Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Tibetans Burn Selves for Freedom (Insightful article by Ming Xia).
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Peter Terpstra
Feb 7, 2012, 11:04:38 AM2/7/12
to
Tibetans Burn Selves for Freedom
By Ming Xia
February 7, 2012
News today that three Tibetan herders may have set themselves alight highlights the increasing frequency with which Tibetans (usually
monks or nuns) have been turning to self-immolation, bringing to 19 the total that have done so in the past year.
Why are Tibetans setting themselves on fire with such frequency? The Chinese government has denied any responsibility, instead blaming
the Dalai Lama for encouraging such radical actions. However, this claim doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Chinese government has told
the West that the Dalai Lama is irrelevant to Tibetans, while telling Chinese and Tibetans within China that he has been marginalized to
the point of becoming a “political orphan.” It’s therefore illogical to accuse him of being the mastermind behind radical actions taken
by Tibetans.
The reality is that the Dalai Lama single-handedly introduced democracy to the Tibetan government in exile immediately after he fled to
India in 1959. He established an elected parliament, while the process of democratization was accelerated by his receipt of the Nobel
Prize in Peace in 1989, which also bolstered secularization in the government. Last year, the Dalai Lama announced plans for his full
political retirement, and with Harvard-educated lawyer Lobsang Sangay directly elected to lead a Cabinet comprising laypersons from
young, well-educated, diverse and cosmopolitan backgrounds.
Such success, has, unfortunately, only deepened Beijing’s anxiety over – and hostility toward – the Dalai Lama and Tibetans. For the past
five years, the military, paramilitary police, and law enforcement forces have conducted searches, arrests, blockades and attacks
against
monasteries and their residents. The Communist Party has, meanwhile, escalated its efforts to “modernize” Tibet, including trying to
brainwash Tibetans with themes of atheism, materialism and patriotism. One example of this has been the intensification of the
enforcement of its 15-year-old ban on hanging portraits of the Dalai Lama in monasteries. During this year’s two New Year’s periods
(Chinese and Tibetan), the Chinese government reportedly sent a million Chinese flags and portraits of four Communist Chinese leaders
(Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao) to monasteries. The government has also vowed to make every monastery
subscribe to The People’s Daily and The Tibetan Daily, two important Communist Party newspapers.
In addition, the Chinese government has further broadened its infiltration into religious affairs and tightened control over monasteries
in
an effort to impose its propaganda agenda, while uncooperative monks and nuns have been expelled. It has been reported that in
Lhasa,
the capital of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, there are more Han Chinese than Tibetans, more soldiers than monks, and more
surveillance cameras than windows.
President Hu Jintao (a former Party secretary in Tibet) and Zhou Yongkang (a former Party secretary in Sichuan, where most of the self-
immolations have occurred, and the current czar for internal security), should be seen as directly responsible for the current repressive
policy toward Tibet.
For believers, Buddhism is seen as a way of ending suffering and death. But as Tibetan Buddhism has lost its autonomy, the unique
culture and identity of Tibetans has also risked becoming extinct. Now, instead of choosing between good or bad, monks and nuns feel
they have no choice but to resort to self-immolation to communicate their grievances and protests.
According to various Buddhist teachings in the school of the Greater Vehicle (Mahayana), suicide can be commended under special
conditions, for example if it is conducted “out of profound inner conviction” that no good can any longer be served by the retention of
the physical body, or if it is in higher service to society. Indeed, it is explicitly in The Lotus Sutra (Fahua Jing) that “setting fire to the
body” or “burning the fingers or toes” might be deemed a great offering to Buddha if the Three Jewels that guide Tibetan Buddhists
(Buddha, Dharma and Sangha) have to be defended and honored.
It has been reported that the self-immolating monks and nuns shouted out their wishes for the return of Dalai Lama and the freedom of
Tibet. If such self-immolations are to end, the global community must mobilize, and citizens must pressure their governments to work
to encourage the halting of the persecution of Tibetan Buddhism and the genocide of Tibetan culture that is being perpetrated by the
Chinese state. The Chinese government has shown no sign of changing course in part because global society hasn’t demonstrated its
moral outrage.
Tibetan refugee and activist Lobsang Sangay once said that: “Tibetans have no oil; even our oxygen is thinner than in other places.
Lamas are what we have. So the West does not care much about us.”
With more Tibetan deaths seemingly inevitable, the international community should show that the lives of Tibetans are at least as
important as fluctuating oil prices. Now is time for it to show that it is willing to act to save an endangered people.
Ming Xia is a professor of Political Science at the Graduate Center and the College of Staten Island, the City University of New York.
http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2012/02/07/tibetans-burn-selves-for-freedom/
By Ming Xia
February 7, 2012
News today that three Tibetan herders may have set themselves alight highlights the increasing frequency with which Tibetans (usually
monks or nuns) have been turning to self-immolation, bringing to 19 the total that have done so in the past year.
Why are Tibetans setting themselves on fire with such frequency? The Chinese government has denied any responsibility, instead blaming
the Dalai Lama for encouraging such radical actions. However, this claim doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Chinese government has told
the West that the Dalai Lama is irrelevant to Tibetans, while telling Chinese and Tibetans within China that he has been marginalized to
the point of becoming a “political orphan.” It’s therefore illogical to accuse him of being the mastermind behind radical actions taken
by Tibetans.
The reality is that the Dalai Lama single-handedly introduced democracy to the Tibetan government in exile immediately after he fled to
India in 1959. He established an elected parliament, while the process of democratization was accelerated by his receipt of the Nobel
Prize in Peace in 1989, which also bolstered secularization in the government. Last year, the Dalai Lama announced plans for his full
political retirement, and with Harvard-educated lawyer Lobsang Sangay directly elected to lead a Cabinet comprising laypersons from
young, well-educated, diverse and cosmopolitan backgrounds.
Such success, has, unfortunately, only deepened Beijing’s anxiety over – and hostility toward – the Dalai Lama and Tibetans. For the past
five years, the military, paramilitary police, and law enforcement forces have conducted searches, arrests, blockades and attacks
against
monasteries and their residents. The Communist Party has, meanwhile, escalated its efforts to “modernize” Tibet, including trying to
brainwash Tibetans with themes of atheism, materialism and patriotism. One example of this has been the intensification of the
enforcement of its 15-year-old ban on hanging portraits of the Dalai Lama in monasteries. During this year’s two New Year’s periods
(Chinese and Tibetan), the Chinese government reportedly sent a million Chinese flags and portraits of four Communist Chinese leaders
(Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao) to monasteries. The government has also vowed to make every monastery
subscribe to The People’s Daily and The Tibetan Daily, two important Communist Party newspapers.
In addition, the Chinese government has further broadened its infiltration into religious affairs and tightened control over monasteries
in
an effort to impose its propaganda agenda, while uncooperative monks and nuns have been expelled. It has been reported that in
Lhasa,
the capital of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, there are more Han Chinese than Tibetans, more soldiers than monks, and more
surveillance cameras than windows.
President Hu Jintao (a former Party secretary in Tibet) and Zhou Yongkang (a former Party secretary in Sichuan, where most of the self-
immolations have occurred, and the current czar for internal security), should be seen as directly responsible for the current repressive
policy toward Tibet.
For believers, Buddhism is seen as a way of ending suffering and death. But as Tibetan Buddhism has lost its autonomy, the unique
culture and identity of Tibetans has also risked becoming extinct. Now, instead of choosing between good or bad, monks and nuns feel
they have no choice but to resort to self-immolation to communicate their grievances and protests.
According to various Buddhist teachings in the school of the Greater Vehicle (Mahayana), suicide can be commended under special
conditions, for example if it is conducted “out of profound inner conviction” that no good can any longer be served by the retention of
the physical body, or if it is in higher service to society. Indeed, it is explicitly in The Lotus Sutra (Fahua Jing) that “setting fire to the
body” or “burning the fingers or toes” might be deemed a great offering to Buddha if the Three Jewels that guide Tibetan Buddhists
(Buddha, Dharma and Sangha) have to be defended and honored.
It has been reported that the self-immolating monks and nuns shouted out their wishes for the return of Dalai Lama and the freedom of
Tibet. If such self-immolations are to end, the global community must mobilize, and citizens must pressure their governments to work
to encourage the halting of the persecution of Tibetan Buddhism and the genocide of Tibetan culture that is being perpetrated by the
Chinese state. The Chinese government has shown no sign of changing course in part because global society hasn’t demonstrated its
moral outrage.
Tibetan refugee and activist Lobsang Sangay once said that: “Tibetans have no oil; even our oxygen is thinner than in other places.
Lamas are what we have. So the West does not care much about us.”
With more Tibetan deaths seemingly inevitable, the international community should show that the lives of Tibetans are at least as
important as fluctuating oil prices. Now is time for it to show that it is willing to act to save an endangered people.
Ming Xia is a professor of Political Science at the Graduate Center and the College of Staten Island, the City University of New York.
http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2012/02/07/tibetans-burn-selves-for-freedom/
rst9
Feb 7, 2012, 1:42:22 PM2/7/12
to
On Feb 7, 8:04 am, Peter Terpstra <pe...@dharma.dyn-o-saur.com> wrote:
> Tibetans Burn Selves for Freedom
It sure is, at least free of earthly miseries.
> Tibetans Burn Selves for Freedom
fyf...@gmail.com
Feb 8, 2012, 4:05:44 AM2/8/12
to
On Feb 8, 12:04 am, Peter Terpstra <pe...@dharma.dyn-o-saur.com>
wrote:
> The Chinese government has denied any responsibility,
Of course, if you Peter were to put some shit into your mouth, would
the Chinese government be held responsible?
instead blaming
> the Dalai Lama for encouraging such radical actions. However, this claim doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Chinese government has told
> the West that the Dalai Lama is irrelevant to Tibetans,
To most Tibetans who are working hard for a living to buy color TVs
and Iphones, DL is fucking irrelevant!
while telling Chinese and Tibetans within China that he has been
marginalized to
> the point of becoming a “political orphan.”
What else? A trouble maker?
> It’s therefore illogical to accuse him of being the mastermind behind radical actions taken
> by Tibetans.
He has not called them to stop!
> The reality is that the Dalai Lama single-handedly introduced democracy to the Tibetan government in exile immediately after he fled to
> India in 1959. He established an elected parliament, while the process of democratization was accelerated by his receipt of the Nobel
> Prize in Peace in 1989, which also bolstered secularization in the government. Last year, the Dalai Lama announced plans for his full
> political retirement, and with Harvard-educated lawyer Lobsang Sangay directly elected to lead a Cabinet comprising laypersons from
> young, well-educated, diverse and cosmopolitan backgrounds.
Being a spiritual leader, having democracy inside the government is
only symbolical of the sights of democracy. If he were truly
practicing democracy, he should have Christians and Muslims joining
the 'Tibet government' in order to produce enough diversity for a
government to be democratic.
> Such success, has, unfortunately, only deepened Beijing’s anxiety over – and hostility toward – the Dalai Lama and Tibetans. For the past
> five years, the military, paramilitary police, and law enforcement forces have conducted searches, arrests, blockades and attacks
> against
> monasteries and their residents.
Is that how the Western countries treat terrorist suspects?
> The Communist Party has, meanwhile, escalated its efforts to “modernize” Tibet, including trying to
> brainwash Tibetans with themes of atheism, materialism and patriotism. One example of this has been the intensification of the
> enforcement of its 15-year-old ban on hanging portraits of the Dalai Lama in >monasteries.
Good thing to do!
During this year’s two New Year’s periods
> (Chinese and Tibetan), the Chinese government reportedly sent a million Chinese flags and portraits of four Communist Chinese leaders
> (Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao) to monasteries. The government has also vowed to make every monastery
> subscribe to The People’s Daily and The Tibetan Daily, two important >Communist Party newspapers.
That would be a bit stupid, provided it would true.
> In addition, the Chinese government has further broadened its infiltration into >religious affairs and tightened control over monasteries
> in
> an effort to impose its propaganda agenda, while uncooperative monks and nuns >have been expelled.
Since these parasitic monks and nuns live off the tax payers' money,
that should be the way they are treated. Corporations fire people, do
they?
>It has been reported that in
> Lhasa,
> the capital of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, there are more Han Chinese than Tibetans, more soldiers than monks, and more
> surveillance cameras than windows.
There are more white mainlanders in Hawaii than natives. Why don't
you go and make a fuss of it?
> President Hu Jintao (a former Party secretary in Tibet) and Zhou Yongkang (a >former Party secretary in Sichuan, where most of the self-
> immolations have occurred, and the current czar for internal security), should be >seen as directly responsible for the current repressive
> policy toward Tibet.
Should be seen as 'directly; responsible? Who says so? You?
> For believers, Buddhism is seen as a way of ending suffering and death. But as Tibetan Buddhism has lost its autonomy, the unique
> culture and identity of Tibetans has also risked becoming extinct. Now, instead >of choosing between good or bad, monks and nuns feel
> they have no choice but to resort to self-immolation to communicate their >grievances and protests.
They can get a fucking job serving at Mac and Star Bug.
> According to various Buddhist teachings in the school of the Greater Vehicle (Mahayana), suicide can be commended under special
> conditions,
That school of thought is not much different from Al-Qaeda teaching?
> for example if it is conducted “out of profound inner conviction” that no good can any longer be served by the retention of
> the physical body, or if it is in higher service to society. Indeed, it is explicitly in >The Lotus Sutra (Fahua Jing) that “setting fire to the
> body” or “burning the fingers or toes” might be deemed a great offering to Buddha >if the Three Jewels that guide Tibetan Buddhists
> (Buddha, Dharma and Sangha) have to be defended and honored.
Fuck you! Who has produced these stupid teachings had better start
killing themselves first.
> It has been reported that the self-immolating monks and nuns shouted out their >wishes for the return of Dalai Lama and the freedom of
> Tibet.
That was what the Muslim bombers did when they were about to pull off
the trigger, for that 72 virgins in heaven.
> If such self-immolations are to end, the global community must mobilize, and > citizens must pressure their governments to work
> to encourage the halting of the persecution of Tibetan Buddhism and the genocide of Tibetan culture that is being perpetrated by the
> Chinese state. The Chinese government has shown no sign of changing course in part because global society hasn’t demonstrated its
> moral outrage.
>
> Tibetan refugee and activist Lobsang Sangay once said that: “Tibetans have no oil; even our oxygen is thinner than in other places.
> Lamas are what we have. So the West does not care much about us.”
That is right. Now why burn yourself to show to the West....stupid!
> With more Tibetan deaths seemingly inevitable, the international community should show that the lives of Tibetans are at least as
> important as fluctuating oil prices. Now is time for it to show that it is willing to >act to save an endangered people.
No, the lives of a few Tibetans are not worthy of serious attention.
> Ming Xia is a professor of Political Science at the Graduate Center and the >College of Staten Island, the City University of New York.
>
Another Bowshiter who is ignorant of economics.
> http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2012/02/07/tibetans-burn-selves-f...
wrote:
> Tibetans Burn Selves for Freedom
> By Ming Xia
> February 7, 2012
>
> By Ming Xia
> February 7, 2012
>
> Why are Tibetans setting themselves on fire with such frequency?
It is because they had been brainwashed by kids like yourself...
> The Chinese government has denied any responsibility,
the Chinese government be held responsible?
instead blaming
> the Dalai Lama for encouraging such radical actions. However, this claim doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Chinese government has told
> the West that the Dalai Lama is irrelevant to Tibetans,
and Iphones, DL is fucking irrelevant!
while telling Chinese and Tibetans within China that he has been
marginalized to
> the point of becoming a “political orphan.”
> It’s therefore illogical to accuse him of being the mastermind behind radical actions taken
> by Tibetans.
> The reality is that the Dalai Lama single-handedly introduced democracy to the Tibetan government in exile immediately after he fled to
> India in 1959. He established an elected parliament, while the process of democratization was accelerated by his receipt of the Nobel
> Prize in Peace in 1989, which also bolstered secularization in the government. Last year, the Dalai Lama announced plans for his full
> political retirement, and with Harvard-educated lawyer Lobsang Sangay directly elected to lead a Cabinet comprising laypersons from
> young, well-educated, diverse and cosmopolitan backgrounds.
only symbolical of the sights of democracy. If he were truly
practicing democracy, he should have Christians and Muslims joining
the 'Tibet government' in order to produce enough diversity for a
government to be democratic.
> Such success, has, unfortunately, only deepened Beijing’s anxiety over – and hostility toward – the Dalai Lama and Tibetans. For the past
> five years, the military, paramilitary police, and law enforcement forces have conducted searches, arrests, blockades and attacks
> against
> monasteries and their residents.
> The Communist Party has, meanwhile, escalated its efforts to “modernize” Tibet, including trying to
> brainwash Tibetans with themes of atheism, materialism and patriotism. One example of this has been the intensification of the
> enforcement of its 15-year-old ban on hanging portraits of the Dalai Lama in >monasteries.
During this year’s two New Year’s periods
> (Chinese and Tibetan), the Chinese government reportedly sent a million Chinese flags and portraits of four Communist Chinese leaders
> (Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao) to monasteries. The government has also vowed to make every monastery
> subscribe to The People’s Daily and The Tibetan Daily, two important >Communist Party newspapers.
> In addition, the Chinese government has further broadened its infiltration into >religious affairs and tightened control over monasteries
> in
> an effort to impose its propaganda agenda, while uncooperative monks and nuns >have been expelled.
that should be the way they are treated. Corporations fire people, do
they?
>It has been reported that in
> Lhasa,
> the capital of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, there are more Han Chinese than Tibetans, more soldiers than monks, and more
> surveillance cameras than windows.
you go and make a fuss of it?
> President Hu Jintao (a former Party secretary in Tibet) and Zhou Yongkang (a >former Party secretary in Sichuan, where most of the self-
> immolations have occurred, and the current czar for internal security), should be >seen as directly responsible for the current repressive
> policy toward Tibet.
> For believers, Buddhism is seen as a way of ending suffering and death. But as Tibetan Buddhism has lost its autonomy, the unique
> culture and identity of Tibetans has also risked becoming extinct. Now, instead >of choosing between good or bad, monks and nuns feel
> they have no choice but to resort to self-immolation to communicate their >grievances and protests.
> According to various Buddhist teachings in the school of the Greater Vehicle (Mahayana), suicide can be commended under special
> conditions,
> for example if it is conducted “out of profound inner conviction” that no good can any longer be served by the retention of
> the physical body, or if it is in higher service to society. Indeed, it is explicitly in >The Lotus Sutra (Fahua Jing) that “setting fire to the
> body” or “burning the fingers or toes” might be deemed a great offering to Buddha >if the Three Jewels that guide Tibetan Buddhists
> (Buddha, Dharma and Sangha) have to be defended and honored.
killing themselves first.
> It has been reported that the self-immolating monks and nuns shouted out their >wishes for the return of Dalai Lama and the freedom of
> Tibet.
the trigger, for that 72 virgins in heaven.
> If such self-immolations are to end, the global community must mobilize, and > citizens must pressure their governments to work
> to encourage the halting of the persecution of Tibetan Buddhism and the genocide of Tibetan culture that is being perpetrated by the
> Chinese state. The Chinese government has shown no sign of changing course in part because global society hasn’t demonstrated its
> moral outrage.
>
> Tibetan refugee and activist Lobsang Sangay once said that: “Tibetans have no oil; even our oxygen is thinner than in other places.
> Lamas are what we have. So the West does not care much about us.”
> With more Tibetan deaths seemingly inevitable, the international community should show that the lives of Tibetans are at least as
> important as fluctuating oil prices. Now is time for it to show that it is willing to >act to save an endangered people.
> Ming Xia is a professor of Political Science at the Graduate Center and the >College of Staten Island, the City University of New York.
>
> http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2012/02/07/tibetans-burn-selves-f...
rst9
Feb 8, 2012, 12:55:33 PM2/8/12
to
Tibetans Burn Selves for Freedom - at least free of earthly miseries -
fyfpoon is in HongKong to post his divergent views to share with us.
fyfpoon is in HongKong to post his divergent views to share with us.
0 new messages