Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
good...@rock.com  
View profile
 More options Apr 30, 2:32 pm
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.pacific-island, talk.philosophy.humanism, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.bush
From: good...@rock.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 30 2008 2:32 pm
Subject: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
People who are against sex are ugly fat people who can't get laid, or
are people who have never been fucked good.

Sex in public should be legal.  It's the oldest act known to mankind,
and your unalienable right.

------------------

Sex is not immoral if two forms of birth control are used, as the risk
of pregnancy falls to nearly zero.

It's the difference between a risk in the tens or hundreds and a risk
in the thousands or tens of thousands.

Combine any of the following two methods for greater protection
against pregnancy:

Condoms
Pill
Pull-Out Method
Diaphragm/Sponge

When used alone, some of these methods such as the pull-out method are
ineffectual.  When combined, the chance that both fail is nearly zero.

For example, if you roll one die, what is the chance 1 comes up?  1 in
6.  If you roll two dice, what is the chance you get snake eyes? 1 in
36.  The risks of pregnancy are usually given on a yearly basis
assuming 80-100 sex acts.  If the risk of pregnancy in typical use is
1 in 6 for condoms and 1 in 12 for the pill, per year, this must mean
100 in 600 and 100  in 1200.   If you roll a 1200 sided die and a 600
sided die 100 times, what is the chance you get snake eyes?  100 in
1200x600=720,000 or 1 in 7,200.   Thus the risk of pregnancy per year
in typical use if both condoms and the pill are used is 1 in 7,200,
compared to just 1 in 12 per year for the pill and 1 in 6 per year for
condoms.  In perfect use we see a similar difference of 1 in 50 for
condoms and 1 in 300 for the pill; this corresponds to 100 in 5,000
and 100 in 30,000.  The chance you get snake eyes: 100 in
5,000x30,000=150,000,000 or 1 in 1,500,000 per year in perfect use
compared to 1 in 50 and 1 in 300.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Frank Arthur  
View profile
 More options Apr 30, 2:35 pm
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.pacific-island, talk.philosophy.humanism, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.bush
From: "Frank Arthur" <A...@Arthurian.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:35:53 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 30 2008 2:35 pm
Subject: Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

<good...@rock.com> wrote in message

news:41fd4b8f-b3b2-44ff-af12-d22d81521da1@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

> People who are against sex are ugly fat people who can't get laid,
> or
> are people who have never been fucked good.

> Sex in public should be legal.  It's the oldest act known to
> mankind,
> and your unalienable right.

Not the oldest act. Before sex was defication.
Defication is an unalienable act.
Would you shit all over the streets?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
good...@rock.com  
View profile
 More options May 1, 1:57 am
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.pacific-island, talk.philosophy.humanism, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.bush
From: good...@rock.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 1 2008 1:57 am
Subject: Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
On Apr 30, 11:35 am, "Frank Arthur" <A...@Arthurian.com> wrote:

> <good...@rock.com> wrote in message

> news:41fd4b8f-b3b2-44ff-af12-d22d81521da1@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

> > People who are against sex are ugly fat people who can't get laid,
> > or
> > are people who have never been fucked good.

> > Sex in public should be legal.  It's the oldest act known to
> > mankind,
> > and your unalienable right.

> Not the oldest act. Before sex was defication.
> Defication is an unalienable act.
> Would you shit all over the streets?

Shitting all over the streets is litter.  If you shit in a bowl that
would be okay.  It is actually legal to shit in public already, it's
just the exposure which is illegal.  It may be perceived as
disgusting, but it's your right to look away.

Sex probably came first anyway.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google