Re: Lyin' Larry Glasser vs. Saint McGyver

[_ Prof. Jonez _]

Lyin' Larry wrote:
> In article <8kk3k.906$LG4...@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a...@b.com>
> wrote:
>> Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> On 9 Jun 2008 14:11:57 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> Technically, Kent is a compulsive liar, not a pathological one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a bit of a racist post from your hero (MID is included
>>>>> so context can be verified. Something Jonezie NEVER permits):
>>>>
>>>> I have no heroes on usenet.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> =========
>>>>>>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>>>>>>> the invading White Man ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
>>>>>
>>>>> S for Savage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
>>>>> =========
>>>>>
>>>>> This still doesn't compose 100% of the evidence, of course.
>>>>
>>>> Comprise.
>>>
>>> Moi aussi.
>>>
>>>> Not a flame, just thought that since you claim to be a
>>>> teacher, you should know that.
>>>
>>> I do understand French, though I don't teach it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> However, even you must accept that your hero is a racist. He
>>>>> proudly displays it often enough.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have no heroes on usenet.
>>>
>>> Other than Jonezie.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jonezie:
>>>>>>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>>>>>>> the invading White Man ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Deadrat:
>>>>>> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonezie:
>>>>> S for Savage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
>>>>
>>>> I see sarcasm here, not hatred. After all, the first reference
>>>> by Jonez is to Native Americans. The context also suggests sarcasm.
>>>
>>> Only if one NEEDS it to.
>>>
>>>> But Jonez has never been shy about expressing unpopular or
>>>> politically incorrect opinions.
>>>
>>> A nice way to spin his racism.
>>>
>>>> If he really does hate Native
>>>> Americans I suspect he will post here and correct my
>>>> misapprehensions.
>>>
>>> He may, he may not.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (I suspect Deadrat also saw Jonez's comment as sarcasm, being as
>>>> how he never challenged him on it.)
>>>
>>> Only DR can actually say why he's not responded to your hero's
>>> most recent proof that he HATES all non-whites, but my guess would
>>> be that once Jonezie turned the conversation into a racial one, DR
>>> opted to let the matter go.
>>
>> Let me respond again. Jonez suggested we discuss "the holocaust of
>> Native Americans by the invading White Man." Doesn't sound like
>> someone who hates Indians, but rather someone aware of a shameful
>> part of American history.
>>
>> It was my suggestion that we discuss war crimes alphabetically, thus
>> placing any misdeeds of Jews last (under Z for Zionism), reversing
>> the order of the Jonez obsession. Given Jonez' initial offering,
>> deciding to put Indians in the list at "S for Savages" seems
>> entirely ironic.
>>
>> YMMV.
>
> Ironic, yes. But I still submit that calling an entire race "savages"
> is racist.

Is that not what the invading White man referred to them as, as they
were systematically being slaughtered for fun and profit ?

"I happen to be a prosecutor in New York. "
-- Larry the habitual liar Glasser

"I happen to be an Assistant District Attorney, and I have
absolute immunity for the charges I bring against someone.
Besides, someone being found "not guilty" does not mean they are 'innocent.' "
-- Larry the amoral coward

"Actually, as an Assistant District Attorney, I know precisely who should be in
prison "
-- Larry Glasser evoking his fascist megalomania