Einstein Was A FAKE!
Protagonist
Find a jew and you'll always find a liar or a fake, or both. Itz good
for jews!
Strapu
ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed
the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as
'The Often-Repeated Lie= Truth,' he has been made an idol to young
people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius. THE TRUTH,
HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept & moronic person, who
could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to
the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary
-- he stole the ideas of others, and the Jxxxx-controlled media made him
a 'hero.'
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his
only 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER
PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or
lack thereof, is an important part of this story. The Encyclopedia
Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little
scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor
grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no
diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of
imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple
entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.
This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed
himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a
lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering
school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still
could not get a position at the engineering school!
Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help
of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical
expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher
qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking
papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he
was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was
doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was
not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing
technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely
qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while
continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without
success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university
colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the
things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his
spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical
physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.
Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including
Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that
many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because
indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept
moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any
real education.
HOWEVER, THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source
of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by
Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of
which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt
with the following four ideas, respectively:
1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2) The equivalence of energy and mass;
3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4) The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of
relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to
Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called
the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).
This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was
based upon two premises:
1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for
all observers; and
2) since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source,
then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in
whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for
an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same
place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's
velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities
where time would pass faster. This theory has been validated by modern
experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises
are far from being originally Einstein's. FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT
THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF
ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH
SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.
Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed
that it was electromagnetic in nature.
James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of
the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by
1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific
community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the
conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of
the observer.
Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years
before Einstein wrote his paper. This debate over the nature of light
also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important experiment, the
results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They
observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand
relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through
ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of
light.
In response to this problem, in 1880, the irish physicist george fitz
gerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio
waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the
michelson-morley experiment could be explained if, "...the length of
material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the either
or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their
velocities to that of light."
THIS IS THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, 13 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN'S PAPER!
FURTHER... IN 1892, HENDRIK LORENTZ, of the Netherlands, proposed the
same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the
1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote
articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what
is now known as the Lorentz-Fitz Gerald Contraction.
In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the
Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7
years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, "Lorentz transformations," the
series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz.
They> describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the
time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light.
In short, by 1904, everything in "Einstein's paper" regarding the
Special Theory of Relativity had already been published. The Frenchman
PoincarÚ had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He
stated seven years before Einstein's paper: "...we have no direct
intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of
two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of
two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of
the natural laws be as simple as possible." Anyone who has read
Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the
lack of originality on the part of Einstein.
Thus, we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term
'Special Theory of Relativity.' EVERYTHING ELSE WAS PLAGIARIZED. Over
the next few years, PoincarÚ became one of the most important lecturers
and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or
speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while PoincarÚ was busy
bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding
relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent> office in Bern and
no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much
credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists
knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of
another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the
irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the
molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement
had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827.
The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of
Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig
Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In
fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the
famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained
by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a
third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by
the famous equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as
"his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea
is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was
not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in
the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original
with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in
the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W.
Kaufmann in G÷ttingen. In 1900, PoincarÚ had shown that there was a mass
relationship for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy.
Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich
Hasen÷hrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of
the era. Hasen÷hrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who
would later become famous for a variety of topics. He had worked on the
idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and had
published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which
Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his
brilliant work in this area, Hasen÷rhl had received in 1904 a prize from
the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a
simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish
physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the
mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2 was the
logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.
THUS, THE EXPERIMENTS OF THOMSON, KAUFMANN, AND FINALLY, AND MOST
IMPORTANTLY, HASENÍRHL, CONFIRMED MAXWELL'S WORK. IT IS LUDICROUS TO
BELIEVE THAT EINSTEIN DEVELOPED THIS POSTULATE, particularly in light of
the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct
the appropriate experiments. In this same plagiarized article of
Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps it will
prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is
variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark
demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for this was
truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he
really did not understand basic scientific principles and that he was
writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response
to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond
the realm of possible experience." The last subject dealt with in
Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the photon theory of light.
Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect
is the release of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the
action of light. This area of research is particularly important to the
Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he UNJUSTLY received
his 1922 Nobel Prize.
But AGAIN IT IS NOT EINSTEIN, BUT WILHELM WIEN AND MAX PLANCK WHO
DESERVE THE CREDIT. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point
for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in
finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the
photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by
Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
worked on understanding this phenomenon.
Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released
in the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the
light but by the frequency of the light. This was an important
breakthrough. Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers
of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and
Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in
finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and
Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking
about one particular type of energy light energy. But the principles and
equations governing the process in general had been deduced by Planck in
1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's
work was that light also existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus,
nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific
community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the
patent office until 1909 when it was arranged by World Jewry for him to
take a position at a school . Still, it was not until a 1919 A Jewish
newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety. With Einstein's
academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where he could
begin to use other people's work as his own more openly.
He engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories
he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then
he could present the research as his own or at least take partial
credit. In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his
gravitational research in terms of a new, recently developed calculus,
which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was the beginning
of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915.
BUT THE MATHEMATICAL WORK WAS NOT DONE BY EINSTEIN - HE WAS INCAPABLE OF
IT. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who
in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Berhard Riemann,
who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is
the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to
the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their
orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a
massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon
the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to
Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the conclusions
were incorrect.
It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for
Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his
General Theory. Einstein published his correct General Theory of
Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he,
"completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring
to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliantmathematician of the 20th
century, and Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been
instrumental in the development of the area of calculus that Grossmann
had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to
believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions
regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their
thinking.
However, the exact opposite is true. EINSTEIN STOLE THE MAJORITY OF HIS
GENERAL RELATIVITY WORK FROM THESE TWO MEN, THE REST BEING TAKEN FROM
GROSSMANN. HILBERT SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION, A WEEK BEFORE EINSTEIN
COMPLETED HIS WORK, A PAPER WHICH CONTAINED THE CORRECT FIELD EQUATIONS,
OF GENERAL RELATIVITY.
What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper,
with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had
an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were
friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary,
for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own.
Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form
of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert
had presented his paper on November 20 in G÷ttingen. On November 18,
Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a
draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact,
Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to
Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but
Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.
Therefore, THIS SERVES AS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT EINSTEIN QUICKLY
PLAGIARIZED THE WORK AND THEN PRESENTED IT, HOPING TO BEAT HILBERT TO
THE PUNCH. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle
Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an
effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the
mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his
work first. Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of
much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are
many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper.
We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper
is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and
electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schr÷dinger, whose work is the
basis of all modern day quantum mechanics. That the group of men
discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by
Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a
group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before
Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasen÷hrl, PoincarÚ, etc., had
created the foundations of the theory of relativity." However, the
Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did
not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the
work of the Jew Albert Einstein.
As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert
first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays
should bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the
eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun
was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported
the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jxxxx-controlled media
immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero,
at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert. On November 7th, 1919,
the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed,
"Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe - Newtonian ideas
overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein
myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905
papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator of
all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media,
in 1922, EINSTEIN RECEIVED THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR THE WORK HE HAD STOLEN IN
1905 REGARDING THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been
established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his
image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to
be today.
As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism. The
masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to
change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we
ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues.
This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing
effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like
David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist
had come from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's
two middle names were 'FŘrchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.'
In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding
installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a
proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German
scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews
certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved
either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been
important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay in
Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schr÷dinger to
be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go
on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public
letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work
on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even
though it had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not
understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare
genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and
contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty
principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and the
binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry.
NO, THE JEWS DID NOT WANT HEISENBERG PROMOTED AS A GENIUS BECAUSE HE
WOULD GO ON TO HEAD THE GERMAN ATOMIC BOMB PROJECT AND SERVE PRISON TIME
AFTER THE WAR FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE THIRD REICH. No, the Jews did
not want to give credit to any of a number of Germans, Austrians,
Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had
contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein
plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to erect Einstein
as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed
himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work
he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an
"emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the
"energy of the atom." The article says, "But the 'energy of the atom' is
something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to
harness this boundless energyto drive a great steamship across the ocean
on a pint of water, for instancethen, according to Einstein, you are wrong"
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had
supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time
theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and
nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he
made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his
real purpose evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry.
Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were
co-authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, Einstein
had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles;
he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to
their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his
assault for World Zionism.
egypinty
te kis szo'csöve a történelem hamisito iparnak - csak nem gondolod,
hogy mi elhisszuk egy pillanatra is, hogy ez a "diatribe" a te bunko
tolladbol ered!
.... when quoting it is customary to name the source -- szoval, honnan
kopiroztad le ezt a tanulmányos cikket? Van tõbb ilyen?
Elõre is köszi!
ep~
Protagonist
>>
>> Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had
>> supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time
>> theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and
>> nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he
>> made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his
>> real purpose evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry.
>> Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were
>> co-authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, Einstein
>> had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles;
>> he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to
>> their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his
>> assault for World Zionism.
>
> te kis szo'csöve a történelem hamisito iparnak - csak nem gondolod,
> hogy mi elhisszuk egy pillanatra is, hogy ez a "diatribe" a te bunko
> tolladbol ered!
> kopiroztad le ezt a tanulmányos cikket? Van tőbb ilyen?
>
> Előre is köszi!
> ep~
>
Nem hamisitas, csak a tudatlansagod!
ne masokat hibaztass!
JS