we have over 40 million CHINESE living in ASEAN , who
are using all sorts of different names and
all sorts of different nationalities .
so our CORE interest is also ASEAN ,.
we CPC shall take control of ASEAN in the future for
all our 1 billion CHINESE people in CHINA .
we start first by claiming all South China Sea for all
CHINESE ,
then
next our 40 million Chinese in ASEAN shall help more
Chinese migrating into ASEAN .
finally when ASEAN shall be saturated with more millions
of CHINESE,
our CHINESE people in ASEAN
shall call ASEAN as a NEW SOUTH CHINA ,
just like the South CHINA SEA .
n May 12, 9:58 pm, rst0 <
rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> China’s Evolving ‘Core Interests’
> By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
> Published: May 11, 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/12/opinion/sunday/chinas-evolving-core...
>
> Whenever China wants to identify the issues considered important
> enough to go to war over, it uses the term “core interests.” The
> phrase was once restricted to Taiwan, the island nation that China has
> threatened to forcibly unify with the mainland. About five years ago,
> Chinese leaders expanded the term to include Tibet and Xinjiang, two
> provinces with indigenous autonomy movements that Beijing has worked
> feverishly to control.
>
> Since then, Chinese officials have spoken more broadly about economic
> growth, territorial integrity and preserving the Communist system. But
> recently they narrowed their sights again, extending the term
> explicitly to the East China Sea, where Beijing and Tokyo are
> dangerously squabbling over some uninhabited islands. Top Chinese
> military officials first delivered the message to Gen. Martin Dempsey,
> chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when he visited Beijing last
> month. The next day, the Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Hua Chunying,
> told reporters that “the Diaoyu Islands are about sovereignty and
> territorial integrity. Of course it’s China’s core interest.”
>
> This wording, with its threatening implications, is raising new
> tensions in a region already on edge over North Korea and several
> other maritime disputes, and it will make it harder to peacefully
> resolve the dispute over the islands, called Diaoyu in China, and
> Senkaku in Japan.
>
> While Japan has held the islands for more than a century, China also
> claims title and has sent armed ships and planes from civilian
> maritime agencies to assert a presence around them. The waters
> adjacent to the islands are believed to hold oil and gas deposits.
>
> To some extent, China is simply throwing its weight around,
> challenging the United States and its regional allies. On Wednesday
> and Thursday, Chinese state-run newspapers carried commentaries
> questioning Japan’s sovereignty over the island of Okinawa, where
> about 25,000 American troops are based. Japan, whose wartime
> aggression against China and other countries still engenders
> animosity, has not helped. Last September, the government of Prime
> Minister Yoshihiko Noda provocatively bought three of the islands from
> their private owner.
>
> The right-wing nationalists who took power in December may be equally
> unwilling to put Japan’s past behind it, although the government of
> the new prime minister, Shinzo Abe, took a positive step on Tuesday
> when it said it would abide by official apologies that the country
> made two decades ago to victims of World War II. China and Japan have
> strong economic ties and are critical to regional stability. Both will
> lose if they stumble into war or otherwise cannot resolve this
> escalating dispute. Though efforts are under way to find a mutually
> face-saving solution, using loaded phrases like “core interests” to
> describe the islands only adds to the political and emotional
> sensitivities and will not advance that goal.
>
> Meet The New York Times’s Editorial Board »