Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Want to end mental illness?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
DP
Feb 2, 2012, 7:53:10 AM2/2/12
to
Want to end mental illness?
It doesn't take much to realize that mental illness itself costs
society an unimaginable amount of money. Let us look at the USA
statistic, it is said that "Among all Americans, 36.2 million people
paid for mental health services totaling $57.5 billion in 2006
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/mentalcost2006usa.html>. " For
Canada it is said that "On any given day, 500,000 Canadians are absent
from work due to a form of mental illness-half a million people- at a
total cost to the Canadian economy of more than $50 billion a year in
lost productivity
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/mentalcostcanada.html>." Based
on USA and Canada, mental illness costs $107.5 billion a YEAR but we
know that there are other countries who also suffer from similar
financial burden due to the mental illness scam . Based on the fact that
there are 195 countries
<http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm> in the
world, I will put it in the range of trillions annually just to provide
a figure to the interested audience.
It doesn't take much to realize that mental illness costs people
unnecessary suffering. I have offered to challenge the psych industry
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/index2.html> and given proof
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/selfprot.html> why mental illness is a
scam. As I have stated before, mental illness is a created illness. I
find it unacceptable to allow people to be financially burden and having
to deal with unnecessary suffering. Therefore, I will resort to using
the public to help me end mental illness. Why on earth would I take the
trouble to do such a thing? I am tired of the people in charge of
society who would sit and do nothing while people are made mentally ill.
This is why I do it. There are ways in which the public can help me
amass the resource I need to end mental illness. In comparison to what
mental illness costs society, the amount I ask is insignificant. Given
what mental illness costs annually worldwide, the amount I ask for is
meaningless to end the whole mental illness scam. Your contribution to
the cause of helping me end mental illness will be documented so that
the world will know that you care about people. As I have stated above,
the cost annually worldwide is trillions but I will just assume a cost
of $1 trillion worldwide annually. Is it too much to ask for 1% of $1
trillion to end mental illness worldwide which equals $10 billion? Also
take into account that the mental illness scam has existed for so long
that the money that was wasted would total to an astronomical amount.
There are expense that has to be taken in to consideration and people
that will be used in the process in ending the mental illness scam. The
mental illness scam is a global problem and people all over the world
can contribute to the cause of ending it.
There are many ways in which the mental illness scam can end but so
far it has not. If what I do can lead to the mental illness scam ending
directly or indirectly, then what I do is a service to the world. But I
don't need $10 billion to end the mental illness scam, $1 billion will
be sufficient to cover the expense which is a bargain in any
perspective. If I had $1 billion I would have spent it to end the mental
illness scam but I do not so I am counting on the public. This is just a
step in achieving my goal so any contribution would help towards that
outcome. There are so many charitable causes in the world that continue
to operate without any resolution but this one is different because the
mental illness scam will end and people will benefit financially and
mentally. Some of you may wonder how come I cannot be stopped from what
I am doing since I do not a medical degree? The method which I have
outline to rid oneself of mental illness works as long as someone does
not tamper with what you are doing. The method works because mental
illness is a scam. The government watchdog, drug companies, researchers
in the field of mental health have not end the mental illness scam so
this is the solution which I propose; financially support me in my quest
to end the mental illness scam.
The contribution that you are making is a step in ending the mental
illness scam. It can trigger people 's awareness of mental illness being
a scam. Those agencies which monitored the area of mental health, law
enforcement, etc, who have decided not to take action may take action.
It can also give you the peace of mind that the end result of your
contribution will result in the ending of the mental illness scam as it
will be used for that purpose. The mental illness scam continues to
operate because there is nobody like myself who existed that would take
it this far to challenge the psych industry
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/index2.html>. We want to live life
free from being made mentally ill. Your contribution is to help me help
society.
I have to use my own resources to fight the psych industry. This is
how pathetic the FBI and other law enforcement agencies are. I am trying
to do society a service and I am being put in a financial burden. If
what I say about mental illness being a scam is false, then law
enforcement would SHUTDOWN the website and I would be in legal trouble.
The fact that I have to bring the mental illness scam to this level of
awareness is SHAMEFUL to those in law enforcement. The psych industry
wants people to be mentally ill otherwise there is no reason for its
existence. I am calling the psych industry a bunch of criminals. Yes,
the psych industry will accept my judgment that it is criminal. The
psych industry would LOSE in a battle with me, I just need the resources
to bring it to its destruction. I was a victim of the mental illness
scam because law enforcement did NOT do its job. It is not my job to
monitor scam but who else is there to do it? I am being put in a
position of financial burden because law enforcement is not doing its
job. Do you want people to be made mentally ill or do you to end mental
illness scam as quickly as possible? How many more years should we wait
until the imbecile in law enforcement take action? Yes, I am calling
those in law enforcement imbecile and those in law enforcement will
accept that judgment. I do not know the extent of corruption in law
enforcement to allow such a scam of this magnitude to continue, all I
know is I can prove mental illness is a scam and nobody dares to
challenge me. Why would law enforcement accept being called imbecile?
What I say about mental illness being a scam in undeniable and people in
law enforcement will be in trouble for not protecting the public when
the mental illness scam is brought to destruction which can be one of
the reasons for the silence by those in law enforcement. I have the
solution to end the mental illness scam but I do not have the financial
resources to put it in action and I don't exactly need $1 billion to do
it, it is just an upper estimate. When I have the necessary amount, then
I can proceed to destroy the psych industry. I do not have the patience
to continue to wait forever, if I don't get the amount necessary, I will
resort to other method to destroying the psych industry. Each day that
goes by somebody is made mentally ill. All these years the imbeciles in
law enforcement have not taken action, do you think they ever will? The
public should think about protecting itself and join me in the effort to
end the mental illness scam. I repeat myself again, the law has NOT and
continue to NOT protect those who are mentally ill. I am the person who
can end the mental illness scam and there will be no longer any mental
illness. When the law does not protect you then you should think about
protecting yourself.
I do not get paid for what I am doing but law enforcement is PAID
to protect the public. Since the mental illness scam is still operating,
I would say that law enforcement is NOT doing its job and still gets
PAID. I would consider the treatment I receive from those in USA as
poor. Is this how America treat someone who is trying to do society a
service? What kind of example will this set for others who would try to
do society a service as well? Will they also be treated like outcast?
Maybe the mayor of NYC is the reason for it? Bloomberg once said "I like
theater, dining and chasing women," he once told a reporter. "Let me put
it this way: I am a single, straight billionaire in Manhattan. What do
you think? It's a wet dream." "The 65-year-old divorced bachelor had a
reputation as a womanizer during the years he was building his financial
empire."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/MichaelBloombergSexualHarassmentCharges.html>
So why did Bloomberg get into politic? Bloomberg does not perform well
as mayor. Does being mayor help in Bloomberg's desire for "a wet dream"?
Do you think Bloomberg care for those made mentally ill, people much
poorer than himself? Why did Michael Bloomberg want to extend the law so
he can be mayor longer? During Bloomberg's last campaign some estimate
he spent in the range of $100 million and that is a lot of money to the
average individual and money can buy a lot of favors in a place like New
York City. As a person who founded the company Bloomberg LP, Michael
Bloomberg would be the individual that shape the culture of the place.
According to this article
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/BloombergLPDiscriminationSuit.html>,
"The plaintiffs claim that they received demotions, pay cuts and other
barriers to the career when they took maternity leave."В It even states
in the article, a former Bloomberg CEO allegedly said, "I'm not having
any pregnant bitches working for me." Although the case has not gone to
trial, it does demonstrate what those employees of Bloomberg LP think
about the place they work in. In this article
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/MichaelBloombergSexualHarassmentCharges.html>,
Bloomberg "found out the woman was pregnant, he told her "Kill it!" and
said "Great! Number 16!" an apparent reference to the number of women in
the company who were pregnant or had maternity-related status. What has
Bloomberg accomplished by extending his mayoral term? I still see
beggars in the street, subway, front of stores, homeless people, etc.
Bloomberg is not a popular mayor to the average individual, while other
speakers get cheers, "The pro-labor crowd loudly booed and heckled
Bloomberg from start to finish."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/NYCMayorBloombergBooed.html>
Bloomberg did not do anything outstanding as mayor. Does he care for
people or just himself? Mayor Bloomberg's perception of people sometimes
come out publicly which lead to a "call for an apology from New York
Mayor Michael Bloomberg for racist and incendiary remarks made during
The John Gambling Show, on August 13, against the Seneca Nation."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/NativeAmericansoutragedoverBloomberg.html>
Bloomberg has a way of shooting his mouth at people and sometimes it
turns negative but Mikey is rich so he can buy some people. "The remarks
are highly, highly offensive to any Irish person. I don't think he would
say a joke like that to any other ethnic group."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/BloombergjokeaboutIrish.html>
Mikey using money to get his way is not unusual as this article points
out <http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/Bloombergbuysilence.html>.
"Mayor Bloomberg's money was able to buy more than just consultants,
polls and advertising in his reelection campaign last year: It was able
to buy silence."
Bloomberg doesn't demonstrate bravery. "Mayor Bloomberg said today
that he defends the pastor of a small Florida church who plans to hold a
Koran burning this week."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/BloombergdefendspastorKoranburning.html>
Bloomberg is basing his decision on legal terms not on consequences of
his decision. "Afghan protests over the burning of a Koran in Florida
continued yesterday for a third day, with three more people killed here.
That brought to 24 the number of people killed."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/AfghanprotestsoverburningKoran.html>
Was it necessary for Bloomberg to bring attention to this pastor? I only
write about it after the fact to show what Bloomberg did was
irresponsible. Now 24 people are dead so why didn't Bloomberg defend
those that died which would be a sign of bravery. I am about keeping
innocent people ALIVE so if Bloomberg had any sense of humanity he would
have tried his best to convince the pastor NOT to burn the Koran instead
of saying he would defend the pastor to burn the Koran. Why is burning
the Koran dangerous, because there are people who follow the religion
based on the Koran who believe it is acceptable to kill people who
perform the act of burning the book. Another point to remember is that
there are people who believe that the Koran tell them to do a "holy war"
against a country like the United States which is what 9/11 is about.
The Koran is being used to do "holy war". I suppose the prophet Muhammad
spread his religion by his sword but in today's time, people who are not
of the faith of Muhammad will not buy such a "holy war". Because such
people exist, society has no choice but to accept their way of thinking
or be killed. The humane thing for society to do is to steer such people
from committing such acts by teaching them to find method that doesn't
involve killing people because of a burned book but that doesn't seem to
be the case. I find that killing someone for burning a book is dumb no
matter what great value you place in the book because a book can be
reproduced while people only have one life to live. I believe government
everywhere should allow the citizens to burn any religious text that
they want. The citizens bought the text so they should be allowed to do
with it as they please. This is a fair solution even for people who are
not religious. It is just a book. What if this religious text was put in
a computer and a person decided to burn the storage device( it can be
the hard drive, usb drive, floppy disk, etc) - do you know how
ridiculous it is? I too would like the opportunity to burn the Koran or
put up a picture of the prophet Muhammad but it is not my life that I
fear but the lives of others who didn't do the act. This is the type of
people who follow the Koran.
Muhammad ibn Abdullah, founder of the religion of Islam considered a
prophet by his followers because he received messages from
Jibril(Gabriel) an Archangel who communicated for "God". Muhammad is
said to be have received these messages from 610CE to 632 CE, the year
of his death. So Muhammad had a close relationship with Gabriel for a
period of 23 years where messages were communicated to him and a person
called Sahaba wrote down those messages. Eventually these written down
messages were compiled into a book called the Koran or Quran(same book).
Muhammad was born in Mecca and when Muhammad instructed all his
followers to leave Mecca for Medina, the Meccans plotted to kill
Muhammad. The Meccans who plotted to kill him didn't believe Muhammad
was a prophet, he was a troublemaker to them. These "killers' didn't
fear that "God" would punish them for killing his prophet because they
see Muhammad as a troublemaker, not a prophet. Muslims regard the Koran
as divine guidance and direction of humanity because it is the literal
word of "God". So how did this Muhammad came to communicate with
Gabriel? Where did Gabriel come from and how do we reach him? Since this
Gabriel was able to communicate to Muhammad why can't we today with our
communication technologies talk to this "Gabriel". We would all like to
find out who this "God" that Gabriel works for. We are physical being
and communication when it happens would be physical so it must originate
from somewhere physical such as between Muhammad and Gabriel and hence
"God". As we advance further with technologies, we still have no
physical proof of the existence of "God", "Gabriel", "Santa Clause (The
fat man that shows up every Christmas with present-his existence is
eternal and he has a big bank account)", "Vampire", etc...how do we find
such supernatural beings? Doesn't it seem strange that when we go to the
past such supernatural beings were "seen" since they appear in religion,
stories, etc, but not in our modern time. I think that modern education
and advancement in society make people more intelligent than those in
the past so people become unbeliever. People want definitive proof and
that cause these supernatural beings to not exist because there is no
proof so stories of such beings are dismissed. Those of us who are not
religious are tolerant in watching movies about vampire, archangel,
Santa Clause, etc, because it is entertainment, not because we believe
in such beings.
Muhammad like all other religions similar to his believe in an
afterlife. The concept of an afterlife is against the concept of being a
physical being. We are physical being so an afterlife is illogical. One
can promise a thousand virgins to someone in an afterlife but how can
the person get his reward when there is no such thing. In other words,
an afterlife is an empty promise so one can make up anything. Muhammad
believes he is the "last" prophet from God but that is his words.
Anybody can claim to be the "last" prophet because it is just a claim.
There is no basis to support this. In today's time, if a person has
enough followers and wanted to start a "religion", he can claim to be
the last prophet and modify Muhammad's words and say that God told him
he is the real last prophet. If this person wanted multiple wives then
he can add that to his religion and say it is the words of God. To be
honest, there are a lot of competing religions so the initial cost can
be high. The person can say that God will damn them all to hell if they
do not accept his religion as an incentive to attract more followers.
The person can use words like blasphemy to those who reject his new
religion. The person can proclaim that God is super great to show the
new religion to be more devoted to God than those who just say God is
great. There is also the chance that someone may want you dead for
starting a religion since it is competition to their religion. Religion
can be competitive so different tactics are used to get new members. In
the old days, some people were forced to join the religion or die which
has a high rate of success to get new members. It is just a
philosophical point. Religions based on an afterlife is simple that is
why so many exist. One can promise anything in an afterlife because the
followers will not be able to collect. One can also make threat of a
"hell" in an afterlife to keep the followers obedient and contributing
to the religion. The more likely possibility is that people join these
religion with the hope for a "heavenly" afterlife not a "hellish"
afterlife. In the old days, some religion even "sell" a better
afterlife for a monetary fee. I and others who follow my logic would
prefer a reward in this life because an afterlife is an empty promise
which is why I don't belong to a religion. I would challenge the
religion of Islam that I would take any punishment in an afterlife but I
want to take all the reward in this life. The point I am making is that
there is no afterlife which makes the religion illogical. So is there
anyone in the religion of Islam willing to take my challenge? I am man
enough to backup what I believe, the question is, are you man enough to
backup what you believe?
Some people who are religious may have a "happy" state of mind in
times of difficulties thinking in their mind that an afterlife will be
better than what they have now so they endure hoping for a reward in
another life. Some people may have a "happy" state of mind following
every rule in their religion hoping to be rewarded in an afterlife when
in reality they wouldn't want to follow every rule. But it is a cruel
thing to do this to someone because their "reward" in an afterlife is a
lie because an afterlife is illogical. When a person is living a "lie"
does he really exists? People who are not religious is not against the
idea of "God" but they want proof that this "God" which is described is
real. People of this sort are truthful in the sense that they can
"pretend" to believe in a religion but they don't because it would be
dishonest. There are plenty of people who "pretend" to believe in God
but do not. They pretend because of the benefit of joining a religion.
In reality, the Koran is just a book and if it is supposed to be
"guidance" for humanity, then the readers of such a book is saying it is
acceptable to kill people because such a book is burned? Logically, it
is the content that matters so these people appear dumb. A person may
decide to burn the Koran because he doesn't believe in what it says
which should be his rights because he is not a believer. Killing a
person because of a burned book is inhumane. People can use religion for
their own cause. Take the Osama Bin Laden who waged a terrorist war
against the United States. He was a "holy" man who used the Koran as a
tool to get followers to join his cause but the truth is they found
porno
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/porn-found-osama-bin-laden-evidence-trove.html>
in his bedroom when he was shot dead. Osama is exploiting people to join
his cause and the Koran is just a tool to him. Privately, he enjoys
porno which is not uncommon because many people also watches porno.
Osama probably didn't get many visitors so it may have been a way to
"kill" time. It is reported other "terrorists" are also caught having
porno. Osama died not from watching porno but because people wanted him
dead from his terrorist acts. Watching porno is a safe activity even
police officers, judges, doctors, lawyers, congressmen, presidents,
students, professors, mayors, movie stars, etc, enjoy porno so don't let
it scare you. There is no afterlife and Osama did what he wanted in life
but there are consequences to one's action.
Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism have historically been
against the act of homosexuality with same sex individuals. There are
too many religions to list but their prophets seem to have reached the
same conclusion. Religions do refer to one another to build on what the
other "prophet" said so they have some reference to one another.
Building one's religion based on one another give one's new religion a
sense of authority and some may convert to the "new" religion if it is
seen as better. But a practical question to ask is why do homosexuals
exist if it is wrong. There are those who would say, why do criminals
exist if it is wrong or why do pedophiles exist if it is wrong but the
question is, do you think that is fair to say that about homosexuals?
The point is, if it is acceptable for heterosexual why is it wrong for
homosexual? But can we just say the "laws" are always correct because in
the past, there are "laws" against homosexual and in some places there
may still be "laws" against homosexual but are the laws logical? There
are some acceptance of homosexual in modern day religions but then the
words of the "prophets" were not correct because the attitude of people
have changed hence their religions are changing. Isn't the words of the
prophets those ultimately from "God" so there is no error? But I want
physical proof before I believe those words from the prophets are indeed
the words of "God". By wanting physical proof, it means that we are more
careful when someone say that "God" told him so. So, are we now
approaching a period where logic is used instead of unfounded belief.
Without physical proof how can we say that an angel, God, etc, told the
prophets these words because we are physical beings and there would be a
way to trace the communication. Logically, why would it be wrong if two
adult females want to have sex with one another? There is no crime
committed since a heterosexual couple can have sex with one another so
should homosexual. Logically, words from the prophets should not be
changed and the interpretation should have been done long ago. Because
the religions are changing then logically, were the prophets words
legitimate? One cannot have different interpretations coming from the
same prophet because that would be confusing to the followers. I would
agree to a logical "God" because there is no proof of a physical "God".
I would categorize a physical "God" as inconclusive until I have
absolute evidence. I can only say I am 100% confident mental illness is
a scam.
Bloomberg could have spent his money more wisely if he cares for
people and not get involved in politic. When I see beggars asking for
pocket change, I think to myself why didn't Bloomberg used the $100
million dollars that was spent to EXTEND his mayoral term to help these
people. Bloomberg does not do anything outstanding as mayor so it was
wasted money that could have been used to help people. Although the
money that was spent to extend Bloomberg's term belongs to Bloomberg,
NYC belongs to the people who want somebody for mayor who cares for the
people living in it not just someone who likes to be called mayor
Bloomberg. I do not feel Michael Bloomberg fits that description of a
mayor who cares for the people of NYC. Those made mentally ill are often
the poorest in society. Mental illness is a created illness and my logic
in proving mental illness is a scam cannot be denied. The destruction of
the psych industry will bring waves of lawsuits and the victims can have
a way of seeking some form of remedy for the injustice that they have
endured. Contribute to me if you are tired of waiting for the imbecile
in law enforcement to take action!
Judging from what has been contributed, I do not think people want
the mental illness scam to end. I have come to the conclusion that the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> knows that mental illness is a scam and DO NOT
care for those that were made mentally ill and mental illness WILL
continue because I do not have the support I need. If I was in charge of
the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>,В there would be no mental illness in the
USA within a month and other countries can choose to follow if so
desire. I live in a country will a lot of white people who don't seem to
appreciate that I care about what is being done to the country. The
mental illness scam is a drain to the country and it is causing innocent
people who are made mentally ill to suffer with symptoms. I repeat
myself, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would
be no mental illness in the USA within a month. Obviously, from what I
have written I do not have any confidence in the man in charge of the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> protecting those who were made mentally ill and
those that will be made mentally ill. It would be simple if I had the
resources of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> to end the mental illness
scam. I repeat myself again, if I was in charge of the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be no mental illness in the USA within
a month. Can you think of anyone besides me who can make such a
statement? It is a pity that I live in a country that is unable to
recognize the contribution I am making. Those of you who were diagnosed
with mental illness and have benefited from my writing should pass it on
to other people until the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> decides to take its
head out of its ass and protects its citizens even if it means getting a
new man to be in charged of the organization. I repeat myself a fourth
time, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be
no mental illness in the USA within a month. If what I say is a lie then
how come the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> don't do anything to me? Here I am
offering my information to the world and the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> in
particular to eliminate mental illness. We live in a country of law in a
world operated by logic, not magic or other superstitious belief. The
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> do not care for you that are mentally ill which
is a logical conclusion because mental illness can be eliminated in the
USA within a month.
Am I the smartest person in the world or is the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov> one of the most crooked organization there is? When
the information is in front of you, why don't the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov> act on it? The FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> is supposed
to protect its citizens and it is not doing its job. The mental illness
scam is financially negative and illegal. I am not the smartest person
in the world but what I say is true. I repeat myself a fifth time, if I
was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be no mental
illness in the USA within a month. Why am I allowed to say such things
about the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> and not be afraid of the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov>? Because mental illness is a scam that leaves most
of its victims in financial ruin and living a life of misery. The mental
illness scam is so large that I may be KILLED for what I am saying but
nobody else seems to want to put in to an end. I repeat myself a sixth
time, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be
no mental illness in the USA within a month. The treatment I receive in
NYC is poor may be due to people in the mental illness scam. Who else
would treat someone who is offering to end the mental illness scam this
poorly? Society would benefit from the mental illness scam ending in so
many levels. I repeat myself a seventh time, if I was in charge of the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be no mental illness in the USA
within a month. I want anyone to read what I wrote to notify the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov>. Please tell people in the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>
I think the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> is a scumbag organization that does
not know how to protect its citizens. TheВ FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>
needs someone new to be in charge. Why can I say this? Because if I was
in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, mental illness would no
longer exists because it is a scam that should have ended long ago if
theВ FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> did its JOB.
Of course the solution called SELF-PROTECTION
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/selfprot.html> which I offered to
individuals to solve their created mental illness works if not TAMPER
with because I have spent countless period analyzing it. The problem is,
I cannot be everywhere spreading this information. I want people in the
world to know that I am the one who said mental illness is a CREATED
illness and I offered a SOLUTION to prove it. When I make information
public such as mental illness being a scam, you can bet I am correct. We
all have a certain period of existence in this world so why would I
waste my time writing this when I can spend my time doing something
else? It is because I care even though my time of existence in this
world is precious that doesn't mean I am dying of any illness because I
do not have ANY physical illness as I write this and mental illness is a
scam so I am without ANY illness and I live free of MEDICATIONS. I do
not take pleasure having to waste my precious time criticizing people
and organizations but I do so because I must. Time is precious to us all
in this world because there is no heaven. It is just an imaginary place
made up just like Santa Clause. People can waste their time believing in
imaginary things which is not a crime but they should realize that there
is no afterlife. We live in a logical world so there is no magical
"soul" that would transport a dying person to an afterlife. This is the
only life that we have which is in this world so when people who are
made mentally ill, their time is wasted in period of misery. As an adult
we should be able to distinguish reality from fantasy. We operate using
logic not magical ability so to accept magic when our daily existence is
based on logic signify stupidity. Some people may hate someone like
myself who is interest in truth, not fairy tales but in the end, we all
must accept the truth no matter how much we want to deny it because we
have to grow up as human being. Back in the past when people were
uneducated to our level today, they held strange belief about the world
they couldn't explain so they came up with "magic". The world is
different now, we have more knowledge of how the world operate and we
can explain things without having to be childish believing in magic.
When a person does good things in life it is because he wants to do it,
not because he expects to go to heaven. This is an example of being a
grown up intellectually. Since heaven doesn't exists, neither does hell.
The concept of heaven and hell is to create a belief that behavior in
this world will translate into an afterlife fitting how a person
behaved. But do realize that those who commit crime against others will
not be punished in an afterlife so such individuals must be punished in
this world that is why law exists. We have jails that prove this point.
To give an example, suppose a person stabbed the Pope to death then the
Pope's people would not file criminal charges because the person would
be punished in an afterlife. The person only wants to stab the Pope not
anyone else. The Pope would go to heaven in an afterlife assuming he has
the requirement because the Pope believes in an afterlife. If such an
individual exists, would the Pope be willing to prove this point? This
concept can be applied to a believer in an afterlife and a non-believer
in an afterlife. The non-believer in an afterlife is willing to take the
punishment of hell being non-believer, so how many believer in an
afterlife is willing to take such a challenge of being stabbed to death
and be rewarded in heaven? So what I am doing is telling those who
believe in the afterlife that it doesn't exists so don't take such a
challenge because I care. Since an afterlife doesn't exists and time is
precious, those who are made mentally ill lose living in this world
because the law has not handed down punishment. When time is spent that
results in some form of benefit then it is understandable. For instance,
women wear makeup and dress up which take time but there is benefit in
it. There are also men out there who are also into wearing makeup just
like women which takes time because they want to look "pretty" like
their female counterpart. Some part of the world don't consider men who
wear makeup "manly" but those men who wear makeup tough it out for the
sake of wanting to look "pretty". But I recall when I was a youngster,
an individual called Peter Dao, an untrustworthy family, who was so
fulled of acne and other form of facial issues that he was nickname
"craterface" fought wearing makeup perhaps fearing being seen as
"unmanly" because Asian men don't usually wear makeup. Men out there
such as Peter Dao shouldn't be ashamed to wear makeup because you would
benefit, so tough it out like other men do who wear makeup and look
"pretty". Those of you men out there who look like Seal
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal.jpg> don't lose hope if
you don't want to wear makeup because Seal
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal.jpg> ended up with a
supermodel wife so that is another point to consider and maybe you can
play the lottery and win as well to increase your chance. I think white
female are better looking than black female just as Seal
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal.jpg> does. There are black
women out there who would straighten their hair and even dye it blond to
look like white women because white women are better looking to them and
it takes time but they benefit from it. We live in a society based on
looks, such as Seal's wife Heidi
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal-heidi.jpg> who makes a
living looking good who promotes such behavior to the public. I
personally don't wear makeup it doesn't mean other men cannot do so. I
personally am not a homosexual but it doesn't mean other men cannot be
homosexual. All you homosexual men and women out there, you be homo with
other homo because there is no afterlife and you have a right to live
this life. There are people out there who do worshipping or perform acts
hoping that in a afterlife they will be rewarded which costs time but
there is no afterlife, so the time is wasted resulting in a non-benefit.
But there maybe more people in the world who believe that there is no
afterlife perhaps not knowing it. Why do we reward people who perform
acts we are pleased with in this world from military, ordinary citizens,
etc, if an afterlife exists because they would be rewarded? For all of
you who believe in an afterlife, you would refuse any sort of reward in
this world because you will be rewarded in an afterlife otherwise it is
dishonest. A non-believer is honest in accepting reward in this world
because there is no afterlife. It is cruel and wicked to promise someone
an afterlife when it doesn't existed because the only life that people
have is in this world.
There is a large portion of the population who is a member of
organizations called "religion" who get tax free benefit. The tax free
benefit and donation to the organizations allow it to spread their
"belief" to society. But these organizations "religion" have different
concept of "god" and they all get tax free benefit from the government.
So there are different "belief" what god's will or law is depending on
these organizations "religion". So how many "gods" are there since there
are so many different organizations called "religion"? So if you belong
to any of these organizations "religion" did the law of the religion
change over time? If the law of the religion changed, how is it possible
since god or gods don't make error just human. There are organizations
called "religion" who use the words of god or gods to control people's
behavior. Since god or gods exists why hasn't god or gods show up in
reality instead of through some prophet or messenger of god or gods? How
come there is no image of god or gods? Why would I care about a prophet
of god or gods, or son of god or gods, I want to see god or gods not a
representative. If your a representative of god or gods how come you
cannot do things "magical"? So where is the representative of god or
gods in today's time and impress us with your "magical" ability since
god or gods have never been shown. In today's time people who claim to
do "magic" would be tested, that is why non exists. The only magic that
is close is a magic trick done using logic. So why waste time in these
organizations called 'religion" because the only time you have is in
this world. So why do politicians speak about "god", it is because
members of these organizations "religion" have voting power. So there
maybe people in the organizations called "religion" who may know it is a
time waster but they benefit like politicians do. So it is not unusual
when you read something like this "He has positioned himself as a devout
Christian (having found God, he says, after years as an atheist) and in
a new book The Audacity Of Hope, timed to coincide with his campaign, he
concentrates on his manifesto for 'reclaiming the American dream'."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/A-drunk-bigot--US-Presidental-hopeful-HASNT-said-father-.html.html>
So Mr Obama's strategy was correct because Christian has a large voting
group in the United States of America and it help him to become
president. Is the American dream to "lie" to get what you want? How does
someone suddenly find "God"? So once you were an atheist and god didn't
exists, now you found "god" so where did god come from and in what way
did "god" communicate with you Mr Obama? Is there a benefit to say you
found "God", which I think is what the article is saying about Barack
Obama's cunning strategy to get votes. It can also be the reason why
Jews are less likely to be president because their religion is not of a
majority voting group in the United States. Suppose no religion exists,
then it may be more of the person running for president not what
religion he or she belongs to. But America maybe a religious country as
the money is printed saying "IN GOD WE TRUST" in the back of the
currency. So what "GOD" is the money referring to? A Jew "god"? A
Christian "god"? A Muslim "god"?, etc, so where is the logic in this?
America is a majority Christian country so it would be a Christian "god"
not any other religion's god. So when you read the back of the US
currency and it is not your "god" or you do not believe in "god", how
does that make you feel? If you believe in "god" does it fit that it is
in the back of a currency that gets put in your pants, strippers, or in
other ungodly places. The Christian religion is based on Jesus who was
proven to a lier <http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/psygod.html>
therefore, it is based on a false "GOD".
When we hear about "miracle" healing or explanation as a cause of
curing someone that cannot be duplicated, we are being lied to. If
miracle healing works why not for every physical illness, since mental
illness is a lie, because there is no logic to miracle healing so it
must be magic so why would there be a limit to magic? In other words,
miracle healing is not true so to believe in it is childish. We live in
a logical world and things operate logically so there is a logical
explanation to it so it can be duplicated. There are a host of reasons
why we would be lied to because the lier benefit in some manner. It is
logic not magic or other superstitious belief that allow us to have
modern tools such as television, airplane, computer, etc because if we
waste all our time in such illogical activities we would not have what
we have today. Therefore, illogical activities produce nothing real
other than entertainment if you find it entertaining. A person can pray
to whatever he thinks is his god until death and would produce nothing
real. There is no afterlife so the person would have wasted his whole
life in an illogical activity. Consider the activity of writing this
material which is real because a product called a webpage is produce,
that is engaging in a logical activity. For anyone that still believe in
an afterlife and who commit some sort of "sin", I will take your
punishment in an afterlife for you because I do not believe in an
afterlife. I will sign a contract in writing for a price so that I know
you take it seriously and also because you believe I would be punished
in a afterlife so I should get something in return. Is there any taker
for this? What I say about schizophrenia being able to be cured can be
duplicated so this leads to why mental illness as a whole is a scam.
There is also the issue of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> that
doesn't seem to care that healthy people are being made mentally ill.
This donation page is to help those people who are mentally ill and
society in general, not for myself. This seems to escape the public that
a large group of citizens are being targeted for mental illness so money
can be made and that money which is made would obviously be used against
individuals like myself who is against what is being done. Having a
large sum of money would allow me to do what the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov> has not done which is to end mental illness. The
reason the psych industry can thumb its nose is because the FBI has not
arrest those in charge. Anytime a person is diagnosed with a mental
illness like schizophrenia, a crime has been committed. I repeat myself
an eight time, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there
would be no mental illness in the USA within a month so why don't the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> shut me up or make me in charge? How can the
USA lose in such an offer?
If you want to contribute to end the mental illness scam:
http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/endmental.html
It doesn't take much to realize that mental illness itself costs
society an unimaginable amount of money. Let us look at the USA
statistic, it is said that "Among all Americans, 36.2 million people
paid for mental health services totaling $57.5 billion in 2006
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/mentalcost2006usa.html>. " For
Canada it is said that "On any given day, 500,000 Canadians are absent
from work due to a form of mental illness-half a million people- at a
total cost to the Canadian economy of more than $50 billion a year in
lost productivity
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/mentalcostcanada.html>." Based
on USA and Canada, mental illness costs $107.5 billion a YEAR but we
know that there are other countries who also suffer from similar
financial burden due to the mental illness scam . Based on the fact that
there are 195 countries
<http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm> in the
world, I will put it in the range of trillions annually just to provide
a figure to the interested audience.
It doesn't take much to realize that mental illness costs people
unnecessary suffering. I have offered to challenge the psych industry
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/index2.html> and given proof
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/selfprot.html> why mental illness is a
scam. As I have stated before, mental illness is a created illness. I
find it unacceptable to allow people to be financially burden and having
to deal with unnecessary suffering. Therefore, I will resort to using
the public to help me end mental illness. Why on earth would I take the
trouble to do such a thing? I am tired of the people in charge of
society who would sit and do nothing while people are made mentally ill.
This is why I do it. There are ways in which the public can help me
amass the resource I need to end mental illness. In comparison to what
mental illness costs society, the amount I ask is insignificant. Given
what mental illness costs annually worldwide, the amount I ask for is
meaningless to end the whole mental illness scam. Your contribution to
the cause of helping me end mental illness will be documented so that
the world will know that you care about people. As I have stated above,
the cost annually worldwide is trillions but I will just assume a cost
of $1 trillion worldwide annually. Is it too much to ask for 1% of $1
trillion to end mental illness worldwide which equals $10 billion? Also
take into account that the mental illness scam has existed for so long
that the money that was wasted would total to an astronomical amount.
There are expense that has to be taken in to consideration and people
that will be used in the process in ending the mental illness scam. The
mental illness scam is a global problem and people all over the world
can contribute to the cause of ending it.
There are many ways in which the mental illness scam can end but so
far it has not. If what I do can lead to the mental illness scam ending
directly or indirectly, then what I do is a service to the world. But I
don't need $10 billion to end the mental illness scam, $1 billion will
be sufficient to cover the expense which is a bargain in any
perspective. If I had $1 billion I would have spent it to end the mental
illness scam but I do not so I am counting on the public. This is just a
step in achieving my goal so any contribution would help towards that
outcome. There are so many charitable causes in the world that continue
to operate without any resolution but this one is different because the
mental illness scam will end and people will benefit financially and
mentally. Some of you may wonder how come I cannot be stopped from what
I am doing since I do not a medical degree? The method which I have
outline to rid oneself of mental illness works as long as someone does
not tamper with what you are doing. The method works because mental
illness is a scam. The government watchdog, drug companies, researchers
in the field of mental health have not end the mental illness scam so
this is the solution which I propose; financially support me in my quest
to end the mental illness scam.
The contribution that you are making is a step in ending the mental
illness scam. It can trigger people 's awareness of mental illness being
a scam. Those agencies which monitored the area of mental health, law
enforcement, etc, who have decided not to take action may take action.
It can also give you the peace of mind that the end result of your
contribution will result in the ending of the mental illness scam as it
will be used for that purpose. The mental illness scam continues to
operate because there is nobody like myself who existed that would take
it this far to challenge the psych industry
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/index2.html>. We want to live life
free from being made mentally ill. Your contribution is to help me help
society.
I have to use my own resources to fight the psych industry. This is
how pathetic the FBI and other law enforcement agencies are. I am trying
to do society a service and I am being put in a financial burden. If
what I say about mental illness being a scam is false, then law
enforcement would SHUTDOWN the website and I would be in legal trouble.
The fact that I have to bring the mental illness scam to this level of
awareness is SHAMEFUL to those in law enforcement. The psych industry
wants people to be mentally ill otherwise there is no reason for its
existence. I am calling the psych industry a bunch of criminals. Yes,
the psych industry will accept my judgment that it is criminal. The
psych industry would LOSE in a battle with me, I just need the resources
to bring it to its destruction. I was a victim of the mental illness
scam because law enforcement did NOT do its job. It is not my job to
monitor scam but who else is there to do it? I am being put in a
position of financial burden because law enforcement is not doing its
job. Do you want people to be made mentally ill or do you to end mental
illness scam as quickly as possible? How many more years should we wait
until the imbecile in law enforcement take action? Yes, I am calling
those in law enforcement imbecile and those in law enforcement will
accept that judgment. I do not know the extent of corruption in law
enforcement to allow such a scam of this magnitude to continue, all I
know is I can prove mental illness is a scam and nobody dares to
challenge me. Why would law enforcement accept being called imbecile?
What I say about mental illness being a scam in undeniable and people in
law enforcement will be in trouble for not protecting the public when
the mental illness scam is brought to destruction which can be one of
the reasons for the silence by those in law enforcement. I have the
solution to end the mental illness scam but I do not have the financial
resources to put it in action and I don't exactly need $1 billion to do
it, it is just an upper estimate. When I have the necessary amount, then
I can proceed to destroy the psych industry. I do not have the patience
to continue to wait forever, if I don't get the amount necessary, I will
resort to other method to destroying the psych industry. Each day that
goes by somebody is made mentally ill. All these years the imbeciles in
law enforcement have not taken action, do you think they ever will? The
public should think about protecting itself and join me in the effort to
end the mental illness scam. I repeat myself again, the law has NOT and
continue to NOT protect those who are mentally ill. I am the person who
can end the mental illness scam and there will be no longer any mental
illness. When the law does not protect you then you should think about
protecting yourself.
I do not get paid for what I am doing but law enforcement is PAID
to protect the public. Since the mental illness scam is still operating,
I would say that law enforcement is NOT doing its job and still gets
PAID. I would consider the treatment I receive from those in USA as
poor. Is this how America treat someone who is trying to do society a
service? What kind of example will this set for others who would try to
do society a service as well? Will they also be treated like outcast?
Maybe the mayor of NYC is the reason for it? Bloomberg once said "I like
theater, dining and chasing women," he once told a reporter. "Let me put
it this way: I am a single, straight billionaire in Manhattan. What do
you think? It's a wet dream." "The 65-year-old divorced bachelor had a
reputation as a womanizer during the years he was building his financial
empire."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/MichaelBloombergSexualHarassmentCharges.html>
So why did Bloomberg get into politic? Bloomberg does not perform well
as mayor. Does being mayor help in Bloomberg's desire for "a wet dream"?
Do you think Bloomberg care for those made mentally ill, people much
poorer than himself? Why did Michael Bloomberg want to extend the law so
he can be mayor longer? During Bloomberg's last campaign some estimate
he spent in the range of $100 million and that is a lot of money to the
average individual and money can buy a lot of favors in a place like New
York City. As a person who founded the company Bloomberg LP, Michael
Bloomberg would be the individual that shape the culture of the place.
According to this article
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/BloombergLPDiscriminationSuit.html>,
"The plaintiffs claim that they received demotions, pay cuts and other
barriers to the career when they took maternity leave."В It even states
in the article, a former Bloomberg CEO allegedly said, "I'm not having
any pregnant bitches working for me." Although the case has not gone to
trial, it does demonstrate what those employees of Bloomberg LP think
about the place they work in. In this article
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/MichaelBloombergSexualHarassmentCharges.html>,
Bloomberg "found out the woman was pregnant, he told her "Kill it!" and
said "Great! Number 16!" an apparent reference to the number of women in
the company who were pregnant or had maternity-related status. What has
Bloomberg accomplished by extending his mayoral term? I still see
beggars in the street, subway, front of stores, homeless people, etc.
Bloomberg is not a popular mayor to the average individual, while other
speakers get cheers, "The pro-labor crowd loudly booed and heckled
Bloomberg from start to finish."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/NYCMayorBloombergBooed.html>
Bloomberg did not do anything outstanding as mayor. Does he care for
people or just himself? Mayor Bloomberg's perception of people sometimes
come out publicly which lead to a "call for an apology from New York
Mayor Michael Bloomberg for racist and incendiary remarks made during
The John Gambling Show, on August 13, against the Seneca Nation."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/NativeAmericansoutragedoverBloomberg.html>
Bloomberg has a way of shooting his mouth at people and sometimes it
turns negative but Mikey is rich so he can buy some people. "The remarks
are highly, highly offensive to any Irish person. I don't think he would
say a joke like that to any other ethnic group."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/BloombergjokeaboutIrish.html>
Mikey using money to get his way is not unusual as this article points
out <http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/Bloombergbuysilence.html>.
"Mayor Bloomberg's money was able to buy more than just consultants,
polls and advertising in his reelection campaign last year: It was able
to buy silence."
Bloomberg doesn't demonstrate bravery. "Mayor Bloomberg said today
that he defends the pastor of a small Florida church who plans to hold a
Koran burning this week."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/BloombergdefendspastorKoranburning.html>
Bloomberg is basing his decision on legal terms not on consequences of
his decision. "Afghan protests over the burning of a Koran in Florida
continued yesterday for a third day, with three more people killed here.
That brought to 24 the number of people killed."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/AfghanprotestsoverburningKoran.html>
Was it necessary for Bloomberg to bring attention to this pastor? I only
write about it after the fact to show what Bloomberg did was
irresponsible. Now 24 people are dead so why didn't Bloomberg defend
those that died which would be a sign of bravery. I am about keeping
innocent people ALIVE so if Bloomberg had any sense of humanity he would
have tried his best to convince the pastor NOT to burn the Koran instead
of saying he would defend the pastor to burn the Koran. Why is burning
the Koran dangerous, because there are people who follow the religion
based on the Koran who believe it is acceptable to kill people who
perform the act of burning the book. Another point to remember is that
there are people who believe that the Koran tell them to do a "holy war"
against a country like the United States which is what 9/11 is about.
The Koran is being used to do "holy war". I suppose the prophet Muhammad
spread his religion by his sword but in today's time, people who are not
of the faith of Muhammad will not buy such a "holy war". Because such
people exist, society has no choice but to accept their way of thinking
or be killed. The humane thing for society to do is to steer such people
from committing such acts by teaching them to find method that doesn't
involve killing people because of a burned book but that doesn't seem to
be the case. I find that killing someone for burning a book is dumb no
matter what great value you place in the book because a book can be
reproduced while people only have one life to live. I believe government
everywhere should allow the citizens to burn any religious text that
they want. The citizens bought the text so they should be allowed to do
with it as they please. This is a fair solution even for people who are
not religious. It is just a book. What if this religious text was put in
a computer and a person decided to burn the storage device( it can be
the hard drive, usb drive, floppy disk, etc) - do you know how
ridiculous it is? I too would like the opportunity to burn the Koran or
put up a picture of the prophet Muhammad but it is not my life that I
fear but the lives of others who didn't do the act. This is the type of
people who follow the Koran.
Muhammad ibn Abdullah, founder of the religion of Islam considered a
prophet by his followers because he received messages from
Jibril(Gabriel) an Archangel who communicated for "God". Muhammad is
said to be have received these messages from 610CE to 632 CE, the year
of his death. So Muhammad had a close relationship with Gabriel for a
period of 23 years where messages were communicated to him and a person
called Sahaba wrote down those messages. Eventually these written down
messages were compiled into a book called the Koran or Quran(same book).
Muhammad was born in Mecca and when Muhammad instructed all his
followers to leave Mecca for Medina, the Meccans plotted to kill
Muhammad. The Meccans who plotted to kill him didn't believe Muhammad
was a prophet, he was a troublemaker to them. These "killers' didn't
fear that "God" would punish them for killing his prophet because they
see Muhammad as a troublemaker, not a prophet. Muslims regard the Koran
as divine guidance and direction of humanity because it is the literal
word of "God". So how did this Muhammad came to communicate with
Gabriel? Where did Gabriel come from and how do we reach him? Since this
Gabriel was able to communicate to Muhammad why can't we today with our
communication technologies talk to this "Gabriel". We would all like to
find out who this "God" that Gabriel works for. We are physical being
and communication when it happens would be physical so it must originate
from somewhere physical such as between Muhammad and Gabriel and hence
"God". As we advance further with technologies, we still have no
physical proof of the existence of "God", "Gabriel", "Santa Clause (The
fat man that shows up every Christmas with present-his existence is
eternal and he has a big bank account)", "Vampire", etc...how do we find
such supernatural beings? Doesn't it seem strange that when we go to the
past such supernatural beings were "seen" since they appear in religion,
stories, etc, but not in our modern time. I think that modern education
and advancement in society make people more intelligent than those in
the past so people become unbeliever. People want definitive proof and
that cause these supernatural beings to not exist because there is no
proof so stories of such beings are dismissed. Those of us who are not
religious are tolerant in watching movies about vampire, archangel,
Santa Clause, etc, because it is entertainment, not because we believe
in such beings.
Muhammad like all other religions similar to his believe in an
afterlife. The concept of an afterlife is against the concept of being a
physical being. We are physical being so an afterlife is illogical. One
can promise a thousand virgins to someone in an afterlife but how can
the person get his reward when there is no such thing. In other words,
an afterlife is an empty promise so one can make up anything. Muhammad
believes he is the "last" prophet from God but that is his words.
Anybody can claim to be the "last" prophet because it is just a claim.
There is no basis to support this. In today's time, if a person has
enough followers and wanted to start a "religion", he can claim to be
the last prophet and modify Muhammad's words and say that God told him
he is the real last prophet. If this person wanted multiple wives then
he can add that to his religion and say it is the words of God. To be
honest, there are a lot of competing religions so the initial cost can
be high. The person can say that God will damn them all to hell if they
do not accept his religion as an incentive to attract more followers.
The person can use words like blasphemy to those who reject his new
religion. The person can proclaim that God is super great to show the
new religion to be more devoted to God than those who just say God is
great. There is also the chance that someone may want you dead for
starting a religion since it is competition to their religion. Religion
can be competitive so different tactics are used to get new members. In
the old days, some people were forced to join the religion or die which
has a high rate of success to get new members. It is just a
philosophical point. Religions based on an afterlife is simple that is
why so many exist. One can promise anything in an afterlife because the
followers will not be able to collect. One can also make threat of a
"hell" in an afterlife to keep the followers obedient and contributing
to the religion. The more likely possibility is that people join these
religion with the hope for a "heavenly" afterlife not a "hellish"
afterlife. In the old days, some religion even "sell" a better
afterlife for a monetary fee. I and others who follow my logic would
prefer a reward in this life because an afterlife is an empty promise
which is why I don't belong to a religion. I would challenge the
religion of Islam that I would take any punishment in an afterlife but I
want to take all the reward in this life. The point I am making is that
there is no afterlife which makes the religion illogical. So is there
anyone in the religion of Islam willing to take my challenge? I am man
enough to backup what I believe, the question is, are you man enough to
backup what you believe?
Some people who are religious may have a "happy" state of mind in
times of difficulties thinking in their mind that an afterlife will be
better than what they have now so they endure hoping for a reward in
another life. Some people may have a "happy" state of mind following
every rule in their religion hoping to be rewarded in an afterlife when
in reality they wouldn't want to follow every rule. But it is a cruel
thing to do this to someone because their "reward" in an afterlife is a
lie because an afterlife is illogical. When a person is living a "lie"
does he really exists? People who are not religious is not against the
idea of "God" but they want proof that this "God" which is described is
real. People of this sort are truthful in the sense that they can
"pretend" to believe in a religion but they don't because it would be
dishonest. There are plenty of people who "pretend" to believe in God
but do not. They pretend because of the benefit of joining a religion.
In reality, the Koran is just a book and if it is supposed to be
"guidance" for humanity, then the readers of such a book is saying it is
acceptable to kill people because such a book is burned? Logically, it
is the content that matters so these people appear dumb. A person may
decide to burn the Koran because he doesn't believe in what it says
which should be his rights because he is not a believer. Killing a
person because of a burned book is inhumane. People can use religion for
their own cause. Take the Osama Bin Laden who waged a terrorist war
against the United States. He was a "holy" man who used the Koran as a
tool to get followers to join his cause but the truth is they found
porno
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/porn-found-osama-bin-laden-evidence-trove.html>
in his bedroom when he was shot dead. Osama is exploiting people to join
his cause and the Koran is just a tool to him. Privately, he enjoys
porno which is not uncommon because many people also watches porno.
Osama probably didn't get many visitors so it may have been a way to
"kill" time. It is reported other "terrorists" are also caught having
porno. Osama died not from watching porno but because people wanted him
dead from his terrorist acts. Watching porno is a safe activity even
police officers, judges, doctors, lawyers, congressmen, presidents,
students, professors, mayors, movie stars, etc, enjoy porno so don't let
it scare you. There is no afterlife and Osama did what he wanted in life
but there are consequences to one's action.
Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism have historically been
against the act of homosexuality with same sex individuals. There are
too many religions to list but their prophets seem to have reached the
same conclusion. Religions do refer to one another to build on what the
other "prophet" said so they have some reference to one another.
Building one's religion based on one another give one's new religion a
sense of authority and some may convert to the "new" religion if it is
seen as better. But a practical question to ask is why do homosexuals
exist if it is wrong. There are those who would say, why do criminals
exist if it is wrong or why do pedophiles exist if it is wrong but the
question is, do you think that is fair to say that about homosexuals?
The point is, if it is acceptable for heterosexual why is it wrong for
homosexual? But can we just say the "laws" are always correct because in
the past, there are "laws" against homosexual and in some places there
may still be "laws" against homosexual but are the laws logical? There
are some acceptance of homosexual in modern day religions but then the
words of the "prophets" were not correct because the attitude of people
have changed hence their religions are changing. Isn't the words of the
prophets those ultimately from "God" so there is no error? But I want
physical proof before I believe those words from the prophets are indeed
the words of "God". By wanting physical proof, it means that we are more
careful when someone say that "God" told him so. So, are we now
approaching a period where logic is used instead of unfounded belief.
Without physical proof how can we say that an angel, God, etc, told the
prophets these words because we are physical beings and there would be a
way to trace the communication. Logically, why would it be wrong if two
adult females want to have sex with one another? There is no crime
committed since a heterosexual couple can have sex with one another so
should homosexual. Logically, words from the prophets should not be
changed and the interpretation should have been done long ago. Because
the religions are changing then logically, were the prophets words
legitimate? One cannot have different interpretations coming from the
same prophet because that would be confusing to the followers. I would
agree to a logical "God" because there is no proof of a physical "God".
I would categorize a physical "God" as inconclusive until I have
absolute evidence. I can only say I am 100% confident mental illness is
a scam.
Bloomberg could have spent his money more wisely if he cares for
people and not get involved in politic. When I see beggars asking for
pocket change, I think to myself why didn't Bloomberg used the $100
million dollars that was spent to EXTEND his mayoral term to help these
people. Bloomberg does not do anything outstanding as mayor so it was
wasted money that could have been used to help people. Although the
money that was spent to extend Bloomberg's term belongs to Bloomberg,
NYC belongs to the people who want somebody for mayor who cares for the
people living in it not just someone who likes to be called mayor
Bloomberg. I do not feel Michael Bloomberg fits that description of a
mayor who cares for the people of NYC. Those made mentally ill are often
the poorest in society. Mental illness is a created illness and my logic
in proving mental illness is a scam cannot be denied. The destruction of
the psych industry will bring waves of lawsuits and the victims can have
a way of seeking some form of remedy for the injustice that they have
endured. Contribute to me if you are tired of waiting for the imbecile
in law enforcement to take action!
Judging from what has been contributed, I do not think people want
the mental illness scam to end. I have come to the conclusion that the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> knows that mental illness is a scam and DO NOT
care for those that were made mentally ill and mental illness WILL
continue because I do not have the support I need. If I was in charge of
the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>,В there would be no mental illness in the
USA within a month and other countries can choose to follow if so
desire. I live in a country will a lot of white people who don't seem to
appreciate that I care about what is being done to the country. The
mental illness scam is a drain to the country and it is causing innocent
people who are made mentally ill to suffer with symptoms. I repeat
myself, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would
be no mental illness in the USA within a month. Obviously, from what I
have written I do not have any confidence in the man in charge of the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> protecting those who were made mentally ill and
those that will be made mentally ill. It would be simple if I had the
resources of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> to end the mental illness
scam. I repeat myself again, if I was in charge of the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be no mental illness in the USA within
a month. Can you think of anyone besides me who can make such a
statement? It is a pity that I live in a country that is unable to
recognize the contribution I am making. Those of you who were diagnosed
with mental illness and have benefited from my writing should pass it on
to other people until the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> decides to take its
head out of its ass and protects its citizens even if it means getting a
new man to be in charged of the organization. I repeat myself a fourth
time, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be
no mental illness in the USA within a month. If what I say is a lie then
how come the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> don't do anything to me? Here I am
offering my information to the world and the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> in
particular to eliminate mental illness. We live in a country of law in a
world operated by logic, not magic or other superstitious belief. The
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> do not care for you that are mentally ill which
is a logical conclusion because mental illness can be eliminated in the
USA within a month.
Am I the smartest person in the world or is the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov> one of the most crooked organization there is? When
the information is in front of you, why don't the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov> act on it? The FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> is supposed
to protect its citizens and it is not doing its job. The mental illness
scam is financially negative and illegal. I am not the smartest person
in the world but what I say is true. I repeat myself a fifth time, if I
was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be no mental
illness in the USA within a month. Why am I allowed to say such things
about the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> and not be afraid of the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov>? Because mental illness is a scam that leaves most
of its victims in financial ruin and living a life of misery. The mental
illness scam is so large that I may be KILLED for what I am saying but
nobody else seems to want to put in to an end. I repeat myself a sixth
time, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be
no mental illness in the USA within a month. The treatment I receive in
NYC is poor may be due to people in the mental illness scam. Who else
would treat someone who is offering to end the mental illness scam this
poorly? Society would benefit from the mental illness scam ending in so
many levels. I repeat myself a seventh time, if I was in charge of the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there would be no mental illness in the USA
within a month. I want anyone to read what I wrote to notify the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov>. Please tell people in the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>
I think the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> is a scumbag organization that does
not know how to protect its citizens. TheВ FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>
needs someone new to be in charge. Why can I say this? Because if I was
in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, mental illness would no
longer exists because it is a scam that should have ended long ago if
theВ FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> did its JOB.
Of course the solution called SELF-PROTECTION
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/selfprot.html> which I offered to
individuals to solve their created mental illness works if not TAMPER
with because I have spent countless period analyzing it. The problem is,
I cannot be everywhere spreading this information. I want people in the
world to know that I am the one who said mental illness is a CREATED
illness and I offered a SOLUTION to prove it. When I make information
public such as mental illness being a scam, you can bet I am correct. We
all have a certain period of existence in this world so why would I
waste my time writing this when I can spend my time doing something
else? It is because I care even though my time of existence in this
world is precious that doesn't mean I am dying of any illness because I
do not have ANY physical illness as I write this and mental illness is a
scam so I am without ANY illness and I live free of MEDICATIONS. I do
not take pleasure having to waste my precious time criticizing people
and organizations but I do so because I must. Time is precious to us all
in this world because there is no heaven. It is just an imaginary place
made up just like Santa Clause. People can waste their time believing in
imaginary things which is not a crime but they should realize that there
is no afterlife. We live in a logical world so there is no magical
"soul" that would transport a dying person to an afterlife. This is the
only life that we have which is in this world so when people who are
made mentally ill, their time is wasted in period of misery. As an adult
we should be able to distinguish reality from fantasy. We operate using
logic not magical ability so to accept magic when our daily existence is
based on logic signify stupidity. Some people may hate someone like
myself who is interest in truth, not fairy tales but in the end, we all
must accept the truth no matter how much we want to deny it because we
have to grow up as human being. Back in the past when people were
uneducated to our level today, they held strange belief about the world
they couldn't explain so they came up with "magic". The world is
different now, we have more knowledge of how the world operate and we
can explain things without having to be childish believing in magic.
When a person does good things in life it is because he wants to do it,
not because he expects to go to heaven. This is an example of being a
grown up intellectually. Since heaven doesn't exists, neither does hell.
The concept of heaven and hell is to create a belief that behavior in
this world will translate into an afterlife fitting how a person
behaved. But do realize that those who commit crime against others will
not be punished in an afterlife so such individuals must be punished in
this world that is why law exists. We have jails that prove this point.
To give an example, suppose a person stabbed the Pope to death then the
Pope's people would not file criminal charges because the person would
be punished in an afterlife. The person only wants to stab the Pope not
anyone else. The Pope would go to heaven in an afterlife assuming he has
the requirement because the Pope believes in an afterlife. If such an
individual exists, would the Pope be willing to prove this point? This
concept can be applied to a believer in an afterlife and a non-believer
in an afterlife. The non-believer in an afterlife is willing to take the
punishment of hell being non-believer, so how many believer in an
afterlife is willing to take such a challenge of being stabbed to death
and be rewarded in heaven? So what I am doing is telling those who
believe in the afterlife that it doesn't exists so don't take such a
challenge because I care. Since an afterlife doesn't exists and time is
precious, those who are made mentally ill lose living in this world
because the law has not handed down punishment. When time is spent that
results in some form of benefit then it is understandable. For instance,
women wear makeup and dress up which take time but there is benefit in
it. There are also men out there who are also into wearing makeup just
like women which takes time because they want to look "pretty" like
their female counterpart. Some part of the world don't consider men who
wear makeup "manly" but those men who wear makeup tough it out for the
sake of wanting to look "pretty". But I recall when I was a youngster,
an individual called Peter Dao, an untrustworthy family, who was so
fulled of acne and other form of facial issues that he was nickname
"craterface" fought wearing makeup perhaps fearing being seen as
"unmanly" because Asian men don't usually wear makeup. Men out there
such as Peter Dao shouldn't be ashamed to wear makeup because you would
benefit, so tough it out like other men do who wear makeup and look
"pretty". Those of you men out there who look like Seal
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal.jpg> don't lose hope if
you don't want to wear makeup because Seal
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal.jpg> ended up with a
supermodel wife so that is another point to consider and maybe you can
play the lottery and win as well to increase your chance. I think white
female are better looking than black female just as Seal
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal.jpg> does. There are black
women out there who would straighten their hair and even dye it blond to
look like white women because white women are better looking to them and
it takes time but they benefit from it. We live in a society based on
looks, such as Seal's wife Heidi
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/images/seal-heidi.jpg> who makes a
living looking good who promotes such behavior to the public. I
personally don't wear makeup it doesn't mean other men cannot do so. I
personally am not a homosexual but it doesn't mean other men cannot be
homosexual. All you homosexual men and women out there, you be homo with
other homo because there is no afterlife and you have a right to live
this life. There are people out there who do worshipping or perform acts
hoping that in a afterlife they will be rewarded which costs time but
there is no afterlife, so the time is wasted resulting in a non-benefit.
But there maybe more people in the world who believe that there is no
afterlife perhaps not knowing it. Why do we reward people who perform
acts we are pleased with in this world from military, ordinary citizens,
etc, if an afterlife exists because they would be rewarded? For all of
you who believe in an afterlife, you would refuse any sort of reward in
this world because you will be rewarded in an afterlife otherwise it is
dishonest. A non-believer is honest in accepting reward in this world
because there is no afterlife. It is cruel and wicked to promise someone
an afterlife when it doesn't existed because the only life that people
have is in this world.
There is a large portion of the population who is a member of
organizations called "religion" who get tax free benefit. The tax free
benefit and donation to the organizations allow it to spread their
"belief" to society. But these organizations "religion" have different
concept of "god" and they all get tax free benefit from the government.
So there are different "belief" what god's will or law is depending on
these organizations "religion". So how many "gods" are there since there
are so many different organizations called "religion"? So if you belong
to any of these organizations "religion" did the law of the religion
change over time? If the law of the religion changed, how is it possible
since god or gods don't make error just human. There are organizations
called "religion" who use the words of god or gods to control people's
behavior. Since god or gods exists why hasn't god or gods show up in
reality instead of through some prophet or messenger of god or gods? How
come there is no image of god or gods? Why would I care about a prophet
of god or gods, or son of god or gods, I want to see god or gods not a
representative. If your a representative of god or gods how come you
cannot do things "magical"? So where is the representative of god or
gods in today's time and impress us with your "magical" ability since
god or gods have never been shown. In today's time people who claim to
do "magic" would be tested, that is why non exists. The only magic that
is close is a magic trick done using logic. So why waste time in these
organizations called 'religion" because the only time you have is in
this world. So why do politicians speak about "god", it is because
members of these organizations "religion" have voting power. So there
maybe people in the organizations called "religion" who may know it is a
time waster but they benefit like politicians do. So it is not unusual
when you read something like this "He has positioned himself as a devout
Christian (having found God, he says, after years as an atheist) and in
a new book The Audacity Of Hope, timed to coincide with his campaign, he
concentrates on his manifesto for 'reclaiming the American dream'."
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/links/A-drunk-bigot--US-Presidental-hopeful-HASNT-said-father-.html.html>
So Mr Obama's strategy was correct because Christian has a large voting
group in the United States of America and it help him to become
president. Is the American dream to "lie" to get what you want? How does
someone suddenly find "God"? So once you were an atheist and god didn't
exists, now you found "god" so where did god come from and in what way
did "god" communicate with you Mr Obama? Is there a benefit to say you
found "God", which I think is what the article is saying about Barack
Obama's cunning strategy to get votes. It can also be the reason why
Jews are less likely to be president because their religion is not of a
majority voting group in the United States. Suppose no religion exists,
then it may be more of the person running for president not what
religion he or she belongs to. But America maybe a religious country as
the money is printed saying "IN GOD WE TRUST" in the back of the
currency. So what "GOD" is the money referring to? A Jew "god"? A
Christian "god"? A Muslim "god"?, etc, so where is the logic in this?
America is a majority Christian country so it would be a Christian "god"
not any other religion's god. So when you read the back of the US
currency and it is not your "god" or you do not believe in "god", how
does that make you feel? If you believe in "god" does it fit that it is
in the back of a currency that gets put in your pants, strippers, or in
other ungodly places. The Christian religion is based on Jesus who was
proven to a lier <http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/psygod.html>
therefore, it is based on a false "GOD".
When we hear about "miracle" healing or explanation as a cause of
curing someone that cannot be duplicated, we are being lied to. If
miracle healing works why not for every physical illness, since mental
illness is a lie, because there is no logic to miracle healing so it
must be magic so why would there be a limit to magic? In other words,
miracle healing is not true so to believe in it is childish. We live in
a logical world and things operate logically so there is a logical
explanation to it so it can be duplicated. There are a host of reasons
why we would be lied to because the lier benefit in some manner. It is
logic not magic or other superstitious belief that allow us to have
modern tools such as television, airplane, computer, etc because if we
waste all our time in such illogical activities we would not have what
we have today. Therefore, illogical activities produce nothing real
other than entertainment if you find it entertaining. A person can pray
to whatever he thinks is his god until death and would produce nothing
real. There is no afterlife so the person would have wasted his whole
life in an illogical activity. Consider the activity of writing this
material which is real because a product called a webpage is produce,
that is engaging in a logical activity. For anyone that still believe in
an afterlife and who commit some sort of "sin", I will take your
punishment in an afterlife for you because I do not believe in an
afterlife. I will sign a contract in writing for a price so that I know
you take it seriously and also because you believe I would be punished
in a afterlife so I should get something in return. Is there any taker
for this? What I say about schizophrenia being able to be cured can be
duplicated so this leads to why mental illness as a whole is a scam.
There is also the issue of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> that
doesn't seem to care that healthy people are being made mentally ill.
This donation page is to help those people who are mentally ill and
society in general, not for myself. This seems to escape the public that
a large group of citizens are being targeted for mental illness so money
can be made and that money which is made would obviously be used against
individuals like myself who is against what is being done. Having a
large sum of money would allow me to do what the FBI
<http://www.fbi.gov> has not done which is to end mental illness. The
reason the psych industry can thumb its nose is because the FBI has not
arrest those in charge. Anytime a person is diagnosed with a mental
illness like schizophrenia, a crime has been committed. I repeat myself
an eight time, if I was in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, there
would be no mental illness in the USA within a month so why don't the
FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> shut me up or make me in charge? How can the
USA lose in such an offer?
If you want to contribute to end the mental illness scam:
http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/endmental.html
DP
Feb 3, 2012, 8:16:24 AM2/3/12
to
DP
Feb 4, 2012, 8:07:12 AM2/4/12
to
DP
Feb 5, 2012, 7:38:10 AM2/5/12
to
needs someone new to be in charge. Why can I say this? Because if I was
in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, mental illness would no
longer exists because it is a scam that should have ended long ago if
theпїЅ FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> did its JOB.
in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, mental illness would no
longer exists because it is a scam that should have ended long ago if
DP
Feb 6, 2012, 7:42:13 AM2/6/12
to
needs someone new to be in charge. Why can I say this? Because if I was
in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, mental illness would no
longer exists because it is a scam that should have ended long ago if
theВ FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> did its JOB.
in charge of the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov>, mental illness would no
longer exists because it is a scam that should have ended long ago if
DP
Feb 7, 2012, 8:33:17 AM2/7/12
to
DP
Feb 8, 2012, 8:12:53 AM2/8/12
to
DP
Feb 9, 2012, 7:48:34 AM2/9/12
to
DP
Feb 10, 2012, 9:59:06 AM2/10/12
to
DP
Feb 11, 2012, 8:38:31 AM2/11/12
to
0 new messages