
the chaos, confusion and corruption we see today.
"We have the greatest opportunity the world has ever seen, as long as
we
remain honest which will be as long as we can keep the attention of
our
people alive. If they once become inattentive to public affairs, you
and I,
and Congress and Assemblies, judges and governors would all become
wolves."
- Thomas Jefferson, Chief Author of the Declaration of Independence
and 3rd U.S. President
Given the pure intention of the Founders, warning us to keep the
attention
of our people alive, we should keep in mind the big picture -- the
difference between the unchartered wilderness of early America and the
unchartered wilderness today -- the web of global conscience at the
heart of
our new "Net reality"; the computer/Internet revolution has made
horse-and-buggy representation systems as retro as planned
obsolescence. We
have new capabilities for upgrading core Constitutional
<http://www.heartcom .org/FiveCoreFre edoms.htm> freedoms for all, yet
monopolized concentrations of power suppress the pure intention of
U.S.
Founders.
Witness how mainstream media has diverted public attention from
focus on solutions to the anachronistic system of public
representation
that has been co-opted by private monopolies via moneyed power.
The best example is the privately owned "FED
<http://www.heartcom .org/FED. htm> " (banking system) which, by
stealth and
unConstitutional means, took over Treasury powers of the Republic
almost 100
years ago. The leading scholastic expert on the FED
<http://www.heartcom .org/FED. htm> , Eustice Mullins died this last
week,
Feb. 2nd. In honor of this brilliant writer, I've included a chapter
from
his book on the creation of the Federal Reserves System, at
www.heartcom. org/FedCreation. htm .
See also some current revealing news in the media this last week --
"FED in
the News <http://www.heartcom .org/FedNews. htm> ". As the first
article via
Rep. Ron Paul states plainly, the FED operates in secret, never
allowing a
public audit.
The subversion of the pure intention of the Constitution
began the destruction of the Republic with the "FED
<http://www.heartcom .org/FED. htm> ".
All the disconnect, divisions and dysfunction we see today
are the bad fruit that has privatized core public institutions
for the profit of money-changers in the public treasury.
U.S Founders also abhorred corporatocracy
<http://www.heartcom .org/SupremeCoup .htm> , those privatized special
interests that, by corporate law <http://www.heartcom .org/CorpLaw.
htm> , put
their stockholders before the public when profits are at stake. Back
in
1776, it was corporate interests of the King that were taxing and
ruling
Americans without representation, the cause of the Revolution we are
told.
But there's more.
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed
corporations
which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength,
and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
~ Thomas Jefferson, Chief Architect of
the Declaration of Independence
Modern U.S. history books have been rewritten to virtually eradicate
the
challenge and defiance of "the banksters <http://www.heartcom .org/
FED. htm> "
in their covert war to own and control the United States.
The Founders wisely placed the Constitutional power to "coin Money and
regulate the Value thereof" in Congress, the same as "common Defense"
and
"the general Welfare of the United States". But the banksters
<http://www.heartcom .org/FED. htm> overrode the Constitution in both
1791
and 1913.
The false flag Tea Parties don't discuss this, the real enemy of
America as
the fiat money founded in debt to the world banksters.
Benjamin Franklin said the American Revolution was not about taxes but
about
money, "We issue our own money called Colonial Scrip. In creating our
own
paper money, we control its purchasing power and have no interest to
pay to
anyone." At the urging of the English bankers in 1764, the British
Currency
Act banned the colonial script as legal tender in favor of the debt
ridden
English pound and the colonies plunged from prosperity into a
depression
which caused the Revolution (emphasis added ~CR)
When the British burnt down the White House (War of 1812), it was once
again
to take control of the U.S. over the issue of a central bank. If you
read
this short <http://www.heartcom .org/FED. htm> History of the FED, you
will
know the true story behind the increasing frequency and magnitude of
wars in
the last century... and the ultimatum now facing United Sovereigns of
Earth;
a global issue.
Since the FED took over the U.S. Treasury, the Rothschild banking
powers of
Europe (Bank of England, etc.) joined forces with robber barons of
America
as owners and controllers of the FED, creating debt by printing money
for a
fraction of the action (compound interest) that is paid by U.S.
taxpayers,
with the IRS created at the same time as the FED to pay the interest
on the
debt.
The Federal Reserve is a private foreign corporation
whose owners and shareholders are kept secret.
For almost a century, America has gone down the slippery slope of loss
of
sovereignty under the Constitution due to the controlling interest of
the
FED to create public debt for private profit and power. Thus began the
corporate recipe for creating and managing global wars for profit. The
price
for this is that America is now mortgaged to the hilt, a foreign
corporation
(FED <http://www.heartcom .org/FED. htm> ) owns our banking system,
and a
foreign government (China) owns a majority of home mortgages as
collateral
on trade deficits.
Thanks to the banksters, the U.S. is technically bankrupt,
in severe gridlock and devolutionary recession.
The Republic is in grave danger and
we were warned!
"Money Changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and
violent
means possible to maintain their control over governments by
controlling
money and its issuance."
- James Madison, 4th U.S. President
The golden rule of the Constitution is that Constitutional law rules,
at
least as long as the love of power is kept in check by the "power of
love",
the Higher Power of a moral compass that honors a God of Love at the
heart
of our time-keeping system (BC/AD), in reference to a Christ-like
standard
for the Golden Rule.
"Conscience is the most sacred of property."
~ James Madison, Chief Architect of the Constitution
The golden rule of the money-changers in the temple of public
government is
that he who has the gold makes the rules. Biblical history tells us
that
the only time Jesus the Christ got angry is when he overturned the
tables of
the money-changers in the temple. Ron Paul and some honorable Congress
reps
have attempted to abolish the "FED" money-changers, but there are too
many
paid-off reps content with their perks of profit and power without
Constitutional principle... even though they swore their vow on a
Bible to
stand against all enemies of the Constitution, foreign and DOMESTIC.
For almost 100 years, the privately owned "FED" has been creating debt
to
finance war profiteers and underwrite other giant corporations that
monopolize core social institutions. Domestic enemy #1 is now well
entrenched not only in K-Street and Wall Street, but also garrisoned
in the
banking houses of Main Street America.
"Citizen outrage mounts over the 5-4 Supreme Court decision to
let 'corporate persons' have far more financial clout in elections
than flesh-and-blood ones."
~ Steve Bhaerman at, "
<http://www.opednews .com/articles/ The-Democrats- Shocking- Di-by-
Steve- Bhaerma
n-100121-800. html> The Democrats' Shocking Discovery"
There are those who see the trends to corporatocracy
<http://www.heartcom .org/SupremeCoup .htm> and see only the
consequent
dysfunction and devolution of core social institutions that barely
serve the
Constitutional laws for which they were created.
"We are living in a nation that is the victim of a hostile takeover by
Big
Money interests. This Supreme Court ruling will complete that hostile
takeover. In short, we will become a complete corporatocracy.
Corporations
are not people - they live forever and they can commit crime and
cannot be
put in jail. Moreover, the rights of personhood are not merely being
extended to American corporations - this ruling means that for
nkdat...@bigmailbox.net
wrote:
Can this be more shocking to Mr. Muhammad Javed Iqbal than what
happens under the Kakul trained kleptocrats in Pakistan?!!
> From: Christopher Rudy [mailto:geonotes@mcn. net]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 3:34 AM
> To: GeoNotes@mcn. net
> Subject: FED Corporatocracy vs. the Constitution
> Graphically Archived at:
> <http://www.heartcom.org/FEDvsConsti tution.htm>www.heartcom. org/FEDvsConstit ution.htm
>
> by Christopher Rudy, Editor
> GeoNotes <http://www.heartcom.org/GeonotesNew s.htm> News
> <http://www.heartcom.org/GeonotesNew s.htm>
>
> <http://www.facebook.com/l.php? u=http%253A% 252F%252Fdigg. com
> <http://www.heartcom.org/FiveCoreFre edoms.htm> freedoms for all, yet
> monopolized concentrations of power suppress the pure intention of
> U.S.
> Founders.
>
> Witness how mainstream media has diverted public attention from
> focus on solutions to the anachronistic system of public
> representation
> that has been co-opted by private monopolies via moneyed power.
>
> The best example is the privately owned "FED
> <http://www.heartcom.org/FED. htm> " (banking system) which, by
> stealth and
> unConstitutional means, took over Treasury powers of the Republic
> almost 100
> years ago. The leading scholastic expert on the FED
> <http://www.heartcom.org/FED. htm> , Eustice Mullins died this last
> week,
> Feb. 2nd. In honor of this brilliant writer, I've included a chapter
> from
> his book on the creation of the Federal Reserves System, atwww.heartcom. org/FedCreation. htm .
>
> See also some current revealing news in the media this last week --
> "FED in
> the News <http://www.heartcom.org/FedNews. htm> ". As the first
> article via
> Rep. Ron Paul states plainly, the FED operates in secret, never
> allowing a
> public audit.
>
> The subversion of the pure intention of the Constitution
> began the destruction of the Republic with the "FED
> <http://www.heartcom.org/FED. htm> ".
> All the disconnect, divisions and dysfunction we see today
> are the bad fruit that has privatized core public institutions
> for the profit of money-changers in the public treasury.
>
> U.S Founders also abhorred corporatocracy
> <http://www.heartcom.org/SupremeCoup .htm> , those privatized special
> interests that, by corporate law <http://www.heartcom.org/CorpLaw.
> htm> , put
> their stockholders before the public when profits are at stake. Back
> in
> 1776, it was corporate interests of the King that were taxing and
> ruling
> Americans without representation, the cause of the Revolution we are
> told.
> But there's more.
>
> "I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed
> corporations
> which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength,
> and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
> ~ Thomas Jefferson, Chief Architect of
> the Declaration of Independence
>
> Modern U.S. history books have been rewritten to virtually eradicate
> the
> challenge and defiance of "the banksters <http://www.heartcom.org/
> FED. htm> "
> in their covert war to own and control the United States.
>
> The Founders wisely placed the Constitutional power to "coin Money and
> regulate the Value thereof" in Congress, the same as "common Defense"
> and
> "the general Welfare of the United States". But the banksters
> <http://www.heartcom.org/FED. htm> overrode the Constitution in both
> 1791
> and 1913.
>
> The false flag Tea Parties don't discuss this, the real enemy of
> America as
> the fiat money founded in debt to the world banksters.
>
> Benjamin Franklin said the American Revolution was not about taxes but
> about
> money, "We issue our own money called Colonial Scrip. In creating our
> own
> paper money, we control its purchasing power and have no interest to
> pay to
> anyone." At the urging of the English bankers in 1764, the British
> Currency
> Act banned the colonial script as legal tender in favor of the debt
> ridden
> English pound and the colonies plunged from prosperity into a
> depression
> which caused the Revolution (emphasis added ~CR)
>
> When the British burnt down the White House (War of 1812), it was once
> again
> to take control of the U.S. over the issue of a central bank. If you
> read
> this short <http://www.heartcom.org/FED. htm> History of the FED, you
> (FED <http://www.heartcom.org/FED. htm> ) owns our banking system,
> <http://www.opednews.com/articles/ The-Democrats- Shocking- Di-by-
> Steve- Bhaerma
> n-100121-800. html> The Democrats' Shocking Discovery"
>
> There are those who see the trends to corporatocracy
> <http://www.heartcom.org/SupremeCoup .htm> and see only the
Timur
Satish Kumar
EDITORIAL
Water wrangles
Saturday, 13 Feb, 2010 | 12:44 AM PST |
DISPUTES over water are simmering and must be resolved before they
reach boiling point. On Wednesday, the Indus commissioners for
Pakistan and India were trying to hammer out a solution to the
perennial water quarrels between the two countries. The next day there
were reports of a deadlock in inter-provincial talks on determining
water shares under the 1991 Irsa agreement. This time Punjab’s
representatives were desperate enough to walk out of the session. And
yesterday Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif announced that Punjab was not
going to budge from its position on provincial water shares. Reports
said he planned to meet the prime minister next week to emphasise
Punjab’s viewpoint. Sindh and Balochistan, the two tail-end provinces,
meanwhile appear determined to hold on to their ‘rightful’ share.
This has been a long-unresolved matter, with or without the 1991 water
accord. The latest controversy centres around Irsa’s mid-season
revision of its estimates of how much water may be available in the
pool and Punjab’s claim that it was justified in getting additional
water by opening the Chashma-Jhelum link canal. The revised
probabilities are “not acceptable” to Sindh and Balochistan, just as
their argument is unacceptable to Punjab. Moreover, the tail-enders
maintain that Punjab was allowed 400,000 acre feet of water in
December last year and are seeking commensurate compensation. And if
this were not enough trouble already, Punjab-minders are not partial
to the idea that a man from Sindh is the federal representative in
Irsa, a body whose neutrality and very utility remains in doubt after
all these years.
The country could be on the brink of a major showdown on water. The
tendency once again is to call for sacrifices from the federating
units, which is at best an ad hoc way of doing things. An interim
settlement through prime ministerial or presidential intervention will
spell more of the same old ‘strategy’. Ideally what we need is a new
social contract but that seems to be a distant dream. But if that is
beyond us we can surely make a start by being more professional and
transparent. This professionalism ought to apply across the board,
from water probability reports to measures aimed at ensuring rational
and efficient use of water in a country with a burgeoning population.
What other options do we have? New water reservoirs, small and big,
are often cited as being absolutely essential. But without a more
professional, technically sound approach to tackling the problem at
various tiers right down to the farms, they certainly do not hold much
water or promise.