Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Ben Cramer

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Benito Cramerrini

unread,
Jun 26, 2009, 1:38:08 AM6/26/09
to
On Jun 23, 12:14 am, Johannes von Ebersdorf <ebersd...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:10:32 +0200, "Heinrich"
>
>
>
> <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>
> >"Gord McFee" <gord.mc...@rogers.com> schreef in bericht
> >news:2VB%l.68412$op1....@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com...
> >> On 6/20/2009 3:19 PM, Heinrich wrote:
>
> >>> het is alweer een tijd geleden dat wij iets van de poster met de naam
> >>> ben cramer hebben gehoord.
>
> >>> een geestelijk beperkt persoon vond het noodzakelijk een vervalsing
> >>> op internet  te zetten waarvan hij het idee had dat dit wel indruk
> >>> zou maken.
>
> >>> gelukkig viel hij spoedig door de mand en bleek er niets met ben aan
> >>> de hand te zijn.
>
> >>> desalniettemin vind ik het noodzakelijk u er op te willen wijzen, dat
> >>> enige support van uw kant wel op zijn plaats is.
>
> >>> uw adhesie betuigingen kunt u in deze draad kwijt.
>
> >>> ook joden worden verzocht te reageren.
>
> >> The fact that Heinrich is full of shit is demonstrated by the fact he
> >> posts in Dutch, a language most members of this newsgroup do not
> >> understand.
>
> >> --
> >> Gord McFee
> >> I'll write no line before its time
>
> >> Visit the Holocaust History Project
> >>http://www.holocaust-history.org
>
> >according to you own words you are an experton the german language. since
> >dutch and german have a lot in common my posting in dutch should not
> >troubloe you
>
> LOL, Heinrich, while Dutch actually IS a Germanic language, it isn't
> so similar to High German that one understands one if one understands
> the other. The pronunciation rules of written Dutch seem to be quite
> different. I can in fact make out quite a few individual words to
> their German equivalents, but the intent of the sentence is still
> pretty hard to decipher.
>
> After all, Dutch and English are both Germanic languages and both in
> the Low German branch, but there are sufficiently large differences to
> frustrate unilingual speakers of either one in any attempt to decipher
> the other.

"unilingual speakers of either one in any attempt to decipher
the other"

We _are_NOT!_Germanic, you fool!

And Slavic Rules.

Austria - 75+ % Slavic
Germany - 70+ % Balto-Slavic

PS

Have you noticed that your "Germanic" "Brothers und Sisters"
from the West have crooked noses and imperfect facial features?
Have you ever asked yourself why?

Not to mention low IQ.

Tadas Blinda

unread,
Jun 26, 2009, 12:36:39 PM6/26/09
to
On Jun 26, 8:38 am, Benito Cramerrini <benito.cramerr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
TAKE THIS CRAP ELSWHERE! (not SCB)
0 new messages