Two Different Cultures in Ancient Han race
Supertech
wooden cup while
he let his guests to use the golden cups as if the King suddenly decided one
day to show his moderate temper
by using a wooden cup while he let his guests to use golden cups.
I think he was badly mistaken. Kings do not act on whims. Priscus should
have known that. Of course
you can see he was an arrogant cold observer in his entire writings purely
based on his faulty presumption that
Huns are barbarians while Greco Roman civilization was an advanced one, for
he was an ambassador to Hun from Greece.
If King Attila the Hun knew what he was writing, Priscus's head would have
been cut off at the spot. Well, I would but obviously
he didn't care.
So, you really can't expect Priscus to see the deep rooted culture of the
Huns.
But his snap shot description revealed the enormous depth of the Hun culture
without making him to realize what he had just described.
This must have been a very deep rooted tradition among Huns, which means
they had a very highly sophisticated
philosophy of ruling their people. This fact only becomes clear when you
make the connection between Shilla and Hun.
Contrary to Baekje and Koguryo's militaristic, ruthless rule based on strict
military style disciplines, Hun and Shilla equally show
the completely different ruling principle of its people, much more humane
and compassionate. The King in this culture is a humble figure taking care
of his
/her people with daily direct interactions. As a resut, there was strong
bonding between the King and the people. Of course, this doesn't mean their
military was weak.
They had the iron culture, with the high speed horse back riding and the
inherent nimble physical movement of the Hunic genes which were a deadly
combination
in the ancient battle field to defeat any mediocre enemy.
The reason Chinese could not defeat Hun was not because they were living in
the Gobi desert but because they could not break up the Hun people to
pieces,
between the people and the rulers of the Hun. A nation breaks up when people
are divided, when traitors pop up for the self destruction. In Hun culture
this could not
happen. In cursory look, Shilla could not have been a stronger nation than
Baekje considering the strict military discipline Baekje had.
Yet, Shilla won.
People may say they were shrewd and cunning by bringing in Chinese in the
internal conflict.
I agree with this argument, I wish the unified Shilla could have been
stronger. But their ruling style made the country more habitable and
peaceful.
And people may have loved it more than the other style that has been
transferred to Japan by the Baekje Kingship.
This tradition doesn't stop there. I believe England took this tradition to
the full fruition. I think The Grand Charter was the ultimate fruit and
success of the Hunic ruling philosophy..
The concept of the grand equality, loving king of its people, started from
this Hun tradition. King Arthur(Attila)'s knights and the round table tales
are all part of this tradition.
Ironically, this philosophy, in the modern times, fought against the
militaristic rule of the imperial Japan and won again.
The Karma certainly turns around and around.
Supertech
Philosophy" in the 4th century AD was,
about the same period of time in history, Mayans and Aztecs were pulling
hearts out of the innocent "live" victims to please their Sun god.
And also about the same time, Rome was killing people in the colosseum using
Lions en masse and gave them for animal feeds, all for entertainment.
Who were the most barbarous people? How wrong Priscus was ?
Masonic architectures, Huns did not have, but they had the most advanced
humane and modernistic ruling principle in the world, whose philosophy the
modern society
has finally adopted, not that of the Mayan's nor that of the Rome's.
Huns had the Messianic philosophy already far ahead of everybody else in the
world before the 4th century AD, not in idealism nor by religion
but in real life while Jews were only dreaming about it in their religion.
For a lot of people of Europe north and south, at the time, King Attila the
Hun was regarded as "the" Messiah, the God sent King. He removed
most of the injustices and the corruptions in the European society that Rome
has perpetuated. He presided himself over the court on people's disputes for
justice as you can see in Priscus's record.
As a result, the most rule abiding people in Europe has become the Germanic
tribe and the most corrupt mafia culture was developed in Italy.
No wonder the legend of King Arthur survived in memory of the King Attila
the Hun with a slight disguise of the name pronunciation.
No historians mention nor notice this important historical facts because it
looks so mundane, plain and simple.
However, do not think the Messiah will be kind to everybody, he will judge
and remove the evil forces of the world.
Also, you can see his actual wooden cup story is mingled with the Christ's
holy grail legend as you see in one of the famous Indiana Jones movies.
Scourge of God? Only to those evil forces destroyed by his military,
perhaps.
"Supertech" <eje...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:zv2dncjF8LXhjnbX...@giganews.com...