Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Okrent on Jewis vs. Moslem reporters
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Susan Cohen  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2005, 6:26 pm
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: "Susan Cohen" <flavi...@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:26:07 GMT
Local: Tues, Apr 26 2005 6:26 pm
Subject: Re: Okrent on Jewis vs. Moslem reporters

"Ted" <tdicht...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1114542624.266729.325060@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

> http://mediacrity.blogspot.com/2005/04/more-on-wuss.html

> Tuesday, April 26, 2005

> More on the Wuss

> The Electronic Intifada has an article written by the convenient critic
> mentioned in the Daniel Okrent column on Sunday, an "Alison Weir"

The historian???

Susan

 who

> is with something called "If Americans Knew."
> The text of this bilge-fest can be found at
> http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3796.shtml

> Amid the usual ravings is the following, an account of an exchange
> between Weir and Okrent:

> "I pointed out that since this was a conflict between a state whose
> identity and purpose of existence was to be a Jewish state, it seemed
> to me that the number of Jewish-American reporters covering it should
> be balanced by approximately an equal number of Arab/Muslim-American
> reporters."

> The proper response from Okrent, if he had even the tenth of the guts
> usually found in a salamander, should have been, "Get the hell out of
> my office, you anti-Semitic piece of crud." Or, if he wanted to be
> polite, he could have said "The Times does not discriminate on the
> basis of race, religion, or ethnic origin" and then pitched her
> head-first out of his office.

> Instead, according to the account on EI, Okrent engaged in a dialogue
> with this bigoted slime. What followed was the following exchange
> between slime and wuss:

> "Okrent said that it was impossible to find equal numbers of
> Arab/Muslim journalists of sufficiently high quality to balance out the
> number of Jewish reporters available to cover it, and ignored the
> suggestion that other groups be included in the reportorial/editorial
> pool. "

> Does that mean that if you do find enough Muslim newspeople that they
> can then supplant Jewish reporters? Well, maybe. According to this
> report, "He said that there shouldn't be an 'ethnic litmus test' and
> that Jewish reporters shouldn't be excluded just because there weren't
> enough Muslims for the Times to employ."

> Weir goes on to say that "we came away with the very strong impression
> that Okrent, who is himself Jewish, felt basically that only Jewish
> reporters could cover this issue."

> Even if Okrent didn't mean that Jewish reporters can be excluded if
> there "were enough Muslims," there is a larger question here. Why is he
> humoring this bigot?

> As if we didn't know. Hurry up, Calame!

> posted by The Media Muse at 9:49 AM


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google